Desai, Vishal S.

Background: Avulsion fractures involving the tibial eminence are considered equivalent in terms of the cause to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears; however, there are limited data comparing the outcomes of adolescent patients undergoing surgical fixation of a tibial eminence fracture (TEF) with those undergoing ACL reconstruction. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes, subsequent ACL injury rates, and activity levels between adolescent patients who underwent TEF fixation with patients with midsubstance ACL tears who required acute reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included a group of patients with TEFs treated with surgical fixation matched to a group of similar patients with ACL tears treated with reconstruction between the years 2001 and 2015. Data regarding the initial injury, surgical intervention, ACL/ACL graft injury rates, and physical examination findings were recorded. Clinical and functional outcomes were obtained using a physical examination, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity score. Results: Sixty patients with a mean follow-up of 57.7 months (range, 24-206 months) were included; 20 patients (11 male, 9 female; mean age, 11.9 years [range, 7-15 years]) who underwent surgical fixation for a TEF were matched to a group of 40 patients (23 male, 17 female; mean age, 12.5 years [range, 8-5 years]) who underwent reconstruction for ACL tears. The TEF group demonstrated significantly lower postoperative IKDC scores (TEF group, 94.0; ACL group, 97.2; P = .04) and Lysholm scores (TEF group, 92.4; ACL group, 96.9; P = .02). The TEF group returned to sport 119 days sooner ( P < .01), but there was no difference in postoperative Tegner scores (TEF group, 7.3; ACL group, 7.6; P = .16). The TEF group demonstrated increased postoperative anterior laxity ( P = .02) and a higher rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis ( P = .04). There was no difference in subsequent ACL injuries ( P = .41). Conclusion: Both groups demonstrated quality outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with TEFs demonstrated lower mean clinical outcome scores compared with patients with ACL tears, but the differences were less than reported minimal clinically important difference values. Additionally, the TEF group experienced more postoperative anterior laxity and had a higher rate of postoperative arthrofibrosis. There was no difference in the rate of subsequent ACL injuries. The TEF group returned to sport sooner than the ACL group, but the postoperative activity levels were similar.

Purpose To identify any dose‐dependent association between the use of subacromial corticosteroid injections within a year before rotator cuff repair (RCR) and subsequent need for revision rotator cuff surgery. Methods Two large administrative databases were queried for patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR. A minimum of 1 year of preoperative database exposure and 2 years of postoperative database follow‐up were required for inclusion. Patients were stratified into groups that received 0 (control), 1, 2, or 3 or more ipsilateral corticosteroid shoulder injections within the year prior to RCR. The outcome of interest was ipsilateral revision arthroscopic or open RCR or arthroscopic debridement for a diagnosis of rotator cuff tear within 2 years of the index surgery. Revision rates were compared between groups using a multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for demographic and comorbidity confounders. Results A total of 110,567 patients from the Medicare database and 12,892 patients from the private insurance database were included. There was no association between a single injection within the year prior to RCR and revision surgery in either cohort. The use of 2 or more injections was associated with a significant increase in the risk of requiring revision surgery in both the Medicare (odds ratio [OR], 2.76‐3.26; P < .0001) and private insurance (OR, 2.53‐2.87; P < .0001) populations. Conclusions A single shoulder injection within a year prior to arthroscopic RCR was not associated with any increased risk of revision surgery; however, the administration of 2 or more injections was associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent revision rotator cuff surgery (OR, 2.53‐3.26). Although causality cannot be established on the basis of this database review, caution is recommended when considering more than 1 shoulder corticosteroid injection in patients with potentially repairable rotator cuff tears. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Background: Studies have shown good and excellent clinical and radiographic results after meniscal repair. Limited published information exists on the long-term outcomes, however, especially in a pediatric and adolescent population. Purpose: To determine long-term results of meniscal repair and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in a pediatric and adolescent population. Specifically, the aims were to determine the clinical success rate of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction, compare results with midterm outcomes, and analyze risk factors for failure. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Cases of meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction between 1990 and 2005 were reviewed among patients aged ≤18 years. Patient demographics, injury history, and surgical details were recorded, and risk factors for failure were analyzed. Physical examination findings and clinical outcomes at latest available follow-up were collected. Subjective knee outcomes were compared with midterm results. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used to evaluate the available data. Results: Forty-seven patients (30 females, 17 males) with a mean age of 16 years (SD, 1.37) and a mean follow-up of 16.6 years (SD, 3.57) were included in this study. Overall, 13 patients (28%) failed meniscal repair and required repeat surgery at the time of final follow-up. Of the 13 failures, 9 underwent a subsequent meniscectomy; 2, meniscectomy and revision ACL reconstruction; 1, meniscal repair and revision ACL reconstruction; and 1, meniscal repair and subsequent meniscectomy. Mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores improved from 47.9 preoperatively to 87.7 postoperatively ( P < .01), and the mean score at long-term follow-up (87.7) did not significantly differ from that at the midterm follow-up (88.5) at a mean 7.4 years ( P = .97). Mean Tegner Activity Scale scores improved from 1.9 preoperatively to 6.3 postoperatively ( P < .01) and decreased from 8.3 at preinjury to 6.3 at final long-term follow-up ( P < .01). Conclusion: In conclusion, the long-term overall clinical success rate (failure-free survival) was 72% for repair of pediatric and adolescent meniscal tears in the setting of concomitant ACL reconstruction. Patients reported excellent knee subjective outcome scores that remained favorable when compared with midterm follow-up.

Background: The preoperative assessment of cartilage lesions is critical to surgical planning and decision making. The accurate radiographic determination of acetabular cartilage damage has remained elusive for modern imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). While risk factors have been individually described, no multivariable system exists for predicting high-grade cartilage damage. Purpose: To determine the preoperative predictors of grade 3 to 4 acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) lesions. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Retrievable radiographs were reviewed from primary hip arthroscopic procedures performed at 2 high-volume institutions between December 2007 and April 2017. The predictive value of demographic and radiographic factors for the intraoperative documentation of ALAD grade 3 to 4 damage was analyzed and entered into a multivariable model, and a statistically guided scoring system for the damage risk was created using the Akaike information criterion. The scoring system was then prospectively validated on 167 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between April 2017 and February 2018. Results: A total of 652 primary hip arthroscopic procedures in 614 patients (390 female, 224 male; mean age, 33.2 ± 12.5 years; mean body mass index, 26.9 ± 5.5 kg/m 2 ) from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.11; P < .01), age ≥35 years (OR, 1.96; P < .01), cam morphology (alpha angle >55°) (OR, 2.96; P < .01), and Tönnis grade 1 to 2 (grade 1: OR, 4.14; P < .01, and grade 2: OR, 9.29; P < .01) were univariate risk factors for intraoperatively documented high-grade damage. A multivariable scoring system, the Rapidly Assessed Predictor of Intraoperative Damage (RAPID) score (0-5 points), was generated based on sex, Tönnis grade, and cam morphology. Patients with increasing RAPID scores had an increasing risk of damage, with a 10.5% risk for those with 0 points and an 88.0% risk for those with 5 points ( P < .01). The area under the curve was 0.75 for the study group and 0.76 for the validation group ( P = .94). Conclusion: While preoperative MRI has diagnostic value for hip arthroscopic surgery, the RAPID score provides added benefit as a readily employable, in-clinic system for predicting high-grade cartilage damage. The discriminatory value of the RAPID score compares favorably with previous MRI and MRA studies. This information will help the clinician and patient plan for high-grade damage and identify potential targets for cartilage treatment.

Objective This retrospective case series describes a hybrid fixation technique and determines the clinical outcomes, knee function, and activity level of patients at short-term follow-up. Design Seventeen patients (18 knees) with unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions involving the knee were treated with a hybrid fixation technique in which the salvageable fragment was fixed and osteochondral autograft transplantation system (OATS) was used for the unsalvageable fragment. Thirteen lesions involved the medial femoral condyle, 4 involved the lateral femoral condyle, and 1 involved the patella. Mean patient age was 17 years (range 12-28 years). All lesions were International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade III or IV. The patients were prospectively followed postoperatively. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Tegner activity scale. Results At mean follow-up of 36 months (range 24-67.2 months), the mean postoperative KOOS scores, given as mean (SD), were as follows: Quality of Life (QoL) 91.1 (17.0), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 99.5 (1.5), Sport 94.5 (11.2), Pain 97.4 (5.8), and Symptoms 95.9 (6.5). Mean IKDC score was 96.2 (7.0). There was no significant difference between mean preinjury (7.95, SD = 1.1) and mean postoperative (7.45, SD = 1.5) Tegner scores ( P = 0.363). The mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score was 87.5 at a mean 7.8 months (range 3-18 months) postoperation. There were no reported complications. Conclusion The results of this case series suggest that patients with partially salvageable OCD lesions involving the knee can have positive short-term outcomes and can expect a low complication rate when treated with a hybrid technique of fixation with osteochondral autograft transfer.

Background: Database research is being used in orthopaedic literature with increased regularity. The main limitation of database research is the absence of diagnosis and treatment verification afforded by medical chart review. This absence may limit the accuracy of some conclusions and recommendations produced by database research. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to describe the accuracy of 1 database (Rochester Epidemiology Project) used in orthopaedic research to detect isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and to discuss the limitations of database research. It was hypothesized that diagnostic codes alone are unlikely to be accurate in identifying patients with ACL tears. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A population-based historical cohort study was performed with the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. All subjects had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes consistent with ACL tears between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2010. The medical records of all subjects were reviewed in detail to confirm the accuracy of diagnosis and gather data on injury type, laterality, associated meniscal injuries, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and treatment details. Results: A total of 3494 patients had codes consistent with ACL tears, and 2288 of them were confirmed through chart review to have an isolated ACL tear (65.5%). Among these were 1841 patients (52.7%) with an ACL tear within 1 year of injury and an additional 447 (12.8%) with an ACL tear >1 year from injury. Thirty-nine patients (1.1%) had a partial ACL tear diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging, 48 (1.4%) had an isolated posterior cruciate ligament tear, and 22 (0.6%) had a combined ACL–posterior cruciate ligament injury. Twenty-four patients (0.7%) had ACL reconstruction before the study period. The remaining 1073 patients (30.7%) had diagnostic codes consistent with an ACL tear but did not have a cruciate ligament injury. Conclusion: This study demonstrates low accuracy with the use of diagnostic codes alone to identify an ACL tear. Database studies offer unique benefits to the medical literature, but the inherent limitations should be taken into account when these data are used to counsel patients, dictate clinical management, or make health care policy decisions. Information from a health care database is most accurate when accompanied by verification of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes with medical chart review.

Background: Full-thickness radial meniscal tears render the meniscus nonfunctional and have historically been treated with partial meniscectomy. As preservative techniques evolve for radial repair, comparisons with other tear patterns are necessary to evaluate repair efficacy and prognosis. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of radial meniscal repair and to compare them to bucket-handle meniscal repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears without concurrent root injuries undergoing surgical repair at a single institution between 2007 and 2015 were analyzed, including both all-inside and inside-out suturing techniques. Propensity matching was performed on the basis of age at surgery, sex, meniscus laterality, body mass index (BMI), and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a comparison pool of 70 bucket-handle repairs. Reoperation-free survival rates and Tegner, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were analyzed. Results: Twenty-four patients (18 male, 6 female; mean age, 22.8 ± 11.9 years) who underwent repair of a radial meniscal tear were followed for a mean of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-6.3 years). Significant postoperative improvements in VAS scores at rest and with use and IKDC scores were noted postoperatively ( P < .001). Five patients (20.8%) required a reoperation. Subsequently, 18 patients with radial tears (mean age, 19.1 ± 9.1 years; 12 male; mean BMI, 27.0 ± 6.2 kg/m 2 ; 3 medial; 11 ACLR) were propensity matched to 18 patients with bucket-handle tears (mean age, 20.8 ± 5.1 years; 13 male; mean BMI, 25.0 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ; 3 medial; 11 ACLR). The matched radial and bucket-handle groups demonstrated similar ( P = .17) reoperation-free survival rates at 2 years (88.9% and 94.4%, respectively) and 5 years (77.8% and 87.7%, respectively). VAS and IKDC scores improved significantly after surgery ( P < .001), with no difference noted between the groups ( P ≥ .17). Patients with radial and bucket-handle meniscal repairs achieved mean postoperative Tegner scores (6.6 and 6.6, respectively) not significantly different from their preinjury levels (6.9 and 6.7, respectively) ( P ≥ .32). Conclusion: Satisfactory clinical outcomes are achievable for radial meniscal tear repair at short-term follow-up. In a robustly matched comparison, radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears demonstrate similar improvements in VAS and IKDC scores, restoration of preoperative Tegner scores, and acceptable reoperation rates. Full-thickness radial meniscal tears should be considered for repair.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a disorder of unknown origin that can affect knees in skeletally mature and immature patients. Surgical management is an important cornerstone of treatment for unstable OCD lesions. Purpose: To determine the (1) healing rate after internal fixation of unstable OCD between skeletally immature and mature knees, (2) risk factors for failure, and (3) patient-reported outcomes among healed patients. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients who underwent internal fixation of unstable knee OCD lesions from 2000 to 2015. Skeletal immaturity was defined as open or partially open physes. Healing was assessed through clinical findings and imaging. Definitive reoperation for the same OCD lesion was classified as failure. Results: Among 87 patients included, 66 (76%) had healed lesions at ≥2 years postoperatively, while 21 (24%) failed. Skeletal maturity made no significant difference in failure rate (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.29-1.72; P = .40). For skeletally immature patients, lateral versus medial condylar location conferred an increased hazard of 18.2 (95% CI, 1.76-188.07; P < .01). Multivariate analysis factoring in skeletal maturity showed that lateral condylar location was an independent risk factor for failure (hazard ratio, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.47-19.85; P < .01). Mean patient-reported outcome scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) increased significantly after surgery, except the KOOS symptoms score for the skeletally mature group. Final scores (mean ± SD) were as follows at a mean follow-up of 60 months (range, 24-166): IKDC, 83.5 ± 20.2; KOOS pain, 89.7 ± 14.1; KOOS symptoms, 87.4 ± 18.4; KOOS activities of daily living, 93.9 ± 12.7; KOOS sports, 80.7 ± 25.9; KOOS quality of life, 78.9 ± 23.1. Conclusion: Skeletally immature and mature patients heal at comparable rates after internal fixation of OCD lesions, resulting in functional and subjective improvement. Lateral femoral condylar lesion location is an independent risk factor for failure.

Background: As the number of cartilage restoration procedures is increasing, so is the number of revision procedures. However, there remains limited information on the reasons for failure of primary cartilage restoration procedures. Purpose: To determine the common modes of failure in primary cartilage restoration procedures to improve surgical decision making and patient outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who presented for revision after failed cartilage repair surgery were evaluated for factors contributing to failure of the primary procedure. All revision cases performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary center for failed cartilage restoration over a 6-year time frame were identified. In all cases, the medical records, preoperative radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed by 2 experienced cartilage surgeons. The cause for failure was categorized as malalignment, meniscal deficiency, graft or biologic failure, or instability. Univariate and descriptive statistics regarding patient demographics, index procedure, lesion location and size, and mechanism of failure were analyzed. Results: A total of 59 cases in 53 patients (32 male, 21 female) met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age at the time of revision was 27.6 years, and the mean body mass index was 28.4 kg/m 2 . Failed index surgical procedures included 35 microfractures (59%), 12 osteochondral allograft transplantations (20%), 10 osteochondral autograft transfers (17%), 2 nonviable osteochondral allografts (3%), and 2 particulated juvenile chondral allografts (3%). The mean lesion size was 4.4 cm 2 . Reasons for failure included 33 cases with untreated malalignment (56%), 16 with graft failure (27%), 11 with untreated meniscal deficiency (19%), and 3 with untreated instability (5%); 4 cases demonstrated multiple reasons for failure. Conclusion: The most commonly recognized reason for failure was untreated malalignment. While biologic and graft failures will occur, the majority of failures were attributed to untreated background factors such as malalignment, meniscal deficiency, and instability. The stepwise approach of considering and addressing alignment, meniscal volume, and stability remains essential in cartilage restoration surgery.

Background: Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs), if left untreated, can cause devastating effects to the knee, with rapid articular cartilage degeneration and loss of the meniscus as a secondary stabilizer. Detection and surgical repair of these defects have been linked to favorable outcomes, but preoperative identification of LMPRTs continues to be challenging. Purpose: To determine the rate of LMPRTs diagnosed preoperatively on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a consecutive series of arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 45 consecutive patients with arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs between 2010 and 2017 were included in this study. The preoperative MRI report for each patient was evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. Each preoperative MRI study was then reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists who worked in consensus. Results: A total of 45 patients (32 males, 13 females) with arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs and a mean age of 27 years (range, 14-54 years) were included in the study. Only 15 of 45 LMPRTs (33%) were initially diagnosed on preoperative MRI. Past or concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was present in 37 of 45 cases (82%). Upon retrospective review, 15 of the 30 missed LMPRTs were “clearly evident,” 12 “subtly evident,” and 3 “occult” (unavoidably missed). There were no significant differences in the rate of LMPRT diagnosis based on history of prior knee surgery, meniscus extrusion, or tearing of the meniscofemoral ligament. Conclusion: Despite improved identification of other meniscus tear patterns on MRI, a high percentage of LMPRTs were still missed. In the setting of previous ACL reconstruction, if the root cannot be confidently identified, the MRI interpretation should indicate that “the root is poorly visualized” to alert the surgeon to thoroughly evaluate this structure. The surgeon should maintain a high index of suspicion and carefully probe the posterior root of the lateral meniscus at the time of arthroscopy, especially in cases of ACL injury.