Trifiletti, Daniel M.

Objectives: Early identification of patients living with cancer at higher risk of death from an infection is critical in infection mortality prevention. We characterize patients living with cancer at the highest risk of dying from an infection. Methods: 7,529,481 US cancer survivors (1992 to 2015) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% CIs were calculated. Fine-gray survival analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios by adjusting for the effects of competing risks (eg, deaths due to causes other than infection). Results: Among 7,529,481 patients living with cancer (1992 to 2015), 101,167 (1.3%) died of infection. The rate of infection-specific mortality was 27.19/10,000 person-years, with an SMR of 3.29 (95% CI: 3.26-3.32, P <0.001). Patients who were older, male, black, and unmarried were at a greater risk of fatal infection. Overall, the risk of infection-specific mortality for patients living with cancer is greatest 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population (SMR: 8.68, 95% CI: 8.53-8.84; P< 0.0001), and this risk decreases with follow-up time (SMR at >10 y after diagnosis: 2.93, 95% CI: 2.87-3.00; P< 0.0001). Among patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, and Kaposi Sarcoma, 9.2%, 11.5%, and 82.2% of all deaths within the first year after cancer diagnosis occurred due to acute infectious disease. In contrast, for patients with liver cancer, the relative percentage of infection-specific mortality increases with follow-up time from 3.5% at <1 year after cancer diagnosis and 10.4% at 10+ years of follow-up. Conclusion: The results of this study characterize infection mortality in patients living with cancer, which can guide more targeted research and interventions in this population.

Abstract Pituitary tumors require a diverse, multidisciplinary approach in their management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (single or hypofractionated) and fractionated radiotherapy are integral parts of the armamentarium. With the introduction of highly conformal, stereotactic ionizing radiation approaches, the reported tumor control rates and clinical outcomes have improved significantly. This review details the indications, risks, and outcomes of pituitary radiosurgery and radiation therapy, and presents in brief the differences in treatment approaches between stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated radiation therapy, and proton therapy.

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate local control (LC) of tumors, patient overall survival (OS), and the safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for esophageal cancer brain metastases (EBMs). METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from 15 International Radiosurgery Research Foundation facilities encompassing 67 patients with 185 EBMs managed using SRS between January 2000 and May 2022. The median patient age was 63 years, with a male predominance (92.5%). Most patients (64.2%) had a single brain metastasis, while 7.5% had more than 5 metastases. The median tumor volume was 0.9 cm 3 , and the median margin dose delivered to the tumor was 20 Gy. RESULTS The median OS post-SRS was 15.2 months, with 1- and 2-year OS rates of 65.7% and 32.3%, respectively. A significant inverse correlation was found between the number of EBMs and OS in the univariable analysis. LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 89% and 76%, respectively. Adverse radiation effects (AREs) were observed in 17.9% of patients, with 13.4% being mild and transient and 4.5% severely symptomatic (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3). New intracranial disease developed in 58.2% of patients, with 1- and 2-year rates of 58% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS SRS for EBMs demonstrated high survival rates and effective tumor control, with a low incidence of severe AREs. These findings highlight the potential role of SRS in the multidisciplinary multimodality management paradigm of EBM.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite standard of care with maximal safe resection and chemoradiation, glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive type of primary brain cancer. Surgical resection provides a window of opportunity to locally treat gliomas while the patient is recovering and before initiating concomitant chemoradiation. The objective was to assess the safety and establish the maximum tolerated dose of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) for the treatment of recurrent GBM. Secondary objectives were to assess the toxicity profile and long-term survival outcomes of patients enrolled in the trial. In addition, biospecimens will be collected to explore the local and systemic responses to this therapy. METHODS: We will conduct a phase 1, dose-escalated, nonrandomized, open-label, clinical trial of patients with GBM who are undergoing surgical resection for recurrence. Up to 18 patients will receive intracavitary application of AMSCs encapsulated in fibrin glue during surgical resection. All patients will be followed for up to 5 years for safety and survival data. Adverse events will be recorded using the CTCAE V5.0. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: This study will explore the maximum tolerated dose of AMSCs along with the toxicity profile of this therapy in patients with recurrent GBM. In addition, preliminary long-term survival and progression-free survival outcome analysis will be used to power further randomized studies. Finally, cerebrospinal fluid and blood will be obtained throughout the treatment period to investigate circulating molecular and inflammatory tumoral/stem cell markers and explore the mechanism of action of the therapeutic intervention. DISCUSSION: This prospective translational study will determine the initial safety and toxicity profile of local delivery of AMSCs for recurrent GBM. It will also provide additional survival metrics for future randomized trials.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Lymphopenia attributed to postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can accelerate tumor recurrence and contribute to poor prognosis in GBM. We hypothesize that short course (1-2 weeks) CRT can mitigate lymphopenia compared to standard course and may provide immune benefits for future combination therapy. METHODS GBM patients were randomized on a multi-site phase II study comparing short course (35Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/10Fx depending on target volume) (Arm A) versus standard dose fractionation (60Gy/30Fx or 40Gy/15Fx, Arm B). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This unplanned interim analysis evaluates changes of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), CD4 and CD8 prospectively at 3-timepoints: baseline (prior to CRT), end of CRT, and 1-month post-CRT. RESULTS To date, 72 patients enrolled (34 Arm A, 38 Arm B). Median age 66 (35-86), ECOG 0-2. Patients characteristics as followed in Arm A vs. Arm B, respectively: female 47% vs. 42%, MGMT promotor methylated 31% vs. 34%, steroid use 46% vs. 45%, ALC 1310 cells/mm3 (330 –9730) vs. 1480 (750 –7750), CD4 531 cells/mm3 (86 –1368) vs. 662 (318 –1671), and CD8 151 cells/mm3 (56 –940) vs. 272 (68 –875). Lymphocytes data were collected in 49 patients (21 Arm A, 28 Arm B). There were signficantly fewer reductions of ALC, CD4 and CD8 in Arm A. Median ALC changes were 95% and 99% of baseline (Arm A) vs 52% and 61% of baseline (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.01). Median CD4 changes 93% and 96% of baseline (Arm A) vs 51% and 49% (Arm B), and median CD8 changes 97% and 98% of baseline (Arm A) vs 57% and 71% (Arm B) at the end of CRT and 1-month post-CRT, respectively (p&lt;0.05). CONCLUSIONS This interim analysis suggests that short course RT could reduce treatment-related lymphopenia and immune suppression compared to standard RT, thus could be potentially beneficial to combine with immunotherapy.

Abstract BACKGROUND Fatigue is among the most common symptoms managed by patients with cancer. Hypothalamic pituitary axis dysfunction has an established role in a subset of patients with fatigue. Our primary aim was to longitudinally assess the impact of hypothalamic radiation exposure to patient self-reported fatigue. METHODS We included a sample of patients who received radiation therapy treated at a single institution from 2014-2024. The PROMIS-10 questionnaire (“How would you rate your fatigue on average,” scale 1-5) was used in standard clinical practice, with measures from 6 time points over 2 years. We performed descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models were used to assess the impact of hypothalamic radiation dose on fatigue scores. Mixed models were controlled for gender, age, time, tumor category (CNS vs. non-CNS), and modality (photon vs. proton). Models were fit with random intercepts for each Patient ID. RESULTS 1092 patients (43% female) with a median age of 54 years (range: 18-92) were included. Most patients were treated for CNS cancer (76%), with about 50% each photon and proton. Median hypothalamus radiation dose was 1306 cGy (range: 0.01-6138). Mean baseline fatigue (2.4) increased after treatment (2.7) remaining elevated at 3- and 6-months post-treatment (2.6, 2.5), returning near baseline at 1- and 2-years post-treatment (2.4, 2.3). Higher radiation dose (Estimate (SE): 0.014 (0.006), p=0.0266) and CNS cancer treatment (0.11 (0.051), p=0.0319) were significant predictors of higher fatigue in the mixed model. Male patients (-0.16 (0.042), p=0.0001) and time (-0.003 (0.0016), p=0.0398) were associated with lower fatigue. Age and treatment modality were not significant predictors of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS We found that higher hypothalamic radiation dose was related to more self-reported fatigue, which peaked by 6 months. This effect was seen more prominently in female patients and those treated for CNS disease. Treatment modality and age did not influence fatigue scores.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluates the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation for Koos grade I vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS: In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed data of patients with Koos grade I VS who underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). Propensity score matching was used to equilibrate demographics, tumor size, and audiometric data across groups. The outcome analyzed included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing, and neurological function. RESULTS: The study matched 142 patients, providing a median follow-up period of 36 months. SRS significantly enhanced tumor control compared with observation, with a 100% control rate at both 5- and 8-year marks in the SRS group vs 48.6% and 29.5% in the observation group at the same time intervals, respectively ( P < .001). Preservation of serviceable hearing outcomes between groups showed no significant difference at 5 and 8 years, ensuring a comparable quality of auditory function (SRS 70.1% vs observation 53.4% at 5 years; P = .33). Furthermore, SRS was associated with a reduced likelihood of tinnitus (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, P = .04), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.17, P = .002), and overall cranial nerve dysfunction (OR = 0.49, P = .03) at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: SRS management of patients with Koos grade I VS was associated with superior tumor control and reduced odds for cranial nerve dysfunction, while not compromising hearing preservation compared with observation. These findings support the safety and efficacy of SRS as a primary care approach for this patient population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in comparison with watchful waiting for managing Koos grade II vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS: A retrospective, multicentric analysis was conducted, focusing on patients with Koos grade II VS who either received SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). To ensure comparability between groups, propensity score matching was used, including factors such as demographic characteristics, tumor dimensions, and hearing assessments. The primary end points examined were tumor control, maintenance of serviceable hearing, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were equally matched across both cohorts, with a median follow-up of 37 months for the SRS group and 27.5 months for those observed. The SRS cohort exhibited superior tumor control over observation across 3, 5, and 8 years, achieving a 100% control rate vs 47.9%, 40.1%, and 34.3% for the observation group at these time intervals, respectively ( P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates were comparable between the 2 groups throughout 3, 5, and 7 years (72.9% for SRS vs 65.4% for observation at 3 years; P = .86). Moreover, SRS management correlated with a lower incidence of vestibular symptoms (odds ratio = 0.11, P = .002), with no significant disparity in the deterioration of cranial nerve (CN) V or CN VII functions. Notably, the likelihood of experiencing any CN impairment was significantly diminished in the SRS cohort (odds ratio = 0.47, P = .04). CONCLUSION: For patients with Koos grade II VS, SRS offers superior tumor control rate and a lower risk of CN dysfunction without sacrificing hearing preservation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with neoadjuvant embolization is a treatment strategy for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), especially for those with large nidal volume or concomitant aneurysms. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of pre-SRS embolization in AVMs with an associated intracranial aneurysm (IA). METHODS: The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM database from 1987 to 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. SRS-treated AVMs with IAs were included. Patients were categorized into those treated with upfront embolization (E + SRS) vs stand-alone SRS (SRS). Primary end point was a favorable outcome (AVM obliteration + no permanent radiation-induced changes or post-SRS hemorrhage). Secondary outcomes included AVM obliteration, mortality, follow-up modified Rankin Scale, post-SRS hemorrhage, and radiation-induced changes. RESULTS: Forty four AVM patients with associated IAs were included, of which 23 (52.3%) underwent pre-SRS embolization and 21 (47.7%) SRS only. Significant differences between the E + SRS vs SRS groups were found for AVM maximum diameter (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 cm 3 , P = .019) and SRS treatment volume (9.3 ± 8.3 vs 4.3 ± 3.3 cm 3 , P = .025). A favorable outcome was achieved in 45.4% of patients in the E + SRS group and 38.1% in the SRS group ( P = .625). Obliteration rates were comparable (56.5% for E + SRS vs 47.6% for SRS, P = .555), whereas a higher mortality rate was found in the SRS group (19.1% vs 0%, P = .048). After adjusting for AVM maximum diameter, SRS treatment volume, and maximum radiation dose, the likelihood of achieving favorable outcome and AVM obliteration did not differ between groups ( P = .475 and P = .820, respectively). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a favorable outcome and AVM obliteration after SRS with neoadjuvant embolization in AVMs with concomitant IA seems to be comparable with stand-alone SRS, even after adjusting for AVM volume and SRS maximum dose. However, the increased mortality among the stand-alone SRS group and relatively low risk of embolization-related complications suggest that these patients may benefit from a combined treatment approach.