Gertz, Morie A.

Abstract Abstract 4954 Background Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains incurable with current approaches and newer therapies targeting the abnormal disease biology need to be developed. The malignant plasma cell is highly dependent on the marrow microenvironment, which promotes tumor cell proliferation as well as survival. There is increased bone marrow vascular density in patients with MM and the degree of neo-angiogenesis appear to be prognostic in this disease. Studies have also shown that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is intricately involved in the interaction between the marrow microenvironment and the myeloma cell. These findings suggested that the VEGF pathway may be a valuable target for therapeutic approach in this disease. Patients and Methods We designed a phase 2 trial of Sunitinib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received less than three prior therapies. Sunitinib malate (SU11248; Sutent) is a novel, multi-targeted, small molecule inhibitor of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1), -2, and -3, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) -α and -β. The treatment consisted of Sunitinib 37.5 mg given daily in a continuous fashion in six-week cycles. Toxicities were graded according to CTCAE response version 3.0 and responses were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria. Response rate of single agent Sunitinib was the primary endpoint of the study. Results 13 patients were accrued between July of 2007 and April 2009 before the study was closed. The median age of the study population was 61 years (range, 53 - 84), and included nine females (69%). The median time from diagnosis to registration was 39.2 months (range, 4.5 - 88) and 10 patients had received previous stem cell transplant. Previous therapy included lenalidomide in 7 patients, thalidomide in 5 patients and bortezomib in 2 patients. All 13 patients were alive at last follow up with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (range, 1.3 -21.2). All patients have gone off study, disease progression being the most common cause (9 patients), followed by adverse events (3 pts) and alternate treatment in the remaining patient. A hematological grade 3 or higher adverse event was documented in 6 patients and a grade 3 or higher non-hematological adverse event was seen in 8 patients. A grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 5 pts and thrombocytopenia in 2 pts. Fatigue was common and was seen in 11 pts. The median number of cycles administered was one (range, 1-5) and the total number of cycles across 13 patients was 22. Treatment delays or interruptions were seen in five and six patients respectively. The most common reason for treatment delays was hematologic adverse events. No responses (PR or better) were seen, and stable disease was seen in eight of the 13 patients as the best response. The median time to progression was 2.9 months. Conclusions Single agent Sunitinib has no clinically relevant efficacy in this group of patients with relapsed myeloma with one or two previous therapies. Hematological toxicity was higher than anticipated. Whereas these results indicate that VEGFR TK inhibitors are not active in previously treated myeloma, it does not preclude the possibility that VEGF targeting strategies may enhance the efficacy of other therapies. Disclosures Kumar: CELGENE: Research Funding; MILLENNIUM: Research Funding; BAYER: Research Funding; GENZYME: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 3884 Poster Board III-820 Background and Objective Thalidomide/dexamethasone (thal/dex) combination has shown high activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) (Rajkumar SV. at al, J Clin Oncol 2006;24:431-436). In newly diagnosed patients, lenalidomide/dexamethasone (len/dex) has demonstrated superiority compared with high-dose dexamethasone alone (Zonder JA et al, Blood 2007;110:77). Although both thal/dex and len/dex are active in newly diagnosed MM, no randomized trial has been reported comparing these two regimens, and unfortunately none are ongoing or planned. We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of thal/dex and len/dex as primary therapy in 411 newly diagnosed MM patients treated at the Mayo Clinic. Patients and methods 411 consecutive patients seen at Mayo Clinic between 2001 and 2008, who received induction with thal/dex (n=183) or len/dex (n=288) were retrospectively studied. Thalidomide was given at a dose ranging from 100 mg/day to 400 mg/day continuously; the lenalidomide dose was 25 mg/day, days 1-21 on a 28-day cycle. All patients received dexamethasone, either at high-dose (40 mg orally on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20) or at low-dose (40 mg orally day 1, 8, 15, 22); each cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. In addition, a case-matched subgroup analysis that adjusted for age, gender and transplantation status was performed among patients who received high-dose dexamethasone comparing the thal/dex (n=72) and len/dex (n=72) groups. Outcome was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The Chi-square or the rank sum tests were used to compare variables. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and all comparisons were determined by the log-rank test and by the Cox proportional hazards model. Results On intention-to-treat analysis, of 411 patients, 80.3% versus 61.2% patients, respectively in the len/dex group and in the thal/dex group (p < 0.001), achieved at least a partial response. A significant difference between the 2 groups was found in terms of both very good partial response or better (34.2% vs 12.0%, p < 0.001) and complete response rate (13.6% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). Duration of therapy was significantly longer in len/dex patients as compared to thal/dex patients: 36.7% vs 12.6% of patients who did not stop treatment to receive SCT were still receiving therapy at 1 year (p < 0.001).Time-to-progression was significantly better in the len/dex group than in patients receiving thal/dex (median 27.4 vs 17.2 months, HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.44-0.93; p = 0.019). Similarly, progression-free-survival was significantly higher in len/dex patients (median 26.7 vs 17.1 months, HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.48-0.98; p = 0.036). This translated into an increase in overall survival (OS) (median not reached for len/dex group compared to 57.2 months in thal/dex patients, HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.40-0.92; p = 0.018). Survival advantages were evident in patients presenting with International Staging System Stage (ISS) I/II (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.32-1.00; p = 0.052) at diagnosis but not in patients with ISS stage III in subgroup analysis. There was a trend toward better OS in len/dex group compared to thal/dex group both for patients who underwent transplant and for patients who did not. A similar rate of patients experienced at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event (57.5% vs 54.6% in len/dex and thal/dex groups, respectively, p = 0.568). However, the toxicity profile was different in the two groups: major grade 3-4 toxicities of len/dex were hematological, in particular neutropenia (14% with len/dex vs 0.6% with thal/dex, p<0.001) while the most common toxicities in thal/dex were venous thromboembolism (15.3% vs 9.2%, p = 0.058) and peripheral neuropathy (10.4% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). The data on efficacy and safety shown above were also confirmed in the subgroup case-matched analysis which included only high-dose dexamethasone patients. Conclusions This cohort study shows the superiority of len/dex in terms of response rates and survival, compared to thal/dex. The toxicity profile of the 2 regimens is different and len/dex treatment, although more active, was not associated with increased toxicity (grade 3-4 AEs). These data need to be carefully evaluated and randomized prospective phase III studies are necessary to confirm these results and determine the optimal initial therapy for MM. Disclosures: Off Label Use: research drugs in combination to standard care. Lacy:celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; genzyme: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria; amgen: Honoraria. Kumar:celgene: Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:celgene: Research Funding. Bergsagel:amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; genetech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; merck: Research Funding; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Witzig:celgene: Research Funding. Fonseca:medtronic: Consultancy; genzyme: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; otsuka: Consultancy. Greipp:celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 429 Background: Patients with MM who have progressed after multiple novel agents have limited treatment options. Pomalidomide (CC4047) is the newest immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent that has demonstrated response rates of 63% in a Phase 2 trial of Pom/dex in patients with relapsed MM (in press, JCO). To better define the response rate in this group, we treated an additional cohort of patients who were truly resistant/refractory to lenalidomide. Methods: To be eligible, patients must:be refractory to lenalidomide therapy defined as relapsing on or within 60 days of stopping lenalidomide. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily on days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally at a dose of 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily as prophylaxis against DVT. Pom/dex regimen would be declared promising if we observed at least 4 confirmed responses out of 34 patients based on a single stage Fleming design. Results: 34 patients (23 male and 11 female) resistant/refractory to lenalidomide were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range, 39-77). The median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 62 months (range 8-179). 12 patients had high risk molecular markers including loss of 17p (6 pts), t(4;14) (1 pt) and del 13 by cytogenetics (5 pts). 70% had ≥3 prior regimens including 38% with ≥5 prior regimens; 56% had prior thalidomide, 59% had prior bortezomib, and 68% had prior SCT. Toxicity (at least possibly related to treatment) was mild and consisted primarily of myelosuppression: grade 3/4 neutropenia (21%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (9%); and grade 3 anemia (12%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred in 24%: pneumonia (3%), non-infectious pneumonitis (3%), hyperglycemia (3%), edema(3%), fatigue(9%) skin rash(3%). Neuropathy occurred in 18% (12% grade 1; 6% grade 2). No thromboembolic events have occurred so far. Nine (26%) patients were confirmed responders (all PR), surpassing the threshold for a positive trial, and 18 (53%) had SD. With a median follow-up of 4 months (range:0-8), 65% remain progression free; 88% remain alive; and 12% have died, all due to progressive MM. Conclusions: Pom/dex is active and well tolerated in this heavily pre-treated population of lenalidomide-refractory MM patients. The majority of patients have not progressed and objective responses are seen in 26%. This study confirms that pomalidomide has non-cross resistance with lenalidomide and offers benefit for patients who have relapsed after other novel therapies. Disclosures: Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bergsagel:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Stewart:Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria.

Abstract Peripheral blood infused total autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) correlates with day 15 absolute lymphocyte count and is an independent prognostic factor for survival after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Factors to enhance A-ALC collections are not well defined. We hypothesize that the number of peripheral blood apheresis collections (PBAC) directly correlates with A-ALC. 190 consecutive NHL patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic between 1993 and 2001 were analyzed. The primary end point of the study was to assess the correlation between the number of PBAC and A-ALC. The secondary end point was to determine if the number of PBAC affected survival post-ASCT. Of the 190 patients, 18 patients underwent 1 PBAC, 23 patients 2 PBAC, 50 patients 3 PBAC, 37 patients 4 PBAC, 50 patients 5 PBAC, and 12 patients had ≥ 6 PBAC. There was no association between the number of PBAC and the number of CD34+ stem cells collected (p= 0.25). A strong association between number of PBAC and A-ALC (Kruskall Wallis test, p <0.0001)(Figure 1) was identified. Using a cut-off of 4 PBAC, superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were observed for patients that underwent 4 PBAC or more compared to patients that underwent less than 4 PBAC (86 months vs 18 months, p <0.0001; 76 months vs 10 months, p <0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated PBAC ≥ 4 is an independent prognostic factor for OS (RR = 0.654, 95%CI: 0.529–0.804, p< 0.0001) and for PFS (RR = 0.682, 95%CI: 0.561–0.826, p< 0.0001) when compared with other significant factors including performance status, lactate dehydrogenase and extra nodal disease. These data suggest that increasing the number of PBAC beyond the minimum number required to meet CD34+ collection targets may result in improved overall and progression-free survival mediated by an increase in autograft absolute lymphocyte count.

Abstract Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoid neoplasm associated with accumulation of lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow and an elevated monoclonal IgM in the serum. Although the genetic and molecular mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of WM are not well understood, losses of the long arm of chromosome 6 have been found as the only recurrent genomic aberration. These deletions, mostly starting at 6q21, are observed in upwards of 50% of patients and involve the majority of the clonal cells. To better characterize pathologic gene expression signatures in different types of WM at the molecular level (6q deleted versus not), we examined gene expression level changes of more than 20000 human gene probes in bone marrow tissues of clinically proven WM patients. We used Affymetrix HG-U133A v2 chips (n = 24). Clonal cells were purified using a combination of anti-CD138 and anti-CD19 Miltenyi™ magnetic microbeads. Based on cIgM-FISH results, we classified samples into two groups - 6q normal (ND) group and 6q deletion (D) group. We then proceeded to identify genes that showed differential expression between the two groups. We selected 165 differentially expressed genes (DEG) using SAM, and underwent further investigation of biological annotations of them using Gene Ontology™ (GO) terms. Among165 DEG, only 32 showed high level of expression in ND group compared to D group while 133 showed high level of expression in D group. As expected, all genes that reside in 6q region showed under-expression in D group, constituting 53% (17 genes) of genes under-expressed in D group (32 genes). According to GO analysis, the 6q-deletion-induced under-expression affects many biological processes, and is associated with a transcriptional upregulation of downstream genetic cascades. This likely indicates release of regulatory control by a tumor suppressor gene. Genes involved in cell growth and maintenance, cell communication and morphogenesis are also over-expressed in D group. Interestingly, a gene that is involved in innate immune response and inflammatory response shows under-expression in D group but is not accounted for by other mechanisms. In similar vein, a gene that is involved in negative regulation of cytokine biosynthesis showed over-expression in D group. We think these transcriptional characteristics can provide basic framework for differentiating subtypes of WM and search for genes associated with WM pathogenesis

Abstract Background: The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) has been shown to be highly effective as initial therapy for multiple myeloma. More recently, a phase III trial demonstrated improved survival with use of lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone (Rd). Further improvements by incorporating other active agents may increase the depth of response and may improve long-term outcome. We report the results from a phase II trial combining lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (RCd) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed MM. Methods: The trial was initiated in July 2006 and completed the initial target accrual of 33 patients by July 2007 (Cohort 1). Due to high rate of dose reductions in cohort 1, between July 2007 and May 2008 an additional 20 patients were enrolled with lower doses of cyclophosphamide (Cohort 2). The treatment protocol consisted of lenalidomide given orally at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. Dex was given orally at a dose of 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Cyclophosphamide at a dose of 300 mg/m2 was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle in cohort 1 and 300 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle in cohort 2. Patients also received an aspirin once daily as thromboprophylaxis. Response was defined as a decrease in serum monoclonal (M) protein by 50% or higher and a decrease in urine M protein by at least 90% or to a level less than 200 mg/24 hours. Responses were assessed on intent to treat basis. Results: 53 patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years (range, 37–82). 14 patients (29%) had ISS stage III disease. The median number of cycles was 4 (range: 1 – 20). The best response based on all enrolled patients on an intent to treat basis was 83%, including CR:1 (2%), VGPR: 20 (38%), PR: 23 (43%), and less than PR: 9 (17%). The CR plus VGPR rate was 40%. Among the 20 patients in cohort 2 who were enrolled after optimization of the cyclophosphamide dosing, 16 (80%) have already achieved a partial response or better with 17 patients in this cohort still receiving study treatment. Overall, 25 of the 53 enrolled patients have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for ending treatment are: completed study per protocol (14), disease progression (5), adverse event (3) and alternate treatment (3). This includes 3 patients from cohort 2, one completed treatment per protocol, one went to alternate therapy and one patient went off for progression. Hematological toxicity was the most common with grade 4 toxicity seen in 8 patients (only 1 from cohort 2). Non-hematological toxicities included neuropathy, diarrhea, cystitis, and thrombosis. There were 6 patients with grade 4 non-hematological toxicities (none from cohort 2) attributed to the drug (thrombosis, confusion, depression and sepsis). Thirteen patients had dose adjustments, most commonly due to hematological toxicity attributed to lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide. One patient has died off study, of intracranial hemorrhage. The median follow-up for the remaining patients is 7.8 months. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (RCd) has excellent activity in the setting of newly diagnosed myeloma. Seventeen patients continue on study and the response rates are likely to be higher with additional followup. Myelosuppression was a significant toxicity leading to dose reductions and cycle delays, and is lower with decreased dose of CTX in cohort 2 without any apparent loss of responses.

Abstract Background: Thalidomide and its analogue lenalidomide have high response rates among patients with newly diagnosed as well as previously treated myeloma. Pomalidomide (CC4047) is the newest immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent that has shown single-agent activity in phase I studies. We report on the first Phase 2 trial of pomalidomide combined with low dose dexamethasone (Pom/dex) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: 37 patients (21 male and 16 female) were enrolled. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily on days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally at a dose of 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily as prophylaxis against DVT. Results: The median age was 66 years (range, 40 – 88). All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity, and all analysis were done on intent to treat basis. All patients had received prior therapy; 38% had 3 prior regimens; 35% had 2 prior regimens and 27% had one prior regimen. 76% had previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 24% had 2 prior ASCT. 62% had previous IMiD therapy. Toxicity was mild and consisted primarily of myelosuppression. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 31%; grade 3 thrombocytopenia 3%; grade 3 anemia 3 %. Other grade 3/4 toxicities seen in less than 5% pts included: diarrhea, atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, dehydration and renal insufficiency. 16 % had grade 1/2 neuropathy. No grade 3 neuropathy was seen and there have been no thromboembolic events. Thirty (81%) patients are continuing study treatment. Seven patients have discontinued treatment due to: disease progression (5), died on study (1) and the medical doctor’s discretion (1). Twenty three of 37 patients (62%) achieved an objective response to therapy; including 9 (24%) with VGPR; 14 patients (38%) with PR; 6 (16%) with stable disease. Objective responses were seen in 4 of 13 patients (29%) who were refractory to lenalidomide. Conclusions: Pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pom/dex) is highly active and well tolerated for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with an objective responserate of 62%, including a 29% response rate among patients who are lenalidomiderefractory.

Background: Primary amyloidosis (AL) is characterized by multi-organ deposition of light chain derived amyloid protein, resulting in organ dysfunction of varying severity. High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an effective treatment for AL, but is limited in applicability due to high transplant related mortality in patients with advanced organ dysfunction. Serum LDH, an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of lactate to pyruvate, is present in large amounts in heart, kidney, liver, and muscle and is elevated with abnormalities in one or more of the organs. It is commonly elevated in a variety of hematologic malignancies. Given the multi-organ involvement in AL, we examined the prognostic value of LDH in AL. Methods: We examined our transplant database to assess the prognostic value of LDH. Laboratory values from pre-ASCT evaluation were used for the analysis. Results: Three hundred and thirteen pts who underwent ASCT between March 1997 and March 2007 were included in this analysis. The median age at ASCT was 57.5 years (range, 33–73); and 183 pts (58.3%) were male. The median duration from diagnosis to transplant was 4.1 months (range, 1–75) and the median follow up post transplant was 28.3 months (range, 1 m to 10 years) for the 229 pts (73%) alive at the time of analysis. The median LDH was 194 IU (range, 92-441) and 138 pts (44%) had an LDH > 200. The median overall survival post-ASCT for patients with an LDH > 200 was 59.4 mos (95% CI; 37.9, 80.8) compared to not reached for the rest (Figure). The prognostic value of LDH for post transplant OS was independent of cardiac troponin (cTnT). The median OS post ASCT for patients with cTnT > 0.035 (n=208) was 37.4 months (95% CI; 17, 57.9) compared to 97.5 months (95% CI; 64.8, 130.2) for the rest. In a Cox proportional hazards model, cTnT > 0.035 was associated with a 2.5 fold risk of death (p = 0.0013) and an LDH > 200 was associated with 1.7 fold risk (p = 0.04). We then examined if LDH added to the cTnT in a prognostic model for survival post ASCT. Pts with both cTnT < 0.035 and LDH < 200 (n=133) had a median OS that was not reached compared to 71 mos (95% CI; 48.3, 94) if one factor was abnormal (n=89) and 37.4 mos (95% CI; 16.1, 58.8) if both cTnT and LDH were abnormal as above (n=45); p < 0.001 (Figure 2). Conclusions: In this study we have demonstrated the prognostic value of serum LDH in AL pts undergoing ASCT. Serum LDH appears to add to the value of troponin in prognostic staging of these patients. These results need to be examined in a larger cohort of patients undergoing different treatments. It is possible that LDH is able to globally assess abnormalities of multiple organs including heart, liver and lung. Prospective studies looking at the different LDH fractions are ongoing. Figure Figure Figure Figure

Abstract Purpose: Flavopiridol is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against multiple myeloma cells in vitro and ex vivo. It can induce apoptosis in non-cycling human cell lines, including RPMI-8226, a myeloma cell line. Suggested mechanisms of cytotoxicity include down regulation of anti-apoptotic regulators, direct binding to duplex DNA, disruption of transcription factor/DNA binding, upregulation of p53, inhibition of transcription, and inhibition of angiogenesis. A Phase II multicenter trial was conducted to determine the activity of flavopiridol in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: Eighteen patients were treated with 1 hour flavopiridol infusions (50 mg/m(2)/day) for 3 consecutive days every 21 days. Responses were assessed according to IBMTR criteria each cycle. Serial bone marrow aspirates were collected before and immediately after flavopiridol treatment to measure in vivo and ex vivo effects of flavopiridol on patient plasma cells. Immunoblotting for Mcl-1, Bcl-2, p53, cyclin D, phosphoRNA polymerase II and phosphoSTAT 3 was conducted on total cellular proteins isolated from sorted plasma/myeloma cells. Ex vivo assessment of flavopiridol sensitivity of freshly collected myeloma cells was performed for 5 patients pre-therapy. Results: Median age of patients ranged from 49 to 81 years, with a median of 65 years. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1–5) treatment regimens prior to enrollment. Sixty-one percent of patients were refractory to prior therapy and fifty-five percent had received prior high dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell support. The immunoglobulin isotypes of the patients were as follows: IgG (10), IgA (4), light chain (3), and non-secretory (1). At enrollment, 13 patients had a beta-2 microglobulin greater than 3.5. Seven had a plasma cell labeling index greater than or equal to 1%. Four had an elevated LDH. The trial was stopped at time of interim analysis due to a lack of clinical efficacy. Of eighteen treated patients, 15 progressed (including 1 death on study) and 3 discontinued due to toxicity. All patients have ended the active treatment phase, and the mean number of cycles administered for all enrolled patients was 1.6 cycles (range 1–3). No objective responses were observed. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia and diarrhea (83% each), followed by thrombocytopenia, nausea, and fatigue (61% each). Ex vivo flavopiridol treatment of pre-therapy patient plasma/myeloma cells led to cytotoxicity, but only after longer exposure times at higher flavopiridol concentrations than were anticipated to be achieved in vivo. Further, immunoblotting demonstrated no indication that known in vitro cellular effects of flavopiridol were recapitulated in vivo. Conclusions: Flavopiridol has little single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma when administered at this dose and schedule, which is likely due to the inability to achieve biologically relevant concentrations in patients. .

Background: High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) remains the preferred therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Several studies have demonstrated an improvement in median survival with use of SCT. Patients with myeloma may undergo SCT immediately following 4–6 cycles of ‘induction’ therapy or at the time of relapse from the initial plateau phase. Available evidence does not suggest a survival difference between the two approaches. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated our experience with autologous single SCT for MM to compare the results of delayed SCT to early SCT. We identified from our transplant database, 202 patients with MM, who underwent SCT between October 1992 and November 2002. 101 patients, who responded to induction chemotherapy, had stem cells collected in plateau phase, received maintenance chemotherapy and had SCT at the time of first relapse (delayed SCT group). The remaining 101 patients, after initially achieving a response underwent upfront SCT (early SCT group). Patients refractory to initial therapy were excluded from this study. Most of the early transplants were done in the recent years and hence this group has a shorter follow up. Results: The study cohort had a median age of 55 years (range 29 – 72) at diagnosis consisting of 126 males (62%), with no significant demographic difference between the two groups. As expected measures of tumor burden (M protein, B2M and marrow plasma cell percentage) were significantly higher in the delayed group. Plasma cell labeling indices and presence of abnormal cytogenetics were higher in the delayed SCT group as well at transplant. TBI containing regimens were used more often in the delayed group reflecting a difference in the time periods of transplant. There was no difference between the groups in terms of overall response to transplant though complete response rate was higher for the early transplants. (Table). There was no difference in the time to overall response between the groups (P=0.13, Kaplan Meier estimate). Though the median progression free survival (PFS) from transplant was shorter for the delyaed SCT group, the overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of MM was comparable for the two groups (Table). The overall survival estimate at 5 year from diagnosis was 60% for both groups. Conclusions: Review of our experience demonstrates comparable overall survival for an early SCT compared to SCT at the time of relapse. Although there is an advantage for early SCT in terms of more chemosensitive disease as shown by a longer PFS from SCT, there is no benefit in OS from time of diagnosis. Patient preference and other co-morbidities should play a role in the decision regarding timing of transplant. This study has the disadvantage of being retrospective in nature and the two groups being spread over different periods in time. Early (n=101) Delayed (n=101) P Overall Response 100 (99%) 94 (94%) 0.07 Complete Response 43 (42%) 28 (27%) 0.04 Median PFS (From Transplant) 26.7 months 14.8 months <0.0001 Median OS (From diagnosis) 67 months 70 months 0.1