Sandborn, William J.

Abstract Background and Aims Patient-reported outcomes are recommended endpoints in Crohn’s disease [CD] trials. The association between patient-reported general well-being relative to symptoms of diarrhoea and abdominal pain [AP] in patients with moderate to severe CD was explored. Methods Patients from three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind adalimumab or upadacitinib studies with average daily very soft/liquid stool frequency [SF] ≥4 and/or AP score ≥2 at baseline were included. Using electronic diaries, patients reported general well-being [seven-point Likert scale; 1 = worst; 7 = best] in item 10 of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ]. Changes in well-being and clinical outcomes of SF and AP from baseline to week 12 or 16, and the relationship between well-being and clinical outcomes were evaluated using cumulative distribution function and probability density function curves. Results In total, 858 patients with CD were included [adalimumab, n = 695; upadacitinib, n = 163]. Patients who achieved clinical remission [SF ≤2.8, AP score ≤1.0, neither worse than baseline] were more likely than those not in clinical remission to report IBDQ item 10 response in the 6–7 group category but not IBDQ categories ≤5. Higher IBDQ score for item 10 [6–7] was associated with lower SF and AP score. Greater point increases in IBDQ item 10 were associated with a greater percentage decrease in clinical parameters; a ≥25–30% decrease in SF or AP was associated with a ≥1-point improvement in IBDQ. Conclusions An association between improvements in patient-reported general well-being and clinical remission/response was observed using outcomes of SF and AP, supporting the clinical remission/response endpoint definitions used in clinical studies of CD. Clinical Trial Registrations [ClinicalTrials.gov]: NCT00077779 [CHARM]; NCT00348283 [EXTEND]; NCT02365649 [CELEST].

Abstract Although the prevalence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) is increasing, there is evidence that eosinophilic gastritis and/or duodenitis (EG/EoD) are underdiagnosed. Patients with EG/EoD often present with chronic, non-specific gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, similar to patients with functional GI disorders. We hypothesized that systematic evaluation, including multiple esophageal, gastric and duodenal biopsies, of patients with chronic GI symptoms might reveal a high rate of gastroduodenal eosinophila, with or without eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Methods We performed a prospective multi-center study of patients with non-specific GI symptoms for ≥6 months, from 20 sites. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing abdominal pain, abdominal cramping, early satiety, bloating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and loss of appetite. Those with daily average symptom severity scores ≥3/10 for any single symptom underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with collection of 4 esophageal (EoE), 8 gastric, and 4 duodenal biopsies, analyzed by central pathologists. Histologic criteria for EoE was ≥15eos/hpf in ≥1 esophageal site and for EG/EoD was peak eosinophil counts ≥30/hpf in ≥5 gastric hpfs and/or 3 duodenal hpfs—criteria used in randomized trials. Results Of 556 patients screened, 405 (73%) met symptom criteria and underwent EGD; 181 patients (45%, mean age 45, 73% female) who underwent EGD met the histologic criteria for EG/EoD, and of these, 7% also had EoE diagnosed. Overall 2% met histologic criteria for EoE alone. Of patients who met the histologic criteria for EG/EoD, 93% were previously diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), or functional dyspepsia (FD) (Figure 1). The average duration of GI symptoms in the screened population as well as those that met histologic criteria for EG/EoD was 11 years. Conclusion Forty-five percent of patients with moderate-to-severe GI symptoms who underwent EGD met histologic criteria for EG/EoD. Over 90% of these patients had previously been diagnosed with GERD, IBS, and/or FD, and had minimal overlap with EoE. EGD with systematic gastroduodenal biopsies, and intentional evaluation for tissue eosinophilia, should be performed in patients with chronic GI symptoms. Accurate diagnosis of EG/EoD is required for appropriate, targeted treatment and improved outcomes of patients with moderate-to-severe GI symptoms.

Abstract Background and Aims To report results from VISIBLE 2, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating a new subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab formulation as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease [CD]. Methods Following open-label vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2, Week 6 clinical responders (≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] score from baseline) were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind maintenance vedolizumab 108 mg SC or placebo every 2 weeks until Week 50. Assessments at Week 52 included clinical remission [primary endpoint; CDAI ≤150], enhanced clinical response [≥100-point decrease in CDAI from baseline], corticosteroid-free clinical remission among patients using a corticosteroid at baseline, clinical remission in anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF]-naïve patients, and safety. Results Following vedolizumab intravenous induction, 275 patients were randomised to vedolizumab SC and 135 to placebo maintenance. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus 34.3% receiving placebo were in clinical remission [p = 0.008]. Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was achieved by 52.0% versus 44.8% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus placebo, respectively [p = 0.167]. At Week 52, 45.3% and 18.2% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC and placebo, respectively, were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and 48.6% of anti-TNF-naïve patients receiving vedolizumab SC and 42.9% receiving placebo were in clinical remission. Injection site reaction was the only new safety finding observed for vedolizumab SC [2.9%]. Conclusions Vedolizumab SC is an effective and safe maintenance therapy in patients with CD who responded to two infusions of vedolizumab intravenous induction therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been associated with adverse disease-related outcomes and inferior treatment response to biologic agents in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), but its impact on the risk of treatment-related complications is unknown. We performed a cohort study examining the association between obesity and risk of serious infections in biologic-treated patients with IBD. METHODS: Using an administrative claims database, in a cohort of biologic-treated patients with IBD between 2014 and 2018 with follow-up 1 year before and after treatment initiation, we compared the risk of serious infections (infections requiring hospitalization) between obese vs nonobese patients (based on validated administrative claims) using Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: We included 5,987 biologic-treated patients with IBD (4,881 on tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and 1,106 on vedolizumab), of whom 524 (8.8%) were classified as obese. Of the 7,115 person-year follow-up, 520 patients developed serious infection. Risk of serious infection was comparable in obese vs nonobese patients (8.8% vs 8.5%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–1.54). After adjusting for age, comorbidities, disease characteristics, health care utilization, use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and opiates, obesity was not associated with an increased risk of serious infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.01]). Similar results were seen on stratified analysis by disease phenotype (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) and index biologic therapy (tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and vedolizumab). DISCUSSION: After adjusting for comorbid conditions and disease characteristics, obesity is not independently associated with an increased risk of serious infections in biologic-treated patients with IBD.

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is a once-daily, oral, preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. FIL for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) was evaluated in the phase 2b/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled SELECTION study (NCT02914522). Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is associated with significant side effects. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess the CS-sparing effects of FIL in the SELECTION study. Methods Patients (18–75 years old) with moderately to severely active UC were randomized (2:2:1) to receive FIL 100 mg (n = 564), FIL 200 mg (n = 507) or PBO (n = 280) once daily orally for up to 11 weeks (induction study). At week 11, FIL induction responders were rerandomized 2:1 to continue their induction FIL dose or to receive PBO (maintenance study). CS use was kept stable up to week 14, at which point mandatory CS tapering occurred. CS could be resumed during the maintenance study; however, if the baseline CS dose was exceeded this was considered treatment failure. In this post hoc analysis, CS-free remission was defined as remission at week 58 (endoscopic subscore ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore = 0 and ≥ 1-point decrease in stool frequency subscore to achieve 0 or 1) without systemic or localized CS use that was indicated for UC in the previous 1, 3, 6 or 8 months. Results The baseline characteristics of patients in the maintenance study were similar across treatment groups (Table 1). Of the 92 patients receiving CS at maintenance baseline (week 11; maintenance week 0) who received FIL 200 mg during the maintenance study, 25 (27%) were in remission at week 58 and had been continuously CS-free for at least the previous 6 months (Table 2). The proportion of CS-free remitters in the FIL 200 mg group was consistently higher than with PBO (Table 2). In patients taking CS at maintenance baseline who had continued CS-use post baseline, lower median prednisone dosing was observed with FIL 200 mg than with PBO throughout the maintenance study (maximum difference at week 34 [maintenance week 23]: 5.0 mg vs 13.8 mg) (Figure 1). In SELECTION, a total of 199 patients received FIL 200 mg in the maintenance study, of whom 74 (37.2%) were in remission at week 58; of these 74 patients, 69 (93.2%) were continuously CS-free for at least the previous 6 months (Figure 2). Conclusion In this post hoc analysis of SELECTION maintenance study data, FIL 200 mg was effective in reducing and eliminating CS use through to week 58 in patients with moderately to severely active UC. The vast majority of patients taking FIL 200 mg who were in remission at week 58 had not taken CS in the previous 6 months.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ), an anti-a4β7 integrin antibody that selectively blocks lymphocyte trafficking to the gut, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). This post hoc analysis of data from the VISIBLE 2 trial evaluated early patient-reported outcomes assessed within the first 14 days of VDZ induction. Methods VISIBLE 2 (NCT02611817; EudraCT 2015-000481-58) was a phase 3, multicentre, placebo-controlled study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous VDZ for maintenance treatment in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Efficacy was assessed based on CD Activity Index (CDAI). Patients received induction treatment with intravenous (IV) VDZ 300 mg open-label at Weeks 0 and 2. For this analysis, responses to VDZ were assessed using CDAI sub-scores for patient-reported abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) collected daily via electronic diary in the first 14 days of VDZ treatment (Day 1 to 15) in all patients receiving ≥1 VDZ dose at induction. Descriptive statistics were used. Results The analysis included 611 patients (mean [SD] age 37.6 [13.4] years; CD duration 9.0 [8.1] years); 323 (53%) were male; 228 (37%) had severe disease (CDAI >330) at baseline; and 350 (57%) were anti-TNF-experienced. In the first 14 days of VDZ IV induction, the rate of patients with daily SF≤3 increased from 30% at baseline (Day 1) to 47.7% on Day 15. Increases were similar in both anti-TNF-naïve vs. anti-TNF-experienced patients and in patients with severe vs. moderate disease (Figure 1). Mean baseline SF was reduced from 6.4 to 5.0 at Day 15 in patients with severe disease and from 4.3 to 3.5 in patients with moderate disease. Overall, the proportion of patients rating AP as severe/moderate declined from baseline to Day 15 of induction (from 14.6% to 8.2% for severe AP and from 60.7% to 40.6% for moderate AP). Similar Day 1-to-15 reductions were reported in both anti-TNF-naïve (severe AP: 14.2% to 9.2%; moderate AP: 62.6% to 44.6%) and anti-TNF-experienced patients (severe AP: 14.8% to 7.4%; moderate AP: 59.3% to 37.7%), respectively. Although a minority of patients (6.3%) in the sub-group with moderate AP at baseline had worse pain at Day 15, there were early improvements in AP ratings for most patients reporting severe or moderate AP at baseline (Figure 2). Conclusion This post hoc analysis of daily patient-reported SF and AP in the VISIBLE 2 CD study indicates an early onset of response to VDZ IV induction within the first 14 days of treatment.

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor.U-ACCOMPLISH is one of two phase 3 induction trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods U-ACCOMPLISH was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03653026) that enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC (defined as adapted Mayo score 5–9 with centrally read endoscopic score 2–3) who had inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids and/or biologics. Patients were randomized 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or placebo (PBO) for 8 weeks. At week 8, responders entered the maintenance phase and non-responders entered the extended treatment period to receive open-label UPA 45 mg QD for additional 8 weeks.The primary endpoint (clinical remission per adapted Mayo Score) and ranked secondary endpoints including symptomatic, endoscopic– histologic evaluations from the 8-week PBO-controlled period are reported here. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported. Results 522 patients were randomized (UPA, n=345; PBO, n=177); the intent-to-treat population included 341 patients in UPA and 174 patients in PBO group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups; 50.7% and 51.1% were biologic inadequate responders in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA 45 mg QD (33.5%) versus PBO (4.1%) achieved the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference: 29.0% [23.2, 34.7]; P<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA versus PBO also achieved all ranked secondary endpoints (all P<0.001; Figure 1).Serious adverse events were reported by 3.2% and 4.5% of patients in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 2). Similar rates of serious infection were observed in both groups (0.6%); 2 events each of herpes zoster and opportunistic infection were reported in UPA group. No active tuberculosis, malignancy, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, or deaths were reported in the study. One patient with venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and 1 patient with gastrointestinal perforation were reported in the placebo group. Conclusion In U-ACCOMPLISH, 8-week UPA 45 mg QD induction treatment led to statistically significant improvements in clinical, endoscopic, and combined endoscopic-histologic endpoints. The treatment was well tolerated, and the safety profile and AE prevalence was comparable with previous studies of UPA with no new safety signals identified.