Back to Authors

Dumkrieger, Gina

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-5370

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 56

Clinical Correlates of Insomnia in Patients with Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache Compared with Migraine
Kim, Soo-Kyoung , Chong, Catherine D. , Ross, Katherine , Schwedt, Todd J. , Schwedt, Todd J , Chong, Catherine D , Dumkrieger, Gina , Berisha, Visar

No container title available | January 28, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.2.21982/v1 Get It

Abstract Background: Close associations between insomnia with other clinical factors have been identified in migraine, but there have been few studies investigating associations between insomnia and clinical factors in patients with persistent post-traumatic headache (PPTH). The study objective was to contrast the severity of insomnia symptoms in PPTH, migraine, and healthy controls, and to identify factors associated with insomnia in patients with PPTH vs. migraine. Methods: In this cross-sectional cohort study, 57 individuals with PPTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury, 39 with migraine, and 39 healthy controls were included. Participants completed a detailed headache characteristics questionnaire, the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), Allodynia Symptom Checklist, Photosensitivity Assessment Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) checklist, Ray Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Trail Making Test A and B to assess headache characteristics, disability, insomnia symptoms, sensory hypersensitivities, and neuropsychological factors. Fisher’s test and one-way ANOVA were used to assess group differences of categorical and continuous data. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify clinical variables associated with insomnia symptoms. Results: Those with PPTH had significantly higher ISI scores (16.72 ± 6.58) compared to migraine patients (11.28 ± 6.42) and healthy controls (4.05 ± 4.80) (p < 0.001). For those with PPTH, insomnia severity was most strongly correlated with the BDI (Spearman's rho (ρ) = 0.634, p < 0.01), followed by Trait Anxiety (ρ = 0.522, p < 0.01), PTSD (ρ = 0.505, p < 0.01), HQ (ρ = 0.469, p < 0.01), State Anxiety (ρ = 0.437, p < 0.01), and MIDAS scores (ρ = 0.364, p < 0.01). According to linear regression models, BDI, headache intensity, and hyperacusis scores were significantly positively associated with insomnia severity in those with PPTH, while only delayed memory recall was negatively associated with insomnia severity in those with migraine. Conclusions: Insomnia symptoms were more severe in those with PPTH compared to migraine and healthy control cohorts. Depression, headache intensity, and hyperacusis were associated with insomnia in individuals with PPTH. Future studies should determine the bidirectional impact of treating insomnia and its associated symptoms.
Sensory Hypersensitivity Symptoms in Migraine With vs Without Aura: Results From the American Registry for Migraine Research
Pearl, Talia A. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Chong, Catherine D. , Schwedt, Todd J. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Chong, Catherine D , Dodick, David W.

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | January 22, 2020 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 506-514

10.1111/head.13745 Get It

Background and Objectives Migraine with aura (MwA) is associated with increased brain hyper‐responsiveness to visual stimuli and increased visual network connectivity relative to migraine without aura (MwoA). Despite this, prior studies have provided conflicting results regarding whether MwA is associated with higher photophobia symptom scores compared to MwoA. The relationships between MwA and other types of sensory hypersensitivity, such as phonophobia and cutaneous allodynia (CA), have not been previously investigated. The purpose of this cross‐sectional observational study was to investigate whether MwA is associated with greater symptoms of photophobia, phonophobia, and CA compared to MwoA. Methods This analysis included 321 migraine patients (146 MwA; 175 MwoA) who had been enrolled into the American Registry for Migraine Research. The diagnosis of either MwoA or MwA was determined by headache specialists using ICHD diagnostic criteria. Patients completed the Photosensitivity Assessment Questionnaire, the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, and the Allodynia Symptom Checklist. Mean or median values were compared between groups. Regression models were created to analyze the relationship between MwA with photophobia scores, hyperacusis scores, and the presence of interictal CA. Results Those with MwA had higher mean photophobia scores than those with MwoA (4.1 vs 3.0, P = .0003). MwA was positively associated with photophobia symptom severity ( B = 0.50 [SE = 0.14], P = .0003), after controlling for age, patient sex, and headache frequency. Aura was not associated with hyperacusis symptom severity ( B = 0.07 [SE = 0.08], P = .346) or the presence of interictal CA (OR 1.33 [95% CI 0.70‐2.53], P = .381). Conclusion MwA is associated with higher photophobia symptom scores compared to MwoA. Aura is not associated with greater hyperacusis or interictal allodynia scores. These findings complement prior imaging and neurophysiologic studies that demonstrated MwA to be associated with hyper‐responsiveness of brain visual processing regions. The findings suggest that MwA is associated specifically with visual hypersensitivity, as opposed to being associated with a general hypersensitivity to multiple types of sensory stimuli.
The American Registry for Migraine Research: Research Methods and Baseline Data for an Initial Patient Cohort
Digre, Kathleen B. , Tepper, Stewart J. , Spare, Nicole , Birlea, Marius , Burish, Mark J. , Mechtler, Laszlo , Gottschalk, Christopher , Quinn, Anna , Mcgillicuddy, Linda, Bance, Lisa, Dumkrieger, Gina , Schwedt, Todd J. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Ailani, Jessica , Chong, Catherine D. , Dodick, David W.

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | November 22, 2019 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 337-347

10.1111/head.13688 Get It

Background The American Registry for Migraine Research (ARMR) is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal patient registry, biorepository, and neuroimaging repository that collects clinical data, electronic health record (EHR) data, blood samples, and brain imaging data from individuals with migraine or other headache types. In this manuscript, we outline ARMR research methods and report baseline data describing an initial cohort of ARMR participants. Methods Adults with any International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) diagnosis were prospectively enrolled from one of the 8 participating headache specialty centers. At baseline, ARMR participants complete web‐based questionnaires, clinicians enter the participant’s ICHD diagnoses, an optional blood specimen is collected, and neuroimaging data are uploaded to the ARMR neuroimaging repository. Participants maintain the ARMR daily headache diary longitudinally and follow‐up questionnaires are completed by participants every 3 months. EHR data are integrated into the ARMR database from a subset of ARMR sites. Herein, we describe the ARMR methodology and report the summary data from ARMR participants who had, from February 2016 to May 2019, completed at least 1 baseline questionnaire from which data are reported in this manuscript. Descriptive statistics are used to provide an overview of patient’s sociodemographics, headache diagnoses, headache characteristics, most bothersome symptoms other than headache, headache‐related disability, comorbidities, and treatments. Results Data were available from 996 ARMR participants, enrolled from Mayo Clinic Arizona, Dartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical Center, University of Utah, University of Colorado, Thomas Jefferson University, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Georgetown University Medical Center, and DENT Neurological Institute. Among ARMR participants, 86.7% (n = 864) were female and the mean age at the time of enrollment was 48.6 years (±13.9; range 18‐84). The most common provider‐reported diagnosis was chronic migraine (n = 622), followed by migraine without aura (n = 327), migraine with aura (n = 196), and medication overuse headache (n = 65). Average headache frequency was 19.1 ± 9.2 days per month (n = 751), with 68% reporting at least 15 headache days per month. Sensitivity to light was the most frequent (n = 222) most bothersome symptom overall, other than headache, but when present, cognitive dysfunction was most frequently (n = 157) the most bothersome symptom other than headache. Average migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) score was 52 ± 49 (n = 760), (very severe headache‐related disability); however, 17% of the ARMR population had MIDAS scores suggesting “no” or “mild” disability. The most common non‐headache health issues were allergies (n = 364), back pain (n = 296), neck pain (n = 296), depression (n = 292), and anxiety (n = 278). Nearly 85% (n = 695) of patients were using preventive medications and 24.7% were using non‐medication preventive therapy (eg, vitamins and neuromodulation). The most common preventive medication classes were neurotoxins, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, vitamins/supplements, and anticalcitonin gene‐related peptide ligand or receptor‐targeted monoclonal antibodies. Nearly 90% (n = 734) of ARMR participants was taking medications to treat migraine attacks, with the most common classes being triptans, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, antiemetics, acetaminophen, and combination analgesics. Conclusions ARMR is a source of real‐world patient data, biospecimens, and brain neuroimaging data that provides comprehensive insight into patients with migraine and other headache types being seen in headache specialty clinics in the United States. ARMR data will allow for longitudinal and advanced analytics that are expected to lead to a better characterization of patient heterogeneity, healthcare resource utilization, identification of endophenotypes, factors that predict treatment outcomes and clinical course, and ultimately advance the field toward precision headache medicine.
Static and dynamic functional connectivity differences between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache: A resting-state magnetic resonance imaging study
Dumkrieger, Gina , Ross, Katherine , Berisha, Visar , Schwedt, Todd J. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Chong, Catherine D. , Berisha, Visar

Cephalalgia | May 1, 2019 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1366-1381

10.1177/0333102419847728 Get It

Introduction Although migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache often share phenotypic characteristics, few studies have interrogated the pathophysiological differences underlying these headache types. While there is now some indication of differences in brain structure between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache, differences in brain function have not been adequately investigated. The objective of this study was to compare static and dynamic functional connectivity patterns in migraine versus persistent post-traumatic headache using resting-state magnetic resonance imaging. Methods This case-control study interrogated the static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity patterns of 59 a priori selected regions of interest involved in pain processing. Pairwise connectivity (region of interest to region of interest) differences between migraine (n = 33) and persistent post-traumatic headache (n = 44) were determined and compared to healthy controls (n = 36) with ANOVA and subsequent t-tests. Pearson partial correlations were used to explore the relationship between headache burden (headache frequency; years lived with headache) and functional connectivity and between pain intensity at the time of imaging and functional connectivity for migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache groups, separately. Results Significant differences in static functional connectivity between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache were found for 17 region pairs that included the following regions of interest: Primary somatosensory, secondary somatosensory, posterior insula, hypothalamus, anterior cingulate, middle cingulate, temporal pole, supramarginal gyrus, superior parietal, middle occipital, lingual gyrus, pulvinar, precuneus, cuneus, somatomotor, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Significant differences in dynamic functional connectivity between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache were found for 10 region pairs that included the following regions of interest: Secondary somatosensory, hypothalamus, middle cingulate, temporal pole, supramarginal gyrus, superior parietal, lingual gyrus, somatomotor, precentral, posterior cingulate, middle frontal, fusiform gyrus, parieto-occiptal, and amygdala. Although there was overlap among the regions demonstrating static functional connectivity differences and those showing dynamic functional connectivity differences between persistent post-traumatic headache and migraine, there was no overlap in the region pair functional connections. After controlling for sex and age, there were significant correlations between years lived with headache with static functional connectivity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the migraine group and with static functional connectivity of right primary somatosensory with left supramarginal gyrus in the persistent post-traumatic headache group. There were significant correlations between headache frequency with static functional connectivity of left secondary somatosensory with right cuneus in the migraine group and with static functional connectivity of left middle cingulate with right pulvinar and right posterior insula with left hypothalamus in the persistent post-traumatic headache group. Dynamic functional connectivity was significantly correlated with headache frequency, after controlling for sex and age, in the persistent post-traumatic headache group for one region pair (right middle cingulate with right supramarginal gyrus). Dynamic functional connectivity was correlated with pain intensity at the time of imaging for the migraine cohort for one region pair (right posterior cingulate with right amygdala). Conclusions Resting-state functional imaging revealed static functional connectivity and dynamic functional connectivity differences between migraine and persistent post-traumatic headache for regions involved in pain processing. These differences in functional connectivity might be indicative of distinctive pathophysiology associated with migraine versus persistent post-traumatic headache.
Symptoms of Autonomic Dysfunction Among Those With Persistent Posttraumatic Headache Attributed to Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison to Migraine and Healthy Controls
Howard, Levi, Dumkrieger, Gina , Ross, Katherine , Berisha, Visar , Schwedt, Todd J. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Chong, Catherine D. , Berisha, Visar

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | August 30, 2018 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1397-1407

10.1111/head.13396 Get It

Background Most persistent posttraumatic headaches (PPTH) have a phenotype that meets diagnostic criteria for migraine or probable migraine. Although symptoms of autonomic dysfunction have been well described among those with migraine, the presence and relative severity of such symptoms among those with PPTH have yet to be reported. Objective The objective of this study was to assess and compare symptoms of autonomic dysfunction among those with PPTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) vs migraine vs healthy controls using Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS‐31) questionnaire scores. Methods Individuals with PPTH (n = 56) (87.5% of whom had a migraine/probable migraine phenotype), migraine (n = 30), and healthy controls (n = 36) were prospectively assessed in this cross‐sectional cohort study using the COMPASS‐31 questionnaire. Total COMPASS‐31 scores and individual domain scores (bladder, gastrointestinal, orthostatic intolerance, pupillomotor, secretomotor, vasomotor) were compared between subject groups. Results COMPASS‐31 mean total weighted score was 37.22 ± 15.44 in the PPTH group, 27.15 ± 14.37 in the migraine group, and 11.67 ± 8.98 for healthy controls. COMPASS‐31 mean weighted total scores were significantly higher in those with PPTH vs migraine ( P = .014), for PPTH vs healthy controls ( P = .001), and for migraine vs healthy controls ( P = .001). Those with PPTH had numerically higher scores for all COMPASS‐31 domains compared to those with migraine, and the domain scores were significantly higher for orthostatic intolerance (PPTH = 4.80 ± 2.47 vs migraine = 3.33 ± 2.31, P = .027) and bladder (PPTH = 1.14 ± 1.45 vs migraine = 0.47 ± 0.73, P = .020). Among individuals with PPTH, post hoc correlations indicated a positive association between number of total lifetime TBIs with total weighted COMPASS‐31 scores (rho = 0.32, P = .020), between years lived with headache and vasomotor domain subscores (rho = 0.27; P = .044), and between headache frequency with vasomotor domain subscores (rho = 0.27; P = .041). Conclusions Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction were greatest among those with PPTH compared to migraine and healthy controls. Among individuals with PPTH, number of lifetime TBIs was associated with greater symptoms of autonomic dysfunction, while greater headache burden was associated with higher vasomotor domain autonomic dysfunction subscores, potentially indicating that PPTH patients with higher disease burden have an increased risk for having autonomic dysfunction. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction should be ascertained during the clinical management of patients with PPTH and might be a characteristic that helps differentiate PPTH from migraine.
Structural Co‐Variance Patterns in Migraine: A Cross‐Sectional Study Exploring the Role of the Hippocampus
Dumkrieger, Gina , Dumkrieger, Gina M, Schwedt, Todd J. , Dumkrieger, Gina , Chong, Catherine D.

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | October 4, 2017 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1522-1531

10.1111/head.13193 Get It

Objective To interrogate hippocampal morphology and structural co‐variance patterns in migraine patients and to investigate whether structural co‐variance patterns relate to migraine disease characteristics. Background Migraine is associated with structural alterations in widespread cortical and subcortical regions associated with the sensory, cognitive, and affective components of pain processing. Recent studies have shown that migraine patients have differences in hippocampal structure and function relative to healthy control subjects, but whether hippocampal structure relates to disease characteristics including frequency of attacks, years lived with migraine and symptoms of allodynia remains unknown. Furthermore, this study investigated hippocampal volume co‐variance patterns in migraineurs, an indirect measure of brain network connectivity. Here, we explore differences in hippocampal volume and structural co‐variance patterns in migraine patients relative to healthy controls and examine whether these hippocampal measures relate to migraine disease burden. Methods This study included 61 migraine patients and 57 healthy control subjects (healthy controls: median age = 34.0, IQR = 19.0; migraine patients: median age = 35.0, IQR = 17.5; P = .65). Regional brain volumes were automatically calculated using FreeSurfer version 5.3. Symptoms of allodynia were determined using the Allodynia Symptom Checklist 12 (ASC‐12). Structural co‐variance patterns were interrogated using pairwise correlations and group differences in correlation strength were estimated using Euclidian distance. A stepwise regression was used to investigate the relationship between structural co‐variance patterns with migraine burden. Results Migraine patients had less left hippocampal volume (healthy controls: left hippocampal volume = 4276.8 mm 3 , SD = 425.3 mm 3 , migraine patients: left hippocampal volume = 4089.5 mm 3 , SD = 453.9 mm 3 , P = .02) and less total (right plus left) hippocampal volume (healthy controls: total hippocampal volume= 8690.8 mm 3 , SD = 855.1 mm 3 ; migraine patients: total hippocampal volume = 8341.8 mm 3 , SD = 917.9 mm 3 ; P = .03) compared to healthy controls. Migraineurs had stronger structural covariance between the hippocampi and cortico‐limbic regions in the frontal lobe (inferior opercular gyrus), temporal lobe (planum temporale, amygdala), parietal lobe (angular gyrus, precuneus), and the cerebellar white matter. Results of a stepwise regression showed that hippocampal volumes and the interactions between hippocampal volumes with the volumes of other cortico‐limbic regions associate with migraine‐related allodynia but not with headache frequency or years lived with migraine. Conclusion Migraineurs have less hippocampal volume and stronger hippocampal‐cortico‐limbic connectivity compared to healthy controls. Hippocampal volumes and measures of hippocampal volume connectivity with other cortico‐limbic network regions associate with symptoms of allodynia.