Hampel, Paul J.

INTRODUCTION Mutations in BTK and PLCG2 have been reported to occur in ~80% of CLL patients (pts) who have progression of disease on ibrutinib therapy (Woyach, JCO 2017; Ahn, Blood 2017). These mutations are described as appearing months before actual relapse and thus considered as a potential predictive biomarker for future relapse (Quinquenel, Blood 2019). However, the outcomes of these pts after disease progression are not well described. In this study, we seek to investigate time to next therapy and overall survival (OS) following progression among CLL pts on ibrutinib therapy with and without these resistance mutations. METHODS Between 10/2012 and 6/2019, we identified 34 pts in the Mayo Clinic clinical CLL resource who progressed while receiving ibrutinib therapy and also had testing for BTK and PLCG2 mutation performed as part of routine clinical practice at either NeoGenomics Laboratories or The Ohio State University. OS was calculated from time of ibrutinib progression to last known alive or death date; OS was plotted using Kaplan Meier methods and was compared using the log-rank test between various groups (e.g., mutation positive vs negative; CLL progression vs Richter's). Cumulative incidence of time to next treatment in those who had a treatment after progression was adjusted for the competing risk of death. RESULTS Of 34 pts who progressed while receiving ibrutinib, 26 pts experienced CLL progression and 8 pts had Richter's transformation; baseline characteristics in Table 1A. The presence of a BTK or PLCG2 mutation was found in 20/34 (59%) pts (specific mutations in Table 1B). BTK mutation alone was present in 9 pts, 7 pts had PLCG2 mutation alone, and 4 pts had both mutations. Median time between a positive test and start of next therapy was 4 months (range 1-19 months) and did not vary between BTK vs PLCG2 mutations. Among the 26 pts with CLL progression, 18 (69%) pts had a mutation present: BTK alone (n=8), PLCG2 alone (n=6), both (n=4). Therapy following progression on ibrutinib in these pts was as follows: venetoclax (n=16; 11 pts who continued ibrutinib in combination), idelalisib (n=4), investigational treatments (n=2), continued ibrutinib alone (n=2), dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab; n=1), and unknown (n=1). Twelve of the 26 pts with CLL progression on ibrutinib, including 8 pts with a prior resistance mutation detected, had subsequent progression of disease on the aforementioned next line therapy. Treatment of these patients consisted of the following: restarted ibrutinib in addition to current treatment of venetoclax (n=5), venetoclax (n=2), pembrolizumab (n=2; 1 pt with continued ibrutinib), obinutuzumab with continued ibrutinib (n=1), gemcitabine and vinorelbine with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and no further treatment (n=1). Among the 8 pts with Richter's transformation as the initial progression event on ibrutinib after mutation testing, 1 pt had a BTK mutation and 1 pt had a PLCG2 mutation. Treatments following progression on ibrutinib included multi-agent chemoimmunotherapy (n=3; 2 pts received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP] with continued ibrutinib and 1 pt received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine [ABVD] alone), pembrolizumab (n=3; 1 pt in combination with continued ibrutinib), venetoclax in combination with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and venetoclax and obinutuzumab (n=1). The median time to next treatment (second line of treatment beyond ibrutinib) for the 31 pts who started another therapy following progression on ibrutinib was 16.7 months (95% CI 9.6-NE; Figure 1A) and was not significantly different for pts with or without a resistance mutation (p=0.57). Median OS for all 26 pts with CLL progression was 28.7 month and there was no difference according to presence or absence of a resistance mutation (median 28.7 months vs 18.2 months, p=0.53; Figure 1B). The 8 pts with Richter's transformation had a median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI 2.0-NE). CONCLUSION Approximately 60% of pts tested in this progression cohort had a BTK or PLCG2 mutation at time of or preceding progression on ibrutinib therapy. OS and time to next therapy did not differ statistically between pts with mutated vs non-mutated clones; however, caution should be applied with the conclusions given the limited sample size. Disclosures Ding: DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction: Incidence of secondary malignant neoplasm in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is already established. Genetic predisposition has been considered to be a possible contributory factor for the preponderance of second cancers in this population. In the present study, we examined the frequency, characteristics, and clinical outcomes of secondary malignancies in patients with CLL based on their Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with CLL observed or treated at Ellis Fischel Cancer Center during the period from 2007-2014. We collected demographic data, CLL Rai stage, treatment history, Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel results and the presence of a secondary malignancy (skin cancers, solid tumors and hematologic malignancy excluding CLL transformation).Our aim was to investigate the association between secondary malignancy and chromosomal abnormalities and other risk factors using Chi2test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression models were used to evaluate risk factors of developing secondary malignancy and overall survival. Results: We identified 142 CLL patients who were either observed (n=62) or had a history of treatment (n=80) for CLL. 67% were male and 33% were female. 85% of patients were Caucasians, 10% African Americans, and 5% other. Familial CLL was present in 6% of cases. 51% of patients were non-smokers. 5% of patients had cancers preceding the diagnosis of CLL (non-melanoma skin cancers=3, melanoma=1, Hodgkin's lymphoma=1, Prostate=2). 28% of patients developed secondary malignancies after the diagnosis of CLL; among them non-melanoma skin cancers were the most common (78%), followed by cutaneous melanoma (9.5%) and papillary thyroid cancer (4.7%). Other malignancies included lung (2.3%), kidney (2.3%), prostate (2.3%) and ocular melanoma (2.3%). 12% patients had aggressive non-melanoma recurrent skin cancers that require multiple treatments along-with systemic therapy for progressive CLL. CLL-FISH panel at diagnosis was available in 98 patients. Among these patients,13q deletion was present in 45%. Within the 13q deletion group, secondary malignancy was noted in 50% during a median follow up of 7 years. All cases of papillary thyroid cancers were also present in 13q deletion. In contrast, 11q deletion was detected in 15% and trisomy 12 in 18% of patients with incidence of secondary malignancy 40% and 10%, respectively. No solid malignancy other than skin was identified in the 11q deletion and trisomy 12 groups. 17p deletion was present in 5% of cases and 60% of 17p deletion cases had secondary cancers (skin 80%). Normal FISH panel was present in 17% cases and 20% of normal FISH had secondary malignancy (solid 10%, skin 10%). The median overall survival time is 6 years for the entire cohort (IRQ: 3-9 years). Secondary malignancy was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (HR=0.57, 95% CI:0.33-0.98, p=0.04) compare to patients who did not have secondary malignancy. The risk of secondary malignancy is increased in patients with advanced age (OR=1.05, 95% CI:1.00-1.10, p=0.04) and in those who were treated with alkylating agent for CLL OR=6.62, 95% CI:2.08-21.03, p=0.001. However, there were no significant difference on risk of developing secondary malignancy based on specific chromosomal FISH result, Rai stage, smoking, family history and gender. Conclusion: Secondary malignancies are frequent in patients with detectable chromosome abnormality on FISH panel. However, the increased risk of secondary malignancy does not correlate with specific cytogenetic abnormality. Non melanoma skin cancers are exceedingly common in CLL patients and carries aggressive couse in progressive CLL patients. Larger studies are required to identify subtype of CLL based on integrated mutational and cytogenetic subgroup that are at increased risk of specific secondary malignancies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Among patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the indications for liver biopsy are not known. Additionally, the histopathologic findings of CLL infiltration in the liver along with its clinical implications have not been thoroughly described in the literature. METHODS: We identified all pts with a diagnosis of CLL/SLL from the CLL Clinical Database at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN who underwent a liver biopsy. We also cross referenced the Mayo Clinic Hematopathology Database for all pts who underwent a liver biopsy. The indications for biopsy, description of the pathologic findings in the liver biopsy, CLL therapy and outcomes were abstracted from the clinical records. Retrospective pathology review was performed on cases with CLL involvement in which slides were available for review. RESULTS: Fifty-two CLL/SLL pts who underwent a liver biopsy were identified. The indications for liver biopsy were as follows: liver lesion identified on radiographic imaging in 21 (41%) pts, abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) in 17 (33%) pts, hepatosplenomegaly in 11 (21%) pts, and unknown in 3 (6%) pts. Among all 52 pts, there was concern for Richter transformation at time of biopsy in 7 (13%) pts. Types of biopsy were as follows: percutaneous in 20 (39%) pts, intraoperative in 17 (33%) pts, transjugular in 3 (6%) pts, and unknown in 12 (23%) pts. CLL/SLL involvement was identified in 38/52 (73%) pts undergoing liver biopsy. Among these, the diagnosis of CLL/SLL was made on liver biopsy in 8 pts, and 7 pts had additional findings on their liver biopsy including metastatic colon cancer (n=3), hemochromatosis (n=2), steatohepatitis (n=1), and cirrhosis (n=1). Liver biopsy revealed Richter transformation in 4 (8%) pts (3 pts with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 1 patient with Hodgkin lymphoma), other malignancy in the absence of CLL in 7 (15%) pts (2 metastatic colorectal, 2 metastatic esophageal, 1 hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 metastatic lung, and 1 neuroendocrine), and 1 patient with steatohepatitis. Two (4%) pts had normal findings on liver biopsy. Among the 38 pts with liver involvement by CLL, 27 had slides available for retrospective pathology review. CLL involvement ranged from 2-100% of the liver parenchyma. Seven pts (26%) underwent excisional biopsies or resections and 20 (74%) underwent core biopsies. The portal tracts were the most common region of the liver involved (22/26 pts, 85%). Of these, 8/22 (36%) pts had extension into the lobules or sinusoids, as well. Of the 4 cases without portal involvement, 2 showed extensive involvement such that it effaced the liver parenchyma in the region of involvement. One patient (4%) had a predominantly sinusoidal involvement. One patient (4%) showed small nodular infiltrates that were difficult to localize due to their size. Proliferation centers were noted in only 3 pts (11%). Most pts (29/38; 76%) whose liver biopsy demonstrated involvement by CLL did not receive immediate CLL-specific treatment. Nine of the 38 pts (24%) with CLL involvement on liver biopsy received therapy (Table): purine analog based therapy (n=4), rituximab and steroids (n=2), steroids only (n=1), alkylator and rituximab (n=1), and ibrutinib (n=1). Pts with extensive involvement of the liver by CLL were more likely to receive purine nucleoside analog based therapy compared to pts with portal infiltration by CLL (2/2 pts [100%] vs. 1/6 pts [17%]). The remaining pts were offered no therapy due to incidental finding of CLL in the liver biopsy (n=11), chemotherapy for other cancer (n=5), palliative care (n=3), or unknown (n=10). Pts with Richter's transformation received R-CHOP (n=2) and CHOP (n=1) for DLBCL, and ABVD (n=1) for Hodgkin lymphoma. Pts with other cancers without CLL received appropriate therapy for their underlying malignancy. CONCLUSION: Abnormal LFTs and radiographic abnormalities were the most common indications for a biopsy in this large cohort of CLL pts. Infiltration of the portal tracts by CLL/SLL was the most common histopathological finding. Proliferation centers were not commonly seen, which may make the diagnosis challenging for the pathologist if there is not a prior history of CLL/SLL. The mere presence of CLL/SLL infiltration did not mandate treatment and many pts were able to continue observation. Table Table. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Shanafelt:GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of liver dysfunction in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unknown; knowledge of which may provide important context for emerging therapeutic options with possible hepatotoxicity. The impact of liver dysfunction on outcomes of CLL patients is not well described. METHODS: Between 09/1993 and 04/2016, previously untreated CLL patients seen in the Division of Hematology at Mayo Clinic at diagnosis (<12 months) and who had baseline assessment of at least one of the following liver function tests (LFTs): alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or total bilirubin were included in this analysis. Baseline lab values were defined as the closest value to CLL diagnosis for each lab within 12 months prior to diagnosis up through 6 months after CLL diagnosis. Patients with at least one abnormal LFT (defined as greater than 1.5 x the upper limit of normal) were classified as having liver dysfunction at diagnosis. Analysis for factors related to baseline liver function was performed using age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate time to first treatment (TTFT) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 2336 previously untreated CLL patients who met the inclusion criteria, 123 (5%) patients had at least one abnormal LFT value at time of diagnosis. Thirty five patients had abnormal AST (median value 106 U/L, range 72-745 U/L, reference range 8-48 U/L), 25 patients had abnormal ALT (median 112 U/L, range 82-313 U/L, reference 7-55 U/L), and 54 patients had abnormal total bilirubin (median 2.10 mg/dL, range 1.8-26.5 mg/dL, reference range ≤ 1.2 mg/dL). Forty five patients had abnormal alkaline phosphatase; 35 patients in the year 2003 or later (median 198 U/L, range 172-2269 U/L, reference range 45-115 U/L) and 10 patients in 2002 or earlier (median 471.5 U/L, range 394-706 U/L, reference range 98-260 U/L). Abnormal LFTs were more common among those with advanced Rai stage disease (Rai 0-II=4.7% vs. Rai III-IV=13.4%; p<0.001) and among patients with lower hemoglobin (median 13.1 g/dL vs. 13.9 g/dL; p<0.001) at diagnosis. No difference in the rate of abnormal LFTs was observed based on cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH or CD38, CD49d, ZAP-70 or IGHV gene mutation status. There was no significant difference in prior alcohol abuse history between patients with liver dysfunction at diagnosis (6%) and those without (5%) (p=0.63). Similarly, there was no significant difference in body mass index between groups (median 27.8 vs. 27.8; p=0.12). After 12 years of follow-up, an estimated 69% of the cases with abnormal LFTs were treated. The most common type of treatments included anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy only, followed by purine nucleoside based chemoimmunotherapy, and an alkylating agent with a monoclonal antibody. The median time to treatment was 4.3 years for cases with abnormal LFTs compared to 6.3 years for cases without abnormal LFTs (p=0.02). However, after adjusting for age, sex and Rai stage, there was no difference in TTFT among patients with abnormal LFTs at baseline compared to those with normal LFTs (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.6); p=0.23). The median survival of CLL patients with abnormal LFTs at diagnosis was significantly shorter than those with normal LFTs (8.6 vs. 11.6 years, p<0.001, Figure 1). After adjusting for age, sex and Rai stage, multivariable cox regression analysis showed that abnormal LFTs retained independent prognostic significance for OS with a HR of 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.8; p=0.012). CONCLUSION: At the time of CLL diagnosis, ~1 out of every 20 patients with previously untreated CLL has abnormal LFTs. These data provide context to the recent reports of hepatotoxicity with the use of signal inhibitors in untreated CLL. Although the presence of liver dysfunction at diagnosis does not seem to predict a shorter TTFT, the OS of these patients is significantly shorter compared to patients who have normal LFTs. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-Sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shanafelt:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background:We have previously reported that ∼50% of CLL patients (pts) experience rapid flare of disease when they discontinue ibrutinib therapy due to progression of disease (CLL or Richter's transformation [RT]) (Hampel et al, JCO suppl, 2018). This lead to the clinical practice of overlapping venetoclax with ibrutinib for combination therapy in this setting to prevent ibrutinib withdrawal.Aims:To evaluate the role of continuing ibrutinib beyond the start of salvage venetoclax in pts who have progression of disease on ibrutinib monotherapy, both in preventing ibrutinib withdrawal associated with ibrutinib discontinuation and in disease response.Methods:We identified all CLL pts at Mayo Clinic (3/2017–11/2018) who had disease progression on ibrutinib therapy, where venetoclax was added as subsequent treatment while ibrutinib was continued. CLL‐specific characteristics, treatment timeline and toxicities, and disease course following combination therapy were ascertained. All pts started venetoclax according to the weekly ramp‐up per the package instructions.Results:Eighteen pts treated with the addition of venetoclax to ibrutinib therapy were identified; indications were CLL progression (n = 13) and RT (n = 5). BTK or PLCG2 mutations were present in 8/13 pts. Median duration of follow‐up was 9.6 months after the start of combination therapy.The target venetoclax dose was reached by 5 weeks in 13 pts; reasons for delaying or stopping dose escalation included diarrhea (n = 2), sepsis (n = 2), and neutropenia (n = 1). No patient experienced a disease flare during venetoclax ramp‐up.The median duration of combination ibrutinib and venetoclax therapy was 3 months (range, 0–14 months). Of 18 pts who started combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax, ibrutinib was discontinued in 10 pts. Reasons included hematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 2), planned stop after adequate disease control (n = 4), financial reasons (n = 1), toxicity (neutropenia n = 1, immune thrombocytopenia/bleeding risk n = 1), and death (n = 1). Only 1 patient experienced ibrutinib withdrawal, which occurred following planned discontinuation after clinical complete response (CR) with a 41 day overlap and toleration of venetoclax 400 mg daily; management with re‐initiation of ibrutinib was effective in regaining disease control. Of 9 pts who stopped ibrutinib, 4 pts had a slow taper over 2–8 weeks, and 2 pts also received corticosteroids at the time of ibrutinib discontinuation.Among the other 8 pts who did not discontinue ibrutinib, 6 pts remain on the combination with venetoclax (median duration 6.5 months, range 3–14 months), and 2 pts continued on ibrutinib following venetoclax discontinuation due to disease progression (both pts received further combination of ibrutinib with multi‐agent chemotherapy).The overall response rate (ORR) to combination therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax was 81% (CR/clinical CR n = 9, partial response n = 4, stable disease n = 1, and primary refractory disease n = 2). The duration of combination therapy was <4 weeks in 2 pts, precluding response assessment. The estimated 12‐month event‐free survival was 54% (95% CI 33–87%), and the estimated 12‐month overall survival from start of combination therapy was 79% (95% CI 60–100%); see Figure 1.Summary/Conclusion:Among CLL pts who develop progression of disease on ibrutinib monotherapy, continued ibrutinib therapy with addition of venetoclax was feasible, ameliorated ibrutinib withdrawal, and was associated with high ORR.image

SummaryThe effects of ibrutinib on the natural history of autoimmune cytopenias (AIC) among chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients treated in routine clinical practice require further investigation. Using the Mayo Clinical CLL Database, 193 CLL patients treated with ibrutinib between November 2013 and January 2017 outside the context of a clinical trial were identified; complete review of their medical records was performed for details of past history of AIC and treatment‐emergent AIC. We identified 29/193 (15%) patients with history of AIC prior to ibrutinib start. Of 12 patients requiring AIC therapy at ibrutinib start, 8 (67%) were able to discontinue or de‐escalate AIC treatment, and no patient had worsening of their AIC after initiating ibrutinib. Eleven (6%) patients developed treatment‐emergent AIC after a median of 59 (range, 6–319) days following the initiation of ibrutinib, 7 of whom (64%) were able to continue ibrutinib. Overall and event‐free survival from time of ibrutinib start were not significantly different between patients with history of AIC and those with no history of AIC. Treatment‐emergent AIC were seen exclusively in patients with unmutated IGHV and were associated with a shorter EFS. These results suggest a low rate of treatment‐emergent AIC and improvement in patients with existing AIC.

AbstractThe prevalence of liver dysfunction and its association with outcomes in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unknown. Newly diagnosed (<12 months) previously untreated CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN between 9/1993 and 4/2016 who had baseline assessment of at least one liver function test (LFT) were included in this analysis. The prevalence of liver dysfunction at baseline, proportion of patients who acquired LFT abnormalities, time to first therapy (TTFT) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. An abnormal LFT was present in 82/2336 (3.5%) patients at diagnosis and was associated with advanced Rai stage (Rai III–IV) (21% vs. 6%; P < .001), lower hemoglobin (13.1 g/dL vs. 13.9 g/dL; P < .001), and lower platelet count (187 × 109/L vs. 200 × 109/L; P = .03). Additionally, 236 patients with normal LFTs at diagnosis developed acquired liver dysfunction during follow‐up. Patients with abnormal LFTs at diagnosis had a shorter OS compared to those with normal LFTs (HR 1.80 95% CI 1.13‐2.87; P = .014, adjusted for age, sex, Rai stage, and treatment), although TTFT was not different. Of 52 patients who underwent a liver biopsy, CLL was present in liver tissue in 39/52 (73%) patients, with the portal tracts the most common region involved. Histopathology findings of liver involvement by CLL had limited correlation with choice of CLL therapy. In conclusion, approximately 1 of 25 newly diagnosed CLL patients has abnormal LFTs at diagnosis. Although the TTFT was not different among patients with abnormal LFTs, these patients have a shorter OS compared to those with normal LFTs.