Back to Authors

Amin, Mahul B.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-3634

Mayo Clinic

University of Tennessee Health Science Center

Citations 13

American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for inclusion of risk models for individualized prognosis in the practice of precision medicine
Kattan, Michael W. , Hess, Kenneth R. , Amin, Mahul B. , Lü, Ying , Moons, Karl G.M., Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. , Gimotty, Phyllis A. , Guinney, Justin , Halabi, Susan , Lazar, Alexander J. , Mahar, Alyson , Weiser, Martin R. , Compton, Carolyn C. , Core, members of the AJCC Precision Medicine, Compton, Carolyn, Patel, Tushar P , Sargent, Daniel J. , Core, members of the AJCC Precision Medicine, Mahar, Alyson L , Lazar, Alexander J , Halabi, Susan , Lu, Ying , Kattan, Michael W

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | January 19, 2016 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 370-374

10.3322/caac.21339 Get It

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has increasingly recognized the need for more personalized probabilistic predictions than those delivered by ordinal staging systems, particularly through the use of accurate risk models or calculators. However, judging the quality and acceptability of a risk model is complex. The AJCC Precision Medicine Core conducted a 2‐day meeting to discuss characteristics necessary for a quality risk model in cancer patients. More specifically, the committee established inclusion and exclusion criteria necessary for a risk model to potentially be endorsed by the AJCC. This committee reviewed and discussed relevant literature before creating a checklist unique to this need of AJCC risk model endorsement. The committee identified 13 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria for AJCC risk model endorsement in cancer. The emphasis centered on performance metrics, implementation clarity, and clinical relevance. The facilitation of personalized probabilistic predictions for cancer patients holds tremendous promise, and these criteria will hopefully greatly accelerate this process. Moreover, these criteria might be useful for a general audience when trying to judge the potential applicability of a published risk model in any clinical domain. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:370–374. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Duration of Androgen Suppression Before Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Randomized Clinical Trial 9910
Pisansky, Thomas M. , Hunt, Daniel , Gomella, Leonard G. , Amin, Mahul B. , Balogh, Alexander G., Chinn, Daniel M., Seider, Michael J. , Duclos, Marie , Bauman, Glenn , Gore, Elizabeth , Rotman, Marvin, Lukka, Himanshu, Shipley, William U. , Dignam, James J., Rosenthal, Seth A. , Bauman, Glenn S, Gore, Elizabeth M, Rotman, Marvin Z, Lukka, Himanshu R, Sandler, Howard M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 23, 2014 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 332-339

10.1200/jco.2014.58.0662 Get It

PurposeTo determine whether prolonged androgen suppression (AS) duration before radiotherapy improves survival and disease control in prostate cancer.Patients and MethodsOne thousand five hundred seventy-nine men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of AS followed by radiotherapy with an additional 8 weeks of concurrent AS (16 weeks total) or to 28 weeks of AS followed by radiotherapy with an additional 8 weeks of AS (36 weeks total). The trial sought primarily to detect a 33% reduction in the hazard of prostate cancer death in the 28-week assignment. Time-to-event end points are reported for up to 10 years of follow-up.ResultsThere were no between-group differences in baseline characteristics of 1,489 eligible patients with follow-up. For the 8- and 28-week assignments, 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 95% (95% CI, 93.3% to 97.0%) and 96% (95% CI, 94.6% to 98.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; P = .45), respectively, and 10-year overall survival rates were 66% (95% CI, 62.0% to 69.9%) and 67% (95% CI, 63.0% to 70.8%; HR, 0.95; P = .62), respectively. For the 8- and 28-week assignments, 10-year cumulative incidences of locoregional progression were 6% (95% CI, 4.3% to 8.0%) and 4% (95% CI, 2.5% to 5.7%; HR, 0.65; P = .07), respectively; 10-year distant metastasis cumulative incidences were 6% (95% CI, 4.0% to 7.7%) and 6% (95% CI, 4.0% to 7.6%; HR, 1.07; P = .80), respectively; and 10-year prostate-specific antigen–based recurrence cumulative incidences were 27% (95% CI, 23.1% to 29.8%) and 27% (95% CI, 23.4% to 30.3%; HR, 0.97; P = .77), respectively.ConclusionExtending AS duration from 8 weeks to 28 weeks before radiotherapy did not improve outcomes. A lower than expected prostate cancer death rate reduced ability to detect a between-group difference in disease-specific survival. The schedule of 8 weeks of AS before radiotherapy plus 8 weeks of AS during radiotherapy remains a standard of care in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Renal Oncocytoma: A Reappraisal of Morphologic Features With Clinicopathologic Findings in 80 Cases
Amin, Mahul B. , Crotty, Thomas B., Tickoo, Satish K. , Farrow, George M.

Journal of Urology | January 17, 2006 | Volume: 161 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1735-1736

10.1016/s0022-5347(05)69050-7 Get It