Mesa, Ruben A.

Abstract Abstract 1753 Background: Ruxolitinib (INC424), a potent and selective oral JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved disease-related symptoms, role functioning, and quality of life (QoL) in 2 phase 3 studies in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) (the COMFORT studies). These studies compared ruxolitinib with either placebo or best available therapy (BAT). This analysis compares the efficacy outcomes between the placebo arm from COMFORT-I and the BAT arm from COMFORT-II. Methods: COMFORT-I is a randomized (1:1), double-blind, multicenter study comparing ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg twice daily (bid) with placebo, and COMFORT-II is a randomized (2:1), open-label, multicenter study comparing ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg bid with BAT (investigator-selected therapy, including no treatment). Both studies met their primary end points with statistical significance (ruxolitinib vs control): the percentage of patients achieving ≥35% reduction in spleen volume at week 24 (COMFORT-I, P <.0001) and week 48 (COMFORT-II, P <.0001). QoL was measured using patient responses with the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Questionnaire–Core 30 (QLQ-C30) as an exploratory end point in both studies. Results: In the COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II studies, 154 patients received placebo (ruxolitinib, n=155) and 73 patients received BAT (ruxolitinib, n=146), respectively, and were included in the primary efficacy analyses. The demographic and baseline characteristics were similar between the control arms of the 2 studies, including spleen size below the costal margin (mean [standard deviation, SD] 16.4 [6.27] cm and 15.8 [6.71] cm in placebo and BAT, respectively). Only 1 patient (0.7%) who received placebo and no patients who received BAT had a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at week 24. The median spleen volume increased from baseline at week 24 in both the placebo and BAT groups and was numerically similar (placebo, 8.5% [range, −46.4% to 48.8%]; BAT, 5.1% [range, −33.3% to 29.7%]). In contrast, patients who received ruxolitinib had median reductions in spleen volume from baseline at week 24 of −33.0% (COMFORT-I) and −27.5% (COMFORT-II). The QLQ-C30 provides a measurement of change in QoL and MF-related symptoms, including fatigue, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, and appetite loss. At 24 weeks, neither the placebo nor BAT arms had clinically meaningful changes from baseline (10 points [Osoba et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998]) in any of the QoL (decreases indicate worsening) or symptom scores (increases indicate worsening) (Table). Although differences existed between the placebo and BAT arms, the SDs are large, thus complicating comparisons between the 2 groups. Conclusions: In the COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated significantly greater reductions in spleen size compared with placebo or BAT. This post hoc analysis of the 2 studies shows that patients who received BAT in the COMFORT-II study had similar symptom and QoL responses and numerically similar increases in spleen size as those who received placebo in the COMFORT-I study. No clinically meaningful improvements in QoL or symptoms were seen on either the placebo or BAT arms. These new data strongly suggest that current therapies for MF provide little improvement in spleen size, symptoms, or QoL as compared with placebo. Disclosures: Mesa: Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; SBio: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Cervantes:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Waltzman:Novartis: Employment. Mendelson:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martin:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Sun:Incyte: Employment. Sandor:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Harrison:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; S*Bio: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria.

Abstract Background: Patients with the myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) polycythemia vera (PV) require treatment to manage blood cell counts and reduce the risks of cardiovascular/thromboembolic events. Hydroxyurea (HU) is a common cytoreductive treatment; however, some patients discontinue HU treatment because of resistance, intolerance, or frequently a combination of both limitations. Patients may also continue to receive HU despite diminishing or nonexistent clinical benefit, sometimes in combination with persistent need for phlebotomy procedures. This analysis of MPN Landmark survey data examined patient-reported quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with PV who were naive to HU (HU-N), were continuing HU (HU-C), or had discontinued HU (HU-D). Methods: Patients with an MPN under active management in the US were eligible to complete an online survey (fielded May - July 2014). This is a report of responses given by patients with PV to questions about symptom burden, QoL, activities of daily living (ADL), and work/productivity. PV-related effects on patients feeling depressed/discouraged, patients feeling anxious/worried, or interference with ADLs were considered to be at high levels if the patient-reported score was ≥4 on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal). Symptom severity was rated on a scale of 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable). Results: The survey respondents included 380 patients with PV (HU-N, n=159; HU-C, n=181; HU-D, n=40). Mean age was 62.2 years, 65.1 years, and 64.2 years in the HU-N, HU-C, and HU-D groups, respectively. Mean duration of PV was 8.3 years, 10.3 years, and 13.9 years in the HU-N, HU-C, and HU-D groups, respectively. Patients who had not received HU were currently or previously treated with phlebotomy (87.4%), interferon (11.3%), or anagrelide (9.4%); 66.0% of HU-N patients were classified as high-risk based on information provided by the patients in the survey (ie, age 60 or older or history of thrombosis). Among HU-C and HU-D patients, treatment history included phlebotomy (89.5% and 100%, respectively), interferon (7.2% and 52.5%), or anagrelide (15.5% and 35.0%); 79.6% and 82.5%, respectively, were classified as high-risk. Ruxolitinib was not FDA-approved for PV at the time of this survey. Patients reported high levels of feeling anxious/worried and depressed/discouraged as a result of their PV across all subgroups: HU-N, 27.7% and 15.1%, respectively; HU-C, 22.7% and 15.5%; HU-D, 32.5% and 22.5%. Many patients also experienced a high level of PV-related interference with ADLs, which was more common in the HU-D group (30.0%) than the HU-N (11.3%) or HU-C (18.2%) groups. HU-D patients were more likely to have reported ever reducing their work hours (54.2% of the patients who responded) compared with the HU-N (33.3%) and HU-C groups (36.8%). Among all patients, HU-D patients reported a mean of 8.3 doctor visits in the past 12 months, compared with 5.6 in the HU-N group and 6.6 in the HU-C group. Most patients had experienced PV-related symptoms in the past 12 months (Table 1), particularly fatigue, itching, and day/night sweats; fatigue was ranked first as the symptom that patients would most like to resolve. Conclusion: Patients with PV in a large retrospective real-world survey across the US are found to experience burdensome PV-related symptoms and reduced QoL. The findings from this study also show that standard treatments do not address these aspects of PV in many patients, and patients who have discontinued HU may experience an even greater disease burden, possibly because of a lack of effective and/or safe alternative treatment options. Importantly, while 66.0% of the patients in the HU-N group were classified as high-risk, the majority of the high-risk patients in the HU-N group (81.0%) were not treated with cytoreductive agents, suggesting a potential knowledge deficit regarding recommendations for PV management. Collectively, these results illustrate the adverse impact of PV-related symptom burden on patient QoL and reinforce the importance of unmet control of PV-related symptoms in choosing PV therapy. Disclosures Mesa: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Miller:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Promedior: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Kalobios: Research Funding. Thyne:Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Paranagama:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parasuraman:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fazal:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Naim:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mangan:Incyte Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Background: JAK2 inhibition improves splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has been shown to improve both bone marrow fibrosis and survival in MF patients (Cervantes et al., 2013; Verstovsek et al., 2013). Current prognostic models such as DIPSS plus (Gangat et al., 2011) predict survival in MF based on clinical, laboratory, and cytogenetic information, but predate the era of JAK2 inhibitor use in MF. As such, their value in predicting clinical response or survival during treatment with JAK2 inhibitors remains unknown. We hypothesized that features not considered by DIPSS plus, including bone marrow fibrosis and splenomegaly, have independent effects on therapy response. We therefore conducted a retrospective analysis to create a new model to risk stratify patients with respect to their likelihood of achieving a > 50% reduction in splenic size by palpation with JAK2-inhibitor therapy. Methods: We studied a cohort of 418 patients with bone marrow biopsy-proven MF who were treated with ruxolitinib or one of four other JAK2 inhibitors. An initial cohort of 203 patients seen at University of Michigan, Stanford University, and Mayo Clinic in Scottsdale, AZ was used identify factors that would predict a clinical response to therapy. Response to therapy was evaluated at an early time point (3-4 mos) in 167 patients and at a late time point (5-12 mos) in 138 patients, with 127 patients overlapping between the two. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression model, with Bayesian variable selection, for predicting the probability of early or late splenic response to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. The model was developed with this initial group of 203 patients. The model was then validated with a cohort of 215 patients from the PERSIST1 trial (data supplied by CTI Biopharma). Results: Conclusion: We identified several factors that play a role in predicting whether or not patients with MF are likely to respond to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. The interaction between spleen size and WBC at the time of therapy initiation plays the strongest role in predicting which patients will have an early response to therapy. Additionally, our model suggests that patients who do not have a response to JAK2 inhibitor therapy by about 4 months of treatment are unlikely to develop a later response. Our model is able to discriminate between those likely to benefit after several months of therapy and those for whom a change in therapy should be considered early in their treatment course. Figure 1 The following characteristics were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model based on the data collected from our 418-patient cohort. Spleen size and white blood cell count at the time of therapy initiation were the strongest predictors of early response to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Achievement of an early response was used to further enhance the model for the late time point (third column) and was the strongest predictor of late response. Interaction terms looked at the interdependence of variables on splenic response. Log odds ratios are provided with 95% credible intervals in parentheses. Figure 1. The following characteristics were selected for inclusion in the prognostic model based on the data collected from our 418-patient cohort. Spleen size and white blood cell count at the time of therapy initiation were the strongest predictors of early response to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Achievement of an early response was used to further enhance the model for the late time point (third column) and was the strongest predictor of late response. Interaction terms looked at the interdependence of variables on splenic response. Log odds ratios are provided with 95% credible intervals in parentheses. Figure 2 An example of the predicted response for a hypothetical patient. The curves show the interaction of a high initial WBC (red) or a low initial WBC (green) with baseline spleen size (depicted along the X-axis) in predicting whether or not the patient will have a late response to therapy (depicted along the Y-axis). The solid lines show the probability that the patient will respond at the later time point if they had an early response. The dashed lines show the probably of a late response if the patient had not achieved a response by the early time point. Overall, a patient with a higher initial WBC and a larger baseline spleen size is less likely to respond to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Additionally, the curves clearly separate to show that, for a given baseline WBC and spleen size, a patient who has an early response to therapy is much more likely to have a late response to therapy, whereas a patient who fails to respond early in their treatment course is much less likely to respond with further treatment. Figure 2. An example of the predicted response for a hypothetical patient. The curves show the interaction of a high initial WBC (red) or a low initial WBC (green) with baseline spleen size (depicted along the X-axis) in predicting whether or not the patient will have a late response to therapy (depicted along the Y-axis). The solid lines show the probability that the patient will respond at the later time point if they had an early response. The dashed lines show the probably of a late response if the patient had not achieved a response by the early time point. Overall, a patient with a higher initial WBC and a larger baseline spleen size is less likely to respond to JAK2 inhibitor therapy. Additionally, the curves clearly separate to show that, for a given baseline WBC and spleen size, a patient who has an early response to therapy is much more likely to have a late response to therapy, whereas a patient who fails to respond early in their treatment course is much less likely to respond with further treatment. Disclosures Boonstra: CTI Biopharma: Research Funding. Gowin:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Talpaz:Ariad: Other: Expense reimbursement, travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Other: Travel expense reimbursement, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding.

Abstract Background MF, PV, and ET are neoplasms characterized by activation of JAK2 signaling, and the majority of cases are associated with the gain of function JAK2 V617F mutation. Given that wild-type JAK2 plays a pivotal role in multiple stages of hematopoiesis it is desirable to treat JAK2V617F-positive cases by selectively inhibiting JAK2 V617F while minimizing inhibition of wild-type JAK2 in order not to impede normal marrow function. LY2784544 is a selective inhibitor of JAK2 which demonstrates dose dependent selectivity for JAK2 V617F/STAT5 signaling. LY2784544 entered clinical testing in a Phase I trial in MF, PV, and ET patients (I3X-MC-JHTA, NCT01134120). We have previously reported early interim analysis from this study and provide here an update following completion of study enrollment. Methods The study’s primary objectives were to determine the safety and tolerability of LY2784544 and define a recommended oral daily dose for further study in patients with JAK2 V617F-positive MF, ET, or PV. Secondary objectives included determination of pharmacokinetics and evaluation of response using the IWG-MRT response criteria (2006), European Leukemia Net response criteria for PV and ET (EULN 2009), and symptom burden using the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) (Scherber et. al. Blood 2011). Study design included a standard 3+3 dose-escalation to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and was amended to allow cohort expansions at multiple doses demonstrating potential clinical merit. Results Patients Prior to closing to enrollment, 47 patients were consented; 9 did not meet eligibility screening. The 38 treated patients included 31 MF (22 pMF, 6 post-PV MF and 3 post-ET MF), 6 PVs, and 1 ET patient(s), and 86% had received prior systemic therapy for their MPN. Dosing and tolerability of LY2784544: Systemic exposures were approximately dose proportional across the tested range from 30 to 300 mg. Daily doses of 200 mg or greater were associated with CTCAE Grade 3 increases in serum creatinine. In general, increases in serum creatinine occurred within the first 2 weeks of either starting treatment or after an increase in study drug dose. With the available data, the elevations in serum creatinine appear to be fully reversible after dose reduction or drug holiday in the majority of patients. The maximum tolerated daily dose of LY2784544 when given on a continuous daily basis was determined to be 120 mg per day. Serious AEs, across all grades and doses, included increased creatinine/acute renal insufficiency (4 grade 3, 5 grade 2, 1 grade 1), hyperuricemia (2 grade 4, 1 grade 1), hyperkalemia (1 grade 1), and anemia (1 grade 3). This study allowed intrapatient dose escalation, and 34 patients received 120 mg during their study participation. There were 4 patients dosed at 120 mg with SAEs but all were unrelated to study drug treatment (anemia, influenza, enterococcal bacteremia, hematuria and pneumonia). At 120 mg, the most frequently reported drug-related AEs across all grades were diarrhea (44%), nausea (29%), increased creatinine (21%), and anemia, vomiting, fatigue (9% each). Of these related AEs at 120 mg, there was 1 Grade 3 anemia, 3 Grade 3 increased creatinine, and 2 Grade 3 fatigue. There were no Grade 4 AEs. Efficacy Among a cohort of 10 MF patients who only received 120 mg, 3 achieved a clinical improvement. Analyzing across dose levels, a palpable spleen length reduction of ≥50% was seen in 15 of 27 evaluable patients (56%) at any time. The median duration of these responses was 18.3 weeks (range from 0.7 to 148.1 weeks). At 12 weeks, 56% of patients (15/27) reported a ≥50% improvement in Total Symptom Score on the MPN-SAF. Of the 6 PV patients, 3 achieved a clinicohematologic PR. Findings from a central pathology review of serial bone marrow samples will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions A recommended phase II dose for daily dosing of LY2784544 was identified as 120 mg. This dose has been well tolerated and associated with clinical improvements, supporting ongoing Phase II testing of LY2784544 in MPNs. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Eli Lilly and Co: Research Funding. Mesa:Eli Lilly and Co: Research Funding; Genetech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Salama:Eli Lilly and Co: Research Funding. Giles:Eli Lilly and Co: Employment. Pitou:Eli Lilly and Co: Employment. Hayden Zimmermann:Eli Lilly and Co: Employment. Price:Eli Lilly and Co: Employment. Walgreen:Eli Lilly and Co: Employment. Prchal:Eli Lilly and Co: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Fedratinib (SAR302503) is a JAK2-selective inhibitor that has provided clinically meaningful reductions in MF-associated splenomegaly and symptoms in Phase I and II studies (J Clin Oncol 2011;29:789. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the Phase III JAKARTA study of fedratinib versus placebo in patients with MF (NCT01437787). Methods In this international double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study, patients aged ≥18 years with IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, platelet count ≥50 × 109/L, and splenomegaly were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo or fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg, orally, once daily, in consecutive 4-week cycles. Patients who received placebo were eligible to cross-over to fedratinib (randomized 1:1 to 400 mg or 500 mg) following 6 cycles of treatment, or prior to Cycle 6 if the patient had disease progression. The primary endpoint was spleen response rate (RR) (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline measured by MRI or CT at Week 24, and confirmed 4 weeks later). Secondary endpoints included symptom RR (≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24, measured through a daily electronic eDiary using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form [Cancer 2011;117:4869. Blood 2011;118:401]), and safety of fedratinib. Results A total of 289 patients were randomized: median age 65 years; 59% male; 63% primary MF; 48% high-risk MF; 67% JAK2V617F positive; 16% platelet count <100 × 109/L; median baseline spleen volume 2568 mL (range 316–8244); median baseline total symptom score 14.7 (0–57). Median (range) exposures for placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups were 24 (2–34), 30 (1–55) and 28 (1–60) weeks, respectively. Spleen RRs at Week 24 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 47%; 500 mg 49%), and confirmed at Week 28 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 36%; 500 mg 40%), were significantly (p<0.0001) higher in both fedratinib groups compared with placebo (Table). Nineteen patients had a spleen response at Week 24 not confirmed 4 weeks later (spleen reduction 25–35% [n=10]; image not available/evaluable [n=8]; image taken outside time window [n=1]). Spleen RRs by baseline platelet level are shown in the table. Patients treated with fedratinib had significantly (p<0.0001) greater improvements in MF symptoms compared with placebo (Table). The most common all grade non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was diarrhea (16%, 66% and 56% of patients in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Grade 3/4 diarrhea was reported in 5% of patients in both the 400 mg and 500 mg dose groups. The most common hematologic TEAE was anemia (any grade 91%, 99% and 98%; Grade 3/4 25%, 43% and 60% in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Rates of Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 9% (placebo), 17% (400 mg), and 27% (500 mg). Incidences of Grade 3/4 liver function tests (placebo/400 mg/500 mg) were: bilirubin, 2%/2%/1%; ALT, 0%/3%/3%; and AST, 1%/2%/2%. Overall treatment discontinuation rates up to 24 weeks of treatment were 25% (placebo), 22% (400 mg) and 32% (500 mg). Twenty-five patients died during the study (10, 5 and 10 in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively); the most common causes of death: disease progression (placebo [n=5]; 400 mg [n=3]; 500 mg [n=4]) and adverse events (placebo [n=4]; 400 mg [n=1]; 500 mg [n=4]). Conclusions In this Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study of 289 MF patients, treatment with fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg once-daily demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in splenic volume and MF-associated symptom burden versus placebo. Fedratinib had an acceptable safety profile, with the adverse events reported consistent with those observed in previous studies. This study was sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Pardanani: Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar and JW Pharma: Clinical trial support Other. Harrison:Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, Celgene, SBio, Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, SBio, Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes:Incyte, Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte, Sanofi: Research Funding. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis and Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Incyte, Genentech, Lilly, MS Pharma, Gilead: Research Funding. Jourdan:Sanofi: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Drummond:Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Honoraria; TargeGen, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Consultancy. Passamonti:Novartis, Celgene, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche: Honoraria. Neumann:Sanofi: Employment. Gao:Sanofi: Employment.

Abstract Background: Treatment options for elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, despite various novel therapies, are still limited. Relapse is common after chemotherapy, and progression on lower intensity treatment with hypomethylating agents is inevitable in all patients even after initial response. Lysine deacetylase inhibitors (KDIs or HDAC inhibitors) have shown limited single-agent clinical activity in AML. Therefore, to develop potential novel treatment options for AML, we aimed to identify synergistic KDI-based drug combinations to build upon the single-agent activity and clinical-availability of KDIs. We performed RNA-interference (RNAi) drug modifier screens of the kinome and phosphatome with the KDI vorinostat in AML cells in order to identify targets to inhibit in combination with KDIs. Based on pathway analysis of RNAi screen results that highlighted an unexpected role for p38/JNK/SAPK signaling in vorinostat activity in AML, we explored the putative p38 substrate-selective MK2 inhibitor CMPD1 combined with KDIs, and demonstrated potent synergistic activity in AML regardless of molecular, cytogenetic or lineage background. As published evidence suggests that CMPD1 can also act as a microtubule-destabilizing/targeting agent (MTA), and that MK2 can associate with microtubules and cytoskeleton-associated proteins, we examined several MTAs in combination with KDIs in AML, including vinca alkaloid microtubule-destabilizing agents vinblastine/vincristine, and taxol as a microtubule-stabilizing agent. Results: Vinblastine and vincristine dose-dependently synergized with vorinostat similarly to CMPD1 in all AML cell lines tested, with vinblastine being more potently synergistic than vincristine. Taxol only potentiated KDI activity in approximately half of AML cell lines. Importantly, preliminary data suggest preferential, dose-dependent synergy of KDIs and vinca alkaloid MTAs in the CD34+ progenitor AML cell fraction, as compared to the paired CD34-depleted fraction from the same primary AML sample in ex vivo culture. This preferential CD34+ activity was similar to that observed with CMPD1 combined with KDIs in ex vivo models. Consistent with synergistic activity of MTAs and KDIs, multiple RNAi screen hits also converged on microtubule dynamics. Subsequently, we identified the LKB1 signaling network, a critical integrator of cellular stress metabolism and hematopoietic stem cell quiescence/homeostasis, as a determinant of vorinostat activity in AML. Of 14 known kinases directly regulated by LKB1, 4 belong to microtubule-associated protein (MAP) or microtubule-affinity regulating kinases (MARK) families (e.g. screen hit MARK4). RNAi screen hits also converged on regulation of microtubule proteins, or directly on microtubule proteins themselves, (e.g. atypical MAPK4 and MAPK6 which phosphorylate microtubule-associated protein 2, or TAOK2 which has a kinase-independent role in stabilizing microtubules). Additionally, several RNAi hits such as PACSIN1 and -2, and MAST2 and -4 link the actin cytoskeleton to microtubule dynamics. Discussion: Herein we show that several types of clinically-used MTAs (i.e. vinca alkaloids or taxanes) potently synergize with KDIs in AML, and that this synergy can occur preferentially in primary CD34+ cells, as compared to the CD34-negative AML compartment. Although at high in vitro doses microtubule-destabilizing agents such as vinca alkaloids, and microtubule-stabilizing agents such as taxanes, can both induce apoptosis via mitotic perturbation, many publications show that low therapeutic MTA doses can induce apoptosis in tumor cells in vivo independent of mitosis. Therefore, we hypothesize that clinically-available KDIs (i.e. vorinostat, panobinostat) and MTAs (i.e. vinca alkaloids or taxanes) represent novel combinations with the potential to target the AML progenitor pool even in a non-proliferate state, and thus have the potential to eradicate minimal residual disease. Disclosures Mesa: Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Galena: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Tibes:Italfarmaco S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract Abstract 1759 Background: Pomalidomide is a second generation IMiDsÒ immunomodulatory drug that has been shown to be active in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF)-associated anemia (J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4563; Leukemia 2011;25: 301). In the current sponsor-independent analysis, we report long-term follow up data on patients from the Mayo Clinic who had participated in three consecutive clinical trials using single agent pomalidomide for MF. Methods: From May 2007 to January 2010, 94 patients with MF (including primary and post-polycythemia/essential thrombocythemia) were enrolled in three consecutive phase I and II clinical trials involving pomalidomide with or without prednisone. Eight two patients who received only single agent pomalidomide constitute the study population for the current study. Follow up information was updated in July, 2011. Results: Among the 82 study patients, 19 were included in a phase I dose escalation study (2.5-3.5 mg/day), 58 in a phase II low-dose single agent pomalidomide study (0.5 mg/day), and 5 in a phase II randomized study (2 mg/day). Median age was 67 years and 63 (77 %) patients were red blood cell transfusion dependent at study entry. Forty-five (55%), 24 (29%), 7 (9%), and 2 (2%) patients remained on pomalidomide therapy for at least 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Table 1). The overall anemia response rate per IWG-MRT criteria was 27% (22/82). Response occurred in the first 6 months in 21 (96%) of the 22 responders. The median time for response was 2.3 months (range, 1–10). The median response duration was 16.5 months (2–40). The anemia response rate in patients with spleen size palpable at less than 10 cm below the costal margin was 44 % (17/39) vs. 10 % (4/39) in those whose spleen was palpable at or above 10 cm (p=0.002). The anemia response rate was twice as likely in JAK2 mutated versus non-mutated cases (30% vs 15% p=0.2). Anemia response rate was also higher in patients with at least 50% increase in absolute basophil count during the first month of therapy: 39% (19/49) vs 6% (2/32) p=0.001). The anemia response rate was not significantly affected by karyotype, transfusion need or leukocyte count. Among the anemia responders (n=22), 3 (14%) relapsed in the first 12 months; relapse was more likely in the presence of baseline leukocytosis (p=0.006). Among the 24 patients who took pomalidomide for at lease 12 months, grade 1 sensory neuropathy developed in 4 (16%) patients. Conclusion: Anemia response to pomalidomide therapy in myelofibrosis often occurs in the first 6 months of treatment and is more likely to occur in the presence of JAK2V617F and absence of marked splenomegaly. Long-term treatment with pomalidomide might be associated with sensory peripheral neuropathy in a subset of treated patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3801 Purpose: Decitabine is a deoxycytidine nucleoside derivative inhibitor of DNA-methyltransferases indicated for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) including previously treated and untreated, de novo and secondary MDS of all French-American-British subtypes. The aim of this study was to determine the absolute bioavailability and safety of a single oral dose of decitabine. Methods: This is an open-label, Phase 1, dose-escalation absolute bioavailability trial in which decitabine was administered orally on Cycle 1 Day 1, and followed by a 1-hour IV infusion of the currently approved regimen (20 mg/m2) on Cycle 1 Days 2–5. Serial blood samples for decitabine pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment were collected up to 6 h post-dosing during Cycle 1 on Days 1 and 2. Three subjects were recruited at each oral dose level of 30, 60, 120 and 240 mg. Subjects were evaluated for adverse events (AEs). Results: Study results are summarized in Table 1. Sixteen subjects were screened and 12 were enrolled. Nine subjects had de novo MDS and 3 had secondary MDS (IPSS score Int-2 = 6, Int-1 = 5, Low = 1). Following oral dose, Cmax was reached within 0.50 h (tmax) and after Cmax the plasma profile showed biphasic decline with terminal half-life ranging between 0.36 to 0.93 hr. Increase in oral dose did not result in proportional increase in Cmax and AUC. The PK parameters following oral doses showed very high variability. Based on comparison of dose normalized exposure, the absolute bioavailability ranged between 3.9 to 14.1% and increased proportionally with dose. The non-dose normalized bioavailabilities were calculated to find a dose at which mean oral bioavailability reaches ≥80% of the current IV regimen of 20 mg/m2. The non-dose normalized bioavailability ranged between 11.7 and 80.5% with highest oral bioavailability observed at 240 mg dose. The most common SAEs were pneumonia (n=4) and neutropenic fever (n=4). Five patients (41.7%) experienced diarrhea and nausea (all grades). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that the absolute bioavailability ranged between 3.9 and 14.1%. Oral decitabine was generally well tolerated at doses between 30–240 mg in MDS subjects and exhibited a safety profile similar to the profile following intravenous administration. The bioavailability and safety data may allow for further testing in the phase 2 setting. Disclosures: Mistry: Eisai Inc.: Employment. Jones:Eisai Inc.: Employment. Kubiak:Eisai Inc.: Employment. Garcia-Manero:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding. Litzow:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding. Mesa:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding. Tarassoff:Eisai Inc.: Employment. Cortes:Eisai Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract Introduction Venetoclax (ABT-199) is an approved BCL-2 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Multiple clinical trials are underway to explore its efficacy in additional indications. While venetoclax demonstrated high remission rates in combination with azacitidine in early stage clinical trials, the question of durability of responses and primary and acquired resistance remain, especially given the modest activity and rapid development of resistance as a single agent. One reported mechanism of intrinsic resistance is high expression of other BCL-2 family proteins, including MCL-1. We and others have demonstrated that the CDK9 inhibitor, alvocidib, can mediate transcriptional repression of anti-apoptotic MCL-1. It has also been shown that alvocidib can increase pro-apoptotic BIM, a dual activator and sensitizer BH3-only protein that can directly induce apoptosis and simultaneously inactivate anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins such as MCL-1 and BCL-2, thus having the same effect on mitochondria-associated apoptosis as MCL-1 down-regulation, with the potential to directly induce apoptosis. An alvocidib-containing cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen demonstrated favorable remission rates in high-risk AML patients over standard therapy in a randomized Phase 2 trial indicating its potential role and safety in AML. We hypothesized that alvocidib and venetoclax would synergize against AML cells by shifting the overall balance of pro- and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 proteins in favor of apoptosis and thus represent a novel active treatment regimen in AML. Aims This study seeks to examine the efficacy of a treatment regimen containing alvocidib and venetoclax in multiple preclinical studies, including in vivo models of AML. Methods Cell viability assays interrogating alvocidib and venetoclax activity in cell lines were performed using CellTiter-Glo according to manufacturer's protocol. mRNA/miRNA expression changes were assessed using standard RT-PCR technique. Protein expression changes were assessed using standard western immunoblotting technique. To assess the efficacy of an alvocidib and venetoclax combination on tumor growth in an in vivo model, the OCI-AML3 xenograft mouse model and ex vivo studies with AML patient samples were performed. Results Herein we demonstrate that alvocidib inhibits both mRNA and protein expression of MCL-1 in a time and concentration-dependent fashion in 3 out of 4 AML cell lines analyzed, while in cells where alvocidib did not reduce MCL-1 protein levels (i.e. MOLM-13) a dose-dependent decrease in miR17-92, and concomitant increase in BIM protein was observed after 24 hours of alvocidib treatment. The alvocidib-venetoclax combination resulted in very strong synergistic reductions of cell viability (with combination indices [CI] of 0.4 to 0.7), both in venetoclax-sensitive and resistant cells. The venetoclax-sensitive lines, MV4-11 and MOLM-13, exhibited 5- to 10-fold reduction of venetoclax EC50 values in the low nM range when combined with only 80 nM alvocidib. Importantly, venetoclax-resistant lines, OCI-AML3 and THP-1, exhibited at least 20-fold reduction of venetoclax EC50 values from near 1 µM to 10-50 nM, when combined with 80 nM alvocidib.In the venetoclax-resistant OCI-AML3 xenograft model, single agent alvocidib and venetoclax achieved tumor growth inhibition (TGI) of 9.7 and 31.5%, respectively, while the combination achieved 87.9% TGI at the same dose levels of individual drugs. Conclusions Taken together, our data suggest that the combination of alvocidib with venetoclax is highly synergistic in vitro and in vivo, in both venetoclax-sensitive and -resistant AML across a heterogeneous genomic background. The particularly high level of synergy achieved in venetoclax-resistant cell lines highlights the central importance of both BCL-2 and MCL-1-mediated cell survival in AML. Importantly, the addition of alvocidib to venetoclax treatment reduced IC50s to clinically achievable concentrations. Therefore, we conclude that an alvocidib/venetoclax combination may be a novel approach for the treatment of AML and warrants further pre-clinical and clinical validation. Disclosures Whatcott: Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Kim:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Haws:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Mesa:Celgene: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; CTI: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Peterson:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Siddiqui-Jain:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Weitman:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Bearss:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Warner:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) associated with a high degree of symptomatology, progressive cytopenias and potential to transform into acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Thrombocytopenia amongst MF patients is a proven negative prognostic indicator and predictor of transformation to AML. Ruxolitinib is an effective JAK inhibitor for MF symptoms and splenomegaly, but is not indicated in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Phase III trials of pacritinib have shown alleviation of the MF symptom burden amongst patients with thrombocytopenia (ASCO 2015 Mesa et. al.). In this study, we assessed the symptom burden of MF patients with significant thrombocytopenia who were naïve to pacritinib. Methods Data was assessed from a prospectively collected international database of MF patients in which demographics, disease features, and MF symptoms utilizing the myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom assessment form (MPN-SAF; Scherber et al, 2011). The MPN-SAF includes the patient's perceptions of common MPN-related symptoms and overall quality of life (QOL) on a 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable) scale. Total symptom score (TSS) was computed based on symptom items using the published scoring algorithm on a 0 (all reported symptoms absent) to 100 (all reported symptoms worst imaginable) scale. MF risk scores were calculated using the DIPSS criteria (Gangat, 2011). Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L, anemia was defined as hemoglobin<10 g/dL and leukopenia was defined as a white blood cell count <4.0 x 10(9)/L. Associations between the MPN-SAF individual symptoms were investigated using Pearson correlations. Results Demographic and Disease Features: A total of 418 patients with (n=89) and without (n=329) thrombocytopenia completed the MPN-SAF. Patients with thrombocytopenia were slightly younger (57.4 vs. 61.0, p=0.01) with longer disease durations (11.9 years vs. 8.8 years, p=0.0489) and had a higher prevalence of primary myelofibrosis (PMF; 82% vs. 66%, p=0.01). The presence of thrombocytopenia was associated with other laboratory abnormalities including anemia (60.7% vs. 25.3%, p<0.001) and leukopenia (34.8% vs. 52.3%, p<0.001), along with the need for red blood cell transfusions (34.8% vs. 14.6%, p<0.001). Patient cohorts did not differ by gender, DIPSS risk score, history of prior thrombosis or hemorrhage. In comparing patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<50 x 10(9)/L, n=43) to those with moderate thrombocytopenia (51-100 x 10(9)/L, n=46), severe thrombocytopenia patients were more likely to have anemia (74.4% vs. 47.8%, p=0.01) and require red blood cell transfusions (51.2% vs. 19.6%, p=0.002). Symptoms Scores for individual MPN-SAF items were assessed for each subgroup. Patients with thrombocytopenia had markedly higher total symptom scores than patients without thrombocytopenia (32.8 vs. 24.1, p<0.001). Individual scores were also higher for most items (fatigue, early satiety, inactivity, dizziness, sad mood, sexuality, cough, night sweats, itching, fever, weight loss, overall QOL)[Figure 1]. No significant differences in MPN SAF TSS or individual symptom scores were observed in comparing severe vs. moderate thrombocytopenia patients. Discussion MF patients with thrombocytopenia have distinctive clinical characteristics and face a significantly more severe symptom burden. Importantly, despite thrombocytopenia being a recognized risk factor for disease advancement, no correlations are noted between patient symptomatology and risk category. In addition, patients with severe thrombocytopenia do not differ symptomatically from patients with moderate thrombocytopenia despite having more severe anemia, leukopenia and transfusion requirements. This implies that the degree of symptomatology expressed by thrombocytopenic MF patients occurs independent from the exact platelet value. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that patients with thrombocytopenia will benefit from aggressive symptomatic control, potentially from targeted agents. Figure 1. MF Symptoms in Patients With and Without Thrombocytopenia Figure 1. MF Symptoms in Patients With and Without Thrombocytopenia Disclosures Kiladjian: Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: Travel grant; Research Funding paid to institution (Hôpital Saint-Louis et Université Paris Diderot); Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Zweegman:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Harrison:Shire: Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cervantes:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; CTI-Baxter: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Barbui:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vannucchi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Novartis. Research- incyte, Gilead, cti, Genentech, promedior, NS Pharma: Consultancy.