Duma, Narjust

11007 Background: The proportion of women & underrepresented groups in medicine (URM) in the field of hematology and oncology remains low, particularly in academic leadership positions. Editorial board appointments allow physicians to have a substantial impact on the nature of the published scholarly work and serve as a platform for academic opportunities. We aimed to assess gender and race/ethnicity representation in editorial board positions in hematology and oncology journals. Methods: Editorial leadership board members from 60 journals from oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and surgical oncology were reviewed, 54 journals were included in the analysis. Gender and race/ethnicity were determined based on publicly available data for editor-in-chief (EiC) and second-in-command (SiC) (including deputy, senior, or associate editors). Descriptive statistics and chi-squared were estimated. Results: A total of 793 editorial board members are included in the analysis. 72.6 % were men and 27.4 % were women. 71.3% of editorial leadership were non-Hispanic white with Asian editorial board members representing the second largest majority at 23.3%. The editorial position was significantly different among men and women (p = 0.038) with women filling only 15.9% (10/63) of the EiC positions. Of these 10 women, the racial breakdown was 90% white and 10% Asian. In the prevalence odds ratio (pOR), women were about half as likely to be in the EiC position compared with men [pOR: 0.47, 95%CI (0.23, 0.95, p = 0.03)]. Women represented 28.4% (207/730) of SiC editorial positions. White editors had the highest representation at 71.0% in the SiC editorial positions, followed by Asian editors at 16.0%. Notable differences were seen in gender proportions between journal specialties (p = 0.001); with surgical oncology and hematology having the lowest female representation at 11.9% and 22.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Women and UIM are markedly underrepresented in leadership roles on Editorial Boards in hematology and oncology journals. Importantly, the representation of minority women physicians in EiC positions is at an inexorable zero which is a sign of unconscious attitudes that may exclude women and minorities from certain positions. It is imperative that we work to move towards a more diverse and inclusive editorial board to ensure critical perspectives are heard and scientific discovery is fostered.[Table: see text]

e21212 Background: Combining local ablative and systemic therapies in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC leads to improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The potential immunostimulatory effects of ablating all visible disease with SBRT in combination with dual immune checkpoint inhibition has prompted interest, but the toxicity and benefit are unknown. Methods: We conducted a phase Ib study to investigate the safety of SBRT, with doses between 30 and 50 Gy in five fractions to all sites of disease, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg IV in combination with tremelimumab 75 mg IV every 4 weeks x 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab maintenance until progression. Eligible patients had 1-6 extracranial metastatic sites, allowing multiple metastases per location, with all lesions suitable for SBRT, ECOG performance status 0-1, no actionable driver mutation, and no prior immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was safety of this combination. Secondary endpoints include PFS and OS. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (any Grade ≥ 3 toxicity) were evaluated from the first administration of SBRT until 28 days post start of durvalumab and tremelimumab. Baseline tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression on post-SBRT biopsy and circulating tumor cells will be correlated with outcomes. In this first cohort analysis, we assess the safety and outcomes of the first 17 patients. Results: From 2/2018-2/2021, the first 17 pts were enrolled. Characteristics of those enrolled included: median age 68 years, female/male 4/13, squamous/non-squamous 2/15, median number of non-central nervous system (CNS) metastatic sites 2 (1-5), median number of non-CNS metastatic lesions 2 (1-9), CNS involvement 6/17 (35.3%), previous treatment 4/17 (23.5%). DLTs were seen in 2/17 (11.8%) patients; DLTs were autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade (G) 1/2. TRAEs included: all TRAEs n = 188, 88.2% (of patients); G 3 n = 17, 29.4%; G 4 n = 1, 5.8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Five patients discontinued treatment due to grade 3/4 immune related adverse events (IRAE). At a median follow up of 20 months 11/17 (64.7%) patients are alive with 10/17 (58.8%) with no evidence of disease (NED). Six of 17 (35.2%) patients experienced disease progression and 4/17 (23.5%) patients died of disease progression. Median PFS and OS are not yet reached. Conclusions: There were no unexpected safety signals in the cohort of patients enrolled. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 IRAEs is similar to the treatment of advanced NSCLC and no additional toxicity was observed with the addition of SBRT. Clinical outcomes look promising with median OS and PFS not yet reached at 20 months median follow up. The study continues to enroll a second cohort and results will be updated. Clinical trial information: NCT03275597.

6549 Background: Representation and outcomes of women, older adults, and racial minorities in ICI trials has not been previously described. Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify ICI RCTs. Data for trial characteristics, proportion of trials reporting race, age and sex as well as the proportion of patients by race, age and sex enrolled in ICI trials was collected. Descriptive statistics were reported for trials reporting minority representation and proportion of included patients by race, age and sex. Disparities in representation were calculated using enrollment incidence disparity (EID) and enrollment incidence ratios (EIR) by comparing trial enrollment against U.S. population-based estimates acquired from the SEER 18 incidence database. The relationship of EID to key trial characteristics were compared using standard parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. Trends in EIR were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression Analysis software. Results: 108 ICI trials from 2009 to 2020 with 48,360 patients were included in this analysis. All RCTs reported sex (101/101). 78 trials reported race (72%), of which only 41 trials (38%) reported data on all 5 U.S. racial categories (Black, White, Asian, Pacific Islander and Native American). Participation of Black patients was reported in 66 trials (61%), White participants in 78 trials (72%), Asians in 69 trials (64%), Native Americans and Pacific Islanders in 41 trials (38%), and Hispanics in 24 trials (22%). Age categories were inconsistently defined, and 80 trials (74%) reported the proportion of patient by age categories. Subgroup analyses of clinical outcomes by race, age and sex were reported in 17 (22%), 62 (79%) and 57 (73%) trials respectively. Women (trial proportion [TP]: 32%; EIR: 0.77), patients aged ≥ 65 years (TP: 42%; EIR: 0.74), Black participants (TP: 1.8%; EIR: 0.17) and Hispanic participants (TP: 5.9%; EIR: 0.67) were largely underrepresented, and Asians were overrepresented (TP: 15.9%; EIR: 2.64). Black patients were underrepresented across all cancer types. Similarly, women, older adults ( > 65 years of age) and Hispanic patients were consistently underrepresented across cancer types with few exceptions. Representation of older adults increased significantly from 2010-2020 (APC: 2.72), while representation of Black patients decreased significantly from 2009-2020 (APC: -23.37). Black patients were found to be significantly underrepresented in phase III trials (p = 0.0005), trials with OS as the primary endpoint (p = 0.004), and PD1 inhibitor trials (p = 0.002). Hispanics were significantly underrepresented in PD1 inhibitor trials (p = 0.003). Conclusions: There is both suboptimal reporting about participation and underrepresentation of women, racial minorities (particularly Black patients) and older adults in ICI trials as compared to their cancer incidence.

1537 Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-cov-2) virus causing COVID-19 has brought great challenges to global health services affecting cancer care delivery, outcomes, and increasing the burden in oncology providers (OP). Our study aimed to describe the challenges that OP faced while delivering cancer care in Latin America. Methods: We conducted an international cross-sectional study using an anonymous online survey in Spanish, Portuguese, and English. The questionnaire included 43 multiple choice questions. The sample was stratified by OP who have treated patients with COVID-19 versus those who have not treated patients with COVID-19. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. Results: A total of 704 OP from 20 Latin American countries completed the survey (77% of 913 who started the survey). Oncologists represented 46% of respondents, followed by 25% surgical-oncologists. Of the respondents, 56% treated patients with COVID-19. A significant proportion of OP reported newly adopting telemedicine during COVID-19 (14% vs 72%, p=0.001). More than half (58%) of OP reported making changes to the treatments they offered to patients with cancer. As shown in the table, caring for patients with COVID-19 significantly influenced practice patterns of OP. Access to specialty services and procedures was significantly reduced: 40% noted significantly decreased or no access to imaging, 20% significantly decreased or no access to biopsies, 65% reported delays in surgical oncology referrals, and 49% in radiation oncology referrals. A vast majority (82%) reported oncologic surgeries were delayed or cancelled, which was heightened among those treating patients with COVID-19 (87% vs 77%, p=0.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the way cancer care is delivered in globally. Although changes to healthcare delivery are necessary as a response to this global crisis, our study highlights the significant disruption and possible undertreatment of patients with cancer in Latin America that results from COVID-19.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Several studies have suggested that vitamin D may have antiproliferative and anticarcinogenic properties and a protective effect against breast cancer. Alaskan Natives have demonstrated high rates of vitamin D deficiency, particularly in young individuals. Hence, high breast density has been associated with increased breast cancer risk. Therefore, we examined the association between serum vitamin D levels and mammographic breast density in a population of Alaskan Native women. Methods: Patients seen in the Mayo Clinic-Alaska Native Medical Center telemedicine program from December 2014 to December 2017 were offered to enroll in the study. Consent was obtained by a study coordinator in Minnesota using a telemedicine platform. Participants were asked to complete the Breast Cancer Risk Questionnaire, which includes questions on hormonal, lifestyle factors and family history. Serum vitamin D levels (25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3) were obtained and later correlated with mammographic breast density (percent density). Data were summarized with frequencies and percentages or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), as appropriate. Pearson correlation was used to estimate the association between breast density and vitamin D levels. Results: 33 women were included; median age was 53 years (IQR 45-58), 70% self-identified as American Indian/Alaskan Native, 12% as White, 6% as Native Hawaiian/Pacific islander and 12% as other. Median BMI was 31 kg/m² (IQR 26.4-34.3), menarche was at age 12 or older for 23 (70%) of the participants and 20 women were postmenopausal at the time enrollment. 10 participants had a hysterectomy, of whom 60% also had oophorectomy. 76% reported history of hormonal birth control use and 23% postmenopausal hormonal supplementation. Median number of pregnancies was 3 (IQR 2-5), and 20 women reported breastfeeding. Fifteen women were current or former smokers (>100 cigarettes) and 19 reported none or low alcohol consumption. Median serum vitamin D level was 39 ng/mL (IQR 30-52) and 9 (27%) women had low vitamin D levels. In regard to breast density, median percentage (average of images) was 15% (IQR 7.5-24.9) with a median dense area of 21.8 cm² (IQR 16.4-34.2). Median time from blood draw to mammogram was 110 days (IQR 41-172) and 19 (58%) participants were taking vitamin D supplementation at the time of study enrollment; doses ranged from 400 to 50,000 units. No correlation was identified between breast density and serum vitamin D levels (correlation=0.02). Conclusion: In this cohort, no association between serum vitamin D levels and breast density was observed. More than half of the participants were on vitamin D supplementation and this could have obscured our observations. Larger studies controlling for vitamin supplementation are needed, as this association could potentially impact breast cancer rates in populations at risk for vitamin D deficiency. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Ivana Croghan, Sarah Jenkins, Loni Neal, Karthik Ghosh, Sandhya Pruthi. Assessing vitamin D and mammographic breast density in a population of Alaskan Native women [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr C088.

Abstract Background: Sex differences in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) outcomes have been described. Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) have emerged as a serious clinical problem in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Risk factors for IRAEs and their association with response to therapy remain controversial. Sex differences in innate and adaptive immune responses have been observed but the association of these differences with IRAEs remains unclear. Therefore, we studied sex differences in IRAEs and their association with response to therapy. Methods: All patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1 therapy at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Florida from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Patients receiving treatment at an outside facility with history autoimmune disorders or radiation-induced pneumonitis were excluded. Chi-square test was used to estimate differences in categorical data. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis. Results: A total of 231 patients were identified; 120 (52%) were women and 111 (48%) were men. Baseline characteristics and ICI distribution were similar among groups. Women were more likely to experience IRAEs compared to men (48% vs. 31%, p<0.008). Among patients with IRAEs, women were more likely to be prescribed systemic steroids (63% vs. 41%, p<0.02). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in the administration of intravenous steroids. Women were more likely to develop pneumonitis (23% vs. 12%, p<0.03) and arthralgias (17% vs. 3%, p<0.04). However, dermatologic toxicities (35% vs. 9%, p<0.002) were more commonly seen in men. In 17% of women the ICI was discontinued due to toxicity (men 7%). Besides sex, no other clinical characteristic was associated with increased IRAEs. Women with IRAEs were more likely to have a radiographic response compared with women without IRAEs (78% vs. 23%, p<0.0001), although this was not observed in men (37% vs. 26%, p>0.22). Better PFS was observed in women with IRAEs (10 months vs. 3.3 months, p<0.0006) compared to women without IRAEs. Conclusions: Women with metastatic NSCLC are more likely to experience IRAEs compared to men. We also observed sex differences in the frequency of certain IRAEs. In addition, an association between IRAEs and response to therapy was observed in women. Larger studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Abdel-Ghani Azzouqa, Siddhartha Yadav, Kahterine Hoversten, Clay Reed, Andrea Sitek, Elizabeth Enninga, Jonas Paludo, Lisa Kottschade, Aaron Mansfield, Rami Manochakian, Roxana Dronca, Alex Adjei. Sex differences in tolerability and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A120.

11041 Background: Twitter (TW) is an essential tool in the medical community. Few studies have examined the use of TW by medical trainees. We aimed to assess its utilization among trainees in hematology-oncology related areas (HORAs). Methods: 576 training programs in HORAs were obtained. We contacted a potential pool of 3,142 trainees. A 50 item survey was distributed between 2/2019-5/2019, focusing on: demographics, professional use, attitudes toward TW, and patient interactions. Responses were analyzed using parametric descriptive statistics. Results: 442 responses (14% response rate) were received; 203 (46%) used a TW account for professional activities. See table for demographics. The most common reasons for using TW were: continuous education (73%), dissemination of information (62%), and networking (62%). > 80% of users have positive views on using TW for: promoting academic discussions (92%), trainees education (89%), and conference networking (83%). 50 (25%) have used TW for collaborations, with abstracts and papers being the most common (20%). Most agreed or strongly agreed that TW: is a useful education tool (89%), and might be useful for career advancement (85%). The most common challenges were: the value of TW content can be decreased by irrelevant content and biased sources (64%), not peer-reviewed (51%), and difficulty searching information (50%). 68% considered that programs should promote the engagement of trainees, but only 21% reported instruction in the use of TW. 83% agree or strongly agree that TW is useful for physicians and patient interactions, but 82% have concerns about legal repercussions. Conclusions: Almost half of trainees in HORAs use TW for professional activities. The most common uses are for education, dissemination of information and networking. Most trainees that use TW have positive views regarding education and academic collaborations. Use of Twitter may strengthen trainees’ education, provide mentorship opportunities, and promote career advancement. Challenges on TW use should continue to be addressed. [Table: see text]

11012 Background: The proportion of women in the field of hematology and oncology (H&O) has increased over recent decades, but representation by women in leadership positions remains a challenge. Our aim was to examine representation of winners of recognition awards by gender and race from the major international hematology and oncology societies. Methods: Published award recipients from the seven major H&O societies were reviewed, with 26 years of data included (1994-2019). Awardee demographics and academic rank were collected and included in the analysis. Gender was determined based on awardee full name and verified by public data. Chi-square and Cochran-Armitage tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Over the past 26 years, 942 awards were presented at the 7 major H&O societies. We excluded 27 gender specific awards from the analysis. Of the 915 awardees included in analysis, award recipients were overwhelmingly men (77.9%) and non-Hispanic white (84.7%). Gender breakdown by society is described in table. ESMO and ASTRO represented the lowest distribution of women at 9.1% and 11.1%, respectively. Women awardees received 30.3% of the awards categorized as humanistic and education-related, while only receiving 16.0% of awards in the basic sciences category (p<0.01). The Cochran-Armitage test demonstrated an upward trend in the number of women awardees, from 10% between 1994-1998 to 25.6% between 2014-2019 (p=0.0004). Over the past five years, the average proportion of women medical oncologists was 35.6% per the AAMC. In this time period, women oncologists have received only 24.0% of all awards, suggesting the awardees included in the study period do not represent the proportion women in the field (p=0.00424). Black, Hispanic, and Asian awardees represented 3.7%, 3.3%, and 6.8% of the total awardees, respectively. Of the 64 Black and Hispanic awardees, 60.9% of the awards were for investigating healthcare disparities and only 4.6% were given for basic science research. Conclusions: During our study period, women physicians and investigators were less likely to receive recognition awards from the seven major H&O societies compared to men. We also observed a considerable low proportion of minority awardees in all oncology subspecialties. While the proportion of women awardees has increased over time, significant underrepresentation remains. [Table: see text]

11000 Background: The diversification of the healthcare workforce has been identified as a strategy to address health disparities and increase patient-physician trust. A prior review of diversity among oncology fellows up to 2010, showed an increase in female representation over 17 years, but no change in underrepresented minorities (URM). We aim to assess the changes in hematology and oncology (HO) fellowship diversity over the last decade and how this compares to our workforce. Methods: Publicly available registries were used to assess differences among female and URM HO fellows, HO fellowship applicants, internal medicine (IM) academic faculty, IM residents, medical school graduates (MSG), and the US population in 2019. These were compared to the 2016 HO practicing physicians. Changes in URM and female HO fellow representation from 2009 to 2019 were assessed. Data was analyzed using binomial tests and simple linear regression models. Results: Female representation among HO fellows (43.8%) was increased when compared with HO practicing physicians (+11.8%, p < 0.0001) and IM faculty (+3.2%, p = 0.0079); no difference from IM residents or HO applicants. Female HO fellows were underrepresented when compared with MSG (-4.0%, p = 0.0014) and US population (P < 0.0001). Hispanic HO fellows (6.1%) had increased representation when compared to IM faculty (+2.7%, p < 0.0001), but were underrepresented when compared to IM residents (-2.2%, p = 0.0012) and US population (p < 0.0001). The proportion of Hispanic HO fellows was no different when compared to HO practicing physicians, HO applicants, and MSG. African American (AA) fellows (3.8%) were underrepresented when compared to IM residents (-2.0%, p = 0.0005), HO applicants (-1.7%, p = 0.0465), MSG (-2.4%, p = 0.0001), and US population (p < 0.0001). AA fellows were increased when compared to HO practicing physicians (+1.5%, p = 0.0002), but no different than IM faculty. Asian HO fellows were increased when compared to IM residents, MSG, and US population. Over the last 10 years there has been no significant change in the proportion of AA or female HO fellow representation, with a decreasing trend in Hispanics (-0.14% per year, p = 0.04).Conclusions: The current state of diversity in HO workforce still requires attention. Despite ongoing efforts, females, AA, and Hispanics continue to be underrepresented. The decreasing trend in Hispanic representation and clear differences in diversity between HO fellowships and IM residencies calls for action among fellowship programs and national societies to increase URM engagement and recruitment.

Background. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed the landscape in the treatment of a number of cancers. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as a serious clinical problem with the use of ICI. Methods. All oncology patients diagnosed with pulmonary complications secondary to ICI at Mayo Clinic Rochester from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, smoking, and oncologic history were analyzed. Results. A total of 10 patients developed pulmonary complications secondary to ICI. Seven patients were men (70%), and the median age at diagnosis was 61.5 (IQR 55.8-69.3) years. All patients had stage IV disease. Melanoma was the most common malignancy. Seven (70%) patients had a positive smoking history, and 6 (60%) were obese (BMI>30). Most cases were grade 2 pneumonitis (70%). One patient with grade 4 pneumonitis required endotracheal intubation and a prolonged course of systemic corticosteroids (>30 days). Eight (80%) patients received prior radiation therapy. The median time from initiation of ICI to pneumonitis diagnosis was 3.5 months. Conclusion. Melanoma was the most common malignancy, the majority of patients had grade 2 pneumonitis and required treatment with steroids, and all patients affected by ICI-related pneumonitis had stage IV malignancy. Potential risk factors included smoking history, prior radiotherapy, obesity, and advance stage at the time of ICI initiation. Extrapulmonary irAEs are common in patients with pneumonitis.