Back to Authors

Chng, Wee Joo

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-8335

Mayo Clinic

National University Cancer Institute, Singapore

Citations 87

Molecular Dissection of Hyperdiploid Multiple Myeloma by Gene Expression Profiling
Kumar, Shaji , VanWier, Scott, Ahmann, Greg, Price-Troska, Tammy, Henderson, Kim, Chung, Tae‐Hoon , Kim, Seungchan , Bryant, Barbara M. , Carpten, John D. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Lacy, Martha Q. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Kyle, Robert A. , Greipp, Philip R., Bergsagel, P. Leif , Fonseca, Rafaël , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Chng, Wee Joo , Henderson, Kimberly J., Mulligan, George , Gertz, Morie A. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela , Chung, Tae-Hoon , Fonseca, Rafael

Cancer Research | April 4, 2007 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 2982-2989

10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-4046 Get It

Abstract Hyperdiploid multiple myeloma (H-MM) is the most common form of myeloma. In this gene expression profiling study, we show that H-MM is defined by a protein biosynthesis signature that is primarily driven by a gene dosage mechanism as a result of trisomic chromosomes. Within H-MM, four independently validated patient clusters overexpressing nonoverlapping sets of genes that form cognate pathways/networks that have potential biological importance in multiple myeloma were identified. One prominent cluster, cluster 1, is characterized by high expression of cancer testis antigen and proliferation-associated genes. Tumors from these patients were more proliferative than tumors in other clusters (median plasma cell labeling index, 3.8; P < 0.05). Another cluster, cluster 3, is characterized by genes involved in tumor necrosis factor/nuclear factor-κB signaling and antiapoptosis. These patients have better response to bortezomib as compared with patients within other clusters (70% versus 29%; P = 0.02). Furthermore, for a group of patients generally thought to have better prognosis, a cluster of patients with short survival (cluster 1; median survival, 27 months) could be identified. This analysis illustrates the heterogeneity within H-MM and the importance of defining specific cytogenetic prognostic factors. Furthermore, the signatures that defined these clusters may provide a basis for tailoring treatment to individual patients. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):2982–9]
Limits to the Human Cancer Genome Project?
Chng, Wee Joo

Science | February 8, 2007 | Volume: 315 | Issue: 5813 | Pages: 762-766

10.1126/science.315.5813.762b Get It

Gene expression profiling and correlation with outcome in clinical trials of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib
Mulligan, George , Mitsiades, Constantine S. , Bryant, Barbara M. , Roels, Steven , Koenig, Erik , Fergus, Andrew, Huang, Yongsheng , Richardson, Paul G. , Trepicchio, William L. , Broyl, Annemiek, Sonneveld, Pieter , Shaughnessy, John D. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Schenkein, David P., Esseltine, Dixie‐Lee, Boral, Anthony, Zhan, Fenghuang , Zhan, Fenghuang , Chng, Wee Joo , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Anderson, Kenneth C. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Zhan, Fenghuang , Mulligan, George

Blood | December 21, 2006 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 3177-3188

10.1182/blood-2006-09-044974 Get It

Abstract The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility of prospective pharmacogenomics research in multicenter international clinical trials of bortezomib in multiple myeloma and to develop predictive classifiers of response and survival with bortezomib. Patients with relapsed myeloma enrolled in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials of bortezomib and consented to genomic analyses of pretreatment tumor samples. Bone marrow aspirates were subject to a negative-selection procedure to enrich for tumor cells, and these samples were used for gene expression profiling using DNA microarrays. Data quality and correlations with trial outcomes were assessed by multiple groups. Gene expression in this dataset was consistent with data published from a single-center study of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Response and survival classifiers were developed and shown to be significantly associated with outcome via testing on independent data. The survival classifier improved on the risk stratification provided by the International Staging System. Predictive models and biologic correlates of response show some specificity for bortezomib rather than dexamethasone. Informative gene expression data and genomic classifiers that predict clinical outcome can be derived from prospective clinical trials of new anticancer agents.
Tumor suppressor p16 methylation in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications
González-Paz, Natalia, McClure, Rebecca F., Blood, Emily, Oken, Martin M., Ness, Brian Van, James, C. David , Kurtin, Paul J. , Henderson, Kimberly J., Ahmann, Gregory , Lacy, Martha Q. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Greipp, Philip R., Fonseca, Rafaël , Chng, Wee Joo , Gertz, Morie A. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Fonseca, Rafael

Blood | July 14, 2006 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1228-1232

10.1182/blood-2006-05-024661 Get It

Abstract The biological and clinical implications of p16 gene methylation in multiple myeloma (MM) are still unclear despite previous studies. In this comprehensive study, using methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), we show that p16 methylation is relatively common and occurs in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS; n = 17), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM; n = 40), and MM (n = 522) at a prevalence of 24%, 28%, and 34%, respectively. However, p16 methylation does not appear to affect gene expression level. In a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up information (n = 439), there was no difference in overall survival between patients with or without p16 methylation. We also found no association between p16 methylation and the main cytogenetic categories, although it was more common among patients with 17p13.1 deletions (p53 locus), a genetic progression event in MM. In addition, p16 methylation has no apparent effect on the cycle because there was also no difference in the plasma cell labeling index (a direct measurement of proliferation) between patients with and without p16 methylation. Our results question a major role for p16 methylation in the oncogenesis of the PC neoplasm, and we now believe p16 methylation may be a marker for overall epigenetic changes associated with disease progression, with no obvious direct biological or clinical consequences.
Gene-expression profiling of Waldenström macroglobulinemia reveals a phenotype more similar to chronic lymphocytic leukemia than multiple myeloma
Schop, Roelandt F.J., Price-Troska, Tammy, Jelinek, Diane F., Dispenzieri, Angela , Lacy, Martha Q. , Kyle, Robert A. , Greipp, Philip R., Tschumper, Renee C. , Fonseca, Rafaël , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Chng, Wee Joo , Ghobrial, Irene M. , Kay, Neil E. , Gertz, Morie A. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Dispenzieri, Angela , Fonseca, Rafael

Blood | June 28, 2006 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2755-2763

10.1182/blood-2006-02-005488 Get It

AbstractWaldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by the ability of the B-cell clone to differentiate into plasma cells. Although the clinical syndrome and the pathologic characteristics are well defined, little is known about its biology and controversy still exists regarding its cell of origin. In this gene-expression study, we compared the transcription profiles of WM with those of other malignant B cells including (chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] and multiple myeloma [MM]) as well as normal cells (peripheral-blood B cells and bone marrow plasma cells). We found that WM has a homogenous gene expression regardless of 6q deletion status and clusters with CLL and normal B cells on unsupervised clustering with very similar expression profiles. Only a small gene set has expression profiles unique to WM compared to CLL and MM. The most significantly up-regulated gene is IL6 and the most significantly associated pathway for this set of genes is MAPK signaling. Thus, IL6 and its downstream signaling may be of biologic importance in WM. Further elucidation of the role of IL-6 in WM is warranted as this may offer a potential therapeutic avenue.
Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm
Ahmann, Greg, Henderson, Kim, Santana-Dávila, Rafael , Greipp, Philip R., Lacy, Martha Q. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Kumar, Shaji , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Lust, John A., Kyle, Robert A. , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Hayman, Suzanne R. , Fonseca, Rafaël , Chng, Wee Joo , Henderson, Kimberly J., Gertz, Morie A. , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela , Fonseca, Rafael

Blood | December 23, 2005 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 3669-3675

10.1182/blood-2005-09-3810 Get It

The mechanisms underlying aneuploidy in multiple myeloma (MM) are unclear. Centrosome amplification has been implicated as the cause of chromosomal instability in a variety of tumors and is a potential mechanism causing aneuploidy in MM. Using immunofluorescent (IF) staining, centrosome amplification was detected in 67% of monoclonal gammopathies, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We also investigated the gene expression of centrosome proteins. Overall, gene expression data correlated well with IF-detected centrosome amplification, allowing us to derive a gene expression-based centrosome index (CI) as a surrogate for centrosome amplification. Clinically, MM patients with high CI (> 4) are associated with poor prognostic genetic and clinical subtypes (chromosome 13 deletion, t(4; 14), t(14;16), and PCLI > 1%, P < .05) and are shown here to have short survival (11.1 months versus 39.1 months, P < .001). On multivariate regression, a high CI is an independent prognostic factor. Given that centrosome amplification is already observed in MGUS and probably integral to early chromosomal instability and myeloma genesis, and patients with more extensive centrosome amplification have shorter survival, the mechanisms leading to centrosome amplification should be investigated because these may offer new avenues for therapeutic intervention.
Genomics in Multiple Myeloma: Biology and Clinical Implications
Fonseca, Rafaël , Chng, Wee Joo , Fonseca, Rafael

Pharmacogenomics | December 1, 2005 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 563-573

10.2217/14622416.6.6.563 Get It