Olson, Eric J.

Abstract Introduction Nightshifts represent a substantial proportion of time dedicated to working in the inpatient setting, particularly among ICU staff. Our institution implemented a 24/7 in-person ICU attending model more than a decade ago. With practice growth and more than 200 ICU beds across disciplines, there are now at least 8 ICU attendings in-hospital all night. Yet, little is known about attending staff perceptions and desires about night work, so we began an exploratory analysis. Methods An online survey of 13 multiple-choice, slider scale, and open-ended questions were sent via email to critical care staff physicians of different disciplines within our institution. Results 69 out of 150 physicians completed the survey (46% response rate). Half were between 35 and 45 years old; 29% were age 45 to 55 years old. About half self-identified as a morningness chronotype. Most (84%) work 3- or 4-night shifts consecutively. Most viewed night shift work as having a negative influence on their quality of life (48% “somewhat negative” and 22% “very negative”) and on their health (51% “somewhat negative” and 24% “very negative”). Most would choose to work less nightshifts (37%) or none (29%). During nightshift assignments, about half (53%) self-report an average of 5 hours of sleep per 24-hour period; 18% self-report ≤ 4hours. Only 6% reported 7 or 8 hours of sleep. Mitigating strategies utilized during series of night shifts include use of caffeine (78%), naps (66%) and use of sleeping aids (21%). Outside of the nightshift series, more than half (56%) reported no sleep difficulties while 21% reported onset or maintenance insomnia. Conclusion At our large tertiary hospital employing an in-house nightshift model across multiple ICUs, most staff ICU physicians have a negative perception of night shift work on their quality of life and health. The majority of respondents would choose to work less or no night shifts. How self-reports of limited sleep (average 5 hours) per 24-hour period compare to objectively measured sleep duration in this population remains to be determined in the next phase of this study. Support (if any)

Abstract Alveolar macrophages (AMS) initiate inflammation during Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia by releasing cytokines including TNF-alpha. Recent studies suggest that macrophage responses to P. carinii are enhanced by serum opsonization, but the mechanisms of enhancement are not well defined. To determine whether macrophage release of TNF-alpha in response to P. carinii was augmented by immune opsonization, alveolar macrophages obtained from rabbits were cultured with P. carinii that had been opsonized with either nonimmune rabbit serum, immune serum generated against P. carinii, or an affinity-purified polyclonal Ab recognizing the major P. carinii surface Ag gp120. Each experiment also included organisms maintained in media alone (nonopsonized P. carinii). Opsonization of P. carinii with immune serum or gp120 Ab significantly enhanced macrophage TNF-alpha release. Interestingly, however, opsonization with nonimmune serum also increased TNF-alpha response to the organism. Because P. carinii is known to interact with the adhesive glycoproteins, vitronectin (VN) and fibronectin (FN), we hypothesized that they might also augment TNF-alpha release. Opsonization of P. carinii with VN or FN resulted in significant potentiation of macrophage TNF-alpha liberation. We further determined that VN and FN were present in increased quantities in the lower respiratory tract of patients with P. carinii pneumonia compared with normal volunteers. Additionally, VN and FN were demonstrated on the surface of freshly isolated P. carinii organisms by immunoblot analysis. Our study suggests that immune and nonimmune opsonins contribute to host defenses during P. carinii pneumonia by enhancing regional TNF-alpha release in response to the organism.