Borlaug, Barry A.

Abstract Aims We aimed to assess regression and development rates of ≥moderate secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Methods Patients with a <1 year diagnosis of HFrEF with mildly (40% ≤ EF < 50%) or moderately (<40%) reduced EF enrolled in GDMT titration programme 2019–2024 were identified. Regression rates of ≥moderate MR/TR to ≤mild and development rates of incident ≥moderate MR/TR were calculated. Results Among 844 patients [median age 64; 68% men; 26% mildly reduced EF; 24% New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV], 28% had ≥moderate MR and 14% had ≥moderate TR. Over median 7.1 months, 171 (75%) patients with ≥moderate MR and 87 (75%) of patients with ≥moderate TR experienced regression to no/mild MR and TR, respectively. Conversely, over median 13 months, incident ≥moderate MR and TR developed in 5% and 6%, respectively, of patients with no/mild baseline MR and TR. Number of GDMT medications at follow-up was less in patients who did not have MR/TR regression (vs who did) and in patients who developed MR/TR (vs who did not). Patients with NYHA Class I/II received a similar number of GDMT and had a similar rate of MR and TR regression and development vs patients with NYHA Class III/IV. However, patients with mildly reduced EF received less GDMT medications vs patients with moderately reduced EF and experienced less MR regression. Conclusion In patients with a recent diagnosis of HFrEF receiving contemporary GDMT, the majority with ≥moderate secondary MR and TR achieved regression of MR/TR, and the minority without significant baseline MR/TR developed ≥moderate regurgitation at follow-up.

BACKGROUND: With pulmonary hypertension (PH), a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)>15 mm Hg is used to diagnose left heart dysfunction, but some patients with adjudicated group 1 PH demonstrate PAWP>15 mm Hg. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate group 1 PH with high PAWP>15 mm Hg. METHODS: Patients with adjudicated group 1 PH from PVDOMICS between 2016 and 2019 were separated into high PAWP(>15 mm Hg) or normal PAWP and compared with adjudicated combined pre- and postcapillary (Cpc) PH related to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Participants underwent dynamic right heart catheterization and metabolomics. Findings were validated in 3 independent cohorts with adjudicated group 1 PH (validation cohorts 1 and 2 with exercise right heart catheterization and validation cohort 3 with resting right heart catheterization). RESULTS: Of 325 patients with group 1 PH (73% women, mean age 53.0±14.3 years), 15% (n=48) had high PAWP. Group 1 PH+high PAWP demonstrated greater obesity, left ventricular hypertrophy ( P <0.0002), left ventricular strain impairment ( P <0.0001), and decreased left ventricular compliance ( P <0.0001) compared with group 1 PH+normal PAWP, with changes comparable to Cpc-PH HFpEF (n=75). Compared with Cpc-PH HFpEF, left atrial function was better in group 1 PH+high PAWP with lower PAWP V wave, higher left atrial compliance, and left atrial ejection fraction ( P <0.0001 for all). Metabolomics demonstrated little difference between group 1 PH with high versus normal PAWP but large differences between group 1 PH+high PAWP versus Cpc-PH HFpEF (100 metabolites altered at false discovery rate P <0.05). Elevated PAWP was also observed in 18% of group 1 PH in the validation cohort 1 (n=402), with exercise PAWP response intermediately abnormal in group 1 PH+high PAWP relative to Cpc-PH HFpEF and group 1 PH+normal PAWP (interaction P <0.0001). Elevated PAWP was similarly observed in 22% and 19% of group 1 PH in validation cohorts 2 (n=55) and 3 (n=787), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 5 adjudicated patients with group 1 PH has elevation in resting PAWP despite severe pulmonary vascular dysfunction and metabolomics consistent with traditionally defined group 1 PH. Despite resting PAWP elevation, these patients with group 1 PH were metabolomically and biologically distinct from Cpc PH HFpEF, with better left atrial function and diastolic reserve during exercise. These data emphasize the limitations of using resting PAWP alone to separate group 1 PH from HFpEF and call for development of more integrated clinical diagnostic criteria.

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often complain of dyspnea, raising the question that symptoms could be related to unrecognized heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We used the HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF algorithm to estimate the probability of undiagnosed HFpEF in CABANA (Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy), and its interaction with catheter ablation on quality of life (QOL). Probable HFpEF was defined as patient‐reported dyspnea with HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability≥75%. Absence of dyspnea or HFpEF‐age, body mass index and history of AF probability<75% was considered to reflect patients without HFpEF. The effect of randomization to catheter ablation on QOL (Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory questionnaire and EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score) was assessed using mixed models. Results Of participants without known HF, 70% (n=1225) had probable HFpEF and the remaining 30% (n=522) did not. Those with probable HFpEF had worse New York Heart Association class, EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level score, Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity, and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory frequency scores ( P <0.0001 for all), with higher risk of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19 [95% CI, 1.11–4.31], P =0.01). Ablation resulted in greater improvement in EuroQol‐5 Dimension‐3 Level and Mayo Atrial Fibrillation‐Specific Symptom Inventory severity/frequency scores in probable HFpEF (interactions P =0.005, P =0.05, and P =0.04 respectively). In probable HFpEF, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92], P =0.003, interaction P =0.03) but not HF hospitalization (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.55–1.64], P =0.84). Conclusions Nearly three quarters of CABANA participants had potentially undiagnosed HFpEF, with worse QOL and risk of HF hospitalization. Catheter ablation in probable HFpEF resulted in greater improvement in QOL, but residual QOL impairment and HF risk remained elevated despite ablation. These data reinforce the importance of diligent consideration of HFpEF among patients with symptomatic AF to ensure optimal use of foundational treatments for HF.

Abstract Background Approximately one-third of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) have exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (EILAH), characterized by normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest, but with pathologic PCWP elevation during exercise. It has been proposed that EILAH may represent an early stage of HFpEF that progresses to resting LA hypertension (RELAH) over time, but this has never been shown. Purpose This observational study aimed to investigate the natural history of patients with EILAH, evaluating patients who underwent multiple invasive hemodynamic evaluations over time. Methods Consecutively-evaluated patients with HFpEF and EILAH (PCWP&lt;15 mmHg at rest and ≥25 mmHg during exercise) who underwent subsequent invasive hemodynamic testing were identified. Prevalence and characteristics of transition to RELAH (PCWP≥15 mmHg at rest) were evaluated. Results Of 659 patients with EILAH, 84 underwent repeat invasive hemodynamic evaluations over a median follow-up of 1.81 (IQR 0.48-3.40) years (55 female, mean age 66 years). Of this group, 33 (39%) patients changed to RELAH and 51 (61%) remained EILAH. Patients with change to RELAH experienced greater increase in NT-proBNP (+16.6%; 95% CI: 7.1% to 26.0%, P&lt;0.001), decreased left ventricular EF (-6.1%, 95% CI: -9.7 to -2.5, P=0.001), right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (-4.5%, 95% CI: -8.8 to -0.3, P=0.037), RV free wall longitudinal strain (-7.3%, 95% CI: -13.1 to -1.6, P=0.013) and worsening tricuspid regurgitation (15% vs 2%, P=0.025) compared to those with no change (Figure 1). Upon invasive hemodynamic at rest, patients with change to RELAH experienced an increase in right atrial pressure (RAP) (+4.4 mmHg, 95% CI: 2.6 to 6.1, P&lt;0.001) and mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (+6.6 mmHg, 95% CI: 4.2 to 9.0, P&lt;0.001) (Figure 1). At the baseline, there were no significant differences in the exercise-induced increases in PCWP, mean PAP, and RAP between the two groups from rest to peak exercise (Figure 2). However, at the final evaluation, patients with change to RELAH displayed a greater increase in PCWP, mean PAP, and RAP during exercise as compared to those who remained EILAH (Figure 2). Of characteristics at the index evaluation, history of atrial fibrillation (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.09-12.8, P=0.036), and lower resting PA compliance (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.24-0.99, P=0.048) were independently associated with the transition to RELAH after adjusting the duration from baseline to final examination. Conclusions Approximately 40% of patients with HFpEF that first present with EILAH to RELAH, suggesting that EILAH can be considered an earlier form of HFpEF. History of atrial fibrillation and reduced PA compliance are associated with progression to RELAH, suggesting that interventions to address atrial myopathy and pulmonary vascular disease may be effective to attenuate or prevent this transition.

Abstract Background Left atrial pressure (LAP) is clinically estimated by the occluded pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (PA wedge pressure, PAWP), which should equalize with downstream LAP. Early studies reported the potential for PAWP to exceed LAP, but the frequency and clinical significance of this finding is unclear. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the hemodynamic characteristics, physiologic determinants, and prognostic impact of patients with PAWP exceeding LAP. Method Patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) for diagnosis or treatment with PAWP and simultaneous measurement of LAP were identified. Patients were divided into two groups based on differences in PAWP and LAP. Pulmonary capillary pressure (Pc) was measured using the PA occlusion technique. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was then partitioned into upstream PVRa ([mean PA pressure (PAP)-Pc]/cardiac output [CO]) and downstream PVRv ([Pc-PAWP]/CO), with each expressed as a percentage of PVR. Results 675 patients underwent RHC with transseptal puncture allowing measurement of both PAWP and LAP simultaneously. A strong correlation and agreement between PAWP and LAP were demonstrated (r=0.92, P&lt;0.001; bias +0.5 mmHg), but 310 patients (46%) displayed PAWP exceeding LAP by at least 1 mmHg (mean difference 3±2 mmHg). Patients with PAWP exceeding LAP displayed higher mean PAP (Figure 1A) and PVR calculated using LAP as the downstream pressure (PVR-LA: 2.10 [1.13-3.53] vs 3.38 [2.19-5.66] WU, P&lt;0.001). PAWP was significantly higher in patients with PAWP exceeding LAP, although there was no significant difference in LAP between the groups (Figure 1B-C). PA compliance, which does not rely on either PAWP or LAP for calculation, was significantly lower in patients with PAWP exceeding LAP (2.7 [1.8-4.0] vs 2.1 [1.5-3.0] mL/mmHg, P&lt;0.001, Figure 1D). The difference between PAWP and LAP was significantly correlated with mean PAP (r=0.32, P&lt;0.001, Figure 1E). In 63 patients where Pc could be measured, those with PAWP exceeding LAP showed a higher Pc and greater pulmonary venous (vs arterial) distribution of PVR (Figure 1F-H). Over 5.4 (IQR 1.7-10.2) years, the composite outcome of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 326 patients (48%). Patients with PAWP exceeding LAP had a higher risk of the composite outcome than those without (log-rank P&lt;0.001, Figure 2). Patients with PAWP exceeding LAP had 37% greater risk of composite outcome than those without (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.73; P=0.008) after adjusting for age, sex, hemoglobin, moderate or greater mitral regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation, LAP, and mean PAP. Conclusions While PAWP is a robust surrogate for LAP, the former commonly exceeds the latter, and patients with PAWP exceeding LAP have more severe pulmonary vascular disease, greater capillary hypertension and venous involvement, and a higher risk for adverse outcomes.