Perry, Avital

Abstract Background Cadaveric dissection remains a preferred and irreplaceable learning modality among neurosurgery residents. We aimed to develop and describe a tiered, quantifiable, and practical curriculum for cranial neurosurgical anatomy education. We report the structure and evaluation of our 2-year pilot study to serve as a suggested guide for other neurosurgery programs. Methods Our Complex Cranial Dissection Program is tailored to the needs of junior-level neurosurgery residents based on their postgraduation years 1 to 4. Dissections are performed in a sequential manner, each of which emphasize a particular set of manual skills and neuroanatomical knowledge. Dissections are scored on a scale of 10 points. The grading was based on specific landmarks and anatomical structures, which need to be exposed, explored, and preserved. Results Out of 16 residents, 14 individuals (87.5%) attended the dissections in the first iteration of the program and 16 individuals (100%) attended the dissections in the second iteration. A total of 17 dissections were performed across all years. In survey feedback about the program, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents considered the assigned dissections to be appropriate for their respective training levels. Further, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents endorsed that the dissections were important and helpful for their practice prior to similar operating room experiences. Conclusion The development and implementation of structured dissection programs within residency training, along with dedicated staff, and objective feedback serve a crucial role in neurosurgical education to further develop and enhance surgical skills in the operative setting.

Abstract Introduction Skull base neuroanatomy is traditionally learned through two-dimensional anatomical atlases, which while are of unquestionable value, lack the nuanced association of three-dimensional relationships between fundamental anatomical structures relevant to surgical approaches. Surgically focused step-by-step anatomical dissections can augment trainee learning of complex skull base techniques, particularly multistep and nuanced techniques such as translabyrinthine and transcochlear approaches. Methods Translabyrinthine and transcochlear approaches were performed on six sides of three formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens. The study objective was the completion and photo documentation of the steps involved in the approach in order to provide a comprehensive, intelligible, and anatomically oriented resource for multilevel trainees. Illustrative case examples were prepared to supplement approach dissections. Results The translabyrinthine and transcochlear approaches offer unique lateral windows through the temporal bone into the posterior fossa, providing excellent access to pathology at the petrous apex, internal auditory canal, Meckel's cave, and anterolateral brainstem. The transcochlear approach, which is an anterior extension of the translabyrinthine, particularly provides excellent exposure of the prepontine region and clivus. Important surgical considerations include patient position, temporal bone drilling and identification of critical landmarks, dural opening and identification of neurovascular structures, and reconstruction/closure techniques. Conclusion The translabyrinthine and transcochlear approaches are fundamental techniques for lateral skull base and posterior fossa pathologies. Both approaches are hearing-sacrificing but often require minimal to no cerebellar retraction and deliver unique visualization of prepontine neurovascular structures. This step-by-step approach guide provides a unique practical and high-yield surgically oriented learning resource for neurosurgery and otolaryngology trainees.

OBJECTIVE The authors report a single-surgeon experience with anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACMs) and propose a novel scoring system to predict visual outcomes based on preoperative risk factors. METHODS A cohort study of all ACMs that were surgically treated by a single surgeon between 2003 and 2021 was performed. Visual function was assessed by an ophthalmologist pre- and postoperatively. Based on the combination of visual fields and visual acuity, 4 visual grades were described. Favorable visual outcomes were defined as mild visual deficit or intact vision postoperatively. Unfavorable visual outcomes were defined as a severe or moderate visual deficit. Predictors of unfavorable visual outcomes were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. A scoring system was then created using the resulting β coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify a cutoff point on the grading score for stratifying patients at risk for unfavorable visual outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-two patients met all inclusion criteria. Twenty-five (48%) patients presented with intact vision, and 27 (51%) presented with some visual dysfunction. Postoperative favorable visual outcomes were achieved in 39 patients (75%). Among the 27 patients presenting with visual dysfunction, 14 (52%) experienced improvement after surgery. No new visual deficits were observed among the 25 patients with intact vision at baseline. Nine patients (17%) had a reversible complication. Multivariable analysis showed that severe preoperative visual deficit (OR 13.03, 95% CI 2.64–64.39; p = 0.002), radiographic evidence of optic nerve (ON) encasement (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.06–16.61; p = 0.04), intraoperative evidence of ON invasion (OR 17.31, 95% CI 2.91–102.86; p = 0.002), an average ganglion cell layer thickness of ≤ 70 µm (OR 21.54, 95% CI 2.94–159.04; p = 0.003), and an average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness of ≤ 80 µm (OR 13.68, 95% CI 1.91–98.00; p = 0.009) were associated with unfavorable visual outcome. The predictive score included the following factors: abnormal optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, radiographic evidence of ON encasement by the tumor, and severe preoperative visual deficit. A score ≥ 4 of 6 points was demonstrated to be the cutoff associated with unfavorable visual outcome, with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 80%, negative predictive value of 88%, and area under the curve of 0.847 (95% CI 0.674–1.0; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS The authors have designed a practical and novel scoring system to predict visual outcomes in patients with ACMs. This scoring system may guide preoperative discussions with patients and timely surgical intervention to yield optimal visual function outcomes. Although most patients have excellent neurosurgical outcomes, severe baseline visual deficits, ON encasement, and characteristic OCT abnormalities are associated with unfavorable visual function after ACM resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Schwannomas originating from the lower cranial nerves (LCNS) are rare and pose a significant surgical challenge. Resection is the mainstay treatment; however, risk of treatment morbidity is considerable, and the available literature regarding differential treatment outcomes in this vulnerable population is sparse. METHODS: A single-institution cohort study and systematic literature review of LCNS were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included: 34 underwent surgical resection and 24 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 17-74). Presenting symptoms were dysphagia (63%), dysarthria/hypophonia (47%), imbalance (33%), and hearing loss/tinnitus (30%). Tumor size was associated with surgical resection, as compared with initial SRS (4.1 cm vs 1.5 cm, P = .0001). Gross total resection was obtained in 52%, with tumor remnants predominantly localized to the jugular foramen (62%). Post-treatment worsening of symptoms occurred in 68% of surgical and 29% of SRS patients ( P = .003). Postoperative symptoms were mostly commonly hypophonia/hoarseness (63%) and dysphagia (59%). Seven patients (29%) had new neurological issues after SRS treatment, but symptoms were overall milder. The median follow-up was 60 months (range 12-252); 98% demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. Eighteen surgical patients (53%) underwent adjuvant radiation at a median of 5 months after resection (range 2-32). At follow-up, tumor control was 97% in the surgical cohort and 96% among SRS patients. CONCLUSION: Although LCNS resection is potentially morbid, most postoperative deficits are transient, and patients achieve excellent tumor control—particularly when paired with adjuvant SRS. For minimally symptomatic patients undergoing surgical intervention, we advise maximally safe resection with intracapsular dissection to preserve nerve integrity where possible. For residual or as a primary treatment modality, SRS is associated with low morbidity and high rates of long-term tumor control.

Abstract Introduction Although many neuroanatomic atlases have been published, few have detailed complex cranial approaches and pertinent anatomic considerations in a stepwise fashion intended for rapid comprehension by neurosurgery students, residents, and fellows. Methods Five sides of formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification. The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches were performed by neurosurgical residents and fellows at different training levels with limited previous experience in anatomical dissection mentored by the senior authors (M.P.C. and M.J.L.). Meticulous surgical anatomic dissections were performed until sufficient visual and technical completion was attained, with parameters of effectively demonstrating key surgical steps for educational training purposes. Following the completion of dissection and three-dimensional photography, illustrative case examples were reviewed to demonstrate the relative benefits and optimal applications of each approach. Results The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches afford excellent access to anterior and middle skull base pathologies, as well as the exposure of the infratemporal fossa. Key considerations include head positioning, skin incision, scalp retraction, fat pad dissection and facial nerve protection, true or false MacCarty keyhole fashioning, sphenoid wing drilling and anterior clinoidectomy, completion of the craniotomy and accessory orbital osteotomy cuts, dural opening, and intradural neurovascular access. Conclusion The frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic approaches are core craniotomies that offer distinct advantages for complex cranial operations. Learning and internalizing their key steps and nuanced applications in a clinical context is critical for trainees of many levels. The orbitozygomatic craniotomy in particular is a versatile but challenging approach; operative-style laboratory dissection is an essential component of its mastery and one that will be powerfully enhanced by the current work.

OBJECTIVE The goal of microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is gross-total resection (GTR) to provide oncological cure. However, a popular strategy is to halt the resection if the surgical team feels the risk of cranial nerve injury is imminent, achieving a maximally safe subtotal resection (STR) instead. The tumor remnant can then be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) once the patient has recovered from the immediate postoperative period, or it can be followed with serial imaging and treated with SRS in a delayed fashion if residual tumor growth is seen. In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of this multimodality approach, particularly the influence of timing and dose of SRS on radiological tumor control, need for salvage treatment, and cranial nerve function. METHODS VS patients treated with initial microsurgery and subsequent radiosurgery were retrospectively included from two tertiary treatment centers and dichotomized depending on whether SRS was given upfront (defined as before 12 months) or later. Radiological tumor control was defined as less than 20% tumor volume expansion and oncological tumor control as an absence of salvage treatment. Facial and cochlear nerve functions were assessed after surgery, at the time of SRS, and at last follow-up. Finally, a systematic literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS A total of 110 VS patients underwent SRS following microsurgical resection, with a mean preradiosurgical tumor volume of 2.2 cm3 (SD 2.5 cm3) and mean post-SRS follow-up time of 5.8 years (SD 4.1 years). The overall radiological tumor control and oncological tumor control were 77.3% and 90.9%, respectively. Thirty-five patients (31.8%) received upfront SRS, while 75 patients (68.2%) were observed for a minimum of 12 months prior to SRS. The timing of SRS did not influence the radiological tumor control (p = 0.869), the oncological tumor control (p = 0.560), or facial nerve (p = 0.413) or cochlear nerve (p = 0.954) function. An escalated marginal dose (> 12 Gy) was associated with greater tumor shrinkage (p = 0.020) and superior radiological tumor control (p = 0.020), but it did not influence the risk of salvage treatment (p = 0.904) or facial (p = 0.351) or cochlear (p = 0.601) nerve deterioration. CONCLUSIONS Delayed SRS after close observation of residuals following STR is a safe alternative to upfront SRS regarding tumor control and cranial nerve preservation in selected patients.