Peters, Bradley J.

Abstract Optimal dosing of prophylactic enoxaparin for individuals ≥150 kg is unknown due to limited inclusion in previous studies. Estimate an optimal weight-based prophylactic enoxaparin dose for individuals ≥150 kg. This multicenter, retrospective study included ≥150 kg adult patients admitted to the hospital between January 2014 and April 2024, who received twice daily prophylactic enoxaparin (goal peak anti-Xa 0.2–0.4 IU/mL). At least one peak anti-Xa was required, obtained 3 to 5 hours after the 3rd consecutive dose. The primary outcome was the range of dosing that produced goal prophylactic peak anti-Xa following linear regression modeling. Secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive care unit (ICU)/progressive care unit (PCU) length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and VTE/bleed events within 72 hours after an eligible peak anti-Xa. A total of 311 encounters and 388 peak anti-Xa levels were assessed. Patients were 46 (37–55) years old, 53.1% were male, and weighed 183.3 kg (166.1–204.1) with a BMI of 61.3 kg/m2 (54.8–69.4). Creatinine clearance was 179.6 mL/min (126.5–228.2) and patients received 4 doses (4–6) before peak anti-Xa, with a time between of 249 minutes (227–271). Linear regression modeling revealed a statistically significant correlation (r2 = 0.27) between weight-based dose and peak anti-Xa (p < 0.0001). Enoxaparin 0.34 mg/kg (95% CI 0.33–0.36) twice daily was predicted to achieve a peak anti-Xa of 0.3 IU/mL. Hospital LOS was 8 days (4–15), ICU/PCU LOS was 8 days (4–14, n = 158), and only two patients (0.6%) died during hospitalization. One VTE event was observed. Our results suggest an appropriate empiric weight-based prophylactic enoxaparin dose for hospitalized patients ≥150 kg is 0.34 mg/kg twice daily.

ABSTRACTWe describe a case of a 56‐year‐old male who developed severe, refractory hypotension after an intentional ingestion of clozapine and who became hemodynamically stable after one session of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The patient, who presented after an ingestion of clozapine, was found to have altered mental status and hypotension in the emergency department. Escalating catecholamine vasoactive agents were necessary to maintain adequate hemodynamics. Angiotensin II was added and rapidly up titrated in efforts to maintain adequate blood pressure. Due to persistent hemodynamic instability despite four vasoactive agents, TPE was attempted to enhance the elimination of the highly protein bound medication. Within 2 h of completing TPE, the catecholamines and vasopressin were stopped, and angiotensin II dosing was significantly decreased. This is the first report of utilizing TPE as a method of enhanced elimination of a toxic clozapine ingestion resulting in severe hemodynamic compromise. Further study is necessary to determine if TPE should be incorporated into the care of patients experiencing clozapine toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate effectiveness and safety outcomes associated with the use of ketamine for primary analgosedation in the surgical/trauma ICU setting. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic medical center in Minnesota. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the surgical ICU between 2015 and 2019 requiring mechanical ventilation and meeting one of three definitions for ketamine primary analgosedation were included: 1) no concomitant opioid infusion, 2) ketamine monotherapy for greater than or equal to 6 hours with subsequent opioid infusion, or 3) ketamine initiated concomitantly or within 4 hours of opioid and total opioid duration less than 4 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Use of ketamine, analgesics, and sedatives were evaluated. Pain, sedation, and delirium assessments immediately before and during ketamine infusion were collected and compared with reported goals. Concomitant analgesics, sedatives, and psychotropics were recorded. Reported failures due to ineffectiveness and toxicity were collected. MAIN RESULTS: Of 164 included patients, 88% never received a concomitant opioid infusion (primary analgosedation definition 1), 12% met alternative criteria for primary analgosedation (definitions 2 and 3). A majority, 68%, were surgical admissions and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score was 90 (± 30). Median mechanical ventilation duration was 2.5 days (1.1–4.5) and ICU length of stay of 4.9 days (3–8). The median ketamine infusion dose and duration were 0.18 mg/kg/hr (0.1–0.3) and 30 hours (15.1–51.8). Concomitant infusions of propofol and dexmedetomidine were administered in 49% and 29% of patients, respectively. During ketamine infusion, the median percent of total pain scores at goal was 62% (33–96%), while 64% (37–91%) of Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores were at goal, and 47% of patients were Confusion Assessment Method-ICU positive during the ketamine infusion. Hallucinations were documented in 14% of patients and ketamine failure occurred in 11% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine may be an effective primary analgosedation option in intubated surgical ICU patients, but prospective randomized studies are needed to evaluate this strategy.

IMPORTANCE: The outcomes of critically ill adults with obesity on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are poorly characterized. The impact of CRRT dose on these outcomes is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if obesity conferred a survival advantage for critically ill adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) on CRRT. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the dose of CRRT predicted mortality in this population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective, observational cohort study performed at an academic medical center in Minnesota. The study population included critically ill adults with AKI managed with CRRT. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome of 30-day mortality was compared between obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) and nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) patients. Multivariable regression assessed was used to assess CRRT dose as a predictor of outcomes. An analysis included dose indexed according to actual body weight (ABW), adjusted body weight (AdjBW), or ideal body weight (IBW). RESULTS: Among 1033 included patients, the median (interquartile range) BMI was 26 kg/m2 (23–28 kg/m2) in the nonobese group and 36 kg/m2 (32–41 kg/m2) in the obese group. Mortality was similar between groups at 30 days (54% vs. 48%; p = 0.06) but lower in the obese group at 90 days (62% vs. 55%; p = 0.02). CRRT dose predicted an increase in mortality when indexed according to ABW or AdjBW (hazard ratio [HR], 1.2–1.16) but not IBW (HR, 1.04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In critically ill adults with AKI requiring CRRT, short-term mortality appeared lower in obese patients compared with nonobese patients. Among weight calculations, IBW appears to be preferred to promote safe CRRT dosing in obese patients.

Abstract Purpose We describe the case of a 22-year-old male who developed thyroid storm necessitating therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The patient’s past medical history was complicated by epilepsy, for which he took lacosamide. Little evidence was available to guide lacosamide dosing during TPE. Because of an exacerbation of the patient’s underlying epilepsy in the context of the thyroid storm, we conducted therapeutic medication monitoring of lacosamide concentrations to guide management. Summary We arranged for measurement of the lacosamide concentration immediately before TPE (5.1 μg/mL) and 2.5 hours after the initial measurement (3.4 μg/mL) to determine the amount of lacosamide removed by TPE. Utilizing population pharmacokinetic parameters, we calculated the expected concentration and compared this to the measured concentration. The difference between these values was used to determine the percentage removed via TPE compared to the expected post-TPE concentration. We found that one TPE session removed an additional 20% of serum lacosamide. Conclusion TPE appeared to remove an additional 20% of lacosamide when compared to the expected post-TPE concentration.

AbstractMyasthenia gravis and the associated pharmacologic management options could place patients at higher risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and exhibiting more severe manifestations of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Multiple agents have been studied for the management of the COVID‐19, including remdesivir. To date, no published reports have evaluated the utilization of the antiviral remdesivir in patients with myasthenia gravis. We describe the first reported clinical course of three patients with myasthenia gravis who safely received remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone for the management of COVID‐19.

Study Objective Serum creatinine ( S c r ) concentration is used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (e GFR ) for medication dosing. Serum cystatin C (CysC) concentration has been proposed as an adjunct or alternative to S cr . This study sought to evaluate the possible impact of using CysC in eGFR equations on drug dose recommendations in hospitalized patients with infections. Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Setting Large academic tertiary care medical center. Patients A total of 308 adults with suspected or documented infections and stable kidney function who were hospitalized between 2012 and 2015. Measurements and Main Results Standardized S c r and CysC measured at the time of antibiotic dosing were used to estimate GFR from the three Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborative ( CKD ‐ EPI ) equations using S c r (eGFR Cr ), CysC( eGFR CysC ), or a combination of S c r and CysC (eGFR Cr‐CysC ), and these values were compared with estimated creatinine clearance (eCl cr ) from the Cockcroft‐Gault equation (standard of care for drug dosage adjustments). The eGFR s were categorized into five common dosage adjustment strata (lower than 20, 20–49, 50–79, 80–130, and higher than 130 ml/min), and agreement between equations was tested with the weighted κ statistic. Recommended drug doses varied considerably between the eC l cr and the CKD ‐ EPI equations (weighted κ [95% confidence interval]: eGFR Cr 0.73 [0.68–0.79], eGFR CysC 0.42 [0.35–0.5], eGFR Cr‐CysC 0.65 [0.6–0.71]). If eGFR Cr, eGFR CysC , or eGFR Cr‐CysC were used instead of eC l cr to dose drugs, 11%, 12%, and 8% of doses, respectively, would be higher, and 12%, 38%, and 24% of doses, respectively, would be lower. Conclusion Significant discordance in drug doses was observed when the CKD ‐ EPI equations were used in place of eCl cr . When CysC was included in eGFR equations, recommended doses were often lower. Further study is needed to develop and test drug‐specific dosing guidelines that incorporate alternate renal biomarkers and/or more contemporary eGFR equations.