Back to Authors

Chávez, Julio C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2045-6238

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 12

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphomas: clinical trial results of available products
Chávez, Julio C. , Bachmeier, Christina A. , Kharfan‐Dabaja, Mohamed A. , Chavez, Julio C

Therapeutic Advances in Hematology | April 15, 2019 | Volume: 10 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/2040620719841581 Get It

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell has changed the treatment landscape of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), especially for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Single-center and multicenter clinical trials with anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy have shown great activity and long-term remissions in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) when no other effective treatment options are available. Two CAR T-cell products [axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel] have obtained US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of refractory DLBCL after two lines of therapy. A third product, liso-cel, is currently being evaluated in clinical trials and preliminary results appear very promising. CAR T-cell-related toxicity with cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity remain important potential complications of this therapy. Here, we review the s biology, structure, clinical trial results and toxicity of two commercially approved CAR T-cell products and others currently being studied in multicenter clinical trials in B-cell NHLs.
Ibrutinib for the treatment of Bing-Neel syndrome: a multicenter study
Castillo, Jorge J. , Paludo, Jonas , Varettoni, Marzia , Buske, Christian , Eyre, Toby A. , Chávez, Julio C. , Shain, Kenneth H. , Issa, Samar , Palomba, M. Lia , Pasvolsky, Oren , Simpson, David , Talaulikar, Dipti , Tedeschi, Alessandra , Ansell, Stephen M. , Nayak, Lakshmi , Paludo, Jonas , Buske, Christian , Eyre, Toby A , Chavez, Julio C , Palomba, M Lia , Talaulikar, Dipti , Tam, Constantine S , Tedeschi, Alessandra , Ansell, Stephen M , Treon, Steven , Castillo, Jorge J , Itchaki, Gilad , Tam, Constantine S. , Treon, Steven P. , Varettoni, Marzia , Pasvolsky, Oren

Blood | December 6, 2018 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 299-305

10.1182/blood-2018-10-879593 Get It

Abstract The treatment of patients with Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is not standardized. We included patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and a radiologic and/or cytologic diagnosis of BNS treated with ibrutinib monotherapy. Response assessment was based on criteria for BNS from the 8th International Workshop for WM. Survival from BNS diagnosis (BNS survival), survival from ibrutinib initiation to last follow-up or death (ibrutinib survival), and time from ibrutinib initiation to ibrutinib discontinuation for toxicity, progression, or death (event-free survival [EFS]) were estimated. Twenty-eight patients were included in our study. The median age at BNS diagnosis was 65 years. Ibrutinib was the first line of treatment for BNS in 39% of patients. Ibrutinib was administered orally at a dose of 560 and 420 mg once daily in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively; symptomatic and radiologic improvements were seen in 85% and 60% of patients within 3 months of therapy. At best response, 85% of patients had improvement or resolution of BNS symptoms, 83% had improvement or resolution of radiologic abnormalities, and 47% had cleared the disease in the cerebrospinal fluid. The 2-year EFS rate with ibrutinib was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-91%), the 2-year ibrutinib survival rate was 81% (95% CI, 49%-94%), and the 5-year BNS survival rate was 86% (95% CI, 63%-95%). Ibrutinib therapy is effective in patients with BNS and should be considered as a treatment option in these patients.