Woodworth, Graeme F.

DART nanoparticles overcome critical drug delivery barriers for primary tumors and brain metastases.

Abstract Fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) is the cell surface receptor for the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family member TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK). The Fn14 gene is not normally expressed in healthy tissues, but expression is significantly increased in many primary solid tumor types, including glioblastoma (GBM). High Fn14 expression in tumors is often associated with the stimulation of cancer cell invasion leading to diffuse, aggressive tumors and metastasis. To investigate the effects of increased Fn14 expression in brain tumors, two different tumor types were developed using the RCAS/tv-a transgenic rat model: a low-Fn14, “proneural-like” (PDGFA/shP53 derived) tumor and a high-Fn14 (PDGFA/shP53/Fn14-derived) tumor. Interestingly, rats with high-Fn14 brain tumors had a significantly shorter median survival compared to those with low-Fn14 with 42 days and 70 days median survival, respectively. Using MR proton spectroscopy, both tumor types exhibited the markers of a malignant glioma such as increases in choline to creatinine ratio (Cho/Cr) and decreases in neuronal activity (NAA); however, high-Fn14 tumors also displayed an increase in lactate during tumor progression which is often a sign of high grade, necrotic tumors and poor prognosis. Morphologically, the two tumor subtypes appear quite different. H&E staining of the high-Fn14 tumors showed a highly malignant tumor with several areas of pseudopalisading necrosis within the tumor core. This is different than the somewhat more homogeneous morphology of the low-Fn14 proneural-like tumor. The pattern of tumor cell invasion also differs between the two brain cancer subtypes. High-Fn14 tumors show a more human GBM-like pattern by invading along the white matter tracts whereas low-Fn14 tumors appear to invade more locally with minimal white matter invasion. High-Fn14 tumors were positive for Fn14 throughout the tumor including the invasive rim of the tumor, which is also seen in human GBM, whereas the low-Fn14 tumor revealed very little staining even at the invasive rim. These findings indicate that increased Fn14 expression creates a more malignant brain tumors that develops and behaves more aggressively then low-Fn14 tumors. Citation Format: Nina Connolly, Heather Ames, Nhan L. Tran, Anthony Kim, Jeff Winkles, Graeme Woodworth. Fn14 overexpression in RCAS/tv-a rat gliomas promotes tumor progression, increases invasion and decreases survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3701.

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains the most common and deadly primary brain tumor with minimal advances in therapeutic development for pharmacological treatment. Tumor resection followed by temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy adds months to survival; however, tumor recurrence usually occurs. The fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) receptor has been shown to be up-regulated in the GBM cells left behind after surgery and contributes to an invasive and pro-survival phenotype, providing a desirable molecule to target after removal of the primary tumor. Previously, L524-0366 was reported by our lab to be the first antagonist of Fn14 signaling; however, minimal efficacy/potency has limited this drug from progressing from a useful research tool to preclinical studies. Structure activity relationship (SAR) studies using the parent L524-0366 compound gave rise to K78, which was found to bind to Fn14 with enhanced affinity, while showing no binding to the structurally-related TNFα receptor. Furthermore, K78 was able to abate the downstream signaling effects initiated by the Fn14 ligand, tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), as well as sensitize GBM cells to the cytotoxic effects of TMZ. TWEAK-induced cellular migration was also mitigated with co-treatment of K78 in GBM cells, compared to a vehicle control. It is anticipated that further development of Fn14 antagonists will be of great importance for the advancement of GBM patient treatment and warrant further investigation as primary and combination therapy, especially for the prevention of recurrent disease. Citation Format: Bryan Harder, Chris Sereduk, Harshil Dhruv, Nghia Millard, Anthony Kim, Jeffrey Winkles, Graeme Woodworth, Holly Yin, Nhan L. Tran. Development of an antagonist to the TWEAK-Fn14 ligand-receptor interaction with enhanced efficacy/potency in glioblastoma cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4910.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and lethal form of primary brain cancer. Numerous barriers exist to the effective treatment ofGBMincluding the tightly controlled interface between the bloodstream and central nervous system termed the ‘neurovascular unit,’ a narrow and tortuous tumor extracellular space containing a dense meshwork of proteins and glycosaminoglycans, and genomic heterogeneity and instability. A major goal ofGBMtherapy is achieving sustained drug delivery to glioma cells while minimizing toxicity to adjacent neurons and glia. Targeted nanotherapeutics have emerged as promising drug delivery systems with the potential to improve pharmacokinetic profiles and therapeutic efficacy. Some of the key cell surface molecules that have been identified asGBMtargets include the transferrin receptor, low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein, αvβ3integrin, glucose transporter(s), glial fibrillary acidic protein, connexin 43, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR),EGFRvariantIII, interleukin‐13 receptor α chain variant 2, and fibroblast growth factor‐inducible factor 14. However, most targeted therapeutic formulations have yet to demonstrate improved efficacy related to disease progression or survival. Potential limitations to current targeted nanotherapeutics include: (1) adhesive interactions with nontarget structures, (2) low density or prevalence of the target, (3) lack of target specificity, and (4) genetic instability resulting in alterations of either the target itself or its expression level in response to treatment. In this review, we address these potential limitations in the context of the keyGBMtargets with the goal of advancing the understanding and development of targeted nanotherapeutics forGBM.WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol2017, 9:e1439. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1439This article is categorized under:Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging TechnologiesTherapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Neurological DiseaseTherapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease