Back to Authors

Simone, Charles B.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-3694

Mayo Clinic

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Citations 15

A phase III randomized trial of pleurectomy/decortication plus chemotherapy with or without adjuvant hemithoracic intensity-modulated pleural radiation therapy (IMPRINT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) (NRG LU-006).
Yorke, Ellen , Voong, Khinh Ranh , Peikert, Tobias, Li, Zuofeng , Bradley, Jeffrey, Rimner, Andreas , Zauderer, Marjorie G. , Simone, Charles B. , Gill, Ritu R. , Tsao, Ming‐Sound , Rusch, Valerie W.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: TPS9079-TPS9079

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps9079 Get It

TPS9079 Background: Pleurectomy/Decortication (P/D) with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has become a common lung-sparing surgical approach for MPM. Adjuvant hemithoracic IMPRINT was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and safe in a multi-institutional phase II study, with promising survival outcomes. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored this phase III randomized cooperative group trial to test the efficacy of this lung-sparing trimodality approach for resectable MPM. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed MPM amenable to P/D are enrolled and undergo P/D followed by adjuvant platinum/pemetrexed (preferred) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by P/D. Patients are stratified by histologic subtype, resection status (R0/1 vs. R2), and center patient volume (≤10 vs. > 10 P/Ds per year). Within 8 weeks after completion of the second modality patients are randomized 1:1 to undergo hemithoracic IMPRINT vs. no further therapy. All IMPRINT contours and treatment plans will be centrally reviewed. A contouring atlas and treatment planning constraints for target structures and organs at risk including acceptable and unacceptable variations and deviations were developed. Photon and proton therapy are permitted. The primary endpoint of the study is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include local failure-free, distant-metastases-free and progression-free survival, treatment-related toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) and change in quality-of-life (EORTC QLQ-C30 mean score changes at 9 months post randomization). The target accrual is 150 patients. This study was activated on January 29, 2020. Over 20 institutions have already committed to opening the study which is open to all National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) sites. Treatment planning guidelines and helpful hints for photon and proton therapy will be presented. Conclusions: NRG LU-006 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04158141 ) is open to accrual. This is the first NRG Oncology randomized phase III trial on MPM and evaluates the use of IMPRINT following lung-sparing P/D and chemotherapy. This project was supported by grants U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC), U24CA180803 (IROC) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Clinical trial information: NCT04158141.
Proton therapy for thymic malignancies: multi-institutional patterns-of-care and early clinical outcomes from the proton collaborative group and the university of Florida prospective registries
Mercado, Catherine E. , Hartsell, William F. , Simone, Charles B. , Vargas, Carlos , Zhu, He J., Larson, Gary, Simone, Charles B , Tsai, Henry K. , Henderson, Randal H. , Zeng, Jing , Hoppe, Bradford S.

Acta Oncologica | February 20, 2019 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1036-1040

10.1080/0284186x.2019.1575981 Get It

Dosimetric comparison of advanced radiotherapy approaches using photon techniques and particle therapy in the postoperative management of thymoma
Haefner, Matthias F. , Bougatf, Nina , Mielke, Thomas, Tonndorf‐Martini, Eric, König, Laila , Rwigema, Jean‐Claude M. , Simone, Charles B. , Uhlmann, Lorenz , Eichhorn, Florian , Winter, H. , Grosch, Heidrun, Haberer, Thomas, Herfarth, Klaus , Rieken, Stefan , Simone, Charles B , Verma, Vivek , Debus, Jürgen

Acta Oncologica | September 28, 2018 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1713-1720

10.1080/0284186x.2018.1502467 Get It

Prospective study of proton‐beam radiation therapy for limited‐stage small cell lung cancer
Rwigema, Jean‐Claude M. , Lin, Liyong , Levin, William P., Evans, Tracey L. , Rengan, Ramesh , Langer, Corey J. , Cohen, Roger B. , Simone, Charles B. , Verma, Vivek , Berman, Abigail T. , Aggarwal, Charu , Simone, Charles B , Lin, Liyong

Cancer | July 5, 2017 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 4244-4251

10.1002/cncr.30870 Get It

BACKGROUNDExisting data supporting the use of proton‐beam therapy (PBT) for limited‐stage small cell lung cancer (LS‐SCLC) are limited to a single 6‐patient case series. This is the first prospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LS‐SCLC.METHODSThis study prospectively analyzed patients with primary, nonrecurrent LS‐SCLC definitively treated with PBT and concurrent chemotherapy from 2011 to 2016. Clinical backup intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient and were compared with PBT plans. Outcome measures included local control (LC), recurrence‐free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates and toxicities.RESULTSThirty consecutive patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median dose was 63.9 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 45‐66.6 cobalt gray equivalents) in 33 to 37 fractions delivered daily (n = 18 [60.0%]) or twice daily (n = 12 [40.0%]). The concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/etoposide (n = 21 [70.0%]) or carboplatin/etoposide (n = 9 [30.0%]). In comparison with the backup IMRT plans, PBT allowed statistically significant reductions in the cord, heart, and lung mean doses and the volume receiving at least 5 Gy but not in the esophagus mean dose or the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy. At a median follow‐up of 14 months, the 1‐/2‐year LC and RFS rates were 85%/69% and 63%/42%, respectively. The median OS was 28.2 months, and the 1‐/2‐year OS rates were 72%/58%. There was 1 case each (3.3%) of grade 3 or higher esophagitis, pneumonitis, anorexia, and pericardial effusion. Grade 2 pneumonitis and esophagitis were seen in 10.0% and 43.3% of patients, respectively.CONCLUSIONSIn the first prospective registry study and largest analysis to date of PBT for LS‐SCLC, PBT was found to be safe with a limited incidence of high‐grade toxicities. Cancer 2017;123:4244–4251. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Multi‐institutional experience of stereotactic body radiotherapy for large (≥5 centimeters) non–small cell lung tumors
Shostrom, Valerie , Kumar, Sameera , Zhen, Weining, Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Holland, John , Harkenrider, Matthew M. , Iskhanian, Adrian S., Neboori, Hanmanth J., Attia, Albert, Lee, Percy , Alite, Fiori , Walker, Joshua M. , Stahl, John M. , Wang, Kyle , Bingham, Brian , Hadzitheodorou, C., Decker, Roy H. , McGarry, Ronald C., Simone, Charles B. , Verma, Vivek , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Braunstein, Steve , Jabbour, Salma K , Simone, Charles B

Cancer | October 14, 2016 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 688-696

10.1002/cncr.30375 Get It

BACKGROUNDStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard of care for patients with nonoperative, early‐stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) measuring < 5 cm, but its use among patients with tumors measuring ≥5 cm is considerably less defined, with the existing literature limited to small, single‐institution reports. The current multi‐institutional study reported outcomes evaluating the largest such population reported to date.METHODSClinical/treatment characteristics, outcomes, toxicities, and patterns of failure were assessed in patients with primary NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm without evidence of distant/lymph node metastasis who underwent SBRT using ≤5 fractions. Statistics included Kaplan‐Meier survival analyses and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.RESULTSA total of 92 patients treated from 2004 through 2016 were analyzed from 12 institutions. The median follow‐up was 12 months (15 months in survivors). The median age and tumor size among the patients were 73 years (range, 50‐95 years) and 5.4 cm (range, 5.0‐7.5 cm), respectively. The median dose/fractionation was 50 Gray/5 fractions. The actuarial local control rates at 1 year and 2 years were 95.7% and 73.2%, respectively. The disease‐free survival rate was 72.1% and 53.5%, respectively, at 1 year and 2 years. The 1‐year and 2‐year disease‐specific survival rates were 95.5% and 78.6%, respectively. The median, 1‐year, and 2‐year overall survival rates were 21.4 months, 76.2%, and 46.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, lung cancer history and pre‐SBRT positron emission tomography maximum standardized uptake value were found to be associated with overall survival. Posttreatment failures were most commonly distant (33% of all disease recurrences), followed by local (26%) and those occurring elsewhere in the lung (23%). Three patients had isolated local failures. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities included 1 case (1%) and 4 cases (4%) of grade 3 dermatitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively (toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Grades 2 to 5 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 11% of patients. One patient with a tumor measuring 7.5 cm and a smoking history of 150 pack‐years died of radiation pneumonitis.CONCLUSIONSThe results of the current study, which is the largest study of patients with NSCLC measuring ≥5 cm reported to date, indicate that SBRT is a safe and efficacious option. Cancer 2017;123:688–696. © 2016 American Cancer Society.