Back to Authors

Piulats, Josep M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-1724

Mayo Clinic

Hospital Durans I Reynals ICO, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spanien

Citations 12

Keynote-365 cohort b: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus docetaxel and prednisone in abiraterone (abi) or enzalutamide (enza)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Massard, Christophe , Retz, Margitta, Hammerer, Peter, Fong, Peter C.C. , Berry, William R. , Romano, Emanuela, Conter, Henry Jacob , Augustin, Marinela , Wu, Haiyan , Schloss, Charles , Poehlein, Christian , Quevedo, Fernando , Gurney, Howard , Piulats, Josep M. , Joshua, Anthony M. , Linch, Mark David , Kolinsky, Michael Paul , Sridhar, Srikala S , Yu, Evan Yi-Wen

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 7_suppl | Pages: 170-170

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.170 Get It

170 Background: Pembro had antitumor activity as monotherapy in pretreated advanced mCRPC (KEYNOTE-028; KEYNOTE-199). KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) is a phase 1b/2 umbrella study testing combinations in mCRPC; we report early results from cohort B combining pembro + docetaxel in mCRPC. Methods: Pts who failed or became intolerant to ≥4 weeks of abi or enza in the pre-chemotherapy mCRPC state received pembro 200 mg IV with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W plus prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily. Pts also progressed within 6 months prior to screening as determined by either PSA progression or radiologic progression in bone or soft tissue. Response was evaluated by PSA levels Q3W and imaging Q9W for first year and Q12W thereafter. Primary end points: safety and PSA response rate (confirmed PSA decline ≥50%). Key secondary end points: investigator-determined ORR (RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD ≥6 mo), time to PSA progression, rPFS, and OS. Results: 72 pts (median age 68 years; PD-L1+ 29%; visceral disease 36%; measurable disease 50%) initiated pembro + docetaxel. Median (95% CI) follow-up was 10 (8-12) mo. Efficacy is outlined in table below. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 69 (96%) pts; most frequent (≥30%) were alopecia (43%), fatigue (40%), and diarrhea (39%). Grade 3-5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 27 (38%) pts, including 2 deaths due to treatment-related AEs (pneumonitis). Conclusions: Combination of pembro + docetaxel/prednisone has activity in pts with mCRPC previously failing anti-hormonal therapy. Observed safety profile for the combination was consistent with known safety profile of each component. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573. [Table: see text]
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Beer, Tomasz M. , Kwon, Eugene D., Drake, Charles G. , Fizazi, Karim , Gravis, Gwénaëlle , Ganju, Vinod , Polikoff, Jonathan, Humanski, Piotr, Piulats, Josep M. , Mella, Pablo González, Ng, Siobhan, Jaeger, Dirk, Parnis, Francis, Franke, Fábio , Puente, Javier , Carvajal, Roman, Sengeløv, Lisa, McHenry, M. Brent , Varma, Arvind , Eertwegh, Alfonsus JM. van den, Gerritsen, Winald R. , Logothetis, Christopher, Saad, Fred, Gonzalez Mella, Pablo, Ng, Siobhan S, Parnis, Francis X, Franke, Fabio A, van den Eertwegh, Alfonsus J, Gerritsen, Winald, Logothetis, Christopher J. , Saad, Fred , Eertwegh, Alfonsus Johannes Maria van den, Gravis, Gwenaelle , Beer, Tomasz M

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 11, 2016 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 40-47

10.1200/jco.2016.69.1584 Get It

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.