Hillman, Shauna L.

This article introduces the adverse event (AE) burden score. The AE burden by treatment cycle is a weighted sum of all grades and AEs that the patient experienced in a cycle. The overall AE burden score is the total AE burden the patient experienced across all treatment cycles. AE data from two completed Alliance multi-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials, with different AE profiles (NCCTG 97-24-51: 176 patients, and A091105: 83 patients), were utilized for illustration. Results of the AE burden score analyses corroborated the trials’ primary results. In 97-24-51, the overall AE burden for patients on the treatment arm was 2.2 points higher than those on the placebo arm, with a higher AE burden for patients who went off treatment early due to AE. Similarly, in A091105, the overall AE burden was 1.6 points higher on the treatment arm. On the placebo arms, the AE burden in 97-24-51 remained constant over time; and increased in later cycles in A091105, likely attributable to the increase in disease morbidity. The AE burden score enables statistical comparisons analogous to other quantitative endpoints in clinical trials, and can readily accommodate different trial settings, diseases, and treatments, with diverse AE profiles.

7544 Background: NCCTG N0028 was a trial that determined the MTD of RT that could be given with carboplatin & paclitaxel was 74 Gy/34 fractions. This secondary analysis was performed to determine the survival of pts treated on this trial. Methods: Eligible pts had medically or surgically unresectable NSCLC, PS=0–1, weight loss <10% in the prior 3 months(mo), no prior therapy, adequate laboratory & pulmonary functions. Included were 25 pts with clinical stages I (4pts), II (1 pt), IIIa (12 pts), & IIIb (8 pts). Treatment included: weekly I.V. paclitaxel (50mg/m2) & carboplatin (AUC=2) during RT. The RT included 2 Gy daily to an initial dose of 70 Gy. The total dose was increased in 4 Gy increments until the MTD was determined. RT was delivered with 3-D treatment planning but no elective nodal RT. Three pts received 70 Gy, 18 pts received 74 Gy, & 4 pts received 78Gy. Results: Pts were followed until death or from 10–67 mo (median: 28mo) in those alive at last evaluation. The median survival (MS) of the entire cohort was 42mo. The 5 stages I-II pts had a MS of 53 mo & the 20 stage III pts had MS of 42mo. Conclusions: Standard dose RT is unable to sterilize disease in the majority of pts with unresectable NSCLC. While the addition of chemotherapy has significantly improved survival of these pts, the MS is generally 15–24 mo. These preliminary results suggest higher than standard doses of RT may improve disease control & prolong survival. A phase III trial comparing standard-dose RT(60Gy) to high-dose RT (74Gy) is open and should more definitively address the issue of RT dose with concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable NSCLC. Future technological improvements in imaging & targeting will provide methods to safely administer even greater RT doses which will likely further improve disease control. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

TPS9077 Background: ALCHEMIST (Adjuvant Lung Cancer Enrichment Marker Identification and Sequencing Trial) is a clinical trial platform of the National Cancer Institute that offers biomarker analysis for high-risk resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to support randomized trials of novel adjuvant therapies within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). EA5142, a trial of adjuvant nivolumab for patients (pts) without EGFR / ALK alterations, has completed enrollment. Given the survival benefit seen with 1st-line chemo-immunotherapy (chemo-IO) for advanced NSCLC without EGFR / ALK alterations, there was compelling rationale for the launch of a trial offering concurrent immunotherapy with adjuvant chemo. Here we report updated enrollment to ALCHEMIST as of Jan 14, 2020. Methods: ALCHEMIST includes a screening trial (A151216, 5362 registered) that enrolls pts with completely resected clinical stage IB (≥4 cm)–IIIA (per AJCC 7) NSCLC. Tissue and blood are collected, biomarker testing includes EGFR sequencing, ALK FISH and PD-L1 IHC. 733 active sites are enrolling across the NCTN. Pts with EGFR mutations may enroll to adjuvant erlotinib vs observation (A081105, 352 randomized); those with ALK fusions may enroll to adjuvant crizotinib vs observation (E4512, 99 randomized). A trial offering adjuvant nivolumab vs observation regardless of PD-L1 status (EA5142, 935 randomized) recently completed enrollment. To support ongoing investigation of adjuvant immunotherapy, ALCHEMIST is adding A081801 (opens spring 2020). Pts will be randomized to one of 3 arms: chemo-IO with pembrolizumab during and after chemo vs sequential chemo followed by pembrolizumab vs chemo alone. Pts with pathological N2 nodes are eligible and can undergo postoperative radiotherapy after completing chemo. Pts are eligible if enrolled to A151216, negative for EGFR and ALK alterations, and with PD-L1 testing completed (required for stratification). Local testing for EGFR, ALK and PD-L1 will be accepted for enrollment; central testing will not delay randomization. Pts may not have received any therapy except surgery for the lung cancer and must be age >18, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, have no active autoimmune disease requiring systemic treatment within 2 years, must not be pregnant or nursing, have no active second malignancy within 3 years and meet standard organ function values. By building off the ongoing ALCHEMIST platform, we hope to facilitate rapid enrollment to A081801 across participating NCTN sites. Clinical trial information: NCT02194738.

7502 Background: Prior studies suggest that adjuvant brachytherapy reduces local recurrence (LR) after sublobar resection (SR) for NSCLC. A multicenter randomized study was undertaken in patients (pts) with stage I NSCLC ≤3cm comparing SR to SR with brachytherapy (SRB). Methods: High-risk operable patients with NSCLC were randomized to SR or SRB. Brachytherapy involved placement of I125 seeds incorporated into Vicryl sutures or into Vicryl mesh placed over the staple line. Wedge or segmental resection was allowed. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence (LR) defined as recurrence within the primary tumor lobe at the staple line (local progression), away from the staple line or within hilar nodes. The trial was designed to have 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.315 in favor of the SRB arm using a one-sided α of 0.05 with a sample size of 100 eligible pts per arm. Follow-up CT scans were obtained serially for 36 months. Results: 224 pts were randomized; 213 (109 SR,104 SRB) were eligible. Median (range) age was 71 (49-87) yrs; 94 (44%) were male. No differences were found in baseline characteristics. Adverse events, previously reported, were not different between arms. Median (range) follow-up was 4.06 (0.04, 5.0) yrs. There was no difference between arms in time to LR (HR = 0.87; 5% CI: 0.41, 1.86, p=0.72) or to LR or death (LRD) (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.32, p=0.40). There was no difference between arms in pattern of LR (table). In subgroups of pts with potentially compromised surgical margin (margin < 1cm; margin:tumor ratio <1; positive staple line cytology) SRB did not reduce LR or LRD at 3-yrs. Overall 3-yr survival was similar for SR (71%) and SRB (72%) (p=0.81). Conclusions: LR remains a concern after sublobar resection. However, local progression at the staple line was low. This trial demonstrated that adjuvant brachytherapy does not impact oncologic outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]

6006 Background: In March 1998, the Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 was implemented and introduced the collection and reporting of attribution of adverse events to study treatment. Collection and reporting of attribution adds time and cost to the clinical trial process, and its use while reporting adverse events (AE) in the literature has varied. We investigate whether attribution adds value to the interpretation of AE data. Methods: Patients on the placebo arm of trial 97–24–51 (CAI vs. Placebo) were chosen since the true relationship of the event to the study treatment is known (“unrelated”). Attribution was collected per CTCv2.0 and categorized as “not related” (not related or unlikely) and “related” (possible, probable, or definite). All reported AEs and the maximum severity for a given AE were evaluated. Patterns were evaluated using generalized estimating equations adjusting for multiple events per patient. Changes in attribution over time for the same event were computed. Results: 84 patients on the placebo arm experienced a total of 1013 AEs. 47% of AEs were reported as “related” with 36% reported as possibly related. Known CAI AEs were more likely to be reported as “related” (p = 0.005). Pulmonary AEs were more likely to be reported as “not related” (p = 0.0006). No patterns were observed by gender, age, PS, severity or treatment cycle of AE. When the same event was reported on the same patient in multiple cycles, the attribution category changed at least once 36% of the time with 25% changing from “related” to “unrelated” or vice versa. Conclusion: Almost 50% of events on a placebo arm of a phase III trial were reported as being attributed to study treatment and 25% of the time the same event was not consistently attributed. These data suggest that attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and thus its value in large phase III trials is questionable. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

13013 Background: The glutathione metabolic pathway is directly involved in the inactivation of platinum compounds. Our earlier work indicated that genotypes corresponding to varied glutathione-related enzyme activities may predict survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. Herein, we evaluated the role of glutathione-related genotypes on clinical outcomes in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer patients who were stable or responding from one prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: DNA samples from patients who had tumor regression or stable disease after treatment with one platinum based chemotherapy regimen were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers that encode 5 important enzymes in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes used in the analysis were GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*), GPX1 (CC vs. other), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. other), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. other), GSTM1 (null vs. present), and GSTT1 (null vs. present). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, treatment arm, ECOG performance status, stage, and prior tumor response, were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the genotypes at each locus. Results: Data from 112 patients with a median follow-up of 10.6 (range: 0.4–56.3) months was used. No significant difference in time to disease progression was observed for any of the genotypes. Among the 6 genomic DNA markers, the GCLC genotype was an important prognostic factor for overall survival after adjusting for other factors. In particular, patients carrying a 77 repeat genotype (homozygous) had a significantly worse survival (Hazard ratio = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.05–2.63). Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be used as host factors in predicting patients’ prognosis after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the effects of these genes in chemotherapeutic regimens is needed. (This work was partly supported by NIH research grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

18037 Background: Platinum compounds are major chemotherapeutic agents in lung cancer and are metabolized by the glutathione pathway enzymes. We reported that genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GCLC, may be host factors in predicting survival of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer who were stable or responding from prior platinum-based chemotherapy (Yang et al., ASCO 2006). NCCTG investigators previously correlated allelic variants in 5-FU metabolizing genes with QOL in colorectal cancer patients (Sloan et al., ASCO 2004). We sought to evaluate the role of glutathione pathway genotypes on QOL. Methods: DNA samples were analyzed using 6 polymorphic DNA markers in the glutathione metabolic pathway. The contrasting genotypes in the analysis were GSTM1 and GSTT1 (null vs. present), GSTP1-I105V (AA vs. GA/GG), GSTP1-A114V (CC vs. CT/TT), GPX1 (CC vs. TT/TC), and GCLC (homozygous repeat 77 vs. heterozygous 7*). Forty-six patients completed the FACT-L and the UNISCALE QOL questionnaires at baseline and week-8, and we have results for all 6 genotypes. A clinically significant decline (CSD) in QOL was defined as a 10% decrease from baseline to week-8. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association of all 6 genotypes with a CSD in QOL. Results: Patients carrying the GPX1-CC genotype had a CSD in the UNISCALE (Odds Ratio (OR): 10.0; p=0.02), total FACT-L score (OR: 7.9; p=0.03), the FACT-L physical well being construct (OR: 13.7; p=0.02), and the FACT-L functional well being construct (OR: 5.3; p=0.05). Other constructs, i.e., emotional, social and family, and additional concerns were not significantly associated with the genotypes. Conclusions: Genotypes of glutathione-related enzymes, especially GPX1 may be inherited factors in predicting patients’ QOL after platinum-based chemotherapy. Further investigation to define and measure the direct or indirect effects of these genes on QOL is critical, particularly, via drug responses, toxicities, and disease recurrence. (This work was partly supported by NIH grants CA77118, CA80127, and CA84354.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7547 Background: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with single-agent activity in previously treated NSCLC. In an effort to evaluate its single agent activity in previously untreated NSCLC, the NCCTG undertook a front-line “window of opportunity” study. Materials and Methods: Patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC received sorafenib dosed at 400 mg BID continuously, with a cycle defined as 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated weekly during the first 2 cycles with those who progressed rapidly going on to receive standard chemotherapy. Based on a two-stage Fleming design, if only at most 1 confirmed response was observed in the first 20 patients enrolled to stage I, the regimen would be considered ineffective. If 2 or more responses were observed, the study would proceed to stage 2 and accrue an additional 22 patients. If 5 or more confirmed responses were observed, the regimen would be recommended for further testing. Results: The study did not meet the stage I efficacy criteria (only 1 confirmed partial response in the first 20 patients) and was permanently closed after enrolling 25 evaluable patients [15 females, 10 males; 4 stage IIIB, 21 stage IV; median age 67 (45–85)]. 2 patients are still receiving treatment (14 and 15 months). No grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were observed. Thirteen (52%) patients had a grade 3 non-hematologic adverse event with fatigue (20%), diarrhea (8%), and dyspnea (8%) being the most common. There was one grade 4 pulmonary hemorrhage. A total of 3 (12%) PRs; and 7 (28%) SD were observed in the 25 patients 7 (28%) patients were progression- free at 24 weeks. Median survival and median time to progression were 8.8 and 2.9 months respectively. Conclusion: While the pre- specified efficacy endpoints were not met, the objective response rate of 12% and median survival of 8.8 months suggest that single agent sorafenib has activity similar to two-drug combinations. The feasibility and utility of the “window of opportunity” design in estimating the activity of novel compounds was demonstrated. Finally, the single-agent activity of sorafenib argues for combination studies with standard chemotherapy agents. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6511 Background: In March 1998, the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 introduced the collection of attribution of adverse events (AE) to study drug. Collection of attribution adds time and cost to the clinical trial process, and reporting in the literature has varied. At ASCO 2006 results were presented from NCCTG trial 97–24–51 that showed ∼ 50% of events on the placebo arm were reported as attributed to study drug and 25% of the time the same event was not consistently attributed. We sought to validate these results in a second placebo controlled trial. Methods: Patients on the placebo arm of the phase III ACOSOG trial Z9001 (imatinib mesylate vs. placebo after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors) were evaluated since the reported AEs could not be due to study drug. Attribution was collected per CTCv3.0 as not related, unlikely, possibly, probably, or definitely related, and categorized as “unrelated” (not related or unlikely) and “related” (possible, probable, or definite). Patterns were evaluated using generalized estimating equations adjusting for multiple events per patient. Results: 202 patients and 2871 AEs were included. 52% of AEs were reported as “related”. Known imatinib AEs were more likely to be reported as “related”. The reported rate of AE relatedness varied by AE type. No patterns were observed by gender, age, PS, severity or visit of AE. When the same event was reported on the same patient on multiple visits, the attribution category changed at least once 33% of the time with 19% changing from “related” to “unrelated” or vice versa. Conclusion: 52% of events on the placebo arm of Z9001 were reported as attributed to study drug and 19% of the time the same event was not consistently attributed. These data provide further evidence that attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and of questionable value in interpreting randomized clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]