Klempner, Samuel J.

292 Background: Despite recent approval of anti-PD-1 antibodies as 1L therapy in HER2(-) advanced GEA, benefit remains modest and limited largely to PD-L1(+) patients (pts), primarily those with combined positive scores (CPS) ≥5. Thus novel therapeutic approaches are needed for this pt population. DKN-01 is a targeted anti-DKK1 mAb which has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in pts with elevated tumoral DKK1 expression, a subset of pts with more aggressive disease and shorter overall survival. Methods: DisTinGuish (NCT04363801) is a Phase 2a single arm 2-part trial; Part A investigated DKN-01 (D) + tislelizumab (TS) + CAPOX as 1L therapy for pts with advanced HER2(-) GEA regardless of DKK1 status; Part B investigated two dosing cohorts of D (300 mg and 600 mg) + TS as 2L therapy for DKK1-high advanced GEA pts. Primary objective was to examine safety and tolerability and secondary objectives evaluated multiple efficacy endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) in a modified intent to treat (mITT) population (>1 dose D). Results: Forty-nine pts enrolled between 01 Sept 2020 and 15 Sept 2021; 25 pts in Part A and 24 pts in Part B (D-300 mg). Key clinicopathologic features and efficacy outcomes are shown in Table. The most common D-related AEs were low grade (G1/2) fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Nine pts had D-related ≥G3 toxicities, elevated AST/ALT, elevated alkaline phosphatase, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue all occurring in 1 pt and pulmonary embolism in 2 pts (one G5 event). No new safety signals were observed in Part A or B1. Duration of response (DoR), median PFS and median OS have not been reached for Part A. Last pt enrolled in Part B1 on 15 Sept 2021. Conclusions: The combination of D/TS + CAPOX represents a well-tolerated, active 1L combination, particularly for DKK1-high patients consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. Activity appears to be independent of PD-L1 status. Part B1 is aligned with biomarker enrichment and efficacy and biomarker data will be presented along with updated Part A efficacy data. Clinical trial information: NCT04363801. [Table: see text]

497 Background: As activating RAS mutations have been shown to predict lack of benefit from anti-EGFR therapies in advanced CRC, NCCN guidelines recommend testing for KRAS exon 2 and non-exon 2 mutations; however, these alterations are thought to explain only a subset of de novo resistance to targeted therapy. In a large set of CRC assayed with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care, we assessed the frequency of less common KRAS short insertions that may predict failure of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: 4,422 CRC cases were assayed with CGP performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of > 650X for at least 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. All classes of genomic alterations (GA) were identified, including base pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. Pertinent available prior molecular testing results and clinical history was reviewed for selected cases. Results: Out of 4,422 CRC cases analyzed, KRAS short variants were identified in 50.9% of cases. A majority of cases contained a KRAS alteration at either codon G12 (35.5%) or G13 (9.1%), while alterations at codons Q61 or A146 were identified in 2.2% and 3.1% of cases, respectively. KRAS insertions were identified in 8 ( < 0.5%) cases. All KRAS insertions identified fell within codons 9-13, and 6/8 cases harbored V9_G10 insertions. Out of 6 patients with prior KRAS testing results available, 5 (83%) were negative by previous testing. Conclusions: CGP identifies KRAS insertions within or adjacent to hotspot regions in CRC cases which have previously tested negative for KRAS mutations. Given the importance of KRAS alterations in predicting lack of response to anti-EGFR therapies in CRC, accurate detection of these alterations in the course of clinical care is essential for effective treatment. CGP offers the possibility of identifying KRAS insertions that may impact efficacy of anti-EGFR targeted therapy and should be considered when previous focused testing for KRAS mutations is negative.

Abstract Introduction. A KRAS mutation represented the first genomic biomarker to predict lack of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded RAS testing has further refined the treatment approach, but understanding of genomic alterations underlying primary and acquired resistance is limited and further study is needed. Materials and Methods. We prospectively analyzed 4,422 clinical samples from patients with advanced CRC, using hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians. Comparison with prior molecular testing results, when available, was performed to assess concordance. Results. We identified a RAS/RAF pathway mutation or amplification in 62% of cases, including samples harboring KRAS mutations outside of the codon 12/13 hotspot region in 6.4% of cases. Among cases with KRAS non-codon 12/13 alterations for which prior test results were available, 79 of 90 (88%) were not identified by focused testing. Of 1,644 RAS/RAF wild-type cases analyzed by CGP, 31% harbored a genomic alteration (GA) associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC including mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, EGFR, and ERBB2. We also identified other targetable GA, including novel kinase fusions, receptor tyrosine kinase amplification, activating point mutations, as well as microsatellite instability. Conclusion. Extended genomic profiling reliably detects alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC, while simultaneously identifying alterations potentially important in guiding treatment. The use of CGP during the course of clinical care allows for the refined selection of appropriate targeted therapies and clinical trials, increasing the chance of clinical benefit and avoiding therapeutic futility.

Abstract Introduction. For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to benefit from ALK inhibitors, sensitive and specific detection of ALK genomic rearrangements is needed. ALK break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved and standard-of-care diagnostic assay, but identification of ALK rearrangements by other methods reported in NSCLC cases that tested negative for ALK rearrangements by FISH suggests a significant false-negative rate. We report here a large series of NSCLC cases assayed by hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care. Materials and Methods. Hybrid-capture-based CGP using next-generation sequencing was performed in the course of clinical care of 1,070 patients with advanced lung cancer. Each tumor sample was evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations, including base-pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations and rearrangements, as well as fusions/rearrangements. Results. A total of 47 patients (4.4%) were found to harbor ALK rearrangements, of whom 41 had an EML4-ALK fusion, and 6 had other fusion partners, including 3 previously unreported rearrangement events: EIF2AK-ALK, PPM1B-ALK, and PRKAR1A-ALK. Of 41 patients harboring ALK rearrangements, 31 had prior FISH testing results available. Of these, 20 were ALK FISH positive, and 11 (35%) were ALK FISH negative. Of the latter 11 patients, 9 received crizotinib based on the CGP results, and 7 achieved a response with median duration of 17 months. Conclusion. Comprehensive genomic profiling detected canonical ALK rearrangements and ALK rearrangements with noncanonical fusion partners in a subset of patients with NSCLC with previously negative ALK FISH results. In this series, such patients had durable responses to ALK inhibitors, comparable to historical response rates for ALK FISH-positive cases.