Smoley, Stephanie A.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Karyotype analysis of metaphase cells for discovering genome-wide cytogenetic abnormalities has played an important role in prognosis and counseling of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to the low proliferative rate of CLL B cells, karyotype analysis has been of limited clinical utility in this disease. Thus, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase cells has replaced karyotype analysis for the assessment of recurrent genetic changes in CLL. Recently, immunostimulatory CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG) have been shown to induce primary CLL B cell proliferation via engagement of toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), thereby rendering karyotype analysis feasible and providing for a useful and reliable method to discover new cytogenetic abnormalities in CLL B cells. However, we and others have shown that CpG stimulation of CLL and normal B cells also induces robust expression of activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a mutagenic enzyme that is linked to the development of cytogenetic abnormalities. It is therefore plausible that cytogenetic abnormalities observed following CpG stimulation of CLL B cells may not reflect de novo abnormalities but rather reflect CpG induced-AID mediated cytogenetic alterations. We began to address this possibility by assessing the effects of CpG stimulation on the karyotypes of normal blood B cells. HYPOTHESIS: Since CpG stimulation induces AID expression in CLL and normal B cells, we hypothesize that: robust B cell activation by CpG could result in cytogenetic abnormalities thereby contributing to lymphomagenesis; and if CpG induces cytogenetic abnormalities that are linked to disease initiation and/or progression, such information would be of great value in the interpretation of cytogenetic data obtained from CpG-stimulated CLL B cells. METHODS: We performed interphase FISH analysis on freshly isolated blood B cells, and metaphase karyotype analysis on CpG stimulated B cells from 17 healthy blood donors. Pure (>98%) B cells obtained by negative selection, were hybridized at isolation with a probe set to identify deletion 6q, 11q, 13q, and 17p, trisomy 12, and IGH gene rearrangements, and cells were also stimulated for 5 days with 10 μg/ml CpG (CpG 2006, synthesized in-house) plus IL-2 and IL-15 for metaphase analysis. At least 20 post-CpG metaphase spreads were analyzed for each sample and abnormalities were considered clonal using the accepted convention (gains or translocations are present in two or more cells and loss present in at least 3 cells). The expression of AID in the B cells pre- and post-CpG stimulation was assessed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: FISH analysis of freshly isolated B cells showed that all 17 subjects were normal. After CpG stimulation, all samples examined exhibited strong AID expression as revealed by RT-PCR. By karyotype analysis, none of the 17 CpG stimulated samples showed evidence of clonal abnormalities. However, one or more nonclonal chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 7 out of 17 (41.2%) samples. Among those 7 samples, 4 samples had 1 abnormal metaphase out of a minimum of 20 examined while the other 3 samples exhibited two or more cells, each with distinct abnormalities. Some of those nonclonal abnormalities have also been observed in CLL (i.e., trisomy 3, trisomy 12 and 14q32 rearrangements). This is a much higher incidence of nonclonal abnormalities than has been seen with peripheral blood cells cultured by other methods. CONCLUSION: Our data have significance for the biology of CLL and for clinical practice. First, our data suggest that signaling through TLR9, and perhaps other receptors that likewise induce robust B cell AID expression, may represent a natural mechanism by which B lineage cells acquire chromosomal abnormalities during normal immune responses that may predispose toward neoplastic transformation. Second, given that none of the CpG-induced metaphases in normal B cells resulted in clonal abnormalities in the 5 day timeframe, our data also validate the clinical utility of CpG as a valuable tool for the cytogenetic analysis of CLL B cells since only clonal abnormalities are currently scored. However, it remains possible that non-clonal abnormalities seen in CpG-stimulated CLL B cells may be relevant to the disease process if future work shows that CpG stimulation uncovers recurring non-clonal defects of chromosomes/genes associated with tumorigenic events.

Abstract Figure Figure Background: An isolated 13q deletion in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the single most common cytogenetic abnormality and is a favorable prognostic parameter (Dohner et al., NEJM3432:1910, 2000). Although 13q- can occur as either a heterozygous (13q-x1) or homozygous (13q-x2) deletion, it is unknown whether these two genetic types differ in their impact on clinical outcome. We previously postulated that 13q-x2 may be a more aggressive anomaly than 13q-x1 (Dewald et al., BJH121:287, 2003) and have undertaken a long-term clinical follow-up of patients with an isolated FISH detectable 13q- to test this hypothesis. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with CLL between October 1992 to May 2008 and who had 13q deletion as their sole FISH abnormality. FISH was performed within 2 years of diagnosis and prior to treatment in all patients. Patients were sorted into three groups: 13q-x1 only, 13q-x2 only, or mosaic with both 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 cells. We assessed differences in percentage of abnormal cells, demographic characteristics, and clinical outcome among the three groups. Results: We identified 259 patients with isolated 13q deletion. Age ranged from 38 to 90 years (median=61) and included 99 women and 160 men. With respect to Rai stage, 142 patients (60%) had low risk [Rai 0], 81 (34%) intermediate risk [Rai I-II], and 13 (6%) high risk [Rai III-IV] disease. After a median follow-up of 1.9 years, 40 patients (15%) have been treated and 17 (7%) have died. Median TFS and OS for all patients were 6.9 and 9.3 years, respectively. The mean percentage of abnormal nuclei in the three groups was 44%, 53%, and 47% for 13q-x1 only, mosaic 13q-x1/13q-x2, or 13q-x2 only, respectively (p=0.22). No significant difference in age or gender was observed based on whether 13q- occurred as a heterozygous or homozygous deletion, or was mosaic. Likewise, no significant difference in survival (p=0.313, see Table) or time to treatment (p=0.53) was found among the three groups. Five year OS rates for the 13q- x1 only, 13q- x2 only, and mosaic 13q- x1/13q- x2 are 85%, 95%, and 83%, respectively Median time to treatment for 13q-x1 was not reached, and for the mosaic13q-x1/13q-x2 and 13q-x2 groups median time to treatment was 6.9 and 4.9 years, respectively. Conclusions: The presence of deletion in one versus two 13q- chromosomes in CLL patients appears to have no significant impact on treatment free or overall survival. This observation supports the grouping of CLL patients with isolated 13q- of one or both alleles into a single risk category as originally proposed in the risk categorization by Dohner et al. Taking the present findings together with those of Dohner et al and Dewald et al, we propose a hierarchical risk model of FISH abnormalities in CLL as 17p- à 11q- à 6q- à +12 à normal à 13q-, from most to least aggressive. The 13q- group would now include 13q-x1, 13q-x2, and the mosaic subgroups.

Abstract Abstract 2838 The combination of novel agents and chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has led to a significant increase in both overall and complete response rates for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). There is, however, significant clinical heterogeneity in the overall effectiveness of CIT. Specifically, some patients are long-term responders who experience durable clinical remission while others, even though responding well initially, have less durable remissions. It is unclear if this heterogeneity is a reflection of an incomplete cytotoxic effect or whether certain leukemia sub-populations (i.e. subclones) are resistant to the effects of CIT. Comprehensive analysis of tumor cells has provided, in some malignancies, evidence of extraordinary genomic complexity and intraclonal genetic diversity. Conversely, little is known of the genetic architecture of the leukemic clone in CLL patients and the extent to which CLL tumor cells differentiate genetically at the subclonal level. In order to gain insight into the genetic architecture and clonal evolution underlying disease progression/relapse, we performed a sequential, longitudinal whole genome analysis by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in 22 CLL cases with evidence of clinical progression and/or clinical relapse post therapy. These patients received standard purine analogue, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (PCR) for progressive disease. For the purposes of this study, we classified samples as; time point 1 (TP1) collected >6 months before starting first-line CIT for disease progression; time point 2 (TP2) consisting of tumor samples at the time of initial progression requiring treatment; and time point 3 (TP3) consisting of tumor samples collected >6 months after initial treatment but prior to subsequent treatments. Overall, aCGH assay was performed in 54 samples from 22 cases (2 to 4 time points analyzed per patient): 6 cases were analyzed at TP1 and TP2, 8 at TP2 and TP3, 2 at TP1 and TP3, and the remaining 6 cases were analyzed at TP1, TP2 and TP3. In cases showing genetic changes between time points, FISH analyses were performed in 32 additional samples to assess intra-clonal diversity and provide a quantification of the clone size. There was a small increase in genomic complexity in later time points with a mean of 4 (median 4, range 0–12) CNAs detected at the first time point for each patient, increasing to a mean of 5.3 (median 4.5, range 0–21) CNAs at the last time point analyzed. Diverse patterns of changes in genetic architecture were observed. The simplest change in genetic architectures was the linear sequence, found in 2 cases (9%) and characterized by the maintenance of the initial abnormalities and the subsequent acquisition of additional CNAs in the same subclone. The pattern of changes in genetic architecture in another 4 patients (18%) demonstrated marked heterogeneity including multiple genetic subclones evolving either in succession or in parallel. In all 4 cases with multiple subclones, a marked shift in the dominant subclone was observed at the time of disease relapse, with the minor subclones at TP1 and TP2 becoming the dominant subclones at TP3. In addition, the subclonal evolution continued following secondary therapies, and in all 4 cases the emerging subclone showed resistance to multiple treatments. This argues strongly in favor of subclones with specific genetic structures becoming dominant with the selective evolutionary pressure imposed by therapy. In summary, this sequential genetic study reveals that CLL leukemic B cells exhibit an unanticipated level of heterogeneity including a variable number of genetically distinct subclones, which display dynamic behavior in disease progression. The characterization of this intraclonal architecture is of critical importance to better understand the mechanisms of disease progression and relapse as well as to ultimately inform us of individualized treatment strategies. Disclosures: Fonseca: Consulting :Genzyme, Medtronic, BMS, Amgen, Otsuka, Celgene, Intellikine, Lilly Research Support: Cylene, Onyz, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Background: In B-CLL, the observation of interphase cells with hemizygous D13S319 deletion at 13q14 (13q-x1) as a sole anomaly in blood is widely considered a favorable prognosis. The observation of cells with 11q-, +12 or 17p- has been associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Over the past 1.5 yrs, 16.2% (174/1,076) of patients (pts) referred for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for B-CLL in our clinical practice had a clone with homozygous D13S319 deletion (13q-x2), but the prognostic significance of this observation is poorly understood. Moreover, 39.3% (142/361) of pts with unfavorable FISH anomalies have 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 and the clinical significance of this observation is also unknown. Thus, we investigated pts with 13q- (with or without other chromosome anomalies) to establish the relative clinical significance of 13q- in B-CLL. Methods: We studied 333 pts with B-CLL sampled between 9/1999 and 6/2004 who had FISH performed on interphase nuclei from blood. The FISH probe set was designed to detect 6q-, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, and translocations involving IgH at 14q32. We classified pts into four groups: 13q-x1 only (group 1), 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 only (group 2), 13q-x2 only (group 3) and 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 plus other FISH anomalies (group 4). FISH groups were compared with gender, age, Rai stage, treatment status, time to treatment, CD38 and IgVH mutation. Results: Of the 333 pts, 171 (51.3%) had a 13q-: 71 were in group 1, 25 in group 2, 26 in group 3 and 49 in group 4. %CD38+ differed significantly across FISH groups; in pairwise analyses, the proportion of pts with >30% CD38+ was significantly greater for pts in group 4 vs. group 3 (p=0.0015) although no significant differences were observed for group 3 vs. group 1 or vs. group 2. Pts in group 3 were not significantly different from other FISH groups for Rai stage, IgVH mutation or gender. The median percentage of abnormal nuclei for pts with group 1 was 54.5% vs. 79.5% for pts in group 4 (p<0.0001). The median percent abnormal nuclei for pts in groups 3 and 2 was 72.5% and 68.5%, respectively. Median % abnormal nuclei for group 3 was not significantly different than the other FISH groups. Treatment status was available on 147 pts, where the proportion of pts who had treatment in each group was as follows: group 1, 15/66; group 2, 2/22; group 3, 4/21; and group 4, 9/38. Due to limited sample size and heavy censoring, any analysis on time to treatment is preliminary; however, these early analyses suggest group 4 pts have a lower median time to treatment (9 yrs) compared to groups 3 and 1 (12.3 and 13 yrs, respectively). Conclusions: This study has generated new information about the 13q- anomaly in B-CLL. First, known prognostic markers for B-CLL pts with 13q-x2 are not significantly different than for pts with 13q-x1 or 13q-x1/13q-x2. Second, 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 occurring with other unfavorable FISH anomalies have an unfavorable prognosis; i.e. potential benefits of 13q- are trumped when it is observed with unfavorable FISH anomalies. Thus, patients with any form of 13q- alone may have indolent disease while patients with 13q- and unfavorable FISH anomalies should be considered to be in a more aggressive phase.

Abstract The most common recognized cytogenetic change in B-CLL is a deletion involving band 13q14.3. Dewald found a heterozygous or homozygous 13q– in 92% of CLL patient samples using the FISH probe D13S319 that hybridizes to 13q14.3 (BJH 121:287, 2003). This contrasts with the usually normal conventional chromosome analysis (CCA) results partly because CLL cells divide infrequently but also because the 13q– is often visualized only by FISH (Stockero, Ca Genet Cytogenet 166:152, 2006). Mayr recently showed that CpG stimulation can reveal a chromosomally abnormal CLL clone in metaphase cells (Blood 107:742, 2006). The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of microdeletion and visible 13q deletion in CLL using interphase FISH and CCA after CpG culture on the same peripheral blood specimens. METHOD: We compared the chromosome 13 results by interphase FISH (fresh uncultured cells) and by a 20 metaphase CCA from 5–day CpG cultures. Our unselected CLL cohort (n=40) represented a typical and relatively high risk population: median age 61 (range 36–75), 48% CD38–positive, 62% ZAP–70 positive, and 48% IgVH unmutated. In addition 70% were previously treated for progressive disease, with all Rai stages represented. CpG RESULTS: By CCA of 40 patients, CpG stimulation revealed a clonal (multiple abnormal cells) or nonclonal (one abnormal cell) abnormal karyotype in 32 (80%) and a normal karyotype in 8 of the 40 patients (20%). Among the 32 abnormal cases, each chromosome 13 pair appeared normal in 17 and was abnormal in 15 (one was monosomy 13, 8 were 13q–, and 6 had a 13q translocation). CpG did not reveal a homozygous 13q abnormality in any patient. In total, CpG revealed a 13q abnormality in 15 of 40 (38%) patients (8 had multiple abnormal metaphases and 7 had only one abnormal metaphase). FISH RESULTS: By interphase FISH, 29 of 40 (73%) patients had a 13q–. The deletion was heterozygous in 18 patients, homozygous in 7, and mixed homo– and heterozygous in 4. Of the 18 with a heterozygous 13q loss by FISH, CpG revealed an abnormal 13 in only 8. Of the 11 patients with homozygous or mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– by FISH, CpG revealed a heterozygous 13q abnormality in only 6. Of the 8 patients with a normal CpG karyotype, by FISH 5 had a 13q– in one or both 13s. Of the 9 patients with heterozygous 13q loss by CpG, the FISH result was 13q– in 4 and homozygous or mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– in 5. Of the 6 with a chromosome 13 translocation by CpG, FISH revealed heterozygous 13q– in 4, mixed homo– and heterozygous 13q– in one, and in one case the 13q FISH result was within normal limits. In this latter case, CpG stimulation followed by metaphase FISH analysis confirmed that the apparently balanced translocation harbored a microdeletion 13q. Interphase FISH analysis confirmed the presence of a clonal deletion 13q in all 7 of the patients with a CpG metaphase result of a non-clonal (one metaphase cell) 13q abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CpG induces CLL metaphases in cell culture and reveals many chromosome abnormalities that cannot be identified by interphase FISH, cytogenetic evaluation of CLL by CpG alone significantly underestimates the incidence of 13q deletions. When a 20-cell analysis after CpG stimulation reveals a 13q abnromality in only one (apparently nonclonal) metaphase cell, concurrent interphase FISH analysis often confirms clonality for the 13q defect.

Abstract Purine nucleoside combination therapy, with and without immunotherapy has become the standard treatment approach to CLL. Past approaches, other than stem cell transplantation, have not been successful in curing the disease. Inherent resistance of CLL precursors, impaired immune surveillance (T-cells, NK cells) and microenvironmental abnormalities may all play a role in the ability to effectively eradicate leukemia. PCR has been successfully employed for previously treated (Lamanna 2006) and previously untreated (Kay 2007) patients with CLL. In addition, CA has been added to FCR (Wierda 2006) to treat relapsed/refractory CLL disease. We designed a study to evaluate PCR followed by CA for relapsed/refractory CLL. This ECOG study includes, in addition to response criteria, molecular correlates (FISH anomalies and CpG karyotype), risk parameters analysis, including CD38, ZAP-70 and IgVH mutational status. We assessed the baseline and sequential changes in the angiogenic status of patients by measuring plasma VEGF, bFGF, thrombospondin and their immune status via T-cell repertoire. From September 2004 to September 2006, 32 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL were enrolled in the protocol. The protocol combined 2 regimens (PCR and CA). Step 1, PCR, was planned for 6 monthly cycles. Steps 2 and 3 consisted of short term CA (4 weeks) or standard CA (18 weeks) depending upon Step 1 response. There were 3 ineligible, 1 not evaluated, and 28 evaluable patients. FISH anomalies revealed that 8 patients had a homozygous or heterozygous 13q-defect, 9 had complex FISH defects (more than one FISH anomaly), 5 patients had FISH anomalies that included del(17p13.1), 4 patients had FISH anomalies that included 6q-and 3 had FISH anomalies that included 11q-. CD38 was positive in 10 patients, 11 were ZAP-70 positive and 12 of 19 patients tested had unmutated type clones. The planned 6 cycles of Step 1 (PCR) was administered to 14/32 patients (44%), the others receiving 0–5 cycles. All responses were considered partial responses (11/29; 37.9%), with 2 patients (6.9%) demonstrating progressive disease. However, patients receiving the planned 6 cycles of PCR, achieved a partial response of 71% (10/14) with 2 cases of tumor lysis syndrome. Toxicity (Step 1-PCR) was predominately myelosuppressive (Grade 1–4). A case of chronic idiopathic polyneuropathy and a case of “paraneoplastic pemphigus” were reported. There were 4 deaths. CMV reactivation was diagnosed in 2 patients, neither of which was fatal. During Step 2 (CA), short-term administration in one patient led to grade 3 skin toxicity, which limited administration. During long-term administration of CA (PR, PD, SD) (n=7), infectious complications occurred in 6 patients all of whom developed grade 4 lymphopenia. The median survival for the entire group was 15 months. In conclusion, a significant number of heavily pre-treated and poor prognosis patients with CLL will respond to PCR. Further analysis will determine whether a significant number of patients will achieve a higher level of response and longer survival after CA administration. Studies of association of outcome with the risk parameters are ongoing and will be presented with the clinical response data.

Abstract Abstract 1772 Background: B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is notorious for its complex and heterogeneous clinical behavior pattern in a given patient. Panels of prognostic predictors in CLL can be complex but in general have been found to be useful in counseling a given patient. The current most powerful prognostic parameters for disease progression potential are related to leukemic B cell genetic features. Using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) panels, we and others have found a hierarchy of clinical outcome with 17p- and 11q- most aggressive. The limitation of the FISH panel is that while it detects the most common recurring defects, it does not evaluate the global genomic status of the leukemia in terms of less common genetic changes or in terms of genetic complexity. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has shown that CLL B cells frequently do exhibit greater genetic complexity than is detected by the FISH panel. To further assess the relationship of genomic defects in CLL to disease outcome, we used CGH for genetic analysis of the leukemic cells at or close to the diagnosis in two cohorts of CLL patients who had either stable or progressive disease. Methods: We obtained leukemic B cells from patients retrospectively identified as “progressive” (n=47) or “stable” (n=21) CLL patients. The CLL patients had given informed consent to have tissue stored and had robust long term clinical outcome available on our Mayo Clinic CLL Tissue Bank and clinical database. Patients were selected based on whether they were stable as defined by no need for therapy after 5 years from diagnosis, or progressive as defined by requiring therapy within 2 years of the actual CLL diagnosis. All progressive patients had leukemic blood cells sampled within 12 months of diagnosis and prior to treatment. All stable patients had blood cells sampled within 24 months of diagnosis. DNA was extracted and then used for global genomic defect detection using a custom high density 2 × 400k oligonucleotide CGH chip (Agilent). Copy number abnormalities (CNA) and copy number variants (CNV) were assessed. CNA were studied for relationship to clinical outcome for the two cohorts of CLL patients.and CNV were excluded from further analysis. Results: The median age was 61 (range 42–81) years in progressive and 67 (range 42–80) in stable patients. Males comprised 77% of the progressive and 57% of the stable patients. CGH was successful in all 68 patients. FISH and CGH were discordant in 8 cases, all with <20% abnormal cells by FISH. Total number of CNA (excluding known benign variants and immunoglobulin rearrangements) was 816, with 597 in progressive (mean 12.7) and 219 in stable patients (mean 10.4). Two stable patients had a normal CGH result. Progressive patients included 15 of 16 trisomy 12, all 4 deletion 17p, and 10 of 11 deletion 11q abnormalities by CGH. Deletion 13q was observed in 39 (83%) progressive and 15 (71%) stable patients, with Rb1 deletion in 11 (23%) progressive and 4 (19%) stable patients. Remarkably, trisomy 18 (2 patients), trisomy 19 (4 patients), and trisomy 21 (1of 2 patients) were observed by CGH in association with trisomy 12. Other recurrent CNA were del(3)(q22q22) in 2 progressive and 1 stable patient and dup(8)(q24.3q24.3) plus dup(11)(p15.4p15.5) in 3 progressive patients; one progressive patient had the dup(8q) without dup (11p). None of the dup(8q) or dup(11p) patients exhibited 11q-, 17p- or +12 defects. Cytogenetic complexity (measured by number of CNA) was greater in progressive than stable patients (p=0.03; odds ratio 1.196), although there was substantial overlap between the groups (range 6–28 CNA in progressive and 5–18 in stable patients). The number of CNA tended to be higher in the presence of 11q- (8–16 CNA) and trisomy 12 (7–21 CNA), and especially 17p- (13–28 CNA). Conclusions: CGH and FISH were comparable for the FISH probes tested. CGH revealed that deletion breakpoints were highly variable around the regions targeted by the FISH probes. That trisomy 18, 19, and 21 were confined to the trisomy 12 patients suggests a different mechanism of genetic instability underlying trisomy 12 in CLL. Trisomy 12, deletion 11q and deleton 17p were confined almost exclusively to patients with progressive disease. Likewise, 3 other recurrent CNA (3q-, 8p dup and 11p dup) were over-represented in progressive disease, may comprise high risk genetic defects, and offer new targets for understanding genetic pathways in CLL. Disclosures: Kay: Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Abstract 3538 Background: Cytogenetics detection of common recurring genetic defects by FISH is an important clinical prognostication tool in CLL and is frequently used by clinicians for counseling and risk stratification. Thus, any improvement in FISH technology is a welcome advance in our care for CLL patients. Mayo Clinic CLL FISH analyses are prepared directly from buffy coat samples rather than mononuclear cells or lymphocytes. FISH probes (deletion 6q, 11q, 13q, 17p, +12 & IGH/CCND1) are scored among consecutive nuclei without selection for nuclear morphology (so called clinical scoring). CLL B-cells are observed, microscopically, primarily as round lymphocytes with round nuclei, and we found (ASH 2010, #3606) that the % abnormal nuclei in the CLL round cell population is significantly higher than that of the non-round nuclei population. In 79 of 87 (91%) patients, the % abnormal nuclei was greater in round vs unselected nuclei (mean difference 24%; range 1.5 – 57%). Round nuclei (p = 0.004) correlated better with % B-cells by flow cytometry than either consecutive unselected nuclei (p = 0.046) or the lobed (non-round) nuclei (p = 0.40). Utilizing this “Poor Man's” sorting technique, we proposed that scoring consecutive round nuclei would improve sensitivity of detection of CLL FISH defects in patients, especially those with low B-cell counts. In a retrospective study of Mayo Clinic patients with normal baseline FISH who had a FISH defect in follow-up, we showed that by re-scoring 28 baseline cases for round nuclei exclusively, 12 originally normal samples remained normal but 16 (57%) were abnormal using the “Poor Man's” scoring technique. In the present study, we prospectively compared FISH scoring on unsorted samples using the “Poor Man's” technique vs the clinical technique. Methods: After IRB approval, we collected 63 consecutive unsorted Mayo Clinic patient blood samples referred for CLL FISH testing with an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC)< 30K × 109/L, and scored each sample using both the “Poor Man's” round nuclei method and the standard clinical method. The kappa statistic was used to adjust for chance agreement. Bland Altman plots of difference (“Poor Man's” result minus clinical result) vs the average of the two methods were generated. Results: Median age of the 40 males (64%) and 23 females (36%) was 66 years (range 36–87), and median ALC was 6.803 (range 0.980–29.750). The most common FISH defects were 11q-, trisomy 12 & 13q- by clinical technique (14%, 22% & 46% respectively) as well as by “Poor Man's” method (16%, 24% & 49% respectively). A high degree of agreement was observed between the two methods when positive/negative comparisons were made (p<0.0001). Additional FISH defects were observed in 12 of 63 (19%) patients (one 11q-, one +12; six 13q-, and four 17p-) when we utilized the “Poor Man's” method that were not observed by the clinical method. Discussion: The “Poor Man's” sorting method compares well with the clinical method for the presence and absence of FISH defects. The abnormal CLL FISH patterns are truly confined to round nuclei. The “Poor Man's” method is more sensitive than the clinical method, resulting in higher reported abnormal cells and detection of more defects. Importantly, additional FISH defects were identified in 12 patients via “Poor Man's” method that were not observed by clinical technique and 6 of these involved a change in the patients' hierarchical (Döhner) classification due to detection of the more unfavorable prognostic markers of trisomy 12 or deletion 11q or 17p. Thus, selectively scoring FISH in the round nuclei increases the sensitivity for detection of a genetic defect in CLL and provides a practical framework for prognostication in CLL patients with low lymphocyte counts and, we would speculate, including those in clinical remission or with minimal residual disease. Disclosures: Kay: Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract Rearrangements involving TCF3 (E2A) at 19p13.3 are a common cytogenetic abnormality in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-LL) across all age groups accounting for at least 5% of B-LL. The most common translocation partner, PBX1 at 1q23, is associated with an unbalanced der(19) or a balanced t(1;19) in 80% vs. 20% patients, respectively, and results in a PBX1/TCF3 fusion transcriptional activator. Several other rearrangement partners have been described, and as such TCF3 is approaching the dubious status of a "promiscuous" gene partner. Clinically, our laboratory uses a dual-color, dual fusion PBX1/TCF3 FISH probe to characterize the most common gene fusion; however, this FISH strategy also allows for the identification of atypical disruptions of the TCF3 gene region, and may suggest a gene partner based on abnormal metaphases/metaphase-FISH. Interrogation of our pediatric leukemia database (ages 0-30) identified 219 patients with abnormal TCF3 FISH results. We selected 23 samples for mate-pair evaluation to test the methodology, characterize novel rearrangements and identify new TCF3 fusion partners. In total, 19 patient samples were successfully sequenced by Mate-Pair, including 13 samples with variants of the 1;19 translocation. Of the samples with TCF3/PBX1 fusion, 3 patients demonstrated novel insertional translocation events characterized by mate-pair. A total of 6 samples with undefined/unknown TCF3 partner genes were evaluated. The mate-pair results identified 5 samples with a t(12;19)(p13.31;p13.3), resulting in TCF3/ZNF384 fusion. Interestingly, two of the ZNF384 rearrangements were observed in the unbalanced form, suggesting a similar mechanism related to the der(19)t(1;19) regularly observed in the common PBX1-TCF3 rearrangement. From a karyotype perspective, since these rearrangements result in only a small portion of chromosome 12p translocated onto distal 19p, this rearrangement would "cryptic" by conventional karyotyping. One patient sample demonstrated a new TCF3 gene fusion partner (TEF), associated with a t(19;22)(p13.3;q13.2). Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of mate-pair evaluation as an adjunct methodology in the identification of novel TCF3 rearrangements in B-LL. We have successfully expanded the application of mate-pair to characterize other novel/cryptic abnormalities in various hematologic and oncologic neoplasms encountered in our laboratory. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), a number of investigators have identified specific cytogenetic abnormalities that identify CLL patients with a more aggressive (17p-, 11q-) or indolent (13q-) disease course. Some have suggested patients who initially have a normal karyotype may acquire new chromosome abnormalities during the course of their disease. Since patients with specific cytogenetic abnormalities (17p-, 11q-) are less likely to respond to purine nucleoside analogues, such clonal evolution has potential implications for treatment as well as prognosis. No study has prospectively investigated the frequency of clonal evolution in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed untreated CLL. Methods: Between 1994 and 2000, we enrolled 167 patients with previously untreated CLL seen at Mayo Clinic in a prospective trial evaluating the prognostic importance of cytogenetic abnormalities and clonal evolution detected by FISH. All patients provided a baseline blood specimen for FISH testing and follow-up specimens over the following 24 months. Other research samples from later timepoints were tested where available. Study participants were contacted by mail in 2004 to update vital and treatment status. Of 83 living responders, 70 (84%) indicated they would be willing to provide an additional follow-up sample for cytogenetic analysis of whom 48 have returned a sample to date. Results of clinical FISH testing during the follow-up interval were also abstracted. FISH was performed on interphase nuclei from blood as we have previously described (BJH 121:287). Results: Median age at diagnosis was 64. Median time from diagnosis to study enrollment was 3.3 months. 94% of patients had early stage disease at enrollment (88 Rai 0; 48 Rai I, 18 Rai II, 2 Rai III; 8 Rai IV). Median follow-up time from diagnosis for all 164 eligible study participants was 8.5 years (range: 0.33–22.9 yrs). As of last follow-up, 48% of patients have received treatment and 57 (35%) have died. 75% of patients had chromosome abnormalities on FISH testing at baseline. The frequency of individual cytogenetic abnormalities on baseline FISH analysis along with overall survival by hierarchical FISH risk category are shown in Table I. 106 patients had sequential samples for FISH analysis at least 2 years apart, 61 had samples at least 5 years apart, and 22 had samples at least 10 years apart. 15 patients had evidence of clonal evolution during follow up as evidenced by a new FISH anomaly not present on the baseline specimen. No clonal evolution was observed in the first 2 years of follow-up (n=106), however of 61 patients with samples at least 5 years apart, 14 (23%) had evidence of clonal evolution. Median time for development of a new cytogenetic abnormality among these patients was 9.3 years. Conclusions: Clonal evolution occurs during the course of disease for approximately 25% of patients with early stage CLL. Clonal evolution appears to occur at low frequency during the first 2 years of follow-up but increases in frequency after 5 years. This finding has potentially significant implications for prognosis and treatment of patients with CLL. FISH Risk Category* N (Baseline) Median Overall Survival (Years) * Difference between groups significant p=0.0038 13q- x 1 37 14.4 13q- x2 35 17 Normal Karyotype 40 13.2 12+ 24 11.1 11q- 12 8.6 17p- 10 10.5 6q- 2 4.1 Other 2 Not reached