Lightner, Amy L.

AbstractThe use of temporary fecal diversion is of great importance to tenuous anastomosis, immunosuppressed patient, or actively infected patient. Its use protects newly constructed intestinal anastomoses from being the culprit of pelvic sepsis or systemic illness. Thus, potential morbidity and mortality can be averted. However, its appropriate or optimal use is often debated. We herein discuss the evidence for when to best use a diverting stoma for colorectal, coloanal, and ileoanal anastomoses. We also discuss the importance of considering a temporary diverting stoma in the setting of high-dose immunosuppression (e.g., transplant patients or inflammatory bowel disease), active infection, or upon creation of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Lastly, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a loop ileostomy versus colostomy for temporary diversion of fecal contents.

AbstractAimRestorative proctocolectomy with ileal‐pouch anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis. Unfortunately, up to 10% of pouches will fail, requiring either reconstruction or excision. While several series have reported on the aetiology of pouch failure, no study to date has focused on the postoperative complications associated with pouch excision.MethodsPatients who had excision of ileoanal reservoir with ileostomy (CPT code 45136) were included. Data abstracted included preoperative, operative and postoperative variables. A Kaplan–Meier curve of pouch survival was performed.ResultsIn all, 147 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The median age of patients was 47 years (73 women), and 132 had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis at the time of colectomy. The most common indications for pouch excision were sepsis (n = 46; 31%) and Crohn's disease (n = 37; 25%). 84 (57%) patients experienced short‐term (< 30 days) postoperative complications, the most common of which was a surgical site infection (n = 32; 21%); 55 (37%) patients had long‐term complications (> 30 days) postoperatively, the most common of which was a return to the operating room (n = 19; 13%) largely for perineal wounds. Thirty‐day mortality was zero. 4.8%, 47.6%, 65.3% and 84.4% of patients had undergone pouch excision by 1, 5, 10 and 20 years from the time of pouch construction, respectively.ConclusionsPouch excision has a high rate of both short‐ and long‐term postoperative complications. Patients should be appropriately counselled to set expectations accordingly. In view of these findings we suggest that this operation should ideally be performed at a high volume centre with the availability of a multidisciplinary surgical team.

576 Background: Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is rare, accounting for 1% of gastrointestinal malignancies, but the incidence is rising. Risk factors for the development of ASCC in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) include immunotherapy, increased duration of disease, and chronic fistulizing perianal disease. We sought to understand management strategies for ASCC in the setting of CD. Methods: A retrospective review from 2001-2016 was conducted for ICD-9/10 codes pertaining to Crohn’s disease (CD) (555.9/ K50) and ASCC (154.3/C44.520). Adult patients with a diagnosis of CD at the time of ASCC diagnosis were included. Results: A total of 7 patients (5 female) were included with a median age of 50 years. The majority presented with perianal pain (4) and bleeding (3). The mean duration of CD was 20 years, and all patients had perianal disease for > 10 years. Five patients had perianal fistulizing disease at the time of ASCC presentation. Clinical stage at diagnosis of ASCC was stage 0 (n = 1), I (n = 1), II (n = 1), III (n = 2), IV (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). All patients were treated with Nigro protocol which included radiation (50-55Gy), 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycin; 1 patient received cisplatin due to concurrent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Three patients required fecal diversion during radiation due to significant perianal disease. Two patients experienced complications related to radiation including anal and vaginal stenosis and an anovaginal fistula. One additional patient required an APR with rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for uncontrolled CD after treatment. During follow-up, 3 of the 7 patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation developed residual or recurrent disease and required salvage APR. All patients were alive at last follow-up, 2 with metastatic disease. 5-year disease free survival was 56%. Conclusions: Patients with ASCC in the setting of CD may be managed with the standard Nigro protocol, but complications from radiation are common in this setting. Three of seven patients required salvage surgery for residual or recurrent disease, and an additional patient required APR for palliation of CD symptoms. Given the aggressive nature of ASCC in this population, surveillance guidelines are necessary.

AbstractAimClostridium difficile infection (CDI) of the ileal pouch following restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is becoming increasingly recognized. We aimed to understand better (i) the associated risk factors, (ii) treatment practices and (iii) the pouch diversion and failure rate in patients who developed CDI of the pouch after RPC for ulcerative colitis (UC).MethodPatients who tested positive for C. difficile of the pouch between 2007 and 2010 were included in the analysis. Data collected included patient demographics, time from RPC to documented CDI, the treatment of CDI and rate of excision of the pouch.ResultsOf 2785 patients recorded in the hospital CDI database, 15 had had an RPC with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The median age was 44 years and the median interval from RPC to first documented episode of CDI was 3 years. Thirteen (81%) patients had had multiple episodes of pouchitis before and after CDI infection, and all were symptomatic at the time of testing for CDI. Within 30 days of the diagnosis of CDI, six (40%) patients were taking immunosuppressive medication, seven (47%) were taking a proton pump inhibitor and 12 (80%) had received antibiotics. Five patients required hospitalization for CDI and four had severe infections characterized by a serum creatinine more than 1.5 times baseline (n = 3) and a white cell count above 15 000 (n = 1). Six patients who underwent endoscopy had severe inflammation of the pouch including the presence of a pseudomembrane in one case. Ten patients were treated with metronidazole alone and five with vancomycin. Two patients had recurrent CDI of the pouch during a median follow‐up period of 2.9 years and one had CDI refractory to medical management. This patient required diversion of the pouch with an ileostomy for refractory CDI but no patient required excision of the pouch.ConclusionAll 15 patients developing CDI of the pouch were successfully treated with antibiotics and only one required surgery in the form of an ileostomy.