Duffy, Joseph R.

Computer-based analysis systems are increasingly available for the clinical assessment of speech and voice functions. These systems have the potential to provide immediate quantitative information to assist clinical assessment and treatment. The Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) is a computer program that can calculate as many as 33 acoustic parameters from a voice sample. The MDVP appears to have potential for rapid quantitative assessments of voice in both research and clinical applications. This report evaluates the robustness and reliability of MDVP for vocal analyses of 32 individuals with dysarthria of various etiologies. It is concluded that the reliability is generally very good and that MDVP has potential as a tool for the semi-automatic analysis of voice samples in dysarthria. Some parameters appear to hold particular value in the description of voice qualities in these speech disorders.

Although ataxic dysarthria has been studied with various methods in several languages, questions remain concerning which features of the disorder are most consistent, which speaking tasks are most sensitive to the disorder, and whether the different speech production subsystems are uniformly affected. Perceptual and acoustic data were obtained from 14 individuals (seven men, seven women) with ataxic dysarthria for several speaking tasks, including sustained vowel phonation, syllable repetition, sentence recitation, and conversation. Multidimensional acoustic analyses of sustained vowel phonation showed that the largest and most frequent abnormality for both men and women was a long-term variability of fundamental frequency. Other measures with a high frequency of abnormality were shimmer and peak amplitude variation (for both sexes) and jitter (for women). Syllable alternating motion rate (AMR) was typically slow and irregular in its temporal pattern. In addition, the energy maxima and minima often were highly variable across repeated syllables, and this variability is thought to reflect poorly coordinated respiratory function and inadequate articulatory/voicing control. Syllable rates tended to be slower for sentence recitation and conversation than for AMR, but the three rates were highly similar. Formant-frequency ranges during sentence production were essentially normal, showing that articulatory hypometria is not a pervasive problem. Conversational samples varied considerably across subjects in intelligibility and number of words/ morphemes in a breath group. Qualitative analyses of unintelligible episodes in conversation showed that these samples generally had a fairly well-defined syllable pattern but subjects differed in the degree to which the acoustic contrasts typical of consonant and vowel sequences were maintained. For some individuals, an intelligibility deficit occurred in the face of highly distinctive (and contrastive) acoustic patterns.

AbstractBackgroundApolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) is a risk factor for β‐amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease dementia. Its influence on β‐amyloid deposition in speech and language disorders, including primary progressive aphasia (PPA), is unclear.MethodsOne hundred thirty subjects with PPA or progressive speech apraxia underwent APOE genotyping and Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET scanning. The relationship between APOE ε4 and PiB status, as well as severity and regional distribution of PiB, was assessed.ResultsForty‐five subjects had an APOE ε4 allele and 60 subjects were PiB‐positive. The odds ratio for a subject with APOE ε4 being PiB‐positive compared with a subject without APOE ε4 being PiB‐positive was 10.2 (95% confidence interval, 4.4–25.5; P < .0001). The APOE ε4 allele did not influence regional PiB distribution or severity.ConclusionAPOE ε4 increases the risk of β‐amyloid deposition in PPA and progressive speech apraxia but does not influence regional β‐amyloid distribution or severity.

Background and purposeA subset of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) present with early and prominent language deficits. It is unclear whether the burden of underlying β‐amyloid pathology is associated with language or general cognitive impairment in these subjects.MethodsThe relationship between cortical β‐amyloid burden on [11C]Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) and performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Wechsler Memory Scale − Third Edition (WMS‐III), the Boston Naming Test (BNT) and the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) was assessed using regression and correlation analyses in subjects presenting with aphasia who showed β‐amyloid deposition on PiB PET.ResultsThe global PiB ratio was inversely correlated with MoCA (P = 0.02) and the WMS‐III Visual Reproduction (VR) subtest (VR I, P = 0.02; VR II, P = 0.04). However, the correlations between PiB ratio, BNT (P = 0.13), WAB aphasia quotient (P = 0.11) and WAB repetition scores (P = 0.34) were not significant.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that an increased cortical β‐amyloid burden is associated with cognitive impairment, but not language deficits, in AD subjects presenting with aphasia. The results suggest that β‐amyloid deposition could be partly contributing to impaired cognition in such patients whilst language dysfunction may be more influenced by other pathological mechanisms, perhaps downstream pathways of β‐amyloid deposition.

This study seeks to examine the effect of level of presentation on scaling of speech intelligibility of speakers with dysarthria. Previous data [Kim et al. (2007)] reported the somewhat surprising result that different presentation levels do not cause a significant change in speech intelligibility scores of speakers with dysarthria, but do for healthy speakers. The current study reports further data using the same speech stimuli, however, with a main focus on the across-conditions effect of presentation level, since the previous data were limited to within-conditions effects. Four conditions of level of presentation were generated by varying absolute level of presentation (high and low) and normalizing each utterance for peak vowel intensity (adjusted and nonadjusted). In this presentation, we will report how scaled speech intelligibility is affected by the level of presentation of speech samples produced by speakers with various types and severity of dysarthria and by healthy speakers. The results of this study will be helpful to understand the rationale of speech therapy for dysarthria, especially considering the frequent use of speech intelligibility and speech therapy techniques designed based on intensity variation of speech. [Work supported by NIH DC00319 and internal fund from Louisiana State University.]