Okafor, Philip N.

Abstract Background There is evidence that gastrointestinal disease (GI) outcomes are poorer among patients from underrepresented backgrounds. However, the impact of hospital patient racial diversity on GI outcomes is understudied. Aims We aimed to investigate the impact of hospital patient racial diversity on GI outcomes Methods Using the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS), racial diversity was defined by the percentage of Hispanic or Indigenous American patients discharged from each hospital. GI discharge diagnoses were defined by diagnostic related group. We included GI bleeding, inflammatory bowel diseases, GI obstruction, cirrhosis, and alcoholic hepatitis. Logistic regression was used to predict major complication rates or comorbidity (MCC), long length of stay (LOS), and high total charges. Control variables included age, gender, payer type, patient location, area-associated income quartile, hospital characteristics including size, urban vs. rural, teaching vs. nonteaching, region, and the interaction of the percentage of Hispanic and Indigenous Americans with patient race. Results were validated with the 2018 NIS dataset. Results Our analysis cohort of 537,830 hospitalizations included 252,225 GI bleeding discharges, 59,310 gastrointestinal obstruction discharges, 106,820 cirrhosis and alcoholic hepatitis discharges, and 119,475 inflammatory bowel diseases discharges. In the unadjusted analyses, MCC rates were higher among Hispanic (24.8%) and Indigenous American patients (30.4%), compared to Whites (18.3%). In adjusted analyses, compared to white patients, Hispanic patients had higher MCC rates [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15-1.28]. The same trend was seen among Indigenous American patients [OR 1.25, (95% CI) 1.09-1.43]. However, as hospital Hispanic diversity increased, inpatient MCC outcomes for Hispanics improved [OR 0.93, (95% CI) 0.87-1.14], and were even better among Indigenous American patients as hospital inpatient Indigenous American diversity increased [OR 0.83, (95% CI) 0.73-0.94] (Table 1). A similar improvement in MCC with increasing Hispanic and Indigenous American diversity was observed in the 2018 validation cohort. Table 1 highlights impact of increasing diversity on LOS and total charges. Conclusions Increasing hospital inpatient Hispanic and Indigenous American diversity is associated with better outcomes for these underrepresented minority groups. More research is needed on the impact of cultural competence and linguistic concordance on patient outcomes. Funding Agencies None

BACKGROUND: The impact of English proficiency on gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) outcomes remains unclear. In this analysis, we compare inpatient GIB outcomes between patients with English as their primary language (EPL) and those with a primary language other than English (PLOE). METHODS: Using the 2019 State Inpatient Databases for New Jersey, Maryland, and Michigan, we created an analysis cohort of GIB hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Patients were stratified by primary language (EPL vs PLOE) and type of bleeding (variceal upper GI bleeding [VUGIB], nonvariceal upper GI bleeding [NVUGIB], and lower GI bleeding (LGIB)]. Regression analyses were used to compare mortality, 30-day readmissions, and length of stay. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the cohort, 5.5%–10% of the patients spoke a primary language other than English. Endoscopy utilization was lower among patients with PLOE vs EPL for NVUGIB (17.2% vs 21.2%, P < 0.001) and LGIB (26.3% vs 29.2%, P = 0.027). Patients with PLOE had higher odds of dying of VUGIB (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.16–2.48) and LGIB (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.22–2.12). Patients with PLOE were also more likely to be readmitted after NVUGIB (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.64–1.81). However, after controlling for the percentage of patients with PLOE discharged from each hospital, the disparities in mortality and readmissions were no longer detected. DISCUSSION: Disparities exist in GIB outcomes among patients with PLOE, but these gaps narrow at hospitals with higher percentages of patients with PLOE. Cultural and linguistic competence may improve outcomes in this vulnerable group.

Abstract Background and aims Readmission within 30 days occurs in up to 18% of admitted patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The importance of postdischarge follow-up with a gastroenterologist as well as the optimal follow-up interval is unknown. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with UC who were admitted to Stanford University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. We included adult patients with UC who were admitted for a UC flare. Patients with a colectomy during hospitalization or with Clostridium difficile infection at the index hospitalization were excluded. The primary outcome was time to readmission for a gastroenterology (GI) indication, and the primary predictor (time dependent) was follow-up with a GI provider. Patients were followed for 180 days after discharge. Data were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of the 223 patients hospitalized with UC during the study period, 25% (n = 57) were readmitted within 180 days, with 13.9% occurring within 30 days. Early follow-up (within 7 days) was observed in 29% (n = 65) of patients, while 30-day follow-up was seen in 68.7% (n = 153), and follow-up within 180 days was seen in 198 (89%) patients. In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, GI follow-up was associated with fewer readmissions (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.81; P = .009). Early follow-up was strongly associated with a reduced risk of readmission (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.69; P = .008). Follow-up in 7 days was associated with fewer readmissions (P &lt; .0001). Conclusions Outpatient GI follow-up after UC hospitalization reduces readmissions, with the greatest reduction occurring among patients followed up within 1 week of discharge.

AbstractBackground and AimThe impact of the Coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on patients with liver disease is not well described at the population level in the United States. We used the largest, nationwide inpatient dataset to describe inpatient liver disease outcomes in the United States during the first year of the pandemic (2020) using 2018 and 2019 as comparator years.MethodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample (2018–2020), we explored year‐to‐year and 2020 month‐to‐month trends in hospitalizations, length of stay, and inpatient mortality for liver‐related complications including cirrhosis, alcohol‐associated liver disease (ALD) and alcoholic hepatitis using regression modeling. We reported relative change (RC) in the study period.ResultsDecompensated cirrhosis hospitalizations decreased in 2020 compared with 2019 (RC: −2.7%, P < 0.001) while all‐cause mortality increased by 15.5% (P < 0.001). Hospitalizations for ALD increased compared with pre‐pandemic years (RC: 9.2%, P < 0.001) with a corresponding increase in mortality in 2020 (RC 25.2%, P = 0.002). We observed an increase in liver transplant surgery mortality during the peak months of the pandemic. Importantly, mortality from COVID‐19 was higher among patients with decompensated cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.53–1.94]), Native Americans (OR 1.76, 95% CI [1.53–2.02]), and patients from lower socioeconomic groups.ConclusionsCirrhosis hospitalizations decreased in 2020 compared with pre‐pandemic years but were associated with higher all‐cause mortality rates particularly in the peak months of the COVID‐19 pandemic. In‐hospital COVID‐19 mortality was higher among Native Americans, patients with decompensated cirrhosis, chronic illnesses, and those from lower socioeconomic groups.

Abstract Background The impact of the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patients with liver disease is not well described at the population level in the United States. Purpose We used the largest, nationwide inpatient dataset to describe inpatient liver disease outcomes in the United States during the first year of the pandemic (2020) using 2018 and 2019 as comparator years. Method Using the National Inpatient Sample (2018-2020), we explored year-to-year and 2020 month-to-month trends in hospitalizations, length of stay, and inpatient mortality for liver-related indications including compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (VUGIB) using regression modeling. We also looked at the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liver transplantation rates. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result(s) Hospitalizations for both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis decreased in 2020 compared to 2019 (relative change [RC] of 1.5%, p &lt;0.001, Table 1). Interestingly, hospitalizations for ALD and AH increased in 2020 compared to pre-pandemic years (ALD RC=15.5% and AH RC 17.0%; p&lt;0.001). Despite the decrease in cirrhosis hospitalizations in 2020, all-cause inpatient mortality among patients with compensated cirrhosis increased from 30,135 in 2019 to 35,220 in 2020 (p&lt;0.001) and from 22,850 in 2019 to 26,390 in 2020 among patients with decompensated cirrhosis (p&lt;0.001). This was accompanied by a 27.8% increase in mortality for ALD (p=0.004) in comparison to pre-pandemic years. Corresponding to the peaks of the pandemic, we observed the fewest cirrhosis hospitalizations in April and December 2020 (Table 2), however, these months had the highest observed mortality rates (p-trend ≤ 0.004). Reassuringly, liver transplantation rates were not significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.51). Image Conclusion(s) Cirrhosis hospitalizations, in general, decreased in 2020 compared to pre-pandemic years but were associated with higher all-cause mortality rates particularly in the peak months of the COVID-19 pandemic (April and December 2020) possibly reflecting COVID-19 specific mortality. Alcoholic liver disease admissions also increased during the pandemic while liver transplantation rates were not significant impacted. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of data on the impact of readmission to the same vs a different hospital following an index hospital discharge in cirrhosis patients. METHODS: We sought to describe rates and predictors of different-hospital readmissions (DHRs) among patients with cirrhosis and also determine the impact on cirrhosis outcomes including all-cause inpatient mortality and hospital costs. Using the national readmissions database, we identified cirrhosis hospitalizations in 2013. Regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of DHRs. A time-to-event analysis was performed to assess the impact on subsequent readmissions and all-cause inpatient mortality. RESULTS: In 2013, there were 109,039 cirrhosis readmissions with 67% of these being same-hospital readmissions and 33% being DHRs ( P < 0.001). Two percent of readmitted patients were treated at ≥4 different hospitals. The 30-day readmission rate was 29.1%. Predictors of DHR included Medicaid payer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.01–1.14), age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.978–0.982), elective admission (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.17), hepatic encephalopathy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16–1.25), hepatorenal syndrome (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.16), and low socioeconomic status (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06–1.25). No difference was observed in 30-day readmission risk following a DHR (adjusted hazard ratio 1.044, 95% CI 0.975–1.118). In addition, there was no increased risk of inpatient death observed during a DHR within 30 days (adjusted hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.94–1.23). However, patients with DHR had significantly higher hospital costs and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of cirrhosis readmissions are same-hospital readmissions. Different-hospital readmissions do not increase the risk of 30-day readmissions and inpatient mortality but are associated with higher hospital costs.