Hunter, Jacob B.

ObjectivesTo analyze factors that influence hearing preservation over time in cochlear implant recipients with conventional‐length electrode arrays located entirely within the scala tympani.Study DesignCase series with planned chart review.SettingSingle tertiary academic referral center.Subjects and MethodsA retrospective review was performed to analyze a subgroup of cochlear implant recipients with residual acoustic hearing. Patients were included in the study only if their electrode arrays remained fully in the scala tympani after insertion and serviceable acoustic hearing (≤80 dB at 250 Hz) was preserved. Electrode array location was verified through a validated radiographic assessment tool. Patients with <6 months of audiologic follow‐up were excluded. The main outcome measure was change in acoustic hearing thresholds from implant activation to the last available follow‐up.ResultsA total of 16 cases met inclusion criteria (median age, 70.6 years; range, 29.4‐82.2; 50% female). The average follow‐up was 18.0 months (median, 16.1; range, 6.2‐36.4). Patients with a lateral wall electrode array were more likely to have stable acoustic thresholds over time (P <. 05). Positive correlations were seen between continued hearing loss following activation and larger initial postoperative acoustic threshold shifts, though statistical significance was not achieved. Age, sex, and noise exposure had no significant influence on continued hearing preservation over time.ConclusionsTo control for hearing loss associated with interscalar excursion during cochlear implantation, the present study evaluated patients only with conventional electrode arrays located entirely within the scala tympani. In this group, the style of electrode array may influence residual hearing preservation over time.

ObjectiveTo describe surgical outcomes and perioperative complications in patients taking antiplatelet and anticoagulation medications while undergoing cochlear implantation.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTwo tertiary otologic referral center.Subjects and MethodsForty‐six adult patients (2005‐2014) who underwent cochlear implantation while on perioperative antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy without interruption. Outcomes included estimated intraoperative blood loss, perception of increased difficulty secondary to bleeding, and postoperative complications attributable to continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy.ResultsThe cases of 46 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; 30.2% female) were analyzed. Of these, 39 patients were taking aspirin, 10 warfarin, and 7 clopidogrel. Aside from 3 (6.5%) patients with postoperative bruising without hematoma and 1 patient (2.2%) who reported self‐resolving oral cavity blood, no intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in any patient that could be ascribed to antiplatelet or anticoagulant use.ConclusionThese data demonstrate that the risk of perioperative complications from continued antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy is low. For subjects who are at risk of major complications (eg, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident) from temporary medication cessation, continuing antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy through the perioperative period is an appropriate strategy.