Sangaralingham, Lindsey R.

6591 Background: BMT CTN 1101 was a Phase III randomized controlled trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow (haplo-BM) cell sources for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies (leukemias, lymphomas). We report results of an economic evaluation conducted as part of the clinical trial. Methods: 368 patients (90% of planned accrual) enrolled from 33 centers in the U.S. were randomly assigned to unrelated UCB (n=186) or haplo-BM (n=182) transplant. Healthcare utilization and costs were estimated using propensity-score matched cohorts of BMT patients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse for trial participants <65 years, and Medicare claims for trial participants ≥65 years. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from payer perspectives (commercial, Medicare) over a 20-year time horizon from time of transplant. Weibull models (best fit based on AIC/BIC) were used to extrapolate survival from 5-year trial follow-up data. Trial participant surveys (EQ-5D) were used to derive health state utilities for estimating Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess uncertainty in results. Outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. Results: At 5-year follow-up, overall survival was 42% for haplo-BM versus 36% for UCB (P=.06). Over a 20-year time horizon, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective and more costly for <65 year-olds and in ≥65 year-olds it is expected to be more effective and less costly. In one-way uncertainty analyses, for persons <65, the cost/QALY result was most sensitive to life years and health state utilities. For persons ≥65, life years were more influential than costs and health state utilities. Using probabilistic sensitivity analysis, for persons <65 there was a 43% chance that haplo-BM was cost-effective using a willingness to pay threshold of $150k/QALY and 52% at a $200K/QALY threshold. Conclusions: Results from a large national clinical trial indicate that compared to UCB, haplo-BM was moderately cost-effective for patients aged <65 years, and less costly and more effective for persons ≥65 years. Haplo-BM is a fair value choice for commercially insured patients with high-risk leukemia and lymphoma who require HCT. For Medicare enrollees, haplo-BM is a preferred choice when considering costs and outcomes. [Table: see text]

6589 Background: Real-world utilization and comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment remains largely unexplored. Methods: De-identified administrative claims data (OptumLabs - Data Warehouse) for adult active cancer patients with acute VTE (1/1/2012-9/30/2019) were assessed for utilization patterns, recurrent VTE, and major bleeding differences between DOACs, LMWH, and warfarin. Patients were followed up till the end of treatment. Patients who crossed over to other anti-coagulants within the follow up period were excluded. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess predictors of anticoagulant administration. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the differences in time to medication discontinuation among the three groups. Propensity score (PS) and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to balance baseline differences between groups. Standardized difference (SD) was used to assess the balance of covariates after weighting and SD < 10% was considered acceptable. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression with a robust variance estimator was then used to assess outcomes in PS weighted groups. Results: A total of 5100 patients met the inclusion criteria; 49.3% filled DOACs (n = 2512), 29.2% LMWH (n = 1488), and 28.6% warfarin (n = 1460). Median treatment duration was around 3.2 months for DOACs and warfarin, and 1.8 months for LWMH ( P-value < 0.01). Multinomial regression analysis showed that younger patients were more likely to be prescribed LMWH (OR 0.97 95% CI: 0.97-0.98) as compared to DOACs. Patients with lung (OR 2.07 95% CI: 1.12-3.65; OR 1.87 95% CI: 1.04-3.37), urological (OR: 1.94 95% CI:1.08-3.49; OR: 2.04 95% CI: 1.12-3.73), gynecological (OR 4.25, 95% CI: 2.31-7.82; OR 2.31 95% CI: 1.22-4.39) and colorectal cancer (OR 2.26 95% CI: 1.20-4.32; OR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.32-4.79) were more likely to be prescribed LMWH or warfarin respectively, compared to DOACs. VTE recurrences were more frequent for patients receiving LMWH (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.14-1.90) or warfarin (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.13-1.87) compared to DOACs. LMWH, but not warfarin, was associated with greater major bleeding rates compared to DOACs (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.62-3.20). All-cause mortality rates were also significantly higher for patients receiving LMWH, but not warfarin compared to DOACs (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15-2.25). Conclusions: Patients with cancer associated VTE remain on anti-coagulation for a remarkably short duration in real-world clinical practice. DOACs and warfarin may offer better compliance than LMWH. Patients receiving DOACs have a lower risk of VTE recurrence, less major bleeding, and improved mortality. Warfarin may still be considered for patients with contraindications to DOACs and non-compliant to LMWH.

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated use of telehealth, an expansion of services that required the appropriate technological infrastructure for health care facilities and in patient homes. Telehealth on the one hand has held promise for addressing health disparities perpetuated by inadequate rural access, but delivery requires extensive broadband and technologic access. That creates the possibility for new kinds of healthcare disparities. In addition, COVID-19 forced marked reduction in in-lab polysomnography (PSG), and concurrent expansion of home sleep apnea testing (HSAT). We hypothesized that the pandemic led to an increase in the overall frequency of telehealth and HSAT utilization, particularly in those who were younger, White, more educated, and from a non-local area. Methods We completed a retrospective chart review of all adult patients seen by all provider types across the Sleep Medicine practices in Mayo Clinic Rochester, Arizona, Florida, and the Mayo Clinic Health System between 1) 6/1/18—3/8/20 (Pre-COVID-19), 2) 3/9/20—4/19/20 (Early COVID-19), and 3) 4/20/20—present (Late COVID-19). We recorded the total number of PSGs and HSATs and total number of face-to-face and telehealth visits, along with the age, gender, race, educational level, and locality by zip code for patients served. These data were compared across the 3 timeframes. Results Average monthly visits changed from Pre-COVID-19, Early COVID-19, to Late COVID-19 [2194.7/m, 1416.5/m, 2690.6/m (P&lt;0.001)]. Average monthly sleep test volumes also changed [1004.1/m, 530.5/m, 1123.4/m (P&lt;0.001)], with a proportionate increase in HSATs across the 3 periods [34.71%, 65.37%, 53.59% (P&lt;0.005)]. The increase in Late COVID-19 in telehealth visits occurred proportionately more in those who were younger, female, non-White, college and post-graduate educated, and from a non-local area. The increase in use of HSATs occurred proportionately more in patients who were younger, female, non-White, college and post-graduate educated, and from a local area. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth visits and HSATs in Sleep Medicine practices across our enterprise, particularly in those who are younger and more educated, which may be due to ease of use with and access to technology. The reasons for the presence of additional disparities based upon gender, race, and locality needs further exploration. Support (If Any)

Background EAST‐AFNET 4 (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) demonstrated clinical benefit of early rhythm‐control therapy (ERC) in patients with new‐onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant cardiovascular conditions compared with current guideline‐based practice. This study aimed to evaluate the generalizability of EAST‐AFNET 4 in routine practice. Methods and Results Using a US administrative database, we identified 109 739 patients with newly diagnosed AF during the enrollment period of EAST‐AFNET 4. Patients were classified as either receiving ERC, using AF ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy, within the first year after AF diagnosis (n=27 106) or not receiving ERC (control group, n=82 633). After propensity score overlap weighting, Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare groups for the primary composite outcome of all‐cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction. Most patients (79 948 of 109 739; 72.9%) met the inclusion criteria for EAST‐AFNET 4. ERC was associated with a reduced risk for the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75–0.97 [ P =0.02]) with largely consistent results between eligible (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76–1.04 [ P =0.14]) or ineligible (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60–0.98 [ P =0.04]) patients for EAST‐AFNET 4 trial inclusion. ERC was associated with lower risk of stroke in the overall cohort and in trial‐eligible patients. Conclusions This analysis replicates the clinical benefit of ERC seen in EAST‐AFNET 4. The results support adoption of ERC as part of the management of recently diagnosed AF in the United States.

Introduction: Mobile thrombi are commonly observed on endovascular leads at the time of catheter ablation. Transseptal puncture poses a risk of paradoxical embolism. We sought to examine the risk of stroke or systemic embolism after transseptal ablation in patients with and without cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Methods: Using a large, national administrative claims database we identified 31,720 patients who underwent a catheter ablation requiring transseptal puncture between 1/1/2004 and 9/30/2014. We created two propensity-matched cohorts, matching on age, gender, race, household income, region, Charlson index, CHADS-Vasc score, and year and indication for ablation (5,533 patients with CIEDs and 11,300 patients without devices). Incidence rates (events/100 patient-years) and propensity score-matched cox proportional hazards models (with 95% confidence intervals) were used to estimate risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism for patients with or without CIEDs. We also examined the impact of presence of a CIED and oral anticoagulation (OAC) use on risk of stroke or systemic embolism within the matched cohort. Average follow up was 2.1 years. Results: The event rate was 1.5 per 100 person years in patients without device, and 1.9 per 100 person years in patients with device. Among patients not on OAC, presence of a cardiac device was associated with an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.71 [1.24-2.35], P<0.01) whereas there was no association among patients treated with OAC (0.98 [0.75_1.28], p=ns) (Figure). Conclusions: Cardiac devices are associated with an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism after transseptal ablation, but this risk is attenuated with post ablation OAC use. Anticoagulation should be considered for all patients with CIEDs post transseptal ablation, regardless of the presence of another compelling indication for anticoagulation.

Abstract Background: Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) can improve outcomes in ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. The choice of CDK 4/6i selection and dose depends on clinical context and/or potential side effect of profile of each unique CDK 4/6i. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in patients initiated on CDK 4/6i and assess adherence to recommended laboratory monitoring in breast cancer patients in both an institutional and national dataset. Methods: The institutional cohort (IC) involved a retrospective chart review of patients newly initiated on palbociclib between May 8, 2018 - June 4, 2019 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The national cohort (NC) reviewed medical and pharmacy claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) and included patients who were initiated on palbociclib (P), ribociclib (R) or abemaciclib (A) between February 6, 2015 - September 30, 2019. NC patients were required to have a minimum of 6 months baseline coverage, 6 months coverage after first prescription and Day 1 labs drawn. For both cohorts, patients were ≥18 years old with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer. Data was collected for up to 6 cycles of treatment and included cycle start dates, doses, dates of lab draws and dose changes. Laboratory adherence was defined as a complete blood count being drawn +/- 3 days of the defined timepoint for the IC and +/- 5 days for the NC with a l4-day window for Cycle 1, Day 1 labs. Results: The IC included 81 patients and the NC 2600. In the NC, the most prescribed CDK 4/6i was P (90%), followed by A (6%) and R (4%). Prescription breakdown by geographic region was Midwest (26%), Northeast (14%), South (47%), West (13%). Ethnic breakdown of the group was White (68%), Black (15%), Hispanic (8%), Asian (3%) and unknown (6%). P practice pattern data were available for both the IC and NC, but R and A data in the NC only. In the IC, the initial P dose was 125 mg (95%), 100 mg (1%) and 75 mg (4%). In the NC, P (n=2329) dose was 125 mg (81%), 100 mg (15%) and 75 mg (4%). Dose reductions were common with 25% and 28% of patients requiring one dose reduction and 16% and 9% of patients requiring two dose reductions in the IC and NC, respectively. In NC patients initially treated with P, 5% were subsequently treated with A and 2% with R. In the NC, A (n=163) was initiated at 200 mg (7%), 150 mg (79%), 100 mg (10%) and 50 mg (4%). One dose reduction was required in 25% of patients and 6% required two dose reductions. Of those initially treated with A, 16% were subsequently treated with P and 1% with R. In the NC, R (n=108) was initiated at 600 mg (81%), 400 mg (8%) and 200 mg (11%). One dose reduction was required in 17% of patients and 2% required two dose reductions. Of those initially treated with R, 7% each were subsequently treated with P and 10% with A. Laboratory adherence was assessed for P only. For the IC, a total of 81 patients were included (mean age 61±13 years, 98% female and 95% White). The NC included 2329 patients (mean age 66±12 years, 99% female and 69% White). Laboratory adherence is listed in the table below: Conclusions: P was the most commonly prescribed CDK 4/6i. Dose reductions were less common with R. Adherence to laboratory monitoring was higher in our institutional cohort than in a national administrative claims database. Initiatives to ensure that labs are drawn at recommended timepoints during P therapy will be important for safety. ICNCC1D193%100%C1D1589%61%C2D191%71%C2D1558%55%C3D199%62%C4D190%55%C5D184%53%C6D178%50%C = cycle, D = day. Citation Format: Jodi Taraba, Kavya Swarna, Allison Golbach, Lindsey Sangaralingham, Kathryn Ruddy, Kristin Mara, Matthew Smith, Tufia Haddad, Karthik Giridhar. Evaluation of CDK 4/6 inhibitor practice patterns and institutional versus national adherence to palbociclib laboratory monitoring in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-23-05.

Abstract Background The Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial (EAST-AFNET 4) demonstrated clinical benefit of early rhythm-control therapy in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant cardiovascular conditions (CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥2) compared to the current practice of limited rhythm-control therapy to improve AF-related symptoms. Purpose To evaluate the generalizability of the EAST-AFNET 4 trial in routine practice, we assessed the proportion of patients who would have met trial eligibility and examined the association between early rhythm-control and clinical outcomes. Methods Using a large US administrative database, we identified 109,739 patients with newly diagnosed AF from July 28th, 2011 to December 30th, 2016, the enrollment period of the EAST-AFNET 4 trial. Eligibility for trial inclusion was assessed based on inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were classified as either receiving early rhythm-control, i.e AF ablation and/or any antiarrhythmic drug therapy, within the first year after AF diagnosis (N=27,106) or patients not receiving early rhythm-control (N=82,633). The date 12 months after the first AF diagnosis was defined as the index date and the start of the follow up period. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance patients on 90 baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare early rhythm-control with no early rhythm-control for the primary outcome of a composite end point of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction. Results Eligible for the trial were 72.9% (82,633/109,739) of all patients with newly diagnosed AF. Early rhythm-control therapy was associated with a reduction in the composite end point in the overall cohort of patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.97; P=0.015) with largely consistent treatment effects between patients eligible or ineligible for the trial. The reduction of stroke risk associated with early rhythm-control therapy was found in the overall cohort (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47–0.93; P=0.017) and in the trial-eligible cohort (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.45–0.98; P=0.041). Conclusion In a large health care data set, the majority of patients with newly diagnosed AF were eligible for the trial. Early rhythm-control therapy was associated with a 15% reduction in the composite end point of all-cause mortality, stroke, or hospitalization with the diagnoses heart failure or myocardial infarction, with the greatest benefit in the reduction of stroke risk. The treatment effect was consistent between patients eligible or ineligible for the trial. Patients in routine practice had higher rates of adverse outcomes than the trial, but the relative risk reduction with early rhythm-control therapy was similar. These data demonstrate the potential of early rhythm-control therapy to reduce outcomes in patients with AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): German Heart Foundation (Mit Fördermitteln der Deutschen Herzstiftung e.V.)

OBJECTIVE Sustained postoperative opioid use after elective surgery is a matter of growing concern. Herein, the authors investigated incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use among patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, especially as a function of opioid prescribing practices at postoperative discharge (dose in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] and type of opioid). METHODS The OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was queried for postdischarge opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression and discectomy (LDD) or posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for degenerative spine disease. Only patients who received an opioid prescription at postoperative discharge and those who had a minimum of 180 days of insurance coverage prior to surgery and 180 days after surgery were included. Opioid-naive patients were defined as those who had no opioid fills in 180 days prior to surgery. The following patterns of long-term postoperative use were investigated: additional fills (at least one opioid fill 90–180 days after surgery), persistent fills (any span of opioid use starting in the 180 days after surgery and lasting at least 90 days), and Consortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends (CONSORT) criteria for persistent use (episodes of opioid prescribing lasting longer than 90 days and 120 or more total days’ supply or 10 or more prescriptions in 180 days after the index fill). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of long-term use. RESULTS A total of 25,587 patients were included, of whom 52.7% underwent PLF (n = 13,486) and 32.5% (n = 8312) were opioid-naive prior to surgery. The rates of additional fills, persistent fills, and CONSORT use were 47%, 30%, and 23%, respectively, after PLF and 35.4%, 19%, and 14.2%, respectively, after LDD. The rates among opioid-naive patients were 18.9%, 5.6%, and 2.5% respectively, after PLF and 13.3%, 2.0%, and 0.8%, respectively, after LDD. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following were identified to be significantly associated with higher risk of long-term opioid use following PLF: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 500 MMEs, prescription of a long-acting opioid, female sex, multilevel surgery, and comorbidities such as depression and drug abuse (all p < 0.05). Elderly (age ≥ 65 years) and opioid-naive patients were found to be at lower risk (all p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained on analysis for LDD with the following significant additional risk factors identified: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 400 MMEs, prescription of tramadol alone at discharge, and inpatient surgery (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of pharmacy claims from a national insurance database, the authors identified incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use after elective lumbar spine surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been associated with adverse disease-related outcomes and inferior treatment response to biologic agents in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), but its impact on the risk of treatment-related complications is unknown. We performed a cohort study examining the association between obesity and risk of serious infections in biologic-treated patients with IBD. METHODS: Using an administrative claims database, in a cohort of biologic-treated patients with IBD between 2014 and 2018 with follow-up 1 year before and after treatment initiation, we compared the risk of serious infections (infections requiring hospitalization) between obese vs nonobese patients (based on validated administrative claims) using Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: We included 5,987 biologic-treated patients with IBD (4,881 on tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and 1,106 on vedolizumab), of whom 524 (8.8%) were classified as obese. Of the 7,115 person-year follow-up, 520 patients developed serious infection. Risk of serious infection was comparable in obese vs nonobese patients (8.8% vs 8.5%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–1.54). After adjusting for age, comorbidities, disease characteristics, health care utilization, use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and opiates, obesity was not associated with an increased risk of serious infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.01]). Similar results were seen on stratified analysis by disease phenotype (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) and index biologic therapy (tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and vedolizumab). DISCUSSION: After adjusting for comorbid conditions and disease characteristics, obesity is not independently associated with an increased risk of serious infections in biologic-treated patients with IBD.