Strand, Edythe A.

Purpose This study summarizes 2 illustrative cases of a neurodegenerative speech disorder, primary progressive apraxia of speech (AOS), as a vehicle for providing an overview of the disorder and an approach to describing and quantifying its perceptual features and some of its temporal acoustic attributes. Method Two individuals with primary progressive AOS underwent speech-language and neurologic evaluations on 2 occasions, ranging from 2.0 to 7.5 years postonset. Performance on several tests, tasks, and rating scales, as well as several acoustic measures, were compared over time within and between cases. Acoustic measures were compared with performance of control speakers. Results Both patients initially presented with AOS as the only or predominant sign of disease and without aphasia or dysarthria. The presenting features and temporal progression were captured in an AOS Rating Scale, an Articulation Error Score, and temporal acoustic measures of utterance duration, syllable rates per second, rates of speechlike alternating motion and sequential motion, and a pairwise variability index measure. Conclusions AOS can be the predominant manifestation of neurodegenerative disease. Clinical ratings of its attributes and acoustic measures of some of its temporal characteristics can support its diagnosis and help quantify its salient characteristics and progression over time.

AbstractBackgroundApolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) is a risk factor for β‐amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease dementia. Its influence on β‐amyloid deposition in speech and language disorders, including primary progressive aphasia (PPA), is unclear.MethodsOne hundred thirty subjects with PPA or progressive speech apraxia underwent APOE genotyping and Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET scanning. The relationship between APOE ε4 and PiB status, as well as severity and regional distribution of PiB, was assessed.ResultsForty‐five subjects had an APOE ε4 allele and 60 subjects were PiB‐positive. The odds ratio for a subject with APOE ε4 being PiB‐positive compared with a subject without APOE ε4 being PiB‐positive was 10.2 (95% confidence interval, 4.4–25.5; P < .0001). The APOE ε4 allele did not influence regional PiB distribution or severity.ConclusionAPOE ε4 increases the risk of β‐amyloid deposition in PPA and progressive speech apraxia but does not influence regional β‐amyloid distribution or severity.