DuBrock, Hilary M.

Abstract Aims The clinical utility of pulmonary hypertension (PH) risk scores in non-group 1 PH with pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) remains unresolved. Methods and results We utilized the prospective multicenter PVDOMICS cohort with group 2, 3, 4 or 5 PH-related PVD and calculated group 1 PH risk scores (REVEAL 2.0, REVEAL Lite 2, French registry score and COMPERA 2). The c-statistic to predict death was compared separately in (i) pre-capillary PH groups 3/4/5, and (ii) combined post- and pre-capillary PH group 2. Exercise right heart catheterization reserve, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular–pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling were compared across risk categories. Among 449 individuals with group 3/4/5 PH, the REVEAL 2.0 risk score had the highest c-statistic for predicting death (0.699, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.660–0.737, p < 0.0001) with comparable performance using the simpler REVEAL Lite 2 score (0.695, 95% CI 0.656–0.734, p < 0.0001). The French and COMPERA 2 risk scores were also predictive of mortality, but performance of both was statistically inferior to REVEAL 2.0 (c-statistic difference −0.072, 95% CI −0.123 to −0.020, p = 0.006, and −0.043, 95% CI −0.067 to −0.018, p = 0.0007, respectively). RV function and RV-PA coupling measures were prognostic in isolation, but did not add incremental value to REVEAL (p > 0.50 for all). Findings were similar in patients with group 2 PH (n = 239). Stratification by the REVEAL Lite 2 score non-invasively identified non-group 1 PH with more advanced PVD with worse exercise capacity, RV-PA uncoupling, ventricular interdependence and impaired cardiac output reserve (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusions Non-invasive REVEAL risk predicts mortality in non-group 1 PH without incremental prognostic value from detailed RV function or RV-PA coupling assessment. Baseline REVEAL Lite 2 risk stratification non-invasively identifies greater pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart-related exercise limitation, which may help guide patient selection for targeted pulmonary vascular therapies in non-group 1 PH.

Patients with advanced chronic liver disease can develop specific pulmonary complications related or unrelated to pre-existing lung disease. The three major pulmonary complications in this patient population include hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), and hepatic hydrothorax (HH). These entities are most often revealed by increasing dyspnea together with signs of portal hypertension. The prevalence of these complications remains underestimated due to the lack of routine screening of the cirrhotic population. The pathophysiology of HH is better understood than that of HPS and PoPH. The clinical features, diagnosis, and therapeutic options of these pulmonary complications are extensively discussed in this chapter. Liver transplantation may offer a curative therapy in highly-selected cases and MELD exception points allow priority access to liver transplantation, thus avoiding potential deterioration while awaiting transplant and providing a better post liver transplant survival. The complexity of managing these pulmonary complications requires a multidisciplinary team approach, especially when liver transplantation is indicated.

Sleep disturbances are common in chronic liver disease and significantly impact patient outcomes and quality of life. The severity and nature of sleep disturbances vary by liver disease etiology and severity. While there is ongoing research into the association between liver disease and sleep-wake dysfunction, the underlying pathophysiology varies and, in many cases, is poorly understood. Liver disease is associated with alterations in thermoregulation, inflammation, and physical activity, and is associated with disease-specific complications, such as HE, that may directly affect sleep. In this article, we review the relevant pathophysiologic processes, disease-specific sleep-wake disturbances, and clinical management of CLD-associated sleep-wake disturbances.

Background Inhaled treprostinil (iTre) is the only treatment approved for pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD) to improve exercise capacity. This post hoc analysis evaluated clinical worsening and PH-ILD exacerbations from the 16-week INCREASE study and change in 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) in the INCREASE open-label extension (OLE) in patients with less severe haemodynamics. Methods Patients were stratified by baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of <4 Wood units (WU) versus ≥4 WU and ≤5 WU versus >5 WU. Exacerbations of underlying lung disease, clinical worsening and change in N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in INCREASE were evaluated. For the OLE, patients previously assigned to placebo were considered to have a 16-week treatment delay. 6MWD and clinical events in the OLE were evaluated by PVR subgroup. Results Of the 326 patients enrolled in INCREASE, patients with less severe haemodynamics receiving iTre had fewer exacerbations of underlying lung disease and clinical worsening events. This was supported by the Bayesian analysis of the risk of disease progression (HR<1), and significant decreases in NT-proBNP levels. In the OLE, patients without a treatment delay had improved exercise capacity after 1-year compared with those with a 16-week treatment delay (22.1 m vs −10.3 m). Patients with a PVR of ≤5 WU without a treatment delay had a change of 5.5 m compared with −8.2 m for those with a treatment delay. Patients without a treatment delay had a prolonged time to hospitalisation, lung disease exacerbation and death. Conclusion Treatment with iTre led to consistent benefits in clinical outcomes in patients with PH-ILD and less severe haemodynamics. Earlier treatment in less severe PH-ILD may lead to better exercise capacity long-term, however, the subgroup analyses in this post hoc study were underpowered and confirmation of these findings is needed.

Background. Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) occurs in patients with advanced liver disease and can be a contraindication to liver transplant (LT). Improvement of hemodynamic parameters with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies (including endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs]) may help some patients to become eligible for LT. Methods. We conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis to describe the clinical course and management of PoPH in patients on a US registry LT waitlist and outcomes in patients receiving an ERA. Results. At the time of LT waitlist entry (1996–2019), patient characteristics and disease severity were similar in the 685 patients with PoPH enrolled overall (LT waitlist data set) and the 420 of them who underwent LT (LT data set). Most patients (92.0%) had a model for end-stage liver disease exception granted before entering the LT waitlist. Patients spent a median of 8.9 mo (interquartile range, 3.7–19.7) on the LT waitlist before undergoing LT. Overall, 77.1% of patients received PAH treatment at LT waitlist entry (ERAs, 30.1%). Hemodynamic parameters improved in ≥95% of patients between the first assessment versus the second (median interval, 9 mo) and last assessments (median interval, 14 mo). At the first assessment, 49.6% of patients had mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥45 mm Hg versus 2.6% and 1.8% of patients at the second and last assessments, respectively; 47.5% of patients had pulmonary vascular resistance >450 dynes·s/cm5 versus 0.9% and 0.2% of patients at the second and last assessments. One-year survival was 90.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.6-92.9) following LT waitlist entry and was 86.4% (95% CI, 82.6-89.5) after LT; 5-y survival was 67.4% (95% CI, 60.0-73.8) while on the LT waitlist (before LT) and was 75.6% (95% CI, 70.4-80.0) following LT. Conclusions. This large US study of patients with PoPH on an LT waitlist confirms that effective PAH treatments can help patients achieve acceptable hemodynamics, providing the opportunity to undergo LT.