Hafferty, Frederic W.

Collaborative learning is recognized for its positive impact on student performance. Influence of social networking on evolution of student learning is rooted in construct of collaborative learning theory. Studies have alluded to benefits of informal learning (outside class) with little information evidenced in academic performance. Gross anatomy course at Mayo Clinic uses team based learning approach over 7 weeks. Teams are diversified (eg. cultural background, college attended, gender) while normalized (similar total average pre‐admission scores) to give each team equal footing from which to work. Teams are assigned at start of histology block 8 weeks prior and maintained through anatomy block. Based on premise of collaborative learning, we predicted students who spent more time interacting with classmates outside class contributed to collective knowledge of team and positively influenced team performance. Study aimed to determine if interaction of team members with classmates outside of assigned team impacted academic performance. Students voluntarily completed weekly surveys identifying classmates they had studied with after hours. Group size and duration of academic interaction were analyzed. Data were compared with final team performance for practical and written exams. Data were statistically analyzed and measured in terms of where teams ranked in overall class performance. Preliminarily, teams with 2 or more members who studied with non‐team members outside class showed improvement, with more overall members outside the bottom tertile. Students in bottom tertile studying with students in top tertile in a small group (< 5) > 1 hour outside class showed 5% improvement. Students in the top tertile are more likely to study alone or with students in the same tertile. Students who study with those in lowest tertile tend to have a positive effect on their performance. When students are allowed to choose their own networks, they tend to form mixed networks, in addition to formal teams.

Because of its symbolic and practical connection to the human body, buttressed by its historical practice of cadaver dissection, the teaching and learning of anatomy has proven to be a veritable cornucopia of pedagogical opportunities for medical students and faculty alike. In this presentation, I will examine some of these opportunities beginning with the author's own explorations of anatomy lab during the early 1970s as an under appreciated site of emotional socialization. In turn, examining these more tacit forms of learning helped to fuel my later work on the hidden curriculum of medical education, along with more recent efforts to explore the social networks of anatomy small group learning. To this end, I will explore the range of approaches used by anatomists in teaching this most fundamental of the basic sciences. Finally, we will examine how instruction in anatomy might stand as a pedagogical beacon for the other basic sciences.

Abstract In this article, we address the question, ‘What is the role of autonomy in physician development?’ Medical education is a developmental process, and autonomy plays a motivational role in physician development. Calls for increased supervision of residents have raised concerns that the resulting decreased autonomy might interfere with resident development, leading the authors to explore the relationship between supervision and autonomy. The medical education literature posits a simple inverse relationship between supervision and autonomy. Within competency frameworks, autonomy is operationalised as independence and viewed as the end goal of training. Alternatively, there is emerging empirical literature describing autonomy and supervision as dynamic and developmental constructs and point towards more complex relationship between supervision and autonomy. Self‐determination theory (SDT) presents a framework for understanding this dynamic relationship and the role of autonomy in physician development. Within SDT, autonomy is a fundamental psychological need, associated with motivation for learning, self‐regulation and an internal locus of control. Supporting learner autonomy can afford learners the opportunity to internalise the values and norms of the profession, leading to an integrated regulation of their behaviours and actions. Conceptualising autonomy through the lens of SDT provides an avenue for education interventions and future research on supervision and autonomy. Educators can integrate supervision and autonomy support in the clinical setting, seeking to motivate learner development by balancing optimal challenge and support and integrating autonomy support with ‘hands‐on’ approaches to supervision. SDT also provides a theoretical framework relevant to current discussions regarding feedback conversations and coaching in medical education. Lastly, conceptualising autonomy using SDT opens new avenues for investigation, exploring the complex relationship between supervision and autonomy and developing efforts to integrate autonomy support with clinical supervision.

Abstract Introduction Medical education is moving to conceptualise feedback as a bidirectional learning conversation. Within this conversation, learners experience a tension between assessment and feedback. That perceived tension affects learners’ outward performances. In this study, we aimed to characterise residents’ experiences with this tension and its effect on learner authenticity within feedback conversations. Methods In this constructivist grounded theory study, the authors were informed by Goffman's theory of impression management. During data analysis, Dweck's theory of mindset was adopted. The authors conducted semi‐structured interviews with 15 internal medicine residents. Data collection and analysis were conducted iteratively, using constant comparison to identify themes coinciding with impression management and mindset, ultimately developing a theoretical model to help explain residents’ responses to tensions within feedback conversations. Results Residents constantly felt ‘scrutinized’, and this affected their engagement in feedback conversations. They staged a performance within those conversations, linked to their underlying mindset: growth or fixed. Growth mindset was characterised by a focus on development as a physician and was associated with asking questions and seeking opportunities for growth. Fixed mindset was characterised by a focus on achieving a favourable evaluation and was associated with a hesitation to ask questions when faced with uncertainty and admit opportunities for growth, because they were concerned about impression management. Context influenced mindset and impression management. Residents adopted a fixed mindset and managed impressions when they perceived the permanence or consequences of evaluations within feedback. Residents adopted a growth mindset when they trusted the supervisor. Discussion Residents assess the context of feedback conversations, altering the authenticity of their behaviours. Context, including the perceptions of formal assessment and relationships with supervisors, affected residents’ mindset and impression management. Providing space for relationship‐building and clarifying the purpose and structure of assessment may be helpful in supporting effective learning conversations in graduate medical education.

Purpose Unprofessional behavior, which can include failure to engage, dishonest and/or disrespectful behavior, and poor self-awareness, can be demonstrated by medical trainees and practicing physicians. In the authors’ experience, these types of behaviors are associated with exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Given this overlap, the authors studied the percentage of ACEs among trainees and physicians referred for fitness-for-duty evaluations and patterns between the types of ACEs experienced and the reason for referral. Method A final sample of 123 cases of U.S. trainees and physicians who had been referred to a Midwestern center for assessment and/or remediation of professionalism issues from 2013 to 2018 was created. Included professionalism lapses fell within 3 categories: boundary violation, disruptive behavior, or potential substance use disorder concerns. All participants completed a psychosocial developmental interview, which includes questions about ACE exposure. Overall rate of reported ACEs and types of ACEs reported were explored. Results Eighty-six (70%) participants reported at least 1 ACE, while 27 (22%) reported 4 or more. Compared with national data, these results show significantly higher occurrence rates of 1 or more ACEs and a lower occurrence rate of 0 ACEs. ACEs that predicted reasons for referral were physical or sexual abuse, feeling unwanted or unloved, witnessing abuse of their mother or stepmother, or caretaker substance use. Conclusions In this sample, ACE exposure was associated with professionalism issues. Remediating individuals with professionalism issues and exposure to ACEs can be complicated by heightened responses to stressful stimuli, difficulties with collaboration and trust, and decreased self-efficacy. Adoption of a trauma-informed medical education approach may help those that have been impacted by trauma rebuild a sense of control and empowerment. The findings of this study may be useful predictors in identifying those at risk of problematic behavior and recidivism before a sentinel event.

With ever-growing emphasis on high-stakes testing in medical education, such as the Medical College Admission Test and the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1, there has been a recent surge of concerns on the rise of a “Step 1 climate” within U.S. medical schools. The authors propose an alternative source of the “climate problem” in current institutions of medical education. Drawing on the intertwined concepts of trust and professionalism as organizational constructs, the authors propose that the core problem is not hijacking-by-exam but rather a hijackable learning environment weakened by a pernicious and under-recognized tide of commodification within the U.S. medical education system. The authors discuss several factors contributing to this weakening of medicine’s control over its learning environments, including erosion of trust in medical school curricula as adequate preparation for entry into the profession, increasing reliance on external profit-driven sources of medical education, and the emergence of an internal medical education marketplace. They call attention to breaches in the core tenets of a profession—namely a logic that differentiates its work from market and managerial forces, along with related slippages in discretionary decision making. The authors suggest reducing reliance on external performance metrics (high-stakes exams and corporate rankings), identifying and investing in alternative metrics that matter, abandoning the marketization of medical education “products,” and attending to the language of educational praxis and its potential corruption by market and managerial lexicons. These steps might salvage some self-governing independence implied in the term “profession” and make possible (if not probable) a recovery of a public trust becoming of the term and its training institutions.

Purpose Networking is essential to leadership effectiveness in the business context. Yet little is known about leadership networking within the academic health science context. If we are going to train academic leaders, we must first understand the relational, network-based activities of their work. The purpose of this study was to explore how academic health science leaders engage in networking activities in the academic health science context. Method A constructivist grounded theory approach guided our study. The authors interviewed 24 academic health science leaders who were enrolled in the New and Evolving Academic Leadership program at the University of Toronto and used social network mapping as an elicitation method. Interviews, which were conducted between September 2014 and June 2015, explored participants’ networks and networking activities. Constant comparative analysis was used to analyze the interviews, with attention paid to identifying key networking activities. Results Academic health science leaders were found to engage in 4 types of networking activities: role bound, project based, goal/vision informed, and opportunity driven. These 4 types were influenced by participants’ conception of their role and their perceived leadership work context, which in turn influenced their sense of agency. Conclusions The networking activities identified in this study of academic health science leaders resonate with effective networking activities found in other fields. The findings highlight that these activities can be facilitated by focusing on leaders’ perceptions about role and work context. Leadership development should thus attend to these perceptions to encourage effective networking skills.