Villasboas, José C.

Abstract Previous studies have found that the prevalence of subtypes of T cells may be associated with patient outcomes, but a comprehensive analysis of the immune profile in the TM of FL has not been done. In the present study, we identified groups of FL patients with discretely unique TMEs and determined whether the T-cell phenotypes in the TME differed among groups. Using a cohort of 82 FL patients with biopsy specimens collected before treatment, we defined the type of TME based on the content of major lineages (T, B, monocytes/macrophages and NK cells) determined by CyTOF analysis. Hierarchical clustering of this cohort stratified patients into 4 groups with different TME: group 1 (G1) included patients with a high percentage of monocyte/macrophages/NK cells; patients from G2 and G3 were enriched for intratumoral T and B cells, respectively. Patients with intermediate numbers of T and B cells were included in G4. CITRUS analysis revealed that T-cell clusters with phenotypes expressing KLRG1, CD57, PD-1dim and rich in TEMRA cells were significantly more abundant in G1 when compared to G2, G3 or G4. In contrast, T-cell clusters with phenotypes containing CD127, CD45RA, CCR7 or PD-1high cells were significantly less abundant in G1 when compared to other groups. When compared to G3 or G4, 2 classes of T cell clusters, all from CD4+ T cells, were significantly more (CD127+KLRG1-) or less (CD57+PD-1high) abundant in G2, respectively. Clusters with a phenotype rich in short-lived effector cells (SLEC) (from CD8+) were upregulated in G3 when compared to G4. These results suggest that patient groups with distinct TME exhibited variable T-cell phenotypes. To determine the role of T-cell differentiation in predicting patient outcome in FL, we identified T-cell subsets using tSNE plots based on the expression of T-cell maturation markers. We identified 18 subsets (S1-S18) of T cells (11 from CD4, 6 from CD8 and 1 from CD4-CD8-) in each sample. Four subsets - S4 (CD4+TN), S5 (CD4+TCM), S7 (CD8+TN) and S10 (CD8+MEPCs) - were considered to be naïve cells or cells in the early stages of differentiation. Four additional subsets - S8 (CD57+TFH), S9 (CD4+TEXH), S13 (CD8+SLECs) and S17 (CD4+PD-1+Treg) - were memory cells with expression of surface markers indicting late-stage differentiation. We found that the 4 subsets (S4: p=0.08, S5: p=0.01, S7: p=0.04 and S10: p<0.01) with an early-stage phenotype were associated with a favorable clinical outcome. In contrast, subsets (S8: p=0.02, S9: p=0.04, S13: p=0.07 and S17: p=0.06) with a late-stage differentiation phenotype had an unfavorable survival. Supporting this finding, we observed that increased numbers of CD45RA+ T cells correlated with a favorable survival. These results indicate that the differentiation stage may determine the role of T cells in predicting patient outcome in FL. Citation Format: Zhi-Zhang Yang, Hyo Jin Kim, Hongyan Wu, Xinyi Tang, Jordan Krull, Patrizia Mondello, Jose Villasboas, Anne Novak, Stephen Ansell. T-cell phenotype and differentiation vary in the tumor microenvironment of follicular lymphoma and are associated with patient outcome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2529.

LBA7564 Background: Patients with r/r B-NHL have a dismal prognosis. DIAL (Dual Immunomodulation in Aggressive Lymphoma) was a multi-center randomized phase II study testing the efficacy of nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) plus varlilumab (CD27 agonist) in this population. Methods: Patients were randomized (1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg IV every 2 weeks for 4 months, 480 mg IV monthly thereafter; group 1) alone or combined with varlilumab (3 mg/kg IV monthly; group 2). Cross-over (group 1 to 2) was allowed for progression. Primary endpoint was overall response (ORR) per LYRIC criteria. A sample size of 48 patients per arm would provide 80% power to detect increase in ORR from 25% to 45% using a one-sided test (p = 0.15). Pre-specified interim analysis occurred after half of the patients completed first radiologic assessment. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Exploratory endpoints included tumor genomic assessment and immune profiling of blood and tumor. Results: 53 patients were enrolled (27 in group 1; 26 in group 2). Interim analysis included 24 patients from each arm. Mean age was 65.2 years, 34 (70.8%) were male, and 36 (75%) received prior CAR-T cell therapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 8 (33.3%) and 7 (30.4%) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Common AEs (> 5%) of any grade included fatigue, lymphopenia, diarrhea, rash. There were no treatment-associated deaths. Toxicity profile was similar between arms. Table summarizes efficacy outcomes. ORR was achieved in 6 patients (12.5%), not statistically different between arms; 4 responses were complete. Seven patients crossed over (1 responded after crossing). Median OS (8.6 vs 7.3 months; p = 0.39) and PFS (2.7 vs 1.4 months; p = 0.06) were similar between arms. Subgroup analysis of patients with prior CAR-T cell therapy showed similar ORR (5/36; 14%), not statistically different between arms. Correlative analysis results will be presented at conference. The trial met futility criterion on interim analysis and enrollment ceased based on pre-specified stopping rule. Conclusions: Dual immunomodulatory therapy did not enhance anti-tumor activity in patients with aggressive B-NHL compared to nivolumab alone. Response rates were low and consistent with previous data using PD-1 inhibitors in this population. Prior therapy with CAR-T cell does not seem to sensitize patients to PD-1 blockade. Toxicity profile was acceptable and dual therapy did not increase the rate of AEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03038672. [Table: see text]

TPS7586 Background: EO2463 is a therapeutic vaccine designed to activate existing commensal bacteria-specific memory T cells that cross-react with B cell markers in order to drive anti-tumor immune activity against B-cell malignancies. The four microbial-derived, synthetically produced peptides contained in EO2463 (OMP72, OMP64, OMP65, and OMP66), correspond to cytotoxic CD8 T cell HLA-A2 restricted epitopes, and exhibit molecular mimicry with the B cell markers CD20, CD22, CD37, and CD268 (BAFF-receptor), respectively. In pre-clinical models, these peptides can generate strong immune responses and specifically stimulate cross-reactive cytotoxic CD8 T cells to recognize the chosen B cell targets. EO2463 also contains a CD4 helper peptide referred to as universal cancer peptide 2, derived from the human telomerase reverse transcriptase catalytic subunit. The present study is a first-in-human clinical trial of this microbiome-derived peptide therapeutic cancer vaccine approach in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). Methods: This four-cohort phase 1/2 trial will investigate EO2463 monotherapy, and combinations of EO2463/lenalidomide (EL), EO2463/rituximab (ER), and EO2463/lenalidomide/rituximab (ER2), for treatment of patients with FL and MZL. Cohort 1 is a safety lead-in dose-finding in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease, with a 3-by-3 design to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for EO2463 monotherapy and to confirm the safety of the RP2D for combination schedules of EL, and ER2. After the recommended EO2463 monotherapy dose is established, cohorts 2, 3, and 4 will open to accrual. Cohort 2 will investigate EO2463 monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed FL/MZL who are not in need of treatment; cohort 3 will investigate EO2463 monotherapy, followed by ER in patients with limited tumor burden who need treatment, and cohort 4 will further investigate EL, followed by ER2 in the RR setting. EO2463 will be administered SC 4 times at 2-week intervals, followed by continued booster administrations every 4 weeks for 9 (Cohorts 2 and 3) or 12 (Cohorts 1 and 4) months. Inclusion/exclusion criteria, and the design and schedule of the intense immune and safety monitoring will be presented. The safety lead-in dose-finding is currently ongoing, and no safety concerns have been observed thus far. Clinical trial information: NCT04669171.

7556 Background: The majority of R/R NHL progressions after CART involve pre-existing sites, suggesting a promising role for bridging radiotherapy (bRT). We assessed the local control rate of disease sites bridged with radiotherapy prior to CART and identified predictors of in-field recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with aggressive B-cell NHL who received bRT between leukapheresis and CART infusion between 2018 and 2021 at a multi-site single institution. bRT local control rate (LC), calculated based on the total number of irradiated sites, was defined from bRT end date. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) were defined from the date of CART infusion. In-field recurrence was defined as disease relapse occurring within the radiation planning target volume. Kaplan-Meier plots and cox regression modeling were used to estimate the desired output. Results: Median age of the cohort at time of CART infusion was 59 (range 19-73). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose (EQD2) administered was 23.3 Gy (range 4-41 Gy). The median time from end of bRT to CART infusion was 14 days (range 6-42). Five (14%) patients also received bridging chemotherapy with bRT. Among the 34 evaluable patients, 30 (88%) achieved an objective response (59% complete response and 29% partial response). At a median follow-up of 12 months, 1-year PFS was 48% and 1-year OS was 72%. No progression occurred beyond 240 days. On review of treatment plans and pre-treatment PET/CT scans, 59 sites were identified that received bRT prior to CART infusion. The median size and SUVmax of the irradiated sites were 8.7cm (range 1.5-22) and 13 (range 4-46), respectively. Of the 59 irradiated sites, 8 sites (13.6%) in 7 patients had in-field local recurrence, translating to 1-year LC of 84%. No in-field recurrence occurred beyond 180 days. Moreover, no local recurrence occurred in patients who received radiation to all known sites of active disease to EQD2> 30 Gy (n = 4 patients); these patients remained in remission except for 1 who experienced progression outside the bRT field. On univariate analysis, triple hit lymphoma (THL) (OR 22.8, 95% CI: 3.8-138.3; p < 0.001), tumor size (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4; p < 0.001), specifically ≥ 9cm (OR 9.4, CI: 1.2-77.3; p = 0.036) and SUVmax (OR 1.1, CI: 1.02-1.15; p = 0.008), specifically ≥ 20 (OR 5.6, CI: 1.3-23.7; p = 0.018), were significantly associated with increased risk of in-field recurrence. On multivariate analysis, THL (OR 32.9, CI: 3.2-336.0; p = 0.03) and tumor size (OR 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6; p = 0.01) retained significant association with in-field recurrence. Conclusions: Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART provides excellent and durable in-field local control for R/R B-cell NHL. Patients with triple hit histology and bulky disease are likely at higher risk of in-field recurrence and may benefit from higher doses of bRT.

Abstract Background: The importance of the antitumor immune response in TNBC is well established. TNBC with higher TILs are less likely to recur and more responsive to systemic therapy. Likewise, PD-L1+ TNBC are more likely to benefit from chemoimmunotherapy. However, TNBC is highly heterogeneous. Of the TNBC molecular subtypes, LAR TNBC is less sensitive to systemic therapy, has lower TILs and lower rates of PD-L1 positivity. The role of other immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is not well established. Here, we evaluated differentially expressed (DE) immune related proteins in the stromal and intratumoral compartments of LAR vs non-LAR TNBC tumors. Methods: We used the Nanostring GeoMX DSP platform to quantitate 58 proteins within spatially distinct intraepithelial, cytokeratin (CK)-positive tumor segments and adjacent CK-negative/nuclei-positive stromal segments in 248 TNBC tumors included in a tissue microarray generated from a cohort of pts with centrally confirmed TNBC who underwent breast surgery without prior neoadjuvant therapy. A subset (n=111) underwent bulk tumor RNA sequencing and were classified as LAR or non-LAR TNBC. DE proteins were identified using a negative binomial generalized linear model (SNR&gt;2, p&lt;0.05). A targeted set of DE proteins was dichotomized at the 80th percentile. Results: Of 111 TNBC tumors, 17 (15%) were LAR and 94 (85%) non-LAR. Compared to non-LAR TNBC, pts with LAR TNBC were older (age ≥50: 82% vs 52%, p&lt;0.01), with tumors that were more often of apocrine histology (35% vs 0%, p &lt;0.01), grade 1-2 (24% vs 1%, p&lt;0.01), and had lower Ki67 (Ki67 ≤15: 24% vs 11%, p=0.06). Most tumors were T1-2 (94% vs 93%, p=0.82) and N0 (53% vs 62%, p=0.09), respectively. As expected, expression of most immune-related proteins was higher in the stromal vs the intratumoral compartment for both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. When focusing on the stromal compartment, expression of multiple immune related proteins was significantly lower in LAR compared to non-LAR TNBC, including the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 (log-2 fold change [log2FC]: 0.552, p=0.05), the macrophage marker CD14 (log2FC: 0.834, p=0.06), CD44 (lof2FC: 0.637, p=0.07), and the immune checkpoint proteins IDO1 (log2FC: 0.914, p=0.04), VISTA (log2FC: 0.471, p=0.07), ICOS (log2FC: 0.444, p=0.08), and STING (log2FC: 0.544, p=0.09). Proteins with expression levels too low for comparisons included PD-L1, LAG3, FOXP3 and BCL-2. When focusing on the intratumoral compartment, expression of most immune-related proteins was very low in both LAR and non-LAR TNBC. Like in the stromal compartment, CD45 expression was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.78, p=0.02). Expression of the immune checkpoint B7-H3 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.737, p=0.02), while expression of the T cell marker CD127 was higher (log2FC: -0.528, p=0.34). With regards to relevant non-immune markers, expression of Ki67 was lower in LAR TNBC (log2FC: 0.5498, p=0.05), consistent with the clinical assay. Conclusion: In this ultra high-plex spatial analysis, we provide first insights into the differential expression at the protein level of several targetable immune checkpoint molecules in LAR vs non-LAR TNBC. The lower expression of several immune related proteins in LAR TNBC is consistent with the hypothesis that LAR TNBC exhibits a “cold” immune microenvironment compared to other TNBC subtypes, potentially rendering itself less susceptible to immunotherapy-based strategies. These data support the need to consider TNBC molecular subtypes in future evaluations of immune-based therapeutic approaches. Funding: This work was supported by NIH grant P50CA116201 to RLF, JMC, KRK, FJC, DZ, JNI, and MPG; BCRF grant 19-161 to EAT and NCATS grant CTSA KL2 TR002379 to RLF. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH Citation Format: Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David M. Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Xue Wang, Judy C. Boughey, Minetta C. Liu, James N. Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Jose C. Villasboas Bisneto, Fergus J. Couch, E. Aubrey Thompson, Matthew P. Goetz. Digital spatial profiling of immune-related proteins in luminal androgen receptor (LAR) vs non-LAR triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Abstract Background: Although major advances have been made in the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the goal of care remains largely palliative, therefore better treatments are needed. Given encouraging preclinical and clinical data, the combination of cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors and HER2-directed therapy is further being evaluated in this trial. Trial Design: In this phase I/II multicenter trial, we will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of abemaciclib (Abem) combined with T-DM1. Three Abem dose levels will be examined, 50 mg, 100 mg and 150 mg. The phase 2 portion of this trial will examine whether PFS is increased with addition of Abem to T-DM1 in two pt cohorts - those with ER+ HER2+ MBC and those with ER-HER2+ MBC. For phase 2, a pre-registration biopsy is required to confirm ER and HER2-status and to determine levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; vimentin (an epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker); and CD8 and FOXP3 expression. Blood samples will be collected pretreatment , at 6 weeks, and at progression for all pts. Eligibility Criteria: Phase I&II: All pts must have HER2+ MBC per ASCO-CAP guidelines and prior treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. For the phase Iportion, pts can have measurable or non-measurable disease with no restriction on the number of prior lines of therapy. In the phase II portion, pts must have measurable disease with ≤1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy alone, ≤1 HER2-directed therapy alone, and/or chemotherapy with HER2-directed therapies. There is no limit on prior endocrine therapy. Specific Aims: The primary objective of the phase II trial is to assess whether addition of Abem to T-DM1 increases PFS in one or both patient cohorts. Secondary objectives include an assessment of toxicity, objective response rates and overall survival. Correlative studies will assess the association between baseline TIL levels, vimentin expression, and CD8/FOXP3 expression with PFS. Changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CTCs, ctDNA and serum thymidine kinase 1 during the course of treatment will be examined to determine if there is a link with PFS outcomes overall and separately for each cohort. Pharmacogenomic studies will determine if pts with the FCGR3A-158 polymorphism derive less benefit from T-DM1 and have inferior PFS outcomes compared with pts who do not have this polymorphism. Statistical Methods:Phase I: Standard 3+3 design, with dose limiting toxicities as per protocol. Phase II: For each pt cohort, a stratified randomization scheme will be used to assign pts to treatment with liver mets as a stratification factor. For each pt cohort, a stratified log rank test will be used to assess whether PFS is increased with the addition of Abem to T-DM1. A non-binding futility analysis will be applied in each cohort after 58 events in the ER+ HER2+ MBC study cohort and 48 events in the ER- HER2+ MBC study cohort. Present Accrual: 0; target accrual: minimal 120 pts., maximal 140 pts CohortOne-sidedalphaPowerAccrual Period (accrual rate)Follow-up after close of enrollmentPFS with T-DM1PFS with abema and T-DM1Number of eligible patientsER+/HER2+0.100.912 months (5-6 pts per month)12 months12 weeks24 weeks64 (32 per arm)ER-/HER2+0.100.8512 months (3-4 pts per month)12 months6 weeks12 weeks50 (25 pts per arm) Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Jun He, Vera J Suman, Krishna R Kalari, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jose C Villasboas-Bisneto, Pratima Chalasani, Demet Gokalp Yasar, Daniel M Anderson, Philip J Stella, Anthony J Jaslowski, Susan H Tannenbaum, Angela Saverimuthu, Donald Northfelt, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Jodi M Carter, Minetta C Liu, Liewei Wang, Zhenkun Lou, Matthew P Goetz. A phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and T-DM1 in women and men with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) (ACCRU-BR-1801) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-05.

AbstractOur phase III trial reported that autograft‐absolute lymphocyte count (A‐ALC) improved survival post‐autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APBHSCT) for a short‐term follow‐up of 2 years. We evaluated retrospectively in our phase III trial patients that the A‐ALC still confers survival benefit with a longer follow‐up. With a median follow‐up of 127.6 months, patients infused with an A‐ALC ≥ 0.5 × 109 cells/kg experienced better overall survival (HR = 0.392, 95% confidence of interval [CI]: 0.224–0.687, p < 0.001) and progression‐free survival (HR = 0.413, 95% CI: 0.253–0.677), p < 0.0004). This study supports that A‐ALC provides long‐term survival benefit post APBHSCT.