Back to Authors

Alarcón, Alessandro de

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4792-4676

Mayo Clinic

University of Cincinnati

Citations 15

Studying vocal fold non-stationary behavior during connected speech using high-speed videoendoscopy
Naghibolhosseini, Maryam , Deliyski, Dimitar D. , Zacharias, Stephanie R. C. , Alarcón, Alessandro de , Orlikoff, Robert F.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | October 19, 2018 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 3_Supplement | Pages: 1766-1766

10.1121/1.5067811 Get It

Studying voice production during running speech can provide new knowledge about the mechanisms of voice production with and without disorder. Laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy (HSV) systems are powerful tools for studying laryngeal function and, if coupled with flexible fiberoptic endoscopes, they can provide unique possibilities to measure vocal fold vibration with high temporal resolution during connected speech. Hence, we can measure the non-stationary behaviors of the vocal folds, such as the glottal attack and offset times in running speech. In this study, a custom-built flexible fiberoptic HSV system was used to record a “Rainbow Passage” production from a vocally normal female. Automated temporal and spatial segmentation algorithms were developed to determine the time stamps of the vibrating vocal folds and the edges of the vocal folds during phonation. The glottal attack time and offset times were then measured from the temporally and spatially segmented HSV images. The amplification ratio was computed during the phonation onset and the damping ratio was calculated at the offset of sustained portion of phonation. These measures can be used to describe the laryngeal mechanisms of voice production in connected speech.
Outcome measures for pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: International consensus statement
Balakrishnan, Karthik , Sidell, Douglas R. , Bellia‐Munzon, Gaston F., Boesch, R. Paul , Bromwich, Matthew, Cofer, Shelagh A. , Daines, Cori , Alarcón, Alessandro de , Garabédian, N , Ida, Jonathan B., Leboulanger, Nicolas , Manning, Peter B., Mehta, Deepak, Monnier, Philippe, Myer, Charles M. , Prager, Jeremy D. , Propst, Evan J. , Rahbar, Reza , Russell, John , Rutter, Michael J. , Thierry, Briac , Thompson, Dana M. , Torre, Michele , Varela, Patricio, Vijayasekaran, Shyan , White, David R. , Wineland, Andre , Wood, Robert E. , Wootten, Christopher T. , Zur, Karen B. , Cotton, Robin T., Sidell, Douglas R. , Hart, Catherine K , Leboulanger, Nicolas , Prager, Jeremy D , Zur, Karen , Sidell, Douglas R , Bauman, Nancy M. , Bellía-Munzón, Gastón , Hart, Catherine K. , Preciado, Diego A.

The Laryngoscope | August 28, 2018 | Volume: 129 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 244-255

10.1002/lary.27445 Get It

ObjectivesDevelop multidisciplinary and international consensus on patient, disease, procedural, and perioperative factors, as well as key outcome measures and complications, to be reported for pediatric airway reconstruction studies.MethodsStandard Delphi methods were applied. Participants proposed items in three categories: 1) patient/disease characteristics, 2) procedural/intraoperative/perioperative factors, and 3) outcome measures and complications. Both general and anatomic site‐specific measures were elicited. Participants also suggested specific operations to be encompassed by this project. We then used iterative ranking and review to develop consensus lists via a priori Delphi consensus criteria.ResultsThirty‐three pediatric airway experts from eight countries in North and South America, Europe, and Australia participated, representing otolaryngology (including International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group members), pulmonology, general surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery. Consensus led to inclusion of 19 operations comprising open expansion, resection, and slide procedures of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi as well as three endoscopic procedures. Consensus was achieved on multiple patient/comorbidity (10), disease/stenosis (7), perioperative‐/intraoperative‐/procedure‐related (16) factors. Consensus was reached on multiple outcome and complication measures, both general and site‐specific (8 general, 13 supraglottic, 15 glottic, 17 subglottic, 8 cervical tracheal, 12 thoracic tracheal). The group was able to clarify how each outcome should be measured, with specific instruments defined where applicable.ConclusionThis consensus statement provides a framework to communicate results consistently and reproducibly, facilitating meta‐analyses, quality improvement, transfer of information, and surgeon self‐assessment. It also clarifies expert opinion on which patient, disease, procedural, and outcome measures may be important to consider in any pediatric airway reconstruction patient.Level of Evidence5 Laryngoscope, 129:244–255, 2019
Revision thoracic slide tracheoplasty: Outcomes following unsuccessful tracheal reconstruction
Sidell, Douglas R. , Hart, Catherine K. , Bryant, Roosevelt , Rutter, Michael J. , Manning, Peter B., Balakrishnan, Karthik , Yang, Christina J. , Alarcón, Alessandro de , Sidell, Douglas R. , Balakrishnan, Karthik , Hart, Catherine K , Sidell, Douglas R , Tabangin, Meredith E. , Meinzen‐Derr, Jareen K. , Balakrishnan, Karthik

The Laryngoscope | May 5, 2018 | Volume: 128 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2181-2186

10.1002/lary.27145 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisOver the past decade, thoracic slide tracheoplasty (TST) has become the principal operation in the management of congenital tracheal stenosis. The purpose of this report was to describe our experience with revision TST following unsuccessful prior tracheal reconstruction.Study DesignRetrospective analysis at an academic children's hospital.MethodsPatients undergoing TST on cardiopulmonary bypass between January 2005 and May 2014 were reviewed. Patients with a history of prior airway surgery were extracted for further analysis. Preoperative patient variables and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared between patients undergoing revision slide tracheoplasty (RTST) and a control group of 26 matched patients undergoing primary surgery TST.ResultsTwenty‐six revision patients (25 referrals, one primary patient) of 162 patients reviewed over the study period met inclusion criteria. Twenty‐three patients had a history of complete tracheal rings, and three patients had cartilaginous deficiency. A total of 41 airway reconstruction procedures had been performed prior to RTST. When compared to primary TST, patients undergoing RTST required fewer cardiac procedures intraoperatively, and fewer mean ventilator hours (P = .01) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the median length of stay, requirement of >48 hours ventilation, or postoperative complications between groups. There was one nonsurgical postoperative mortality following RTST.ConclusionsDespite some differences in the postoperative management when compared to nonrevision cases, revision TST can be successfully performed after prior tracheal reconstruction with good postoperative outcomes.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 128:2181–2186, 2018
Endoscopic anterior–posterior cricoid split for pediatric bilateral vocal fold paralysis
Rutter, Michael J. , Alarcón, Alessandro de , Parikh, Sanjay R., Balakrishnan, Karthik , Lam, Derek J. , Johnson, Kaalan , Sidell, Douglas R. , Sidell, Douglas R. , Hart, Catherine K. , Daniel, Sam Joseph , Sidell, Douglas R , Lam, Derek J , Balakrishnan, Karthik

The Laryngoscope | March 8, 2017 | Volume: 128 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 257-263

10.1002/lary.26547 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisChildren with bilateral true vocal fold immobility (BTVFI) may present with significant airway distress necessitating tracheostomy. The objective of this study was to review our preliminary experience with the anterior–posterior cricoid split (APCS), an endoscopic intervention used as an alternative to tracheostomy in children with BTVFI.Study DesignMulticenter review.MethodsA review of patients undergoing endoscopic APCS for BTVFI at four institutions was performed. Patients were evaluated for the ability to ventilate without the requirement for tracheostomy or reintubation. Additional data extracted included the duration of intubation following APCS, the requirement for additional procedures, and demographics. Surgical success was defined as the ability to avoid tracheostomy and to cap or decannulate without respiratory symptoms if a tracheostomy was present prior to APCS.ResultsNineteen APCS procedures were performed between October 2010 and June 2016. There were 12 male patients, the mean age at APCS was 4.7 months. BTVFI was primarily idiopathic (58%) and associated with other comorbidities (74%). All patients were candidates for tracheostomy prior to APCS. Fourteen patients (74%) were considered surgical successes. Of the unsuccessful patients, three (66%) required tracheostomy following APCS, and one was treated with a posterior cartilage graft. There was one nonsurgical mortality greater than 2 months after APCS and thought to be unrelated to the airway.ConclusionsEndoscopic APCS appears to be a safe and effective intervention for pediatric BTVFI. Under the correct circumstances, this can be performed as a single procedure, obviating tracheostomy. Further study is warranted.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 128:257–263, 2018
Outcomes and Resource Utilization of Endoscopic Mass‐Closure Technique for Laryngeal Clefts
Balakrishnan, Karthik , Cheng, Esther , Alarcón, Alessandro de , Sidell, Douglas R. , Rutter, Michael J. , Sidell, Douglas R. , Hart, Catherine K. , Sidell, Douglas R , Balakrishnan, Karthik

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | March 17, 2015 | Volume: 153 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 119-123

10.1177/0194599815576718 Get It

ObjectiveTo compare resource utilization and clinical outcomes between endoscopic mass‐closure and open techniques for laryngeal cleft repair.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary academic children’s hospital.Subjects and MethodsPediatric patients undergoing repair for Benjamin‐Inglis type 1‐3 laryngeal clefts over a 15‐year period. All 20 patients undergoing endoscopic repair were included. Eight control patients undergoing open repair were selected using matching by age and cleft type. Demographic, clinical, and resource utilization data were collected.ResultsTwenty‐eight patients were included (20 endoscopic, 8 open). Mean age, rates of tracheostomy and vocal fold immobility, and distribution of cleft types were not different between the 2 groups (all P >. 2). Mean operative time (P =. 004) and duration of hospital stay (P <. 001) were significantly shorter in the endoscopic group. All repairs were intact in both groups at final postoperative endoscopy. Rates of persistent laryngeal penetration or aspiration on swallow study were not different between groups (P = 1.000), although results were available for only 11 patients.ConclusionEndoscopic laryngeal cleft repair using a mass‐closure technique provides a durable result while requiring significantly shorter operative times and hospital stays than open repair and avoiding the potential morbidity of laryngofissure. However, open repair may allow the simultaneous performance of other airway reconstructive procedures and may be a useful salvage technique when endoscopic repair fails. Postoperative swallowing results require further study.