Lund‐Johansen, Morten

OBJECT The primary goals of this study were: 1) to examine the influence of disease and treatment on headache in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS); and 2) to identify clinical predictors of long-term headache disability. METHODS This was a cross-sectional observational study with international multicenter enrollment. Patients included those with primary sporadic < 3-cm VS and a separate group of general population control subjects without tumors. Interventions included a postal survey incorporating the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a VS symptom questionnaire. The main outcome measures were univariate and multivariable associations with HDI total score. RESULTS The overall survey response rate was 79%. Data from 538 patients with VS were analyzed. The mean age at time of survey was 64 years, 56% of patients were female, and the average duration between treatment and survey was 7.7 years. Twenty-seven percent of patients received microsurgery, 46% stereotactic radiosurgery, and 28% observation. Patients with VS who were managed with observation were more than twice as likely to have severe headache disability compared with 103 control subjects without VS. When accounting for baseline differences, there was no statistically significant difference in HDI outcome between treatment modalities at time of survey. Similarly, among the microsurgery cohort, the long-term risk of severe headache disability was not different between surgical approaches. Multivariable regression demonstrated that younger age, greater anxiety and depression, and a preexisting diagnosis of headache were the primary predictors of severe long-term headache disability, while tumor size and treatment modality had little influence. CONCLUSIONS At a mean of almost 8 years following treatment, approximately half of patients with VS experience headaches of varying frequency and severity. Patient-driven factors including age, sex, mental health, and preexisting headache syndrome are the strongest predictors of long-term severe headache disability. Tumor size and treatment modality have less impact. These data may assist with patient counseling regarding long-term expectations following diagnosis and treatment.

ObjectiveSeveral studies have demonstrated small but statistically significant differences in quality‐of‐life (QOL) scores among vestibular schwannoma (VS) treatment modalities. However, does a several‐point difference on a 100‐point scale really matter? The minimal clinically important difference (MCID)—defined as the smallest difference in scores that patients perceive as important and that could lead to a change in management—was developed to answer this important question. While the MCID has been determined for QOL measures used in other diseases, it remains undefined in the VS literature.Study DesignDistribution‐ and anchor‐based techniques were utilized to define the MCID for the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36).SettingTwo academic referral centers.PatientsPatients with VS (N = 538).InterventionCross‐sectional postal survey.Main Outcome MeasuresMCID for PANQOL domains and total score and SF‐36 Physical and Mental Health Component Summary scores.ResultsThe MCID (median, interquartile range) for the PANQOL total score was 11 points (10‐12); the MCIDs for individual domains were as follows: hearing, 6 (5‐8); balance, 16 (14‐19); facial, 10 (no interquartile range); pain, 11 (10‐13); energy, 13 (10‐17); anxiety, 11 (5‐22); and general, 15 (11‐19). The MCID was 7 points (6‐11) for the SF‐36 Mental Health Component Summary score and 8 points (6‐10) for the Physical Health Component Summary score.ConclusionsThe MCIDs determined in the current study generally exceed differences reported in previous prospective studies, in which conclusions about QOL benefit (or harm) among VS treatment modalities were based on statistical significance alone. Moving forward, these MCIDs should be considered when interpreting results of VS QOL studies.

OBJECT The optimal treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) is highly controversial. To date, the majority of studies comparing treatment modalities have focused on a narrow scope of technical outcomes including facial function, hearing status, and tumor control. Very few publications have investigated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) differences between individual treatment groups, and none have used a disease-specific HRQOL instrument. METHODS All patients with sporadic small- to medium-sized VSs who underwent primary microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or observation between 1998 and 2008 were identified. Subjects were surveyed via postal questionnaire using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short form (PROMIS-10), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), and the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life (PANQOL) scale. Additionally, a pool of general population adults was surveyed, providing a nontumor control group for comparison. RESULTS A total of 642 respondents were analyzed. The overall response rate for patients with VS was 79%, and the mean time interval between treatment and survey was 7.7 years. Using multivariate regression, there were no statistically significant differences between management groups with respect to the PROMIS-10 physical or mental health dimensions, the SF-36 Physical or Mental Component Summary scores, or the PANQOL general, anxiety, hearing, or energy subdomains. Patients who underwent SRS or observation reported a better total PANQOL score and higher PANQOL facial, balance, and pain subdomain scores than the microsurgical cohort (p < 0.02). The differences in scores between the nontumor control group and patients with VS were greater than differences observed between individual treatment groups for the majority of measures. CONCLUSIONS The differences in HRQOL outcomes following SRS, observation, and microsurgery for VS are small. Notably, the diagnosis of VS rather than treatment strategy most significantly impacts quality of life. Understanding that a large number of VSs do not grow following discovery, and that intervention does not confer a long-term HRQOL advantage, small- and medium-sized VS should be initially observed, while intervention should be reserved for patients with unequivocal tumor growth or intractable symptoms that are amenable to treatment. Future studies assessing HRQOL in VS patients should prioritize use of validated disease-specific measures, such as the PANQOL, given the significant limitations of generic instruments in distinguishing between treatment groups and tumor versus nontumor subjects.

Objectives/HypothesisTo investigate the influence of posttreatment audiovestibular symptoms, facial neuropathy, and headache on long‐term quality‐of‐life outcomes in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) utilizing the Short Form 36 (SF‐36) Health Survey and the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) scale.Study DesignCross‐sectional observation study.MethodsPatients with sporadic small‐ or medium‐sized VS (< 3.0 cm) who were evaluated between 1998 and 2008 at two independent tertiary academic referral centers were surveyed. Multivariable associations with the PANQOL total score and the SF‐36 physical and mental component scores evaluated using regression analysis.ResultsA total of 538 surveyed patients returned a completed questionnaire, providing a response rate of 79%. Two hundred forty‐seven (46%) patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, 143 (27%) microsurgery, and 148 (28%) observation. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that ongoing dizziness was associated with the greatest reduction in PANQOL total score, followed by headache. After adjusting for all examined features, ongoing dizziness and ongoing headache were the only two variables that were associated with both the SF‐36 physical and mental component scores. Patient sex and treatment modality did not significantly influence PANQOL or SF‐36 scores.ConclusionsOngoing dizziness and headache are the strongest predictors of long‐term quality‐of‐life reduction in patients with sporadic VS, while the impact of hearing loss, facial nerve function, and tinnitus are less by comparison. This information may be valuable for patient counseling, refinement of VS quality‐of‐life assessment instruments, and determining high‐yield targets for therapy in efforts to further improve patient outcomes.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 125:1697–1702, 2015

Objective (1) To characterize long‐term dizziness following observation, microsurgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small to medium‐sized vestibular schwannoma (VS) using a validated self‐assessment inventory; and (2) to identify clinical variables associated with long‐term dizziness handicap. Study Design Cross‐sectional observational study. Setting Two independent tertiary academic referral centers: one located in the United States and one in Norway. Subjects and Methods All patients with sporadic VS of less than 3 cm who underwent primary microsurgery, SRS, or observation between 1998 and 2008 were identified. Subjects were surveyed via a postal questionnaire using the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and a VS symptom questionnaire. Results The overall survey response rate was 79%. A total of 538 respondents (mean age, 64 years; 56% female) were analyzed, and the mean time interval between treatment and survey was 7.7 years. Pretreatment variables associated with greater dizziness handicap included female sex, older age, larger tumor size, preexisting diagnosis of headache or migraine, and symptoms of dizziness predating treatment. Significant posttreatment features strongly associated with poor long‐term DHI scores included frequency and severity of ongoing headache. On multivariable analysis, treatment modality did not influence long‐term dizziness handicap. Conclusion At a mean of approximately 8 years following treatment, over half of patients with VS reported ongoing dizziness. The authors have identified several baseline features that may help predict the risk of lasting dizziness. Treatment modality does not appear to influence long‐term DHI score. We found a strong association between posttreatment headache and poor dizziness handicap. Future study is needed to further define this relationship.