Achenbach, Sara J.

INTRODUCTION Nearly 20% of patients (pts) are ≥ 80 years (yrs) of age at the time of CLL diagnosis. Increased medical comorbidities, as well as declining functional status and organ function, often accompany advanced age. However, clinical trials often enroll a disproportionally low number of people from this age demographic due to stringent eligibility parameters, which provides limited evidence to guide decisions. Here, we report clinical characteristics and outcomes of pts ≥ 80 yrs of age at the time of CLL diagnosis. METHODS Between 1/1995 and 3/2020, we identified previously untreated CLL pts from the Mayo Clinic CLL Database who were ≥ 80 yrs of age at the time of CLL diagnosis, and seen within 3 yrs of diagnosis. Baseline characteristics, treatments administered, and time to first treatment (TFT) were analyzed for all pts. Overall survival (OS) was measured from diagnosis date in all pts and separately from treatment date for treated pts. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was measured in treated pts from first treatment date to date of second treatment or last known treatment. TFT and TTNT were analyzed accounting for competing risk of death. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) compared observed survival to survival in a Minnesota population. Cox multivariable regression models were used to determine which factors were associated with OS (treatment as a time-dependent covariate) and TTNT (accounting for competing risk of death). RESULTS Among the 213 pts identified, the median age was 83 yrs (range 80-97); baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median number of medical comorbidities among all pts was 4 (range 0-8). At least 1 comorbidity was present in 97% of pts, most commonly hypertension (57%), genitourinary (n=48%), rheumatological (46%), and dyslipidemia (n=43%). Median follow-up was 3.8 yrs. A total of 56 pts received treatment and the median TFT was 6.7 yrs. Over this 25 year interval, the treatment approaches included monoclonal antibody alone (n=17), chemotherapy alone (n=17), or chemoimmunotherapy (n=14), novel agents (n=3), and multi-agent Richter's transformation regimens (n=5). Chlorambucil-based treatments (chlorambucil n=13, chlorambucil, prednisone n=3) were the most frequently used chemotherapy regimens. The most common chemoimmunotherapy regimens included rituximab, cyclophosphamide, prednisone (RCP) with (n=3) or without vincristine (n=6), and chlorambucil with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (n=4; obinutuzumab n=2, rituximab n=2). Among 17 pts who received monoclonal antibody alone, treatments included rituximab alone (n=11), rituximab plus methylprednisolone (n=2), obinutuzumab (n=2), and rituximab with alemtuzumab (n=2). Frontline novel agent treatments included ibrutinib alone (n=1), acalabrutinib alone (n=1), and ibrutinib, obinutuzumab, venetoclax (n=1). Five pts with Richter's transformation (diagnosed concurrent with CLL n=4) received multi-agent chemotherapy. Among the 56 treated pts, 22 pts received second line therapy after a median TTNT of 2.8 yrs from start of first therapy. The most common second line treatments were chlorambucil-based (n=6) and rituximab-based (n=6) regimens. Age, sex, absolute lymphocyte count, del17p, and unmutated IGHV were not predictive of TTNT. The median OS among all 213 pts was 4.6 yrs. SMR was 1.2 (p=0.008) when excluding pts with Richter's transformation. In univariable analyses, receipt of therapy (HR 3.92, 95%CI 2.11-7.28; p<0.001), age (per 5 year increase; HR 1.84, 95%CI 1.43-2.38; p<0.001) and unmutated IGHV (HR 2.03, 95%CI 1.12-3.67; p=0.02) were predictors of shorter OS. The OS among pts who received treatment (Figure 1) was similar when compared across time periods of treatment start year grouped as 1995-2001 (n=10), 2002-2013 (n=32), and 2014-2020 (n=14). Treatment categories by time period are shown in Table 2. CONCLUSIONS In this study of 213 pts ≥ 80 yrs of age at time of CLL diagnosis, the median time to first therapy was ~7 yrs. Although survival outcomes did not differ by era across the 25-year span of this study, pts treated with novel agents were underrepresented and are a patient population which warrants additional evaluation. The finding that pts with CLL in this cohort had a 20% higher risk of death compared to an age- and sex-matched population emphasize the need for ongoing efforts to improve clinical outcomes for CLL pts in this demographic category. Disclosures Kenderian: Torque: Consultancy; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding. Wang:Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Genentech, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Kay:Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ding:alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DTRM: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Parikh:Merck: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are known to differentially impact prognosis in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Deletion6q23 (del6q23) has been reported in ~2-3% of CLL patients at diagnosis; however, its prognostic significance remains indeterminate. Methods: We identified previously untreated CLL patients from the Mayo Clinic CLL Database seen between 1/1995 - 2/2020 who had FISH performed. The clinical characteristics, concomitant cytogenetic abnormalities, time to first therapy (TTFT), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with del6q23 to those without this abnormality. TTFT was analyzed from FISH date until treatment or last known untreated date, accounting for competing risk of death. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods from FISH date. In a matched (CLL-IPI risk score and sex) analysis, Cox regression analysis was used to determine the association between TTFT/OS and presence of del6q23. The Mayo Clinic IRB approved this study. Results: A total of 3101 CLL patients were identified; their median age at diagnosis was 64 years and 66% were male. Of these patients, 42 (1.3%) had evidence of del6q23 by FISH. Compared to patients without del6q23, patients with del6q23 carried a more adverse clinical and cytogenetic profile at the time of diagnosis including advanced Rai stage (22% Rai III/IV vs. 9% Rai III/IV; P = 0.002), unmutated IGHV genes (91% vs. 43%; P < 0.001), and high/very high risk CLL-IPI (50% vs. 27%; P < 0.001). Del6q23 was the sole abnormality in 13 patients (31%). Of the remaining patients, del6q23 was concomitantly present with del13q in 8 patients (19%), and with either del11q or del17p in 21 patients (50%). Of the 42 patients with del6q23, 29 received first line therapy: chemoimmunotherapy in 16 patients, BTK inhibitor in 7 patients, and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody alone in 6 patients. The median follow-up of the entire cohort was 7.3 years. The median TTFT in patients with del6q23 was 0.7 years while the 5-year OS was 76%. Patients with del6q23 demonstrated significantly shorter TTFT and reduced OS when compared to patients without del6q23 (Figures 1A and 1B). The shorter TTFT was also evident for patients with del6q23 compared to patients without del6q23 divided according to the Dohner risk category (Figure 2A), although there was no difference in OS between these groups of patients (Figure 2B). Because del6q23 patients were enriched for other unfavorable prognostic markers, we identified four control patients without del6q23, matched by CLL-IPI risk score and sex, to each treatment-naïve patient with del6q23. Patients with del6q23 showed a borderline statistically significant shorter TTFT (median 0.7 years versus 3.9 years; P = 0.07) and a nonsignificant association with OS (median 10.9 years versus 10.3 years; P = 0.28). Conclusion: Del6q23 by FISH in previously untreated CLL represents an uncommon abnormality. When compared to patients without del6q23, patients with del6q23 tend to have more adverse clinical and cytogenetic profiles at baseline, which likely confer a worse prognosis as reflected by shorter TTFT compared to patients without this abnormality. Figure Disclosures Ding: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Kay:Sunesis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian:Juno: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Tolero: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria.

Abstract Context Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) affects up to 50% of patients with adrenal adenomas. Frailty is a syndrome characterized by the loss of physiological reserves and an increase in vulnerability, and it serves as a marker of declining health. Objective To compare frailty in patients with MACS versus patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors (NFAT). Design Retrospective study, 2003-2018 Setting Referral center Patients Patients >20 years of age with adrenal adenoma and MACS (1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression (DST) of 1.9-5 µg/dL) and NFAT (DST <1.9 µg/dL). Main outcome measure Frailty index (range 0-1), calculated using a 47-variable deficit model. Results Patients with MACS (n = 168) demonstrated a higher age-, sex-, and body mass index–adjusted prevalence of hypertension (71% vs 60%), cardiac arrhythmias (50% vs 40%), and chronic kidney disease (25% vs 17%), but a lower prevalence of asthma (5% vs 14%) than patients with NFAT (n = 275). Patients with MACS reported more symptoms of weakness (21% vs 11%), falls (7% vs 2%), and sleep difficulty (26% vs 15%) as compared with NFAT. Age-, sex- and BMI-adjusted frailty index was higher in patients with MACS vs patients with NFAT (0.17 vs 0.15; P = 0.009). Using a frailty index cutoff of 0.25, 24% of patients with MACS were frail, versus 18% of patients with NFAT (P = 0.028). Conclusion Patients with MACS exhibit a greater burden of comorbid conditions, adverse symptoms, and frailty than patients with NFAT. Future prospective studies are needed to further characterize frailty, examine its responsiveness to adrenalectomy, and assess its influence on health outcomes in patients with MACS.

Abstract Context Reduced bone material strength index (BMSi) and increased cortical porosity (CtPo) have emerged as potentially contributing to fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Objective To determine whether BMSi or CtPo are related to other diabetic complications. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting Subjects recruited from a random sample of southeast Minnesota residents. Participants A total of 171 T2DM patients (mean age, 68.8 years) and 108 age-matched nondiabetic controls (mean age, 67.3 years). Main Measures Bone material strength index was measured using microindentation, skin advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) measured using autofluorescence, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography at the distal radius and tibia, assessment of diabetic microvascular complications including urine microalbuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy, and vascular disease (ankle brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen tension [TcPO2]). All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. Results Skin AGEs were negatively correlated with the BMSi in both T2DM (r = -0.30, P < 0.001) and control (r = -0.23, P = 0.020) subjects. In relating diabetic complications to CtPo, we found that T2DM patients with clinically significant peripheral vascular disease (TcPO2 ≤ 40 mm Hg) had higher (+21.0%, P = 0.031) CtPo at the distal tibia as compared to controls; in these subjects, CtPo was negatively correlated with TcPO2 at both the distal tibia (r = -0.39, P = 0.041) and radius (r = -0.41, P = 0.029). Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that bone material properties are related to AGE accumulation regardless of diabetes status, while CtPo in T2DM patients is linked to TcPO2, a measure of microvascular blood flow.

8026 Background: CLL progression and CLL-related complications (infections and second malignancies) were the leading cause of death (COD) in a prospective cohort of CLL patients (Strati, BJH 2017). The CLL-IPI integrates major clinical and molecular prognostic factors and stratifies patients into 4 risk groups with distinct prognosis. It is unknown if COD differs according to CLL-IPI risk group in patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL between 1/2000-12/2019 and seen within 1 year of diagnosis were identified from the Mayo Clinic CLL database. Cumulative incidences of cause-specific death were analyzed using Gray’s test, with deaths from different causes treated as competing events and deaths from unknown causes excluded. Results: 1276 patients were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 24-92), and 880 (69%) were male. Based on CLL-IPI score, 449 (35%) had low risk disease, 443 (35%) had intermediate risk disease, and 384 (30%) had high/very high risk disease. Median follow-up time for the study was 6 years; 286 deaths occurred. The COD was CLL progression in 99 (35%), infection in 16 (6%), second malignancy in 47 (16%), CLL-unrelated in 59 (21%), and unknown in 65 (23%) patients. The rates of death due to CLL progression were higher (17.3% at 5 years; 30.3% at 10 years) than the rates due to CLL-related complications (5.7% at 5 years; 12.9% at 10 years) or due to CLL-unrelated causes (8.6% at 5 years; 16.9% at 10 years) in the CLL-IPI high/very high risk group, but not the CLL-IPI low or intermediate risk group (Table). A higher CLL-IPI risk group was associated with a higher rate of death due to CLL progression ( P < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of death due to CLL-related complications ( P = 0.013), and CLL-unrelated causes ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: Causes of death in newly diagnosed CLL patients differ according to their CLL-IPI risk group. In patients with high/very high risk CLL, improving CLL disease control with novel agents seems justified. In patients with low/intermediate risk CLL, there should be increased efforts to reverse immune dysfunction to reduce infections and second malignancies. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) affects up to 50% of patients with adrenal adenomas. Frailty is a syndrome characterized by diminished strength and endurance and serves as a marker of declining health and dependency. We hypothesized that patients with MACS are more frail when compared to patients with nonfunctioning adrenal tumors (NFAT). Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult patients with adrenal adenoma evaluated at a tertiary center from 2004 to 2018. MACS and NFAT were defined as cortisol after 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression (DST) between 1.8-5 mcg/dl and &lt;1.8 mcg/dl, respectively. Frailty index (FI, range 0-1) was calculated using a 47 variables -deficit model (20 comorbidities, 14 activities of daily living, and 13 symptoms). Patients were excluded if treated with exogenous glucocorticoids, if diagnosed with overt adrenal hormone excess, another adrenal disorder, or if missing variables of interest. Results: MACS was diagnosed in 168 patients (67% women) at a median age 65 (30-91) years and NFAT in 275 patients (61% women) at a median age of 59 (21-84) years. Patients with MACS demonstrated higher prevalence of hypertension (73% vs 62%), cardiac arrhythmias (50% vs 40%), and chronic kidney disease (25% vs 17%), but lower prevalence of asthma (5% vs 14%), when compared to patients with NFAT, p&lt;0.05 for all. Patients with MACS reported more symptoms of weakness (21% vs 11%), falls (7% vs 2%), and sleep difficulty (26% vs 15%) as compared to patients with NFAT, p&lt;0.05 for all. Age, sex and BMI-adjusted FI was higher in patients with MACS vs patients with NFAT (0.17 vs 0.15, p=0.009). Using cut-off FI of 0.2, 42% of patients with MACS were frail, versus 30% of patients with NFAT (p=0.01). Conclusion: Higher frailty in patients with MACS supports a more aggressive management, such as adrenalectomy over conservative follow up. Future prospective studies are needed to characterize frailty in greater detail in patients with MACS, as well as to examine frailty reversal by adrenalectomy.

Abstract Background: Benign adrenal tumors are frequently diagnosed on imaging and may pose health risks to patients regardless of functional status. Both non-functioning adrenal tumors (NFAT) and tumors with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) have been associated with increased cardiovascular events and risk factors. However, limited data exist on the association of adrenal adenomas with cardiometabolic outcomes in the population-based setting. Aim: 1) To determine the prevalence of cardiovascular co-morbidities and events and 2) to assess mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with adrenal adenomas. Methods: We identified adult patients living in the community diagnosed with an adrenal tumor from 1995-2017 using a medical records linkage system. Adrenal tumors were classified as MACS if cortisol was ≥1.8mcg/dL after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test, NFAT if cortisol was &lt;1.8 mcg/dL, and adenoma with unknown cortisol secretion (AUCS) if dexamethasone suppression test was not performed. Cardiovascular co-morbidities and events were assessed at baseline. Patients were then followed until death, migration out of the community, or through December 31, 2018. Results were compared to age and sex matched reference subjects without adrenal tumors and adjusted for tobacco use and BMI. Results: A total of 1,003 patients had adrenal adenomas with 136 (14%) NFAT, 86 (9%) MACS, and 781 (78%) AUCS. The median age of diagnosis was 63 years (range, 20-96) and 581 (58%) were women. At baseline, patients with adrenal adenomas were more likely to have hypertension (92% vs 81%, p&lt;0.001), overweight/obesity (89% vs 82%, p&lt;0.001), pre-diabetes/diabetes (82% vs 70%, p&lt;0.001), dyslipidemia (89% vs 82%, p&lt;0.001), and chronic kidney disease (11% vs 7%, p=0.004) than age and sex matched reference subjects. Myocardial infarctions (13% vs 8%, p &lt;0.001), coronary intervention (9% vs 6%, p= 0.007), heart failure (12% vs 6%, p&lt;0.001), peripheral vascular disease (26% vs 15%, p&lt;0.001), and thromboembolic disease (7% vs 3%, p&lt;0.001) were more prevalent in patients with adrenal adenomas, whereas overall survival was lower compared to reference subjects (60% vs 65%, p value = 0.013). Subgroup analysis (adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and smoking) demonstrated prevalence of cardiovascular events including peripheral vascular disease was highest in those with MACS (44.7%), followed by AUCS (40.1%), and then NFAT (36.6%), although differences between groups were not significant. Overall survival was lower in patients with MACS (62%) and AUCS (59%) compared to NFAT (71%), p&lt;0.001. Conclusions: Adrenal adenomas are associated with significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and morbidity at the time of diagnosis and with increased morality during follow-up. Results are potentially related to abnormal cortisol secretion but are limited by suboptimal evaluation for hormone excess.

Abstract Background: Adrenal tumors are reported in 5% of adults, with malignancy rates in 1–12%, and rates of overt hormonal excess in 1–15 %. However, most estimates originate from convenience samples. Our objective was to determine the incidence, prevalence and clinical presentation of adrenal tumors in a population-based setting. Methods: We used a centralized epidemiologic database to identify patients diagnosed with adrenal tumors in a local community 1995 to 2017. The database is a unique medical records linkage system that allows access to hospital and community medical records for local residents (population 137,000). We calculated incidence rates (IR) as the number of new patients diagnosed while living in the study area, and prevalence as the number of patients living in the study area on Dec 31 2017. IR and prevalence were sex- and age-adjusted to the 2010 US Census population. Results: Of 1,287 patients diagnosed with adrenal tumor, the median age of diagnosis was 62 years (IQR 52–72), 713 (55%) were women, and 13 (1%) were younger than 18 years at diagnosis. IR was highest in patients &gt;65 YO, followed by patients 40–64 YO, 18–39 YO and &lt;18 YO (142 vs 66 vs 9 vs 2 per 100,000 persons years). IR per 100,000 increased from 4.4 (CI95% 0.3–8.6) in 1995 to 47.8 (CI95% 36.9–58.7) in 2017. Overall prevalence in the population was 0.53% in 2017, ranging from 0.01% among 0–17 YO to 1.9% among +65 YO. Malignant adrenal mass was diagnosed in 8.7% patients (4 patients with adrenal cortical carcinoma (0.3%) and 108 (8.4%) patients with other malignant mass). Pheochromocytoma was diagnosed in 11 (1.1%) patients and benign adrenal mass was diagnosed in 1,175 (90.2%) patients (1,076 (83.6%) with adrenal adenoma and 85 (6.6%) with other benign mass). Median tumor size was 15 mm (range 5–255), and 184 (14%) of patients had bilateral tumors. Only 255 (20%) patients had dexamethasone suppression test, 93 (36%) with cortisol&gt;1.8 mcg/dl. Of 1,076 adrenal adenomas, 53 (4.9%) had overt hormone excess, 140 (13%) had nonfunctioning adrenal adenomas, and 88 (8.2%) had mild autonomous cortisol secretion. Hormonal work up for was incomplete in 795 (73.9%) adenomas. Patients discovered incidentally (1,050, 81.6%) had a lower rate of malignancy and hormone excess (5.3% vs 52% of patients with non-incidental discovery, p &lt;0.001). Rate of malignancy was highest in children (67% vs 8% &gt;18YO, p&lt;0.001), bilateral tumors (16% vs 8% unilateral, p&lt;0.001), tumors ≥4 cm (33% vs 7% in &lt; 4 cm, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: IR of adrenal tumors increased 10-fold since 1995, and was highest in patients &gt;65 YO. 8.7% of tumors were malignant, with a majority represented by malignant adrenal tumors other than adrenal cortical carcinoma. The risk of malignancy was highest in non-incidental discovery, children, and tumors &gt; 4 cm. Overt hormone excess was diagnosed in 4.5% of patients. The majority of patients with adrenal adenomas had a suboptimal work up for hormone excess.

Abstract Background: Adrenal adenoma is reported in around 5% of adults undergoing cross-sectional imaging. Although most adenomas are considered non-functioning (NFAT), up to 48% present with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS). Several studies reported increased prevalence and incidence of vertebral fractures in MACS; however conclusions are limited by small sample size, selection bias, inadequate reference population and length of follow up. Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of site-specific fragility fractures in a population-based cohort of patients with adrenal adenomas. Methods: Residents of local community with a radiographic diagnosis of adrenal adenoma between 1995 and 2017 were identified using a centralized epidemiologic database and matched with reference subjects for sex and age. All subjects were followed through 2017, until death or migration from the community. MACS was diagnosed based on cortisol level ≥1.8 mcg/dl after overnight 1mg dexamethasone suppression, NFAT based on cortisol level &lt;1.8 mcg/dl, and patients not tested with dexamethasone were considered as adenoma with unknown cortisol secretion (AUCS). Results: Of 1003 patients with adrenal adenomas (581 women (58%), median age of diagnosis 63 years (20–96)), 136 (14%) were diagnosed with NFAT, 86 (9%) with MACS, and 781(78%) with AUCS. At the time of diagnosis, patients had higher BMI (median 30 vs 28 kg/m2, p&lt;0.001), and higher prevalence of tobacco use (70% vs 54%, p&lt;0.001) than reference subjects. Of 154 patients and 113 reference subjects with BMD available at baseline, patients had a higher median BMD at the total hips (0.93 vs 0.89, p=0.02) but similar median BMD at lumbar spine (1.05 vs 1.03, p=0.49) when compared to reference subjects. However, patients had a higher prevalence of fractures than reference subjects (any fracture: 50% vs 42%, p&lt;0.001, vertebral fracture: 6.5% vs 3.7%, P=0.004). When adjusted for age, sex, and prior history of fracture, patients with adenoma had HR of 1.24 (CI 95% 1.04–1.48) for developing a new fracture and HR of 1.18 (CI 95% 0.97–1.44) when also adjusted for BMI and smoking. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of fractures at the time of diagnosis was higher in all 3 subgroups at any fragility fracture site when compared to reference subjects (NFAT: 44% vs 37%, MACS: 48% vs 43%, AUCS: 51% vs 43%); patients with MACS had the highest incidence of new fracture after 5 years of follow up when compared to AUCS and NFAT (cumulative incidence: MACS 25% vs NFAT 19% vs AUCS 16%), though the differences were not significant. Conclusions: Patients with adrenal adenomas have higher prevalence of fractures at the time of diagnosis. During follow up, patients with adenoma have a higher incidence of fractures even when adjusted for sex, age, and prior history of fracture, possibly due to underlying undiagnosed abnormal cortisol secretion.