Padrnos, Leslie

Abstract Background: A cancer diagnosis results in a multitude of health care decisions that require adequate patient understanding to navigate the health care system. Understanding the type and degree of information needs of cancer patients is imperative to instructing effective and pertinent patient education. This study sought to evaluate the impact of a patient centered cancer symposium on knowledge level, knowledge needs and symptom burden in a cancer patient population. Methods: Surveys were distributed to attendees of the Mayo Clinic "Living with and Surviving Cancer" patient symposium in January 2016. A follow up survey was sent to participants 3 months after the symposium. Surveys included demographic data, questionnaire evaluating disease comprehension and information assessment, symptom burden, desired information and quality of life assessment. Responses were compared between patients with hematologic and solid tumor malignancies by chi-square test. Pre and post comparisons were done in patients completing both surveys by McNemar test. Results: Demographics: 150 patients completed the pre-intervention survey. Average age of participants 67.5 years. Some patients reported more than 1 malignancy. Disease types represented included hematologic malignancies (N=60), specifically multiple myeloma (N=23), lymphoma (N=26), leukemia (N=8) and MPNs (N=3) as well as solid tumor malignancies (N=90). Most patients were diagnosed with cancer at least 1 year prior to the intervention (N=137). Patients with hematologic malignancies were more likely to be on active treatment at the time of the convention (N=35, 58%) compared to solid tumor malignancies (N=37,41%). Baseline Knowledge: Most patients reported an adequate level of knowledge defined as the proportion of participants reporting "quite a bit" or "very much understanding" on the topic of disease understanding (76%). Lowest levels of knowledge were legal issues (18%), pain management (31%), disease relapse symptoms(46%), fatigue management (48%), end of life decision making (50%) and financial management (50%). Patients with hematologic malignancies were more likely to report understanding of fatigue management (N=36, 60%) but less like to report understanding disease risk factors (N=20, 33%), or increased nutritional interest following diagnosis (N=32, 53%) compared to solid tumor malignancy (N=33,37%) (N=55,61%)(N=70,78%), respectively (all p <0.05). The EORTC-INFO25 at baseline revealed hematologic patients had received less information on sexual side effects of treatments (N=7, 14%) compared to solid tumor patients (N=30, 35%; p=0.004), and reported a lower score of treatment information (50 vs 59; p=0.04). Pre and Post Analysis: Of the 150 initial participants, 81 completed the pre and post-convention surveys (54%). Post-symposium, significant improvement defined as the proportion of participants reporting "quite a bit" or "very much" understanding was noted of disease (pre 75% vs post 89%), stress management (pre 56% vs post 69%), maintain relationships (pre 60% vs post 75%) and pain management (pre 33% vs post 51%)(p-value<0.05). The desire for increased information decreased post-symposium regarding all 9 topics, with significant decreases noted in disease, treatment options and side effects, legal issues and stress management. The EORTC INFO25 analysis revealed a decrease in the reported desire for more information (mean; pre 70 vs post 53, p-value <0.05) Discussion: Cancer patients have a variety of information needs. A patient centered educational conference was able to produce significant improvement in understanding in 4 of 17 topics (24%), including general disease, stress and pain management, and relationship maintenance that was durable at 3 months. At least some improvement in understanding was noted in 10 of 17(59%) additional topics. Knowledge deficit improved in all 9 topics assessed, significantly in five. Cancer patient knowledge needs are varied, and likely evolve over time as a patient progress through stages of disease and treatment. Education should re-evaluate and redistribute information to cancer patients over the course of treatment and survivorship. Disclosures Mikhael: Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Dueck:Bayer: Honoraria. Mesa:Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding.

Abstract Background: A diagnosis of cancer leads to significant information requirements to facilitate health care decision making, understand management options, and health care system navigation. Many patients demonstrate a knowledge deficit that can lead to decreased quality of life and poor health care compliance. This study sought to evaluate the impact of a patient centered cancer symposium on knowledge level, symptom burden, and desired information in a broad population of cancer patients. Methods: Surveys were distributed to attendees of the Mayo Clinic "Living with and Surviving Cancer" patient symposium in January 2015. A follow up survey was sent to participants 3 months after the symposium. Surveys included demographic data, questionnaire evaluating disease comprehension, symptom burden, desired information and quality of life. Results: Demographics: 113 patients completed the pre-intervention survey. Average age of participants was 64.7 years. Disease types represented included hematologic malignancies (N=50), specifically multiple myeloma (N=24), lymphoma (N=17), leukemia (N=6), MPN/MDS (n=3), as well as solid tumor malignancies (N=77). Highest knowledge topics were disease (80%), screening tests (74%), and monitoring tools (72%). Lowest knowledge topics were financial management (13%), legal issues (13%), and pain management (35%). Pre and Post Analysis: Of the 113 initial participants, 79 patients completed the pre- and post-symposium surveys. In the post-symposium setting significant improvement was noted in understanding of disease (pre 80% vs post 92%), treatment options (pre 60% vs post 76%), nutrition (pre 68% vs post 84%) and legal issues (pre 15% vs post 32%). Non-significant knowledge improvement was noted in areas of risk factors and symptoms, screening/monitoring tools, disease side effects, managing stress/fatigue, end of life decision making and health care navigation. Most patients desired increased understanding regarding disease, screening tests, nutrition, and stress and fatigue management. The level of patient reported desire for information of these topics decreased in the post-symposium setting, statistically significant decrease noted in 4 of 5 topics assessed. In hematology patients who completed pre and post surveys (N=36), a higher level of baseline knowledge was reported regarding disease understanding (89%), tools monitoring response (83%) and recurrence (75%), symptoms (83%), relapse symptoms (64%) and treatment options (72%). In this group the decrease in desire for information was less prominent in the post-symposium setting. Discussion: This data demonstrates improved patient reported understanding on a variety of topics with durable response at 3 months. A majority of patients reported adequate baseline knowledge of many topics prior to the symposium but also a desire of increased cancer specific information. Knowledge deficit in cancer care includes disease specific topics, social stressors and health care navigation. The percentage of participants reporting a high desire for more information remained high but did decrease, suggesting decreased knowledge deficit in the post-symposium setting. Patient education should strive to be accessible, all-inclusive and reactive to patient needs. Table 1.Reported "quite a bit" or "very much" understanding and desired information regarding cancer carePrePostP-valueN=79(%)N=79(%)I understand…How to manage financial considerations of my disease/treatment39(51)41(53)0.85How to manage my pain24(34)23(32)0.81Risk factors that can lead to my disease37 (49)42 (56)0.56How to navigate the health care system43(55)47(60)0.56How to manage fatigue38(50)43(56)0.54Process of making end of life decisions33(47)41(53)0.52Screening tests60 (76)63 (81)0.5Symptoms associated with relapse35(45)42(54)0.27Disease symptoms54(70)60(76)0.2Tools monitoring recurrence49(62)56 (72)0.19Tools monitoring response56(71)63(81)0.15How to manage stress46(60)56(71)0.12Legal issues of my disease11(15)24(32)<0.05Treatment options47(60)60(76)<0.05What to eat49(68)66(84)<0.05My disease62(80)71(92)<0.05I desire increased understanding…Of my disease59(77)53(70)0.4Of managing stress50(65)35(51)<0.05Regarding nutrition64(84)54(70)<0.05Of the screening tests62(79)43(57)<0.05How to manage fatigue54(72)42(54)<0.05 Disclosures Tibes: TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Mesa:Novartis. Research- incyte, Gilead, cti, Genentech, promedior, NS Pharma: Consultancy.

248 Background: Improved understanding of TME in CCA may allow for development of novel therapeutics targeting stromal components. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a polysaccharide that has been found in the TME of a number of solid tumors characterized by desmoplastic stroma, such as pancreatic cancer. Elevated HA levels were prognostic in these malignancies. HA prevalence and association with clinic-pathological features in CCA is unknown. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using clinically annotated formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue from resected intrahepatic CCA samples. Specimens were analyzed for HA, scored using a positive pixel count algorithm (Aperio Imagescope) and positivity was calculated as % of total pixel count. Clinical variables were examined by chi-square or ANOVA F-test. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: 142 patient samples were stained for HA. HA was identified in all samples (100%), with a range of HA positivity of 32.8 – 91.8%. Median HA value was 67.1% and 95% of patients had HA positivity ≥ 45%. Factors associated with higher than median HA ( > 67%) included perineural invasion (PNI) (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.011), necrosis (67% vs. 41%, p = 0.003), lymph node positivity (32% vs. 14%, p = 0.027), and small tumor size ( < 6.8 cm vs. > 8.4cm, p = 0.014). Stratification of HA staining by median positivity value was not an independent predictor of survival based on multivariate analysis. OS for patients with HA > 67% was 40.1 months (mo) vs 48.5 mo with HA ≤ 67%, p = 0.537. PFS for patients with HA > 67% was 14.4 mo vs. 25.7 mo with HA ≤ 67%, p = 0.177. Conclusions: Prevalence of HA staining in resected CCA is higher than seen in many solid tumors and is ubiquitous in our study. Absence of statistically significant association with OS and PFS might be attributable to ubiquitous prevalence, narrow signal range, and association with known negative prognostic factors. Further pre-clinical and clinical evaluation would be warranted.

204 Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a medically complicated treatment modality used for various hematologic malignancies. Patterns and predictors of distress in post- transplant setting in a contemporary cohort of patients are not well-understood. Methods: 67 patients transplanted between 12/5/12- 4/21/15 completed National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer as part of their long term follow up clinic evaluation on day+100 after HCT. Demographic, socioeconomic and clinical outcome data were analyzed. A score ≥ 4 was considered distressed. Results: Mean age of patients was 50.8 years (range 20-72). Most patients were married or living with their significant other (83%), half were college graduates (58%), and half were employed full time (50%). 21 patients (31%) reported a distress score ≥ 4. Distressed patients reported increased problems with treatment decisions (15% vs 2%, p<0.05) and ability to have children (16% vs 0%, p<0.05). Physically, distressed patients were more likely to report fatigue (85% vs 44%, p <0.05), pain (60% vs 24%, p<0.05) and difficulty getting around (25% vs 7% p<0.05) Distressed patients were likely to report at least 1 emotional problem (N=16, 76%), and nearly a quarter reported ≥ 4 emotional problems (N=5, 24%). Specifically, sadness (25% vs 7%, p<0.05) and worry (64% vs 26%, p <0.01) were more common in distressed patients. Distressed patients had a longer length of hospitalization for transplant (30.8 days vs 24.9 p<0.001) and more hospitalized days during the first 100 days (34.9 vs 28.7 p<0.01). Conclusions: Approximately 30% of allogeneic HCT patients suffer significant distress at Day100 post-transplant. Distressed patients report problems with a variety of factors, including emotional, physical, family and practical issues that may impact function, compliance and quality of life. Higher number of hospitalized days is associated with increased distress and could be used to identify patients who may benefit from stress monitoring. Periodic screening of distress in HCT patients can help identify interventions to help improve patient reported outcomes.

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous malignancy. The most common presentation of EMPD is the vulva followed by perianal involvement. Most cases are localized to the dermis with treatment focused on surgery, topical treatment or radiotherapy. Recurrence is frequent despite therapies utilized. Metastatic extramammary Paget disease is uncommon and, as such, standard treatment guidelines do not exist. This study sought to evaluate the treatment regimens and outcomes of patients treated at a Mayo Clinic Center from 1998-2012. Cancer registry inquiry revealed 261 patients with report advanced Paget disease during these years. Ten cases of metastatic EPMD were identified with sufficient documentation for review. This review reveals support for utilizing localized radiation therapy for bulky disease sequentially with systemic chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel or irinotecan. Further studies are necessary to define the optimal treatment regimen.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and lethal cancer characterized by high invasiveness, local and extensive dissemination at time of diagnosis and resistance to treatment. Few therapies have shown efficacy in the past and even standard of care therapies yield only modest improvements in the mortality of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Efforts have been undertaken to study the pancreatic tumor microenvironment and have established its complex and immunosuppressive nature which could explain the high resistance to chemotherapy. Novel therapies targeting the tumor microenvironment with an aim to decrease this resistance, improve immune tolerance and increase the efficacy of the current treatment have shown some promising preliminary results in preclinical and clinical trials. We review the current advances in the field of immunotherapy and their effectiveness as a potential treatment strategy in the pancreatic cancer.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening for all persons aged 13 to 64 years who present to a health care provider. We sought to improve adherence to the CDC guidelines on the Internal Medicine Resident Hospital Service. We surveyed residents about the CDC guidelines, sent email reminders, provided education, and engaged them in friendly competition. Credit for guideline adherence was awarded if an offer of HIV screening was documented at admission, if a screening test was performed, or if a notation in the resident sign out sheet indicated why screening was not performed. We examined HIV screening of a postintervention group of patients admitted between August 8, 2012, and June 30, 2013, and compared them to a preintervention group admitted between August 1, 2011, and June 30, 2012. Postintervention offers of HIV screening increased significantly (7.9% [44/559] vs 55.5% [300/541]; P<.001), as did documentation of residents' contemplation of screening (8.9% [50/559] vs 67.5% [365/541]; P<.001). A significantly higher proportion of HIV screening tests was ordered postintervention (7.7% [43/559] vs 44.4% [240/541]; P<.001). Monthly HIV screening documentation ranged from 0% (0/53) to 17% (9/53) preintervention, whereas it ranged from 30.6% (11/36) to 100% (62/62) postintervention. HIV screening adherence can be improved through resident education, friendly competition, and system reminders. Barriers to achieving sustained adherence to the CDC guidelines include a heterogeneous patient population and provider discomfort with the subject.

AbstractTo evaluate the impact of a patient‐centered symposium as an educational intervention on a broad population of cancer patients. We developed a comprehensive patient symposium. Through voluntary questionnaires, we studied the impact of this cancer symposium on quality of life, cancer‐specific knowledge, and symptom management among cancer patients. Symposium attendees were provided surveys prior to and 3 months following the educational intervention. Surveys included (1) EORTC‐QLQ‐C30; (2) disease understanding tool developed for this conference; (3) validated disease‐specific questionnaires. Changes over time were assessed using McNemar's tests and paired t‐tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A total of 158 attendees completed the pre‐convention survey. Most respondents reported at least “quite a bit” of understanding regarding treatment options, screening modalities, symptomatology, and cancer‐related side effects. Attendees endorsed the least understanding of disease‐related stress, risk factors, fatigue management, and legal issues related to disease/treatment. At 3 months, there was improvement in understanding (12 of 14 areas of self‐reported knowledge especially regarding nutrition, and stress/fatigue management). However, no significant change was seen in QLQ‐C30 functioning, fatigue, pain, or insomnia. A patient symposium, as an educational intervention improves a solid knowledge base amongst attendees regarding their disease, increases knowledge in symptom management, but may be insufficient to impact QoL as a single intervention.

AbstractDiscrete nodules developed on the leg of a 27‐year‐old immunosuppressed woman after an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Biopsy and culture grew Legionella pneumophila serogroup 8. On day 7 of azithromycin treatment, respiratory distress and abnormal liver transaminases developed, and the patient died on day 14. Review of the medical literature identified 19 reports of Legionella species‐associated skin or soft tissue infections (total of 20 patients, 13 with confirmed infection). Manifestations of the 13 confirmed cases included erythematous macular rash (n = 7), erythema after thoracentesis (n = 1), abscess formation (n = 4), respiratory symptoms (n = 6), and abnormal chest radiographs (n = 8). Six required surgical exploration and débridement, and 7 were immunocompromised. Rash and respiratory infection improved with antibiotics in 10, but 3 died. Immunosuppression may predispose transplant recipients to Legionella infections. Diagnostic biopsies may facilitate appropriate treatment.