Warsame, Rahma

AbstractPositron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) can identify bony lesions, assess disease burden, and detect extramedullary disease (EMD) in patients with multiple myeloma. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent PET‐CT within 60 days of a new diagnosis (before therapy commenced) to identify the nature and prognostic impact of PET‐CT abnormalities. Patients (N = 313) were seen from April 2005 through June 2017. Of the 234 patients (75%) with focal lesions (FLs), 182 (58%) had at least 3 FLs, 38 (12%) had EMD, and 204 (65%) had documented myelomatous lytic lesions. The median maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for the entire cohort was 5.9 (range 1.5‐48.3). Presence of at least 3 FLs and EMD predicted inferior overall survival (OS); median OS was 57.8 months for patients with 3 or more FLs and 103.6 months for patients with fewer than 3 FLs (P = .003). The median OS was 45.5 and 71.8 months for patients with and without EMD, respectively (P = .004). No clear SUVmax cutoff was predictive of progression‐free survival or OS. PET‐CT is a valuable tool for assessing disease burden and could provide prognostic information about a contemporary cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who received treatment with novel agents.

e19530 Background: Neuropathy is a universal symptom of patients with POEMS syndrome, which makes the use of bortezomib less appealing. However, proteasome inhibitors (PIs) can provide rapid and deep hematologic responses in plasma cell disorders. Because there is very little data regarding the use PIs in POEMS syndrome, we performed a study of patients with POEMS syndrome treated with PIs. Methods: Among the 167 patients with POEMS syndrome seen at our institution between 2001-2016, we identified 12 patients who received a PI. One patient receiving < 1 cycle of bortezomib because of worsening neuropathy was included but was excluded from response analyses. One patient received 2 different PIs at separate points during the disease course and each course was considered separately. Four response categories were considered: hematologic, PET, VEGF and clinical as previously described (Dispenzieri et. al AJH 2015). Results: Among the 12 patients who received 13 courses of therapy, the median age at PI initiation was 59; 8 patients were male. Median number of prior therapies was 1 (0-4) and median time from diagnosis to initiation of PI was 75 months. Excluding steroids, regimens were as follows: bortezomib, n=3; bortezomib and cyclophosphamide, n=4; carfilzomib, n=1; and ixazomib, n=1. With a median follow-up from PI initiation of 18 months, the median duration of treatment was 7 months (1-18). Three patients achieved a hematologic CR. Of 6 patients with an abnormal baseline VEGF, 3 achieved normalization VEGF levels. Of 5 patients with an abnormal baseline PET, 2 achieved normalization of their PET. Two patients had improvement of their neuropathy, with the rest having stable symptoms. Of 9 patients with fluid overload, 8 improved. Only 2 patients stopped therapy due to worsening neuropathy related to PIs. Median PFS and OS from initiation of PI were 50 months and 53 months, respectively. Conclusions: We show that PI use in patients with POEMS syndrome can be safe and effective. Nearly 75% of patients treated with bortezomib had no exacerbation of their neuropathy. Clinical improvement in severe fluid overload symptoms (edema, ascites, pleural effusions) is almost universal, making PI-based therapy an attractive potential option in these patients.

8038 Background: Daratumumab-based Combination Therapies (DCT) with bortezomib (V)/ lenalidomide (R)/ pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d) showed exceptional activity in RRMM in trials. Experience outside of trials since the approval of Daratumumab (D) in 2015 is limited. Methods: RRMM pts seen at Mayo Clinic, MN from 12/2015 -12/2016 were reviewed. Pts who received ≥ 1cycle of DCT were included. Time-to-event analyses were done from date of starting DCT. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0 were used to grade toxicities. Results: Of 130 pts, 59% were males and median age at DCT initiation was 67 (43-93) years, ECOG performance score was ≥2 in 29%. Pts were classified as mSMART high (22%), intermediate (22%) or standard (56%) risk. Median time from diagnosis to initiation of DCT was 51.3 (5-156) months (m), and median number of prior therapies was 4 (1-14). 14% of pts were refractory to prior D monotherapy. Fifty-three (41%), 34 (26%) and 25 (19%) received DPd, DRd and DVd respectively. Eighteen (14%) pts received ‘other’ DCT. Median time to first response (≥ PR) was 3.1 m (95% CI 2.1-4.6). Overall response rate was 46%, [CR-2%, VGPR-18%, PR-26%]. Minimal response was seen in 17%, with clinical benefit rate of 62%. Median estimated follow up from initiation of DCT was 5.5 m (CI 4.2-6.1). The median duration of response was 6.1 m [CI 5.1- not reached (NR)]. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.5 m (CI 4.1-7.8) and median time to next therapy (TTNT) was 5.9 m (CI 4.6-9.4). Median PFS for DPd, DRd, DVd and other DCTs were 4.6 (CI 2.7-NR), 7.8 (CI 5-NR), 3.9 (CI 2.1-NR) and 3.9 (CI 2.8-8.2) m, respectively (p = 0.3). Median PFS for quadruple refractory (n = 28) MM was 2.8 m (CI 2.2-5.3) vs 5.9 m (CI 4.9-NR) for the rest (p < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) from DCT was NR (CI 11.4-NR). Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were seen in 42% of pts. Other toxicities included infections (37%), fatigue (31%), infusion reactions (16%) and diarrhea (10%). Conclusions: DCT are effective in RRMM, but the PFS remains short particularly in quadruple refractory pts, reflecting the challenges encountered in managing heavily-pretreated, and often less fit patients, in routine practice.

6572 Background: Cancer patients (pts) receive complex care that may cause physical, emotional, & financial sequelae. Current practice limits clinician time to address patient concerns. The Patient Reported Outcome Quality Of Life (PROQOL) system was developed as a self-reported electronic questionnaire to assess symptoms, QOL and provide data about bothersome issues. Our aim was to determine if the PROQOL system improves QOL without negatively impacting routine clinic workflow. Methods: Eligible pts had multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, head & neck or gynecologic cancer seen in Hematology/Oncology clinics at Mayo Clinic, and were stratified by stem cell transplant and active treatment status. Pts were randomized 2:1 to PROQOL system or usual care. PROQOL system was offered prior to every visit. Pts select from various categories about their single biggest concern, and receive a printed list of actionable resources based on selected concern. Clinicians also receive the PROQOL results to review with pts. Providers and pts randomized to PROQOL completed a “was it worth it survey” (WIWI). An 8 item Linear Analogue Self-Assessment was used to assess QOL. The study was powered to detect a 0.5 standard deviation difference in QOL between groups. Herein we report the planned results of first 6 months. Results: Among the first 118 pts accrued, 55% were female, median age was 63 (32-86), & 93% were on therapy. Median time from diagnosis to PROQOL was 26 months. The PROQOL system took 3.6 minutes to complete. Baseline median QOL (range) was 7 (3-10) for both groups. The most common PROQOL issue selected was “cancer & diagnosis” (36.5%) followed by “physical health” (35.3%). Specific concerns were related to treatment plan, prognosis, fatigue, sleep, and neuropathy. WIWI showed: 71% of pts thought it was worthwhile, 83% would participate again, 80% would recommend it, & 65% used resources provided. 80% of providers reported the PROQOL did not interfere with care & 75% believed the pt wellbeing may improve. Conclusions: Notably treatment plan & prognosis remain pts' greatest concern despite being over 2 year from diagnosis.The PROQOL system demonstrates integrated PRO reporting in clinic is quick & worthwhile to pts & providers.

6512 Background: Cancer patients are nearly 3x more likely to declare bankruptcy than people without cancer. However, little is known about the dynamics of the healthcare provider/patient (pt) conversations around cost issues, the range of topics explored, and the factors that may influence them. We reviewed audio recordings of a cross-section of medical oncology conversations to determine frequency, patterns and attitudes of pts and providers on cost. Methods: We audio recorded conversations between 5/3/2012 & 11/20/2013 for adult patients with any solid tumor malignancy seen in an outpatient medical oncology clinic at one of three sites in the Upper Midwest and Southern California. Basic demographic variables were abstracted from chart review. Recordings were de-identified, reviewed and flagged for any mention of cost. We used descriptive statistics and inductive qualitative content coding methods to further characterize conversation themes. Results: Among 525 recordings, 151 (28%) contained any mention of cost. Median age (range) of pts was 58 years (22-93), and 75% Caucasian, 18% Hispanic, 5% Asian, and 1% Black. Average length of cost discussions was < 2 minutes, and pts usually initiated the discussion (106 /151). Among the 151 conversations, social service referrals were mentioned only 6 times (4%). Through qualitative analysis we identified several key topics: insurance coverage, disability, drug copays, and transportation. The recording dynamics most frequently displayed acknowledging but not taking action on the part of clinicians. Only 25% of clinicians behave confidently in how to address a patients cost concerns. Conclusions: In a diverse cross-section of oncology visits, cost comes up only 1/4 to 1/3 of the time and focuses on insurance coverage, disability and out of pocket drug costs. However clinicians often leave these issues unaddressed. Discussing financial burdens and identifying way to improve existing conversations will be important to mitigate additional financial distress. [Table: see text]