Abstract Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large stone burden can be problematic in patients with significant risk of bleeding complications, specifically thrombocytopenia. This report demonstrates effective correction of two patients' thrombocytopenia, subsequently leading to removal of large stone burden through PCNL. Case Presentation: We present two Middle Eastern patients who presented with medical histories significant for thrombocytopenia, secondary to splenomegaly and hepatic vein thrombosis, and large volume nephrolithiasis. Patient 1 is a 65-year-old female with a right 5 cm stone and a platelet count of 34,000. Patient 2 is a 45-year-old female with a 3 cm left staghorn stone and a platelet count of 44,000. After consultation with hematology, both underwent therapy with prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin without improvement in their platelet count. They then received 3 μg/kg/dose of romiplostim weekly that improved their platelet counts to 133,000 and 195,000 in 2 weeks, respectively. Patient 1's PCNL was completed in a single-stage procedure with stone-free status shown on CT postoperative day 1. Patient 2 underwent PCNL and a secondary ureteroscopy for residual stone fragments on postoperative day 2. Both patients experienced no complication during the procedure, hospital stay, or postoperative course. Both continued romiplostim for 20 days postoperatively with platelet levels returning to their baseline range after 1 month. Conclusion: In the appropriately selected patient, romiplostim can correct thrombocytopenia enough to safely and effectively perform PCNL in patients with underlying hematologic disorders. Close coordination between urology and hematology is imperative to ensure an effective outcome in this challenging patient population.
Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium
Postoperative Infection Rates in Patients with a Negative Baseline Urine Culture Undergoing Ureteroscopic Stone Removal: A Matched Case–Control Analysis on Antibiotic Prophylaxis from the CROES URS Global Study
Purpose: To examine the effects of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative infection rate in patients with negative urine cultures undergoing ureteroscopy (URS). Patients and Methods: Using the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) URS Global Study database, patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing URS for ureteral stones ( n =1141) or kidney stones ( n =184) not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis were matched with those who were predefined by risk factors, including gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and ureteral stent placement. Patient characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes, including the development of urinary tract infection (UTI) and fever, in the two groups were compared. Results: Antibiotic prophylaxis use differed widely across participating countries (13%–100%). Differences were found between patients who did or did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis regarding the frequency of anticoagulation medication, previous treatment with URS, stone burden, previous presence of kidney stones, duration of current URS, and complications post-URS. The prevalence of fever and UTI was low (≤2.2%) and similar in both groups. Factors predictive of postoperative UTI or fever were female gender, Crohn's and cardiovascular disease, a high stone burden, and an ASA score of II or higher. Conclusions: In patients with a negative baseline urine culture undergoing URS for ureteral or renal stones, rates of postoperative UTI and fever were not reduced by preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Female gender and a high ASA score were specific risk factors for postoperative infection in this patient group.
Extended Antimicrobial Use in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Associated Antibiotic Related Complications