Link, Michael J.

The authors developed a new disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure to capture the multifaceted impacts of vestibular schwannoma on daily life, the Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index, which contains 40 items grouped into eight categories: hearing problems; dizziness and imbalance; pain, discomfort, and tinnitus; problems with face or eyes; impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being; difficulty with thinking and memory; satisfaction or regret; and impact on employment. 1 The VSQOL Index was developed in English, although the availability of this instrument in other languages can improve access to quality of life (QOL) research worldwide with enhanced racial, ethnic, and geographic representation. The authors partnered with FACITtrans, a component of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) group with more than 25 years of experience in translation, cultural adaptation, and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcome measures, to translate the VSQOL Index to Japanese using a rigorous translation methodology. 2–5 The translation of the VSQOL Index presented at the end of this article may be used for noncommercial research, clinical, or educational purposes without seeking written permission from the authors. By providing a suite of translations in this digital supplement of the Journal of Neurosurgery , the authors hope to increase the reach and breadth of QOL research and facilitate international collaborations.

Objective To compare differences in sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS)–associated patient-reported symptom scores among patients receiving observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. Study Design Prospective longitudinal survey. Setting Tertiary referral center and the national Acoustic Neuroma Association. Patients Adults with sporadic VS. Intervention Observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery. Main Outcome Measure Baseline and follow-up surveys on patient-reported severity of tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headaches scored on a 10-point numeric scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms; changes of 2 or more points from baseline were considered clinically important. Results A total of 455 patients were eligible for study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (2.4) years, including 122 (27%) managed with observation, 226 (50%) undergoing microsurgery, and 107 (23%) undergoing radiosurgery. Changes in tinnitus severity scores differed significantly among management groups (p = 0.006), with severity scores increasing significantly in the radiosurgery (+0.8, p = 0.005) group but not in the observation (+0.2, p = 0.5) or microsurgery (−0.2, p = 0.18) groups. The changes in dizziness/imbalance and headache severity scores did not differ significantly among management groups. When comparing clinically important improvements (decrease of 2 or more points), the microsurgery and observation cohorts had a greater proportion of patients experiencing a clinically important improvement in tinnitus compared with the radiosurgery cohort; no other clinically important changes were significantly different among management groups. Conclusions In this prospective study of 455 patients comparing patient-reported symptoms after VS management, radiosurgery was associated with worsening tinnitus severity scores overall and resulted in fewer patients reporting clinically important improvements in tinnitus compared with observation and microsurgery. As there was substantial variability in the effect of management modality on changes in symptom severity scores, possible treatment effects on subjective symptoms, including tinnitus, dizziness/imbalance, and headache, should not be used in isolation to inform clinical decision-making for management of sporadic VS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Schwannomas are benign, slow-growing peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Approximately 8% of intracranial schwannomas originate from the trigeminal nerve. No consensus exists regarding superiority of outcomes after resection vs stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of trigeminal schwannomas (TS). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of resection vs SRS for TS management. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases were queried from the date of inception to July 2023 for primary data reporting TS treatment outcomes after SRS or resection. Risk of bias was reported under Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Overall, 29 retrospective observational studies comprising 949 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 13 studies (n = 589) reported outcomes after SRS, and 16 studies (n = 360) reported outcomes after surgical resection, and 182 patients in the SRS group had previous resection. To ensure statistical validity of comparing the cohorts, 3 checkpoints were assessed: the median age (SRS: 48 vs surgery: 40 years old, P < .01), tumor volume (5.2 vs 8.9 cm 3 , P = .06), and median follow-up (53.9 vs 48.5 months, P = .59), which reflected the choice of treatment. Compared with surgical resection, the SRS group demonstrated significantly higher rates of facial hypesthesia improvement (44% vs 12%, P < .01) and lower rates of new onset (4% vs 15%, P = .051) at last follow-up. Facial pain was less likely to improve (58% vs 81%, P = .024) after SRS compared with surgery. However, worsened (5% vs 1%, P = .71) and new facial pain (2% vs 1%, P = .55) were comparable between cohorts. CONCLUSION: SRS seems to offer improvement in rates of hypesthesia and trigeminal motor deficits compared with surgical resection for TS. However, facial pain improvement was more favorable after surgery. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment decisions based on patient characteristics, tumor profile, and pretreatment symptoms.

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent tumor control for pituitary adenoma (PA); however, treatment failure occasionally necessitates salvage surgery. Comprehensive studies on salvage surgical outcomes for recurrent PA after SRS remain scarce. This study aimed to elucidate the outcomes of salvage endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (sETS) for progressive PA failing SRS. METHODS This retrospective, two institution–based cohort study analyzed data from patients who underwent sETS for progressive PA failing SRS. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and neurological and endocrinological outcomes in the sETS group were analyzed and compared with those in the primary ETS (pETS) group after propensity score matching using the following variables: age at surgery, maximum tumor diameter, highest Knosp–Steiner classification, and tumor type. RESULTS Thirteen sETS patients (8 males [62%], median age at surgery of 56 years) with 5 nonfunctioning (39%), 6 corticotropic (46%), and 2 other functioning (15%) PAs who received median (range) follow-up of 125 ( 23–169) months were included. None of the patients experienced new neurological deficits or death after sETS. The median (range) tumor resection rate was 90% (80%–100%). The 5-year PFS and DSS rates were 55% and 77%, respectively. All 4 patients (31%) who experienced recurrence after sETS had corticotropic tumors. In the matched cohort analysis between the sETS group with 12 patients and the pETS group with 12 patients, no significant differences were observed in surgical outcomes. PFS rates were marginally higher in the sETS group than in the pETS group (80% vs 49% at 3 years, p = 0.216, log-rank test), and DSS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.543, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS The authors’ results indicate that ETS can be safely performed as a salvage treatment after failed SRS with low complication rates and satisfactory tumor control in treatment-resistant PA.

AbstractObjectiveLimited evidence guides the optimal timing of treatment after the detection of tumor growth during the observation of sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS). The current work aimed to inform the timing of radiosurgical intervention based on an analysis of patient outcomes among those who ultimately failed stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and underwent salvage microsurgery.Study DesignA historical cohort study.SettingSeven centers across the United States and Norway.MethodsAdults with sporadic VS who underwent salvage microsurgery following failed primary SRS were included. The primary outcome of interest was the association between tumor size at the time of primary SRS and the ability to achieve gross total resection (GTR) and maintain postoperative House–Brackmann (HB) facial nerve grade I at the last follow‐up after salvage microsurgery.ResultsAmong 96 patients, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor size at primary SRS was 14.5 mm (10.0‐19.0). Each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS was associated with a 13% increased likelihood of near‐total/subtotal resection or most recent postoperative HB grade >I (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05‐1.21, P = .001), with an optimal tumor size threshold to distinguish this outcome of 12 mm of CPA extension (c‐index 0.73). Similarly, for each 1‐mm increase in CPA tumor size at the time of primary SRS, a 9% increase in any postoperative complication with salvage microsurgery was observed (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02‐1.15, P = .009).ConclusionCorroborated by size threshold surveillance data informing the timing of primary microsurgical resection, the current study suggests that VS outcomes are optimized when primary radiosurgical intervention is undertaken on growing tumors when they harbor 10–15 mm of cerebellopontine angle extension or less.