BACKGROUND: Fontan conversion (FC) is associated with a lower risk of atrial arrhythmias and thromboembolism, but it is unknown whether FC improves long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of FC on transplant-free survival. METHOD: Adults with Fontan palliation were divided into 3 groups: (1) atriopulmonary Fontan connection; (2) atriopulmonary Fontan and subsequent FC to total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC); (3) TCPC at initial Fontan operation. The risk of death/transplant was compared between the 3 groups using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We studied 534 patients (age 27±9 years; males [N=298; 56%]). Patients were divided into atriopulmonary Fontan group (N=199, 37%); FC-TCPC (N=138, 26%); and TCPC (N=197, 37%). The FC-TCPC and TCPC groups have similar 15-year incidence of death/transplant (42% versus 47%; P =0.8), even after excluding the 8% operative mortality in the FC-TCPC group (38% versus 47%; P =0.3). On multivariable analyses, neither FC nor the type of Fontan connection was associated with death/transplant. Rather, the risk factors for death/transplant were older age, hepatorenal dysfunction, heart failure, and higher Fontan pressures. The prevalence and severity of these comorbidities increased with age, suggesting that these factors reflect the duration of Fontan physiology, rather than the type of Fontan connection. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, in addition to the high operative mortality associated with FC, suggest that this may not be the optimal treatment option for most adults with atriopulmonary Fontan presenting with Fontan failure. Duration of Fontan physiology rather than the type of Fontan connection may be the main determinant of outcomes.
Passive Leg Raise Does Not Unmask Diastolic Dysfunction in Adults With Fontan Circulation
A man in his mid-30s with a history of Crohn disease presented with several years of intermittent, nonexertional chest pressure. What would you do next?
Haemodynamic-guided and device-free shunting for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
ABSTRACT Background The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited. Methods Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures. Results Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm 2 and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm 2 , p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise‐induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output ( r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance ( r = −0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg). Conclusions Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise‐induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.
Hemodynamics of Exercise-Induced Hypertension and Relationship to Outcomes in Adults With Coarctation of the Aorta
BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced hypertension (EIH) is common in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA), but there are limited data about hemodynamics and outcomes in such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in arterial load during exercise in patients with COA with versus without EIH, and the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: We compared Doppler-derived arterial load indices (effective arterial elastance index, total arterial compliance index, systemic vascular resistance index), and clinical indices of disease severity (pulmonary congestion, aerobic capacity, and cardiovascular biomarkers) between adults with repaired COA and healthy controls. EIH was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) at peak exercise >210 mm Hg in men or >190 mm Hg in women. RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed patients with COA (n=41, age 43±14 years, 26 [63%] men) and healthy controls (n=41). Although both groups had similar resting systolic BP, the COA group had higher Doppler-derived arterial load indices at rest, as well as a greater rise in systolic BP and Doppler-derived arterial load indices at each stage of exercise, leading to a higher prevalence of EIH in the COA group (37% versus 10%; P =0.004). Compared with patients with COA without EIH (n=26, 63%), those with EIH had higher arterial load at rest and during exercise, as well as worse cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, and biomarkers of cardiovascular remodeling, despite no significant differences in resting systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: BP assessment during exercise can improve risk stratification and identify patients who may benefit from intensification of medical therapy.
Correlation of pulmonary artery systolic pressures derived from echocardiography and hemodynamic catheterization in patients with tricuspid regurgitation: a large single-center study
Abstract Introduction Echocardiography is the recommended modality for non-invasive assessment of pulmonary pressures. However, in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), the reliability of echocardiographically derived systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) is questioned. Limited data exists on the correlation between echocardiography and right heart catheterization (RHC) in selected group of patients with severe TR. Purpose To evaluate the correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements for sPAP in patients with varying TR severity. Method Patients who underwent echocardiography and RHC within three days at a large single referral center were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria included incomplete echocardiographic and RHC data, ≥moderate pulmonary stenosis, low-quality images, and pregnancy. Echocardiographic sPAP was calculated using simplified Bernoulli equation. Echocardiographic right atrial pressure (RAP) was assessed by evaluating inferior vena cava (IVC) dimension and collapsibility. A difference of ≥10 mmHg between the two modalities for sPAP was considered clinically significant. Results Of 3696 patients included, mean age was 64±14 years, 1689 (46%) were females, 1659 (45%) had systemic hypertension, and 582 (16%) had atrial fibrillation. TR was <moderate in 2475 (67%) patients, moderate in 499 (14%), moderate-severe in 277 (7%), and severe in 445 (12%). Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was diagnosed in 3079 subjects (83%). A good correlation was found between sPAP derived by echocardiographic and RHC in the whole cohort (correlation coefficient (LCC) 0.79, CI 0.78-0.80), in severe TR subgroup (LCC 0.78, CI 0.75-0.82), and in severe TR with PH subgroup (LCC 0.76, CI 0.71-0.79). The mean echocardiographic misestimation for sPAP in severe TR was 3.97 mmHg (CI -5.24 to -2.71). The correlation between the two modalities for RAP was moderate in the whole cohort (LCC 0.59, CI 0.57-0.61) and fair in severe TR (LCC 0.35, CI 0.27-0.42). A clinically significant difference between the two modalities for sPAP was found in 1504 patients (41%), predominantly due to the right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation, rather than RAP misestimation, in patients with no PH (67% vs 33%), patients with mild-moderate PH (mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) 21-34 mmHg) (67% vs 33%) and severe PH (mPAP ≥35 mmHg) (76% vs 24%). Conclusion The correlation between echocardiographic and RHC measurements is good for sPAP, even in severe TR patients, while it is only fair to moderate for RAP. A clinically significant difference between echocardiographic and RHC sPAP is more commonly observed in patients with PH, with right ventricle-right atrium gradient misestimation being the most common cause.
Pseudo-Severe Mitral Stenosis From Obesity-Related HFpEF and Atrial Myopathy