Driscoll, Colin L. W.

OBJECTIVERadiation dose to the cochlea has been proposed as a key prognostic factor in hearing preservation following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, understanding of the predictive value of cochlear dose on hearing outcomes following SRS for patients with non-VS tumors of the lateral skull base (LSB) is incomplete. The authors investigated rates of hearing loss following high-dose SRS in patients with LSB non-VS lesions compared with patients with VS.METHODSPatients with LSB meningioma or jugular paraganglioma and serviceable pretreatment hearing who underwent SRS treatment during 2007–2016 and received a modiolus dose > 5 Gy were included in a retrospective cohort study, along with a similarly identified control group of consecutive patients with sporadic VS.RESULTSSixteen patients with non-VS tumors and a control group of 43 patients with VS met study criteria. Serviceable hearing, defined as American Academy of Otololaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery class A/B, was maintained in 13 non-VS versus 23 VS patients (81% vs 56%, p = 0.07). All 3 instances of hearing loss in non-VS patients were observed in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas. Non-VS with preserved hearing had a median modiolus dose of 6.9 Gy (range 5.7–19.2 Gy), versus 7.4 Gy (range 5.4–7.6 Gy) in those patients with post-SRS hearing loss (p = 0.53). Sporadic VS patients received an overall median modiolus point-dose of 6.8 Gy (range 5.4–11.7 Gy).CONCLUSIONSThe modiolus dose threshold of 5 Gy does not predict hearing loss in patients with non-VS tumors undergoing SRS, suggesting that dosimetric parameters derived from VS may not be applicable to this population. Differential rates of hearing loss appear to vary by pathology, with paragangliomas and petroclival meningiomas demonstrating decreased risk of hearing loss compared to CPA meningiomas that may directly compress the cochlear nerve similarly to VS.

Objective: To describe histologic and radiographic findings associated with insertion of a new lateral wall electrode in human temporal bones, as well as quantify the ease of insertion as characterized by multiple cochlear implant surgeons. Setting: Multi-institutional cadaveric study. Methods: The Slim J electrode was inserted in cadaveric temporal bones via a standard mastoidectomy and facial recess approach. Insertion was performed by five cochlear implant surgeons with no previous experience with the Slim J electrode array. Electrode array insertion was performed via a round window, an extended round window, or a cochleostomy approach. Intracochlear trauma, and angular insertion depth was assessed histologically and radiologically, respectively, after placement of the Slim J electrode array. Results: Scala tympani insertion was accomplished in all 40 specimens. Thirty-eight specimens (95%) showed minimal trauma (Esrhaghi grade 0 or 1). One patient had rupture of basilar membrane (grade 2 trauma) at 380 degrees. One patient had grade 4 trauma with scalar translocation beginning at 210 degrees. The mean angular insertion depth was 416.4 degrees (range: 338.7–509.2 degrees, SD 44 degrees). Surgical handling was described as easy in 38 cases (95%). Conclusion: In a human cadaveric model the lateral wall Slim J electrode produced minimal intracochlear trauma that was positioned completely within the scala tympani in 97.5% of cases.

ObjectivesIdentify predictors of high‐cost otolaryngology care.Study DesignCross‐sectional.SettingTertiary academic multispecialty hospital.Subjects/MethodsAll patients undergoing ≥1 otolaryngologic procedures from 2011 to 2015. Encounter costs were standardized using previously described methods approximating Medicare reimbursement. Patients were stratified by adult/pediatric and inpatient/outpatient. “Outliers” were defined as total encounter costs ≥95th percentile. Logistic regression measured predictors of outlier status.ResultsIn total, 2433 adult inpatient encounters (95th percentile $57,611), 10,031 adult outpatient encounters ($10,772), 346 pediatric inpatient encounters ($84,639), and 3027 pediatric outpatient encounters ($8978) were included. For adult inpatient and outpatient, isolated head and neck oncologic procedures were the reference group. Among adult inpatients, laryngology and facial plastics procedures predicted higher odds of outlier status (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1 and 7.2). Involvement of multiple otolaryngology subspecialties increased the odds (OR = 4.7). Neck dissection and reconstructive procedures were the most common primary operations for adult inpatient outliers. For adult outpatients, several subspecialties had lower odds than head and neck (OR ≤0.44). Increased comorbidities predicted outliers for adult inpatient care (OR = 1.5); sex, age, race, and ethnicity did not. Cochlear implant was the most common primary operation among adult and pediatric outpatient outliers. Greater subspecialty involvement and increasing age predicted pediatric outpatient outliers (OR = 8.0 and 1.1); younger age and female sex predicted pediatric inpatient outliers (OR = 0.8 and 3.5). Airway procedures dominated pediatric inpatient outliers.ConclusionThis is the first large‐scale study of high‐cost otolaryngology care across multiple subspecialties. Specific procedures and subspecialties and increased comorbidities predicted high‐cost care. Contrary to previous studies, patient sex, race, and ethnicity did not.