Back to Authors

Bartels, Stephen J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-2905

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 11

Variation in the Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Adults Associated with Different Research Definitions: Dual‐Energy X ‐Ray Absorptiometry Data from the N
Barré, Laura , MacKenzie, Todd A. , Pratt, Sarah I. , Bartels, Stephen J. , Batsis, John A. , López-Jiménez, Francisco

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | May 6, 2013 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 974-980

10.1111/jgs.12260 Get It

Objectives To determine the prevalence range for sarcopenic obesity and its relationship with sex, age, and ethnicity. Design Cross‐sectional analysis of a population‐based sample. Setting Noninstitutionalized persons in the U nited S tates participating in the N ational H ealth and N utrition E xamination S urveys 1999–2004. Participants Subsample of 4,984 subjects aged 60 and older with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry body composition data. Measurements Eight definitions of sarcopenic obesity identified from six studies found using a systematic literature review ( B aumgartner, B ouchard, D avison, Z oico, L evine, K im‐1,2,3) were applied to the sample. Results were stratified according to sex, age, and ethnicity. Results Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity ranged from 4.4% to 84.0% in men and from 3.6% to 94.0% in women. Prevalence was higher in men using definitions from Baumgartner (17.9% vs 13.3%, P < .001), Levine (14.2% vs 6.6%, P < .001), and Kim‐1 (30.0% vs 9.3%, P < .001); lower for men using the Davison (4.4% vs 11.1%, P < .001) and Kim‐2 (83.7% vs 94.0%) definitions; and the same for men and women using the Bouchard (45.3% vs 44.3%, P = .32) and Kim‐3 (75.6% vs 77.0%, P = .51) definitions. For all but one definition, sarcopenic obesity increased with each decade and was lower in non‐ H ispanic blacks than whites. Conclusion Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in older adults varies up to 26‐fold depending on current research definitions. Such a high degree of variability suggests the need to establish consensus criteria that can be reliably applied across clinical and research settings.