Bartels, Stephen J.

Background. Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard treatment for liver failure secondary to alcohol-associated liver disease, but limited literature and best practices exist for post-LT treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study explores current AUD management practices and providers’ perceived barriers to effective post-LT AUD management. Methods. A 45-item survey on post-LT AUD treatment practices was distributed to members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, the Association of Consult/Liaison Psychiatry Transplant Special Interest Group, and both the American Society of Transplantation’s Liver and Intestine Community of Practice and Psychosocial and Ethics Community of Practice discussion boards, between December 2021 and April 2022. Univariate analysis of categorical variables was performed using the chi-square test. Data were analyzed using center volume tertiles, country region, and provider professional activity. Results. Two hundred thirty-two respondents from 70 LT centers across all 11 United Network for Organ Sharing regions completed the survey. Half of the them were attending physicians and 16.4% were nurse coordinators. Most centers (84%) aimed for alcohol abstinence for all post-LT patients. Perceived barriers to AUD treatment efficacy included ongoing desire to drink (18%), denial about alcohol misuse (14.9%), and lack of posttransplant support (14%). Additionally, 62.1% of centers had no policy for prescribing medication-assisted therapy to treat AUD, and 32.7% of centers reported no center-level changes in AUD care. Providers identified primary needs as hiring additional mental health professionals (30.8%), dedicating specific staff to AUD care (24.7%), and standardizing psychiatric/psychological care in transplant clinics (17.2%). Conclusions. Despite the increasing volume of LT for alcohol-associated liver disease, significant perceived barriers to effective AUD treatment remain.

Abstract Background Older persons with obesity aged 65+ residing in rural areas have reduced access to weight management programs due to geographic isolation. The ability to integrate technology into health promotion interventions shows a potential to reach this underserved population. Methods A 12-week pilot in 28 older rural adults with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) was conducted at a community aging center. The intervention consisted of individualized, weekly dietitian visits focusing on behavior therapy and caloric restriction with twice weekly physical therapist-led group strengthening training classes in a community-based aging center. All participants were provided a Fitbit Flex 2. An aerobic activity prescription outside the strength training classes was provided. Results Mean age was 72.9 ± 5.3 years (82% female). Baseline BMI was 37.1 kg/m2, and waist circumference was 120.0 ± 33.0 cm. Mean weight loss (pre/post) was 4.6 ± 3.2 kg (4.9 ± 3.4%; p < .001). Of the 40 eligible participants, 33 (75%) enrolled, and the completion rate was high (84.8%). Objective measures of physical function improved at follow-up: 6-minute walk test improved: 35.7 ± 41.2 m (p < .001); gait speed improved: 0.10 ± 0.24 m/s (p = .04); and five-times sit-to-stand improved by 2.1 seconds (p < .001). Subjective measures of late-life function improved (5.2 ± 7.1 points, p = .003), as did Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems mental and physical health scores (5.0 ± 5.7 and 4.4 ± 5.0, both p < .001). Participants wore their Fitbit 93.9% of all intervention days, and were overall satisfied with the trial (4.5/5.0, 1–5 low–high) and with Fitbit (4.0/5.0). Conclusions A multicomponent obesity intervention incorporating a wearable device is feasible and acceptable to older adults with obesity, and potentially holds promise in enhancing health.

The term “obesity” is associated with societal stigma and discrimination. Eight individual semi-structured interviews and five focus groups with 29 community-dwelling, rural older adults with obesity, seven primary care clinicians, and four rural community leaders were completed using purposive and snowball sampling. Clinicians perceived that older adults are less affected by obesity stigma than younger adults, yet this was not observed by community leaders; however, older participants with obesity reported that they often felt ashamed and/or stigmatized because of their weight. There was also a disconnect between clinician and older adult understanding of obesity. For older adults with obesity, the word “obesity” was associated with negative connotations. Just as physiological aspects of obesity persist into older adulthood, so do psychological aspects, such as perceptions of stigma. The use of the word “obesity” in medical settings may hinder communication between clinician and older participants. Heightened awareness may change the dialogue around obesity.

Objectives To identify geriatric obesity interventions that can guide clinical recommendations. Design Systematic review using Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL , EMBASE (Ovid), and Psyc INFO (Proquest) from January 1, 2005, to October 12, 2015, to identify English‐language randomized controlled trials. Participants Individuals aged 60 and older (mean age ≥65) and classified as having obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Interventions Behavioral weight loss interventions not involving pharmacological or procedural therapies lasting 6 months or longer. Measurements Two investigators performed the systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses criteria and achieved a high concordance rate (97.3%) in summarizing the primary outcomes. The three primary outcomes were weight loss, physical performance, and quality of life. Results Of 5,741 citations, 19 were included. (Six studies were unique, and the remaining 13 were based on the same study population.) Duration ranged from 6 to 18 months (n = 405 participants, age range 66.7–71.1). Weight loss in the intervention groups ranged from 0.5 to 10.7 kg (0.1–9.3%). Five studies had a resistance exercise program accompanying a dietary component. Greater weight loss was observed in groups with a dietary component than those with exercise alone. Exercise alone led to better physical function but no significant weight loss. Combined dietary and exercise components led to the greatest improvement in physical performance measures and quality of life and mitigated reductions in muscle and bone mass observed in diet‐only study arms. Heterogeneous outcomes were observed, which limited the ability to synthesize the data quantitatively. Conclusions The evidence supporting geriatric obesity interventions to improve physical function and quality of life is of low to moderate quality. Well‐designed trials are needed in this population.