Balakrishnan, Karthik

ObjectiveThe Lymphatic Malformation Function (LMF) instrument is a preliminary parent‐report assessment designed to measure outcomes in children with cervicofacial lymphatic malformation (LM). This study aimed to assess the measurement properties of the LMF, refine it, test criterion validity, and evaluate the test‐retest reliability.Study DesignCross‐sectional.SettingTwo pediatric tertiary referral centers.SubjectsParents of 60 children from 6 months to 15 years old with cervicofacial LM.MethodsParents were recruited via mail and online. The LMF was administered on paper or online initially and again within 21 days. Response distributions and interitem correlations were examined for item reduction. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on retained items. Cronbach’s α, Spearman correlation, and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients were calculated to test internal consistency, criterion validity (compared to stage), and test‐retest reliability, respectively.ResultsOne item was removed due to a floor effect. The response scale was collapsed from a 5‐point scale to a 3‐point scale due to skewness. Six items were discarded due to redundancy (interitem correlations >0.7); 2 items were discarded due to factor loadings <0.4. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 2‐factor structure explaining 84% of variance, and the domains Signs and Impacts had good internal consistency (all Cronbach’s α >0.80 and <0.90), significant association with stage (P <. 05), and good overall test‐retest reliability (ICC, 0.82).ConclusionThe LMF has been refined into a 12‐item, 2‐domain instrument measuring LM‐specific signs and impacts with internal consistency, criterion validity, and test‐retest reliability.

ObjectiveTo develop general and site‐specific treatment effect and outcome measures to standardize the reporting of head and neck lymphatic malformation (HNLM) treatments.Study DesignConsensus statement/expert opinion.SettingMultiple tertiary academic institutions.Subjects and MethodsThe modified Delphi method is an iterative process of collecting expert opinions, refining opinions through discussion and feedback, statistically aggregating opinions, and using these aggregates to generate consensus opinion in the absence of other data. The modified Delphi method was used by a multi‐institutional group of otolaryngology and interventional radiology experts in the field of vascular anomalies to formulate a list of recommended reporting outcomes for the study and treatment of head and neck lymphatic malformations.ResultsThrough 3 rounds of iteration, 10 expert panelists refined 98 proposed outcome measures and 9 outcome categories to a final consensus set of 50 recommended outcome measures in 3 global categories (general, demographics, and treatment complications) and 5 site‐specific categories (orbit, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and neck).ConclusionsWe propose the first consensus set of standardized reporting measures for clinical and treatment outcomes in studies of HNLMs. Consistent outcome measures across future studies will facilitate comparison of treatment options and allow systematic review. We hope that these guidelines facilitate the design and reporting of subsequent HNLM studies.

ObjectiveTo compare resource utilization and clinical outcomes between endoscopic mass‐closure and open techniques for laryngeal cleft repair.Study DesignCase series with chart review.SettingTertiary academic children’s hospital.Subjects and MethodsPediatric patients undergoing repair for Benjamin‐Inglis type 1‐3 laryngeal clefts over a 15‐year period. All 20 patients undergoing endoscopic repair were included. Eight control patients undergoing open repair were selected using matching by age and cleft type. Demographic, clinical, and resource utilization data were collected.ResultsTwenty‐eight patients were included (20 endoscopic, 8 open). Mean age, rates of tracheostomy and vocal fold immobility, and distribution of cleft types were not different between the 2 groups (all P >. 2). Mean operative time (P =. 004) and duration of hospital stay (P <. 001) were significantly shorter in the endoscopic group. All repairs were intact in both groups at final postoperative endoscopy. Rates of persistent laryngeal penetration or aspiration on swallow study were not different between groups (P = 1.000), although results were available for only 11 patients.ConclusionEndoscopic laryngeal cleft repair using a mass‐closure technique provides a durable result while requiring significantly shorter operative times and hospital stays than open repair and avoiding the potential morbidity of laryngofissure. However, open repair may allow the simultaneous performance of other airway reconstructive procedures and may be a useful salvage technique when endoscopic repair fails. Postoperative swallowing results require further study.

Objectives(1) To describe the application of a detailed cost‐accounting method (time‐driven activity‐cased costing) to operating room personnel costs, avoiding the proxy use of hospital and provider charges. (2) To model potential cost efficiencies using different staffing models with the case study of outpatient adenotonsillectomy.Study DesignProspective cost analysis case study.SettingTertiary pediatric hospital.Subject and MethodsAll otolaryngology providers and otolaryngology operating room staff at our institution.ResultsTime‐driven activity‐based costing demonstrated precise per‐case and per‐minute calculation of personnel costs. We identified several areas of unused personnel capacity in a basic staffing model. Per‐case personnel costs decreased by 23.2% by allowing a surgeon to run 2 operating rooms, despite doubling all other staff. Further cost reductions up to a total of 26.4% were predicted with additional staffing rearrangements.ConclusionTime‐driven activity‐based costing allows detailed understanding of not only personnel costs but also how personnel time is used. This in turn allows testing of alternative staffing models to decrease unused personnel capacity and increase efficiency.

ObjectiveTo propose an anatomic classification for fetal nuchal lymphatic anomalies that will be clinically useful and to evaluate the classification’s value in predicting chromosomal abnormalities, pregnancy outcomes, other associated fetal anomalies, and spontaneous resolution of these lesions.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTertiary academic hospital and affiliated tertiary children’s hospital.Subjects and MethodsMother‐baby pairs diagnosed with fetal nuchal lymphatic anomalies in a prenatal ultrasound database. Anomalies were classified as nuchal thickening, dorsal lymphatic malformation, or ventral lymphatic malformation. Pregnancy outcomes, prevalence of chromosomal and anatomic abnormalities, and rates of spontaneous lesion resolution were determined for each group.ResultsThe study included 189 patients: 58 with nuchal thickening, 120 with dorsal lymphatic malformation, and 11 with ventral lymphatic malformation. In fetuses for whom chromosomal analysis was available, chromosomal abnormalities were strongly associated with dorsal lymphatic malformations (83%), less associated with nuchal thickening (29%), and not associated with ventral lymphatic malformations. Dorsal lymphatic malformation predicted high rates of elective (43%) and spontaneous (20%) termination of pregnancy and showed the strongest association with cardiac, renal, and skeletal anomalies. Nuchal thickening was more likely to resolve in utero than dorsal lymphatic malformations, while no ventral lymphatic malformation resolved spontaneously.ConclusionsFetal nuchal anomalies demonstrate significant and clinically important prognostic differences depending on their anatomic location. The simple classification system proposed here therefore provides useful information to clinicians involved in the pre‐ and postnatal management of children with these anomalies.