From detection to decision: how laboratory testing and reporting strategies can shape management of carbapenemase-producing
Enterobacterales
infections
ABSTRACT Antimicrobial resistance mediated by carbapenemases significantly complicates treatment options. A case report by Morelan et al. (ASM Case Reports 1:e00094-25, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1128/asmcr.00094-25 ) illustrates how delayed recognition of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production in an Escherichia coli urinary tract infection resulted in suboptimal cefepime therapy, despite in vitro susceptibility. This case underscores the urgent need for clinical laboratories to implement on-site carbapenemase testing, as recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Timely detection of KPC, coupled with reporting strategies for cefepime susceptibility results (suppression or editing results as resistant) in carbapenemase producers, may have facilitated earlier administration of a more appropriate antimicrobial and prevented recurrent infections and readmissions. In this commentary, we highlight recent updates to CLSI guidance for carbapenemase testing and antimicrobial susceptibility reporting strategies. Using this case report as an example, we outline the potential impact of these strategies on patient management and outcomes, further emphasizing the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in antimicrobial stewardship.
Microbiome and resistome characterization of patients colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales by long-read metagenomic next-generation sequencing of rectal swabs
Abstract Objectives Evaluation of differences in the intestinal microbiome and resistome among high-risk patients (i.e. intensive care, oncology, transplant recipients) who are and are not colonized with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Methods One hundred and twelve rectal swabs were obtained from 85 patients with known CRE colonization status and cohorted. Long-read metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was performed on rectal swabs. Microbiome and resistome analysis were performed by assessing α-diversity, β-diversity, relative abundance assessment and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe), comparing patients colonized (CRE positive) and not colonized (CRE negative) with CRE. Longitudinal analysis of sequential swabs collected over multiple hospital encounters on a subset of patients was performed at the patient level. Results The microbiomes of cohorts were similar when comparing α- and β-diversity measures and relative abundance. LEfSe analysis identified Gram-negative pathobionts enriched among CRE-positive samples and Gram-positive taxa enriched among CRE-negative samples. α-Diversity of the resistome differed at class, gene and allele levels. Relative abundance and LEfSe analysis demonstrated enrichment of genes conferring β-lactam resistance among CRE-positive patients; LEfSe also demonstrated enrichment of antimicrobial resistance genes to multiple antimicrobial classes. At the patient level, fluctuations in the microbiome and resistome among longitudinally collected swabs were associated with antibiotic exposure. Conclusions Differences between the microbiomes of CRE-positive- and CRE-negative-colonized patients at the cohort level were relatively muted, whereas statistically significant differences were observed among their resistomes. In patients followed longitudinally, shifts in microbiome and resistome composition were dramatic in between encounters and antibiotic exposures.
Evaluation of the rapid lateral flow assay (LFA) for detection of five major carbapenemase enzyme families in genotypically characterised bacterial isolates
Background & objectives Antimicrobial resistance has steadily become a grave public health problem worldwide, making carbapenems, often the last choice of antibiotic, for treating infections involving multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. The production of carbapenemases is one of the primary mechanisms responsible for the development of resistance. KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, and OXA-48-like are the most prevalent carbapenemases. Identification of CROs is based on the resistance phenotype or requires molecular assays, which are not widely available. A lateral flow assay (LFA) has been developed to enable rapid identification of carbapenemase production in cultured bacteria. Methods A total of 87 isolates characterised by Whole Genome Sequence (WGS) were tested. Five ATCC strains were used for quality control. LFA was performed according to the kit literature, and the results were compared with those by WGS. The assay was assessed for its sensitivity and specificity for the detection of five major carbapenemases. Results A total of 87 isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, characterised by WGS, were tested. Of these, 52 were positive for the big five carbapenemases (IMP, VIM, KPC, NDM, and OXA-48-like), and 35 were negative. ATCC strains were run for quality control with each batch of tests. Overall sensitivity of the assay was 98.07 per cent (51/52), with no false positives, having 100 per cent specificity (35/35). The assay correctly detected strains producing KPC, OXA-48-like, VIM, and IMP, being 100 per cent sensitive (n=33/33) when compared with WGS results; whereas, it showed delayed positivity (>15 min) to identify one strain producing NDM-1 (thus considered false negative), accounting to sensitivity of 92.3 per cent (n=12/13) for detection of NDM. It correctly identified six strains simultaneously producing OXA-48-like and NDM, and one strain producing NDM-1 and KPC. Interpretation & conclusions The assay, being robust and cost-effective, with a short turn-around-time, will prove to be a great addition to the diagnostic armamentarium, helping in implementing antimicrobial stewardship and preventing AMR.
Establishing Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M45 antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints for
Pseudomonas
other than
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to establish tentative Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M45 MIC and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints (BPs) for Pseudomonas other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa (POPA). Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) to detect carbapenemase production were also evaluated. MIC data from P. aeruginosa and POPA from 2013 to 2022 were evaluated to compare the MIC distributions and modal MICs relative to the CLSI M100 P. aeruginosa BPs. A disk-to-MIC correlation study with 83 isolates was completed by testing reference broth microdilution and DD from the same inoculum, and the error-rate bounded method was used to establish DD BPs. For most antimicrobials, the modal MICs between P. aeruginosa and POPA were within 1-doubling dilution and lower than the M100 P. aeruginosa- susceptible BP. For amikacin, the modal MIC for POPA was 2-doubling dilutions lower than P. aeruginosa and was evaluated relative to the Enterobacterales BP. For aztreonam and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the modal MICs were elevated, and no BPs were set. New DD correlates were established for most antimicrobial agents, except for fluoroquinolones, where the P. aeruginosa correlates were suitable. AMR genes conferring resistance to multiple antimicrobial classes were identified by WGS. Beta-lactamase genes were identified in 30 (36.1%) isolates, with metallo-beta-lactamases (90.6%) predominating. The mCIM had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Upon review, the CLSI M45 committee proposed tentative MIC and DD BPs for expanded-spectrum cephalosporins (ceftazidime and cefepime), carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin), and the aminoglycosides (amikacin and tobramycin). IMPORTANCE Pseudomonas species other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa (POPA) can cause opportunistic infections which may be difficult to treat due to a variety of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is a critical component of patient management for these infections. Currently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100 non-Enterobacterales breakpoints and methodology are utilized for POPA by US clinical laboratories and likely do not accurately predict susceptibility results. The purpose of this study was to establish tentative CLSI M45 MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints for POPA. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance and the modified carbapenem inactivation method to detect carbapenemase production were also evaluated. We present the data used by the volunteers tasked by CLSI to develop POPA breakpoints in the M45 guidelines.
Defining antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and breakpoints among
Achromobacter
species
ABSTRACT Achromobacter species can cause opportunistic infections which are difficult to treat due to a variety of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mechanisms. As such, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is a cornerstone to successful treatment for these organisms. Currently, there are no specific Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) AST guidelines for Achromobacter species. The purpose of this study was to (i) establish tentative CLSI M45 MIC and disk diffusion (DD) breakpoints (BPs), (ii) evaluate the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), and (iii) understand the mechanisms mediating AMR among Achromobacter species. Contemporary MIC data from multiple sources were collated to define the tentative epidemiological cutoff values (tECVs), and the MIC distributions were used to inform the establishment of MIC BPs for various agents. A disk-to-MIC correlate study with 91 isolates from across the United States was completed by testing reference broth microdilution and DD from the same inoculum and applying the dBETS software to establish DD BPs. Lastly, the mCIM and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were pursued. The tECVs for piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem were 1, 2, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. Disk correlates met CLSI M23 acceptance criteria with a few exceptions related to a small number of isolates, resulting in high minor errors. WGS revealed that 82 (90.1%) isolates harbored a bla OXA variant with bla OXA-114 predominating (90.2%). Nineteen isolates harbored acquired beta-lactamase genes, including 16 bla AXC , 2 bla VIM-4 , and 1 bla AZM-1. The mCIM had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87%. Upon review, the CLSI M45 committee set tentative MIC and DD BPs for piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. IMPORTANCE Achromobacter species can cause opportunistic infections which may be difficult to treat due to a variety of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing is a critical component of patient treatment for these infections. Currently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100 non-Enterobacterales susceptibility test interpretive criteria and methodology are utilized for Achromobacter by clinical laboratories and likely do not accurately predict susceptibility results for Achromobacter species. This study was designed to establish tentative MIC and disk diffusion breakpoints specific to Achromobacter species.
“Innovative Diagnostic Methods,” a new section in the
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Abstract The advancement of infectious disease diagnostics, along with studies devoted to infections caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, is a top scientific priority of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG). Diagnostic tests for infectious diseases are rapidly evolving and improving. However, the availability of rapid tests designed to determine antibacterial resistance or susceptibility directly in clinical specimens remains limited, especially for gram-negative organisms. Additionally, the clinical impact of many new tests, including an understanding of how best to use them to inform optimal antibiotic prescribing, remains to be defined. This review summarizes the recent work of the ARLG toward addressing these unmet needs in the diagnostics field and describes future directions for clinical research aimed at curbing the threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.
Reporting of Antimicrobial Resistance from Blood Cultures, an Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Survey Summary: Resistance Marker Reporting Practices from Positive Blood Cultures
Abstract Background We assessed how laboratories use and handle reporting of results of rapid diagnostics performed on positive blood culture broths, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers. Methods A survey assembled by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee was circulated from December 2020 to May 2021. The survey was sent to local hospitals, shared on the ClinMicroNet and Division C listservs, and included in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey. Results Ninety-six laboratories of various sizes across the United States (95%) and outside of the United States (5%) participated. Of the laboratories that had at least 1 rapid diagnostic in place (94%), significant heterogeneity in methods used and reporting practices was found across community (52%) and academic (40%) laboratories serving hospitals of various sizes. Respondents had implemented 1 to 6 different panels/platforms for a total of 31 permutations. Methods of reporting rapid organism identification and AMR results varied from listing all targets as “detected”/“not detected” (16–22%) without interpretive guidance, to interpreting results (23–42%), or providing therapeutic guidance comments to patient-facing healthcare teams (3–17%). Conclusions Current approaches to reporting molecular AMR test results from positive blood culture vary significantly across clinical laboratories. Providing interpretative comments with therapeutic guidance alongside results reported may assist clinicians who are not well-versed in genetic mechanisms of AMR. However, this is currently not being done in all clinical laboratories. Standardized strategies for AMR gene result reporting are needed.
Combination of phage therapy and cefiderocol to successfully treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa cranial osteomyelitis
Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa has the ability to exhibit resistance to a broad range of antibiotics, highlighting the importance of identifying alternative or adjunctive treatment options, such as phages. Patients and methods We report the case of a 25-year-old male who experienced an accidental electrocution resulting in exposed calvarium in the left parieto-temporal region, complicated by a difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-P. aeruginosa) infection. Cefiderocol was the sole antibiotic with consistent activity against six bacterial isolates obtained from the infected region over a 38 day period. Results WGS analysis identified a blaGES-1 gene as well as the MDR efflux pumps MexD and MexX in all six of the patient’s ST235 DTR-P. aeruginosa isolates, when compared with the reference genome P. aeruginosa PA01 and a P. aeruginosa ST235 isolate from an unrelated patient. After debridement of infected scalp and bone, the patient received approximately 6 weeks of cefiderocol in conjunction with IV phage Pa14NPøPASA16. Some improvement was observed after the initiation of cefiderocol; however, sustained local site improvement and haemodynamic stability were not achieved until phage was administered. No medication-related toxicities were observed. The patient remains infection free more than 12 months after completion of therapy. Conclusions This report adds to the growing literature that phage therapy may be a safe and effective approach to augment antibiotic therapy for patients infected with drug-resistant pathogens. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of the GES β-lactamase family in contributing to inactivation of a broad range of β-lactam antibiotics in P. aeruginosa, including ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam.
Considerations from the College of American Pathologists for Implementation of an Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Testing after a Change in Regulatory Status
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the marketing of manufacturers’ in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs), including assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.