Gelfand, Amy A

Abstract Objective To examine the effectiveness of treatment strategies for medication‐overuse headache (MOH) in children and adolescents. Background There are no guidelines for the treatment of adult or pediatric patients with MOH. However, research pertaining to MOH in adults is far outpacing research in children and adolescents. Methods A systematic review of evidence on treatment for MOH in children and adolescents was performed via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane from database inception to October 2024 for articles with the subject headings and keywords for MOH and pediatric, children, and/or adolescent. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized controlled trials and retrospective and prospective observational studies, (ii) children and adolescents aged <18 years with chronic headaches and with medication overuse (MO) or MOH, and (iii) interventions addressing MO or MOH, including pharmacologic and behavioral interventions. At least two independent reviewers screened citations and full‐text articles independently. Results A total of 16 studies (one randomized control trial, six prospective observational studies and nine retrospective observational studies) were identified as meeting final inclusion criteria, resulting in 7978 total participants with a subset of those having MO, MOH or probable MOH. Participants ranged in mean age from 10 to 14.7 years, with 7.1%–46.2% male participants. All the studies recruited patients from an outpatient setting. Interventions used in the studies included withdrawal of the overused acute medication, initiation of preventive medication, patient education, physiotherapy and psychological treatment, and motivational interviewing. Multimodal therapy was studied more than single therapeutic intervention. There was vast heterogeneity across the studies, including study design, diagnostic criteria, intervention type, and outcomes. Conclusion From the data available, there does not seem to be a singular superior treatment approach. Accordingly, the most appropriate treatment modality will need to be tailored to the patient and their caregivers. Further research is required regarding management of MOH in children and adolescents.

Abstract Objective To identify and disseminate research priorities for the headache field that should be areas of research focus during the next 10 years. Background Establishing research priorities helps focus and synergize the work of headache investigators, allowing them to reach the most important research goals more efficiently and completely. Methods The Headache Research Priorities organizing and executive committees and working group chairs led a multistakeholder and international group of experts to develop headache research priorities. The research priorities were developed and reviewed by clinicians, scientists, people with headache, representatives from headache organizations, health‐care industry representatives, and the public. Priorities were revised and finalized after receiving feedback from members of the research priorities working groups and after a public comment period. Results Twenty‐five research priorities across eight categories were identified: human models, animal models, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, treatment, inequities and disparities, research workforce development, and quality of life. The priorities address research models and methods, development and optimization of outcome measures and endpoints, pain and non‐pain symptoms of primary and secondary headaches, investigations into mechanisms underlying headache attacks and chronification of headache disorders, treatment optimization, research workforce recruitment, development, expansion, and support, and inequities and disparities in the headache field. The priorities are focused enough that they help to guide headache research and broad enough that they are widely applicable to multiple headache types and various research methods. Conclusions These research priorities serve as guidance for headache investigators when planning their research studies and as benchmarks by which the headache field can measure its progress over time. These priorities will need updating as research goals are met and new priorities arise.

Objectives This proposed systematic review will identify the existing evidence on medication‐overuse headache in children and adolescents. Background A number of medications have been shown to be effective for acute treatment of migraine in children and adolescents. However, patients may find they need to use their acute medications more frequently when migraine frequency is high. This has led to concern about their potential to develop medication‐overuse headache. Methods We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases from their inception to present time. We will also search conference proceedings of the last 4 scientific meetings of relevant societies and scan the reference lists of studies identified through the search. Study designs will include case series, cross‐sectional, cohort, case‐control, and interventional studies. Participants will include children and adolescents under 18 years of age with primary headache disorders. We aim to determine whether frequency of acute medication use is associated with headache frequency in children and adolescents. Outcomes of interest include: (1) headache frequency; (2) change in headache frequency, with time and in relationship to use of acute medications; and (3) headache‐related disability. We will also review data addressing treatment/management of medication overuse or medication‐overuse headache in children and adolescents. Relevant comparators will be withdrawal vs reduction of acute medication, initiation of preventive therapy vs no initiation with or without withdrawal of acute medication, and initiation of preventive therapy early vs late. Outcomes of interest include (1) days of acute medication use; (2) headache frequency; (3) change in headache frequency; and (4) headache‐related disability. After screening for inclusion, 2 team members will independently review and extract relevant data, and any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion and arbitration. We will assess risk of bias using appropriate tools (Cochrane Risk of Bias for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and Newcastle‐Ottawa Score for observational studies). Data will be summarized descriptively in text and tables. Results This systematic review will provide an overview of the available evidence on medication‐overuse headache in children and adolescents. Conclusions Findings from this review will aid clinicians by clarifying for them the current state of the evidence base, and will inform design of future research on this topic.