Back to Authors

Abrams, Julian A

0000-0002-6021-9376

Mayo Clinic

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Citations 14

Gastrin stimulates a cholecystokinin-2-receptor-expressing cardia progenitor cell and promotes progression of Barrett's-like esophagus
Lee, Yoomi, Urbanska, Aleksandra M., Hayakawa, Yoku , Wang, Hongshan , Au, Andrew S., Luna, Aesis , Jin, Guangchun, Bhagat, Govind , Varró, Andrea, Wang, Kenneth K. , Rustgi, Anil K. , Sepulveda, Antonia R. , Quante, Michael , Wang, Timothy C. , Chang, Wenju , Abrams, Julian A , Friedman, Richard A. , Boyce, Malcolm J. , Bhagat, Govind

Oncotarget | July 18, 2016 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 203-214

10.18632/oncotarget.10667 Get It

Linkage and related analyses of Barrett's esophagus and its associated adenocarcinomas
Sun, Xiangqing , Elston, Robert C. , Faulx, Ashley L., Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Wang, Jean S. , Iyer, Prasad G. , Guda, Kishore , Markowitz, Sanford D. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Chandar, Apoorva K., Brock, Wendy , Chak, Amitabh , Falk, Gary W. , Grady, William M. , Mittal, Sumeet K. , Canto, Marcia Irene , Abrams, Julian A , Willis, Joseph , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S

Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine | March 19, 2016 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 407-419

10.1002/mgg3.211 Get It

AbstractBackgroundFamilial aggregation and segregation analysis studies have provided evidence of a genetic basis for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and its premalignant precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aim to demonstrate the utility of linkage analysis to identify the genomic regions that might contain the genetic variants that predispose individuals to this complex trait (BE and EAC).MethodsWe genotyped 144 individuals in 42 multiplex pedigrees chosen from 1000 singly ascertained BE/EAC pedigrees, and performed both model‐based and model‐free linkage analyses, using S.A.G.E. and other software. Segregation models were fitted, from the data on both the 42 pedigrees and the 1000 pedigrees, to determine parameters for performing model‐based linkage analysis. Model‐based and model‐free linkage analyses were conducted in two sets of pedigrees: the 42 pedigrees and a subset of 18 pedigrees with female affected members that are expected to be more genetically homogeneous. Genome‐wide associations were also tested in these families.ResultsLinkage analyses on the 42 pedigrees identified several regions consistently suggestive of linkage by different linkage analysis methods on chromosomes 2q31, 12q23, and 4p14. A linkage on 15q26 is the only consistent linkage region identified in the 18 female‐affected pedigrees, in which the linkage signal is higher than in the 42 pedigrees. Other tentative linkage signals are also reported.ConclusionOur linkage study of BE/EAC pedigrees identified linkage regions on chromosomes 2, 4, 12, and 15, with some reported associations located within our linkage peaks. Our linkage results can help prioritize association tests to delineate the genetic determinants underlying susceptibility to BE and EAC.
Predicting Barrett's Esophagus in Families: An Esophagus Translational Research Network (BETRNet) Model Fitting Clinical Data to a Familial Paradigm
Sun, Xiangqing , Elston, Robert C. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Faulx, Ashley L., Mittal, Sumeet K. , Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Wang, Jean S. , Iyer, Prasad G. , Tian, Ye D. , Willis, Joseph , Guda, Kishore , Markowitz, Sanford D. , Chandar, Apoorva K., Warfe, James M. , Brock, Wendy , Chak, Amitabh , Falk, Gary W. , Grady, William M. , Canto, Marcia Irene , Abrams, Julian A , Willis, Joseph E , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | February 29, 2016 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 727-735

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0832 Get It

Abstract Background: Barrett's esophagus is often asymptomatic and only a small portion of Barrett's esophagus patients are currently diagnosed and under surveillance. Therefore, it is important to develop risk prediction models to identify high-risk individuals with Barrett's esophagus. Familial aggregation of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma for individuals with a family history, raise the necessity of including genetic factors in the prediction model. Methods to determine risk prediction models using both risk covariates and ascertained family data are not well developed. Methods: We developed a Barrett's Esophagus Translational Research Network (BETRNet) risk prediction model from 787 singly ascertained Barrett's esophagus pedigrees and 92 multiplex Barrett's esophagus pedigrees, fitting a multivariate logistic model that incorporates family history and clinical risk factors. The eight risk factors, age, sex, education level, parental status, smoking, heartburn frequency, regurgitation frequency, and use of acid suppressant, were included in the model. The prediction accuracy was evaluated on the training dataset and an independent validation dataset of 643 multiplex Barrett's esophagus pedigrees. Results: Our results indicate family information helps to predict Barrett's esophagus risk, and predicting in families improves both prediction calibration and discrimination accuracy. Conclusions: Our model can predict Barrett's esophagus risk for anyone with family members known to have, or not have, had Barrett's esophagus. It can predict risk for unrelated individuals without knowing any relatives' information. Impact: Our prediction model will shed light on effectively identifying high-risk individuals for Barrett's esophagus screening and surveillance, consequently allowing intervention at an early stage, and reducing mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 727–35. ©2016 AACR.
Immature myeloid progenitors promote disease progression in a mouse model of Barrett's-like metaplasia
Kong, Jianping , Sai, Hong, Crissey, Mary Ann S. , Jhala, Nirag, Ginsberg, Gregory G. , Rustgi, Anil K. , Wang, Timothy C. , Falk, Gary W. , Abrams, Julian A , Nakagawa, Hiroshi , Wang, Kenneth , Lynch, John Patrick

Oncotarget | October 25, 2015 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 32980-33005

10.18632/oncotarget.5431 Get It