Koch, Kenneth L.

Abstract Background There is increasing evidence for specific cellular changes in the stomach of patients with diabetic ( DG ) and idiopathic ( IG ) gastroparesis. The most significant findings are loss of interstitial cells of Cajal ( ICC ), neuronal abnormalities, and an immune cellular infiltrate. Studies done in diabetic mice have shown a cytoprotective effect of CD 206+ M2 macrophages. To quantify overall immune cellular infiltrate, identify macrophage populations, and quantify CD 206+ and i NOS + cells. To investigate associations between cellular phenotypes and ICC . Methods Full thickness gastric body biopsies were obtained from non‐diabetic controls (C), diabetic controls ( DC ), DG , and IG patients. Sections were labeled for CD 45, CD 206, Kit, i NOS , and putative human macrophage markers ( HAM 56, CD 68, and EMR 1). Immunoreactive cells were quantified from the circular muscle layer. Key Results Significantly fewer ICC were detected in DG and IG tissues, but there were no differences in the numbers of cells immunoreactive for other markers between patient groups. There was a significant correlation between the number of CD 206+ cells and ICC in DG and DC patients, but not in C and IG and a significant correlation between i NOS + cells and ICC in the DC group, but not the other groups. CD 68 and HAM 56 reliably labeled the same cell populations, but EMR 1 labeled other cell types. Conclusions & Inferences Depletion of ICC and correlation with changes in CD 206+ cell numbers in DC and DG patients suggests that in humans, like mice, CD 206+ macrophages may play a cytoprotective role in diabetes. These findings may lead to novel therapeutic options, targeting alternatively activated macrophages.

AbstractBackgroundFactors associated with abdominal pain in gastroparesis are incompletely evaluated and comparisons of pain vs other symptoms are limited. This study related pain to clinical factors in gastroparesis and contrasted pain/discomfort‐ with nausea/vomiting‐predominant disease.MethodsClinical and scintigraphy data were compared in 393 patients from seven centers of the NIDDK Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium with moderate‐severe (Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Symptoms [PAGI‐SYM] score ≥3) vs none‐mild (PAGI‐SYM < 3) upper abdominal pain and predominant pain/discomfort vs nausea/vomiting.Key ResultsUpper abdominal pain was moderate‐severe in 261 (66%). Pain/discomfort was predominant in 81 (21%); nausea/vomiting was predominant in 172 (44%). Moderate‐severe pain was more prevalent with idiopathic gastroparesis and with lack of infectious prodrome (P ≤ 0.05) and correlated with scores for nausea/vomiting, bloating, lower abdominal pain/discomfort, bowel disturbances, and opiate and antiemetic use (P < 0.05), but not gastric emptying or diabetic neuropathy or control. Gastroparesis severity, quality of life, and depression and anxiety were worse with moderate‐severe pain (P ≤ 0.008). Factors associated with moderate‐severe pain were similar in diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Compared to predominant nausea/vomiting, predominant pain/discomfort was associated with impaired quality of life, greater opiate, and less antiemetic use (P < 0.01), but similar severity and gastric retention.Conclusions & InferencesModerate‐severe abdominal pain is prevalent in gastroparesis, impairs quality of life, and is associated with idiopathic etiology, lack of infectious prodrome, and opiate use. Pain is predominant in one fifth of gastroparetics. Predominant pain has at least as great an impact on disease severity and quality of life as predominant nausea/vomiting.