Back to Authors

Giri, Smith

0000-0002-1827-5032

Mayo Clinic

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Citations 14

Left Atrial Appendage Aneurysm: A Systematic Review of 82 Cases
Aryal, Madan Raj , Hakim, Fayaz A., Ghimire, Sailu, Ghimire, Sushil , Pandit, Anil , Bhandari, Yashoda, Bhandari, Naresh, Pathak, Ranjan , Karmacharya, Paras , Pradhan, Rajesh , Giri, Smith , Karmacharya, Paras

Echocardiography | June 28, 2014 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1312-1318

10.1111/echo.12667 Get It

BackgroundAneurysm of the left atrial appendage is rare. We sought to systematically review the published literature on left atrial appendage aneurysm (LAAA) to address its demographic features, clinical characteristics, treatment, complications, and outcomes.MethodologyA systematic electronic search of Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE for case reports, case series, and related articles of LAAA published from 1962 until July 2013 was carried out. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0. Logistic Regression Analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of LAAA‐related thrombus formation and embolism.ResultsEighty‐two cases of LAAA were identified. There was a slight female preponderance and most of the patients presented in their third decades. Palpitation, dyspnea or both were most common clinical symptoms associated with LAAA. Echocardiography was the main diagnostic modality used and the mean size of aneurysm was 7.08 ± 3.03 × 5.75 ± 2.36 cm. Surgical resection of the aneurysm was performed in most patients with favorable results. Systemic embolism and atrial tachyarrhythmias were the two common complications associated with untreated LAAA. Presence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was the only significant predictor of thrombus formation/embolic events.ConclusionAneurysm of left atrial appendage is rare and often an incidental diagnosis during echocardiography. It is important to recognize this entity since it is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by predisposing to atrial tachyarrhythmia and thromboembolism. Surgical resection is the standard of treatment in the current literature. Medical management is directed toward the treatment of thromboembolism and atrial tachyarrhythmia.
Shorter (≤6 months) versus longer (≥12 months) duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug eluting stents: A meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials
Pandit, Anil , Hakim, Fayaz A., Fortuin, F. David , Giri, Smith

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | April 19, 2014 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 34-40

10.1002/ccd.25520 Get It

ObjectiveOptimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), defined as use of both aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, after implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) is still subject of ongoing debate. We systematically review efficacy and safety of ≤6 months versus ≥12 months DAPT after implantation of DES.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies published until 30th November 2013. The studies were limited to randomized clinical trials. Independent observers abstracted the data on outcomes, characteristics, and qualities of studies included. Random effect model was employed for meta‐analysis. Heterogeneity of studies included was analyzed using I2 statistics.ResultsIn four randomized clinical trials published involving 8,163 patients with DES, 4,081 patients were randomized to shorter and 4,082 patients to longer duration DAPT. The P2Y12 receptor inhibitor used in all four studies was clopidogrel. Longer duration of DAPT did not reduce risk of all cause mortality (pooled OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67–1.17, P = 0.4, I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (pooled OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.85–1.57, P = 0.35, I2 = 0%) cardiac death (pooled OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61–1.25, P = 0.47, I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (pooled OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.76–2.21, P = 0.35, I2 = 0%) or cerebrovascular accidents (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41–1.27, P = 0.26, I2 = 0%). Longer duration of DAPT was associated with increased risk of TIMI major bleeding (pooled OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.89, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%).ConclusionThere was no difference in efficacy outcomes between ≤6 months of DAPT and ≥12 months of DAPT in patients with coronary artery disease and DES implantation. Moreover, longer duration of DAPT is associated with increased risk of bleeding complications. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Preventive PCI versus culprit lesion stenting during primary PCI in acute STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Pandit, Anil , Aryal, Madan Raj , Pandit, Aashrayata Aryal, Hakim, Fayaz A., Mainali, Naba Raj , Lee, Howard R., Fortuin, F. David , Mookadam, Farouk , Aryal Pandit, Aashrayata, Hakim, Fayaz Ahmad, Sharma, Prashant , Giri, Smith , Sharma, Prashant Kumar , Mookadam, Farouk

Open Heart | February 18, 2014 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e000012

10.1136/openhrt-2013-000012 Get It

Aim The benefit of preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown in randomised trials. However, all the randomised trials are underpowered to detect benefit in cardiac death. We aim to systematically review evidence on the cardiac mortality benefit of preventive PCI in patients presenting with acute STEMI in randomised patient populations. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for studies published until 30 September 2013. The studies were limited to randomised clinical trials. Independent observers abstracted the data on outcomes, characteristics and qualities of studies included. Fixed effect model was employed for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity of studies included was analysed using I2 statistics. Results In three randomised clinical trials published, involving 748 patients with acute STEMI and multivessel disease, 416 patients were randomised to preventive PCI and 332 to culprit-only PCI. Patients undergoing preventive PCI had significant lower risk of cardiovascular deaths (pooled OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.83, p=0.01, I2=0%), repeat revascularisation (pooled OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, p=0.00001, I2=0%) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (pooled OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.75, p=0.005, I2=0%) compared with culprit-only revascularisation. Conclusions In patients presenting with acute STEMI and significant multivessel coronary artery disease, based on our data, preventive PCI is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with primary PCI of only the culprit artery. This finding needs to be confirmed in larger adequately powered randomised clinical trials.
Right Atrial Appendage Aneurysm: A Systematic Review
Aryal, Madan Raj , Hakim, Fayaz A., Ghimire, Sushil , Pandit, Anil , Bhandari, Yashoda, Acharya, Yam Prasad, Pradhan, Rajesh , Giri, Smith

Echocardiography | January 22, 2014 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 534-539

10.1111/echo.12510 Get It

BackgroundRight atrial appendage aneurysm (RAAA) is rare with fewer than 20 cases reported in the literature. We sought to systematically review the published cases of RAAA in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, complications, and outcome.MethodologyElectronic search for case reports, case series, and related articles published until July 2013 was carried out and clinical data were extracted and analyzed.ResultsSeventeen cases of RAAA were identified with equal sex distribution and commonly presenting in the third decades of life. Dyspnea and palpitation were the most common clinical presentations. Echocardiography was the most common diagnostic modality. The mean size of aneurysm was 8.83 ± 4.84 × 6.05 ± 2.99 cm. Most of the patients were treated medically with close follow‐up. The mean follow‐up period was 10 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmias and heart failure were the most common complications.ConclusionRight atrial appendage aneurysm although rare may be associated with significant morbidity. Surgical resection is indicated in symptomatic patients.