Myasoedova, Elena

ObjectiveTreat‐to‐target (T2T) and shared decision‐making are valued features of current guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Although T2T has demonstrated value for improving RA outcomes, implementation remains inconsistent and lacks standardization and procedures for including patient input. We sought to better understand the impact of shared decisions on T2T and how treatment goal discussions between patients and providers impact RA treatment improvement and satisfaction.MethodsAn anonymous, web‐based questionnaire was presented to United States residents aged 18 years or older with a self‐reported diagnosis of RA by a medical professional with 28 questions regarding socio‐demographics, RA disease activity (DA), diagnosis, treatments, outcomes, and goals. Analyses included descriptive statistics with χ2 and rank sum tests for comparisons.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 907 people (mean age of 58 years; mean 11 years since diagnosis; 90% female). The majority (571; 63%) did not discuss RA treatment goals with providers. Patients engaging in treatment goal discussions with their providers were three times more likely to be satisfied with their treatment plans. Patients discussing treatment goals with their providers were more likely to have improved DA levels and 68% more likely to reach remission.ConclusionA majority of patients with RA report having no treatment goal discussion with their providers; however, these discussions are associated with greater DA improvement and treatment satisfaction. Further research should seek understanding of how shared treatment goal discussions relate to successful RA management and explore the development of practical tools to implement them in regular clinic practice as part of a T2T regimen.

Objective To investigate the effect of therapies on radiographic progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods A comprehensive database search for studies assessing radiographic progression in axial SpA (particular treatment versus no treatment of interest) was performed. Study‐specific standardized mean differences in treatment outcomes at 2 and ≥4 years were estimated and combined using random‐effects models. Results Twenty‐four studies in patients with axial SpA were identified, of which 18 involved tumor necrosis factor inhibitors ( TNF i), 8 involved nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs ( NSAID s), and 1 involved secukinumab. Spinal radiographic progression, as measured by the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score ( mSASSS ), was not significantly different between TNF i‐treated and biologics‐naive patients at 2 years ( mSASSS difference −0.73 [95% confidence interval (95% CI ) −1.52, 0.12], I 2 = 28%) and ≥4 years ( mSASSS difference −2.03 [95% CI −4.63, 0.72], I 2 = 63%). Sensitivity analyses restricted to studies with a low risk of bias showed a significant difference in spinal radiographic progression between TNF i‐treated and biologics‐naive patients at ≥4 years ( mSASSS difference −2.17 [95% CI −4.19, −0.15]). No significant difference in spinal radiographic progression was observed between NSAID ‐treated and control patients ( mSASSS difference −0.30 [95% CI −2.62, 1.31], I 2 = 71%) or between secukinumab‐treated and biologics‐naive patients ( mSASSS difference −0.34 [95% CI −0.85, 0.17]). With regard to treatment differences in patients with nonradiographic axial SpA or in patients with radiographic progression measured using the sacroiliac joint score, an insufficient number of studies were available for analysis. Conclusion Although no significant protective effect of TNF i treatment on spinal radiographic progression was seen over the course of 2 years or ≥4 years in patients with axial SpA, our analysis restricted to studies with a low risk of bias showed a protective effect of TNF i after ≥4 years. Therefore, long‐term TNF i exposure might confer beneficial effects on spinal radiographic progression in axial SpA. No difference in radiographic progression at 2 years was seen in either the NSAID or secukinumab treatment groups compared to their controls. Future studies should explore the effects of biologic treatment on radiographic progression, as well as the effects of long‐term biologics exposure, in patients with early axial SpA or those with nonradiographic axial SpA.

Objective Since comorbidities such as autoimmune diseases may be associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk, we hypothesized that a family history of these other conditions might also predict RA. Therefore, we aimed to determine the association between family history of 79 comorbidities and RA. Methods This case–control study identified 821 cases of RA in the Mayo Clinic Biobank (positive predictive value 95%) and matched 3 controls to each case based on age, sex, recruitment year, and location. Patients self reported family history and characteristics (adjusted). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for RA risk according to the presence of family history for each comorbidity, adjusted for body mass index, race, and smoking. Results Family history of several conditions was associated with developing RA, including rheumatic autoimmune diseases (OR adj 1.89 [95% CI 1.41–2.52]), pulmonary fibrosis (OR adj 2.12 [95% CI 1.16–3.80]), inflammatory bowel disease (OR adj 1.45 [95% CI 1.05–1.98]), hyper/hypothyroidism (OR adj 1.34 [95% CI 1.10–1.63]), and obstructive sleep apnea (OR adj 1.28 [95% CI 1.05–1.55]). Parkinson’s disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus were associated with a statistically decreased risk of RA that did not reach the prespecified significance threshold of P < 0.01 (OR adj 0.70 [95% CI 0.49–0.98] and OR adj 0.81 [95% CI 0.67–0.97], respectively). Analyses among 143 cases of incident RA were similar and also suggested an association with a family history of autism (OR 10.5 [95% CI 2.51–71.3]). Conclusion Family history of several autoimmune and nonautoimmune comorbidities was associated with increased risk of RA, providing an opportunity to identify novel populations at risk for RA.

ObjectiveTo examine lipid profiles among statin‐naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and those without RA before and after the initiation of statins.MethodsInformation regarding lipid measures and statin use was gathered in a population‐based incident cohort of patients with RA (1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria first met between January 1, 1988 and January 1, 2008) and in a cohort of non‐RA subjects from the same underlying population. Only patients with no prior history of statin use were included.ResultsThe study included 161 patients with RA (mean age 56.3 years, 57% female) and 221 non‐RA subjects (mean age 56.0 years, 66% female). Prior to the start of statins, the levels of total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were lower in the RA versus the non‐RA cohort (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). The absolute and percentage change in LDL cholesterol after at least 90 days of statin use tended to be smaller in the RA versus the non‐RA cohort (P = 0.03 and P = 0.09, respectively). After at least 90 days of statin use, patients with RA were less likely to achieve therapeutic goals for LDL cholesterol than the non‐RA subjects (P = 0.046). Increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at baseline (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.85) was associated with lower likelihood of achieving therapeutic LDL goals.ConclusionPatients with RA had lower total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels before statin initiation and lower likelihood of achieving therapeutic LDL goals following statin use than the non‐RA subjects. Some RA disease characteristics, in particular ESR at baseline, may have an adverse impact on achieving therapeutic LDL goals.

ObjectiveTo determine the incidence, time trends, risk factors, and severity of herpes zoster in a population‐based cohort of patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to a group of individuals without RA from the same population.MethodsAll residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota fulfilling for the first time the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2007 and a cohort of similar residents without RA were assembled and followed by retrospective chart review until death, migration, or December 31, 2008.ResultsThere was no difference in the presence of herpes zoster prior to the RA incidence/index date between the cohorts (P = 0.85). During followup, 84 patients with RA (rate 12.1 cases per 1,000 person‐years) and 44 subjects without RA (rate 5.4 cases per 1,000 person‐years) developed herpes zoster. Patients with RA were more likely to develop herpes zoster than those without RA (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.7–3.5]). Herpes zoster occurred more frequently in patients diagnosed with RA more recently (HR 1.06 per year [95% CI 1.02–1.10]). Erosive disease, previous joint surgery, and use of hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids were significantly associated with the development of herpes zoster in RA. There was no apparent association of herpes zoster with the use of methotrexate or biologic agents. Complications of herpes zoster occurred at a similar rate in both cohorts.ConclusionThe incidence of herpes zoster is increased in RA and has risen in recent years. There also has been an increasing incidence of herpes zoster in more recent years in the general population. RA disease severity is associated with the development of herpes zoster.