Demaerschalk, Bart M.

External iliac vein stenosis related to cycling has rarely been reported as a cause of deep vein thrombosis. Ischemic stroke occurring in this condition due to paradoxical embolism across a preexisting patent foramen ovale (PFO) has yet to be reported. Here we report a case of embolic ischemic strokes in a young, avid cyclist with no prior known vascular risk factors. A thorough cerebrovascular workup revealed a right-to-left shunt on transesophageal echocardiogram that prompted venous thrombosis evaluation. Pelvic MR venogram demonstrated a 3.5 cm high-grade stenosis of the right external iliac vein, concerning for possible prior thrombotic disease. His strokes were deemed most likely a result of paradoxical emboli originating in the pelvis at the site of right external iliac vein stenosis. The patient ultimately opted for PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention, as he wished to continue daily cycling. This case highlights the importance of neurohospitalists considering iliac vein stenosis as a potential cause of embolic stroke of undetermined source, especially in young patients who are avid cyclists, as part of a thorough vascular workup.

Background/Aims: Clinical trials evaluating facility-to-facility telemedicine may include sites that have limited research experience. For the trial to be successful, these sites must correctly perform research-related tasks. This study aimed to determine whether health care professionals at community hospitals could accurately identify simulated study eligible patients and submit data to a research coordinating center. Methods: Twenty-seven community hospitals in the United States and Canada participated in this study. An electronic survey was sent to one designated health care professional at each site. The survey included a description of trial eligibility criteria and five written neonatal resuscitation scenarios. For each scenario, the participant determined whether the neonate was study eligible. One scenario required participants to submit 14 data elements to the coordinating center. Accuracy of study eligibility and data submission was summarized using standard descriptive statistics. Results: The survey response rate was 100% (27/27). Overall accuracy in determining study eligibility was 89% (120/135), and accuracy varied across the five scenarios (range 82–93%). Overall accuracy of data submission was 92% (310/336). Data were >95% accurate for 9 of the 14 data elements, with 100% accuracy achieved for 6 data elements. These results were used to clarify eligibility criteria, inform database design, and improve training materials for the subsequent clinical trial. Conclusions: Health care professionals at community hospitals accurately determined trial eligibility and submitted study data based on written clinical scenarios. Research teams conducting telemedicine trials with community hospitals should consider completing pre-trial simulation activities to identify opportunities for improving trial processes and materials.

Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is a neurovascular emergency and acute monocular visual loss should trigger a stroke code activation. As thrombolytic therapy is considered for non-arteritic CRAO in the stroke therapeutic window, we aimed to review all telestroke encounters for acute visual loss in Mayo Clinic national telestroke network, focusing on the ocular diagnosis and the management recommendations. Hypothesis: patients evaluated via telestroke for acute visual loss are less likely to receive thrombolysis Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic Arizona Telestroke/Teleneurology (2010-2017, 6364 encounters) and Mayo Clinic Enterprise Telestroke databases (2018-2020, 3147 encounters), searching for visits requested for acute visual loss. We recorded the subjects’ demographics, time from last seen normal to telestroke evaluation, preliminary diagnosis, and therapeutic/diagnostic recommendation. Results: From a total of 9511 audio-video telestroke encounters, 49 (0.51%) had an ocular diagnosis. Out of those, 6 patients (12.2%) had a provisional diagnosis of CRAO. 4/6 (66.6%) CRAO patients presented within 4.5h from symptom onset (median 2 hours) and none received thrombolytic therapy. All telestroke physicians recommended antiplatelet, ophthalmology consultation for diagnostic evaluation and comprehensive stroke work-up. Conclusions: Telestroke evaluations for CRAO, in routine practice, are less common than the disease prevalence would predict, suggesting that education is urgently mandated to increase the index of awareness. Even when CRAO subjects are evaluated via telestroke within 4.5 hours from symptom onset, they do not receive thrombolytic therapy nor timely ophthalmologic evaluation. Telestroke visits may benefit from the inclusion of tele-ophthalmologic consults to help with establishing the diagnosis in the narrow time-window of intravenous thrombolysis.

ABSTRACT. The clinical epidemiology of adults admitted with reduced level of consciousness (LOC) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and the impact of HIV infection on the risk of mortality in this population is unknown. We secondarily analyzed data from a cohort study that enrolled 359 consecutive adults with reduced LOC presenting to Mbarara Regional Hospital in Uganda with the aim of comparing the prognostic utility of the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score. For this analysis, we included 336 individuals with known HIV serostatus, obtaining clinical, laboratory, and follow-up data. We recorded investigations and treatments deemed critical by clinicians for patient care but were unavailable. We computed mortality rates and used logistic regression to determine predictors of 30-day mortality. The median GCS was 10. Persons living with HIV infection (PLWH) accounted for 97 of 336 (29%) of the cohort. The 30-day mortality rate in the total cohort was 148 of 329 (45%), and this was significantly higher in PLWH (57% versus 40%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.39: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–4.35, P = 0.0046). Other predictors of mortality were presence of any unmet clinical need (aOR 1.72; 95% CIL 1.04–2.84, P = 0.0346), anemia (aOR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.01–2.81, P = 0.047), and admission FOUR score < 12 [aOR 4.26; 95% CI: 2.36–7.7, P < 0.0001). Presentation with reduced LOC in Uganda is associated with high mortality rates, with worse outcomes in PLWH. Improvement of existing acute care services is likely to improve outcomes.

Introduction: Reversible cerebral vasonstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an increasingly recognized clinical and radiologic syndrome. However, it has been rarely reported in the setting of the novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection or sarcomatous tumors. RCVS might be the initial manifestations of COVID-19 infection or noncatecholamine producing masses including sarcoma. Case Report: A 44-year-old male who developed COVID-19–related symptoms followed by rapid onset of severe headaches in the setting of persistently elevated blood pressure (BP). Brain imaging showed multifocal arterial narrowing in the anterior and posterior circulation consistent with RCVS. Serial imaging demonstrated resolution of the arterial narrowing after BP control was achieved with improvement in the patient’s headaches. Further investigation for secondary causes of the patient’s elevated BP revealed a right renal mass, and the patient underwent right nephrectomy, and the biopsy results confirmed the diagnosis of pleomorphic sarcoma. Conclusion: Our case suggests a possible association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with development of RCVS, but further studies are needed to validate this observation, establish a causal relationship and define a pathophysiological mechanism. Considering tumors other than catecholamine-producing masses as a potential risk factor for developing RCVS might lead to earlier detection and treatment of any underlying malignancy in patients whom the main and sole presentation could be RCVS.

Objective We aimed to measure provider perspectives on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and community hospitals. Study Design Providers from five academic tertiary NICUs and 27 community hospitals were surveyed using validated implementation measures to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology. For each of the 12 statements, scale values ranged from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater positive perceptions. Survey results were summarized, and differences across respondents assessed using generalized linear models. Results The survey response rate was 56% (203/365). Respondents found teleneonatology to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. The percent of respondents who agreed with each of the twelve statements ranged from 88.6 to 99.0%, with mean scores of 4.4 to 4.7 and median scores of 4.0 to 5.0. There was no difference in the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology when analyzed by professional role, years of experience in neonatal care, or years of teleneonatology experience. Respondents from Level I well newborn nurseries had greater positive perceptions of teleneonatology than those from Level II special care nurseries. Conclusion Providers in tertiary NICUs and community hospitals perceive teleneonatology to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for their practices. The wide acceptance by providers of all roles and levels of experience likely demonstrates a broad receptiveness to telemedicine as a tool to deliver neonatal care, particularly in rural communities where specialists are unavailable. Key Points

The recognition and management of stroke in the prehospital setting has become increasingly important to improve patient outcomes. Several strategies to advance prehospital stroke care have been developed, including the mobile stroke unit and the telemedicine-enabled ambulance—or “mini-MSU.” These strategies both incorporate ambulance-based audio-visual telemedicine evaluation with a vascular neurologist to facilitate faster treatment but differ in several areas including upfront and recurring costs, scalability or growth potential, ability to integrate into existing emergency medical services systems, and interoperability across multiple specialties or conditions. While both the mobile stroke unit and mini-mobile stroke unit model are valid approaches to improve stroke care, the authors aim to compare these models based on costs, scalability, integration, and interoperability in order to guide our prehospital leaders to find the best solutions for their communities.

Objective We aimed to measure provider perspectives on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and community hospitals. Study Design Providers from five academic tertiary NICUs and 27 community hospitals were surveyed using validated implementation measures to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology. For each of the 12 statements, scale values ranged from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater positive perceptions. Survey results were summarized, and differences across respondents assessed using generalized linear models. Results The survey response rate was 56% (203/365). Respondents found teleneonatology to be acceptable, appropriate, and feasible. The percent of respondents who agreed with each of the twelve statements ranged from 88.6 to 99.0%, with mean scores of 4.4 to 4.7 and median scores of 4.0 to 5.0. There was no difference in the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of teleneonatology when analyzed by professional role, years of experience in neonatal care, or years of teleneonatology experience. Respondents from Level I well newborn nurseries had greater positive perceptions of teleneonatology than those from Level II special care nurseries. Conclusion Providers in tertiary NICUs and community hospitals perceive teleneonatology to be highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for their practices. The wide acceptance by providers of all roles and levels of experience likely demonstrates a broad receptiveness to telemedicine as a tool to deliver neonatal care, particularly in rural communities where specialists are unavailable. Key Points

Background: Although not without its limitations, warfarin has provided essential protection against cardioembolic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for over 60 years. Dabigatran, the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor to be approved in the United States is reputed to provide the same or better ischemic stroke protection with reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage. However, it remains to be seen whether its promise will be borne out in everyday practice. Objective: Track initial dabigatran course in patients at Mayo Clinic Arizona and regional stroke centers since its approval in 2010. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all dabigatran patients between October 2010 and September 2011. Regional practices were obtained from a nationwide survey of cardiologists and neurologists. Results: See table Conclusion: During our period of review, dabigatran was well tolerated. A smaller than expected number of patients discontinued the agent or experienced adverse events, as compared to randomized controlled trial predictions. Furthermore, rates of ischemic events (2/159 or 1.26%) were exceedingly low. Our study had several limitations (retrospective review; random bias, sample bias with low numbers and a more elderly population, shorter median follow up). Many of these shortcomings could be addressed with prospective patient tracking. As with any novel therapy, provider surveys afforded an important window into real world practices and perceptions regarding dabigatran. The majority believed it was a reasonable alternative to warfarin, citing fluctuating INR’s as the most persuasive target population followed by patient preference. Cost was an important limiting factor to prescription and considerable uncertainty remains surrounding reversibility and how to approach acute thrombolysis in recurrent ischemic stroke.

Introduction: "Mild" stroke is not well defined, but is a relative contraindication for the administration of IV rtPA. Advances in telemedicine have allowed for specialized practitioners to observe the examination, rather than rely on the on-scene examiner. We investigated whether there were differences in rates of identification, treatment, and outcomes of mild stroke patients in the phone compared to the video arms of a telestroke network. Methods: The STRokE DOC trials were prospective, randomized, outcome-blinded trials comparing video telemedicine to phone-only evaluations, which assessed eligibility for IV rtPA and correctness of decision-making for 2 hubs and 6 spokes. This analysis included all adult acute ischemic stroke patients from the STRokE DOC trials who were defined as “mild” using a recent definition from the TREAT Task Force. Rates of ICH, mortality, and dichotomized 90-day mRS scores were compared between the video and phone arms. Results: Mild stroke accounted for 32% and 29% of the video and phone arms, respectively. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics except hypertension (higher rate in video arm). Of the video mild stroke patients, 13% had poor outcome (mRS>1) compared to 24% of the phone arm (p=0.45). There were no symptomatic ICH or deaths. Among IV rtPA treated mild stroke patients, all of the video arm had good outcome, versus 25% of the phone arm. Of 100 non-treated patients, 34 were excluded because of "too mild" a deficit (TMT). In the phone arm, 7 of these did not meet the TREAT-derived criteria for mild stroke (p=0.03). One TMT patient in the phone arm had poor outcome. Conclusions: Mild stroke made up a third of the patients in each group. Some TMT patients in the phone arm did not meet the criteria for mild stroke; their subtle findings may not have been conveyed adequately over the phone. Among IV rtPA treated patients, the phone arm had worse outcomes. The results raise concern regarding accuracy of predicting outcomes for mild stroke patients, especially when based on a phone description. The study numbers were small, so conclusions cannot be definitively made. Future studies are necessary to determine decision making factors within the telemedicine process that influence treatment outcomes among mild stroke patients.