Back to Authors

A Stauffer, John

0000-0002-0126-0301

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Citations 24

Glycemic Control after Total Pancreatectomy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm: An Exploratory Study
Jamil, Laith H. , Chindriş, Ana Maria, Gill, Kanwar R. , Scimeca, Daniela , Stauffer, John , Meek, Shon , Nguyen, Justin H. , Asbun, Horacio J. , Raimondo, Massimo , Woodward, Timothy A., Wallace, Michael B. , Heckman, Michael G. , Wallace, Michael B , A Stauffer, John

HPB Surgery | August 26, 2012 | Volume: 2012 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-8

10.1155/2012/381328 Get It

Background . Glycemic control following total pancreatectomy (TP) has been thought to be difficult to manage. Diffuse intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is a potentially curable precursor to pancreatic adenocarcinoma, best treated by TP. Objective . Compare glycemic control in patients undergoing TP for IPMN to patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Design/Setting . Retrospective cohort. Outcome Measure . Hemoglobin A1C(HbA1C) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after TP. In the control group, baseline was defined as 6 months prior to the first HbA1c measure. Results . Mean HgbA1C at each point of interest was similar between TP and type I DM patients (6 months (7.5% versus 7.7%, P = 0.52 ), 12 months (7.3% versus 8.0%, P = 0.081 ), 18 months (7.7% and 7.6%, P = 0.64 ), and at 24 months (7.3% versus 7.8%, P = 0.10 )). Seven TP patients (50%) experienced a hypoglycemic event compared to 65 type 1 DM patients (65%, P = 0.38 ). Limitations . Small number of TP patients, retrospective design, lack of long-termfollowup. Conclusion . This suggests that glycemic control following TP for IPMNcan be well managed, similar to type 1 DM patients. Fear of DM following TP for IPMN should not preclude surgery when TP is indicated.
Pancreas‐Sparing Total Duodenectomy for Ampullary Duodenal Neoplasms
Stauffer, John , Adkisson, Cameron D., Riegert‐Johnson, Douglas L. , Goldberg, Ross F. , Bowers, Steven P. , Asbun, Horacio J. , A Stauffer, John

World Journal of Surgery | June 11, 2012 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2461-2472

10.1007/s00268-012-1672-3 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAmpullary and extensive periampullary lesions can be difficult to treat and often require pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for complete removal, even if benign. However, PD may be overtreatment for noninvasive lesions, and pancreas‐sparing total duodenectomy (PSTD) is an emerging valid surgical option for selected cases.MethodsWe reviewed patients undergoing PSTD at our institution over 16 months and a comparison group who had undergone PD for benign duodenal disease over the past 15 years. We also reviewed cases in the English‐language literature and performed a meta‐analysis of those patients who had undergone PSTD.ResultsPSTD had been performed in four patients, who had an average hospital length of stay (LOS) of 13 days; two of them experienced complications. None required conversion to PD, experienced a postoperative fistula or endocrine or exocrine insufficiency, or required intensive care. Two of the PSTDs were performed laparoscopically. Open PD for benign duodenal disease was performed in 22 patients, with overall morbidity and pancreas fistula rates of 82 and 27 %, respectively. The meta‐analysis found 128 unique cases of PSTD with morbidity and mortality rates of 46.4 and 2.3 %, respectively. Pancreaticobiliary leak was seen in 20 %, with an average LOS of 17 days.ConclusionsAlthough PSTD can be used to avoid PD and can be performed laparoscopically, it is technically challenging and still associated with morbidity.
Commentary on “Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation in the Caudate Lobe for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplantation”
Stauffer, John , A Stauffer, John

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | May 11, 2012 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 403-403

10.1089/lap.2012.9995 Get It

Interposition graft with polytetrafluoroethylene for mesenteric and portal vein reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy
Stauffer, John , Dougherty, Marjorie K., Kim, G.P., Nguyen, Justin H. , A Stauffer, John

British Journal of Surgery | February 17, 2009 | Volume: 96 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 247-252

10.1002/bjs.6483 Get It

Abstract Background Portal vein–superior mesenteric vein resection is frequently required after surgical resection of tumours of the pancreas head. The ideal graft for portal vein reconstruction (PVR) remains undefined. Methods Between May 2000 and July 2007, 28 patients had portal vein–superior mesenteric vein resection and PVR during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Their clinical reports were reviewed retrospectively with specific attention to the methods of PVR and outcomes. Results Ten patients had PVR with primary anastomosis, seven had PVR with autologous vein, one had a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch, one did not have PVR and nine had PVR with a PTFE interposition graft. There was no infection after PTFE grafting. Six patients had PVR thrombosis after surgery: four after primary anastomosis, one after interposition PTFE and one after vein repair. Conclusion PTFE appeared to be an effective and safe option as an interposition graft for portomesenteric venous reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.